References
- Carnevali, D. (2009), E-Justice and Policies for Risk Management, in Cerrillo, M. and P. Fabra (eds.), E-Justice: ICT in the Court System, Hershey, PA, IGI Global, pp. 19–35. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4.ch002
- Carnevali, D. (2019), A Great Success that was on the Brink of Failure: The Case of a Techno-Legal Assemblage in the “Civil Trial On-Line” System in Italy, in “European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities”, Vol. 8, n. 2, pp. 21–35,
https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/62437/ssoar-eqpam-2012-2-carnevali-Great_Success_that_Was_on.pdf?sequence=1 - CCJE, Consultative Council of European Judges (2011), Opinion 14 on Justice and Information Technology, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France,
https://rm.coe.int/168074816b - CEPEJ, European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (2016), European Judicial Systems, Use of Information Technology in European Courts in 2016, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France,
https://public.tableau.com/profile/cepej#!/vizhome/CEPEJ-GlobalIT-2016/ITDashboard - CEPEJ, European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (2017), Guidelines on how to drive change towards Cyberjustice. Stock-tacking of tools deployed and summary of good practices, as adopted at the 28th meeting of CEPEJ,
7 December 2016 ,https://edoc.coe.int/en/efficiency-of-justice/7501-guidelines-on-how-to-drive-change-towards-cyberjustice-stock-taking-of-tools-deployed-and-summary-of-good-practices.html - CEPEJ, European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (2018), CEPEJ European Ethical Charter on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in judicial systems and their environment, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France,
https://www.coe.int/en/web/cepej/cepej-european-ethical-charter-on-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-ai-in-judicial-systems-and-their-environment - CEPEJ, European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (2019), Promoting Cyberjustice in Spain through Change Management and Improvement of Data Collection,
https://www.coe.int/en/web/cepej/promoting-cyberjustice-in-spain-through-change-management-and-improvement-of-data-collection - CEPEJ, European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (2020a), European judicial systems evaluation report 2020 evaluation cycle (2018 data), Council of Europe, Strasbourg,
https://rm.coe.int/evaluation-report-part-1-english/16809fc058 - CEPEJ, European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (2020b), CEPEJ declaration. Lessons learnt and challenges faced by the judiciary during and after the Covid-19 pandemic,
https://www.coe.int/en/web/cepej/impact-and-lessons-of-the-health-crisis-on-the-efficiency-of-justice-and-the-functioning-of-judicial-systems - CEPEJ, European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (2024), Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence by judicial professionals in a work-related context, CEPEJ-GT-Cyberjust (2023)5)final,
https://rm.coe.int/cepej-gt-cyberjust-2023-5final-en-note-on-generative-ai/1680ae8e01 - Cerrillo A. and P. Fabra (2009), Information and Communication Technologies in the Court System, Hershey, PA., USA, IGI Publishing
- Chahine L. (2018), Le droit isométrique: Un nouveau paradigme juriidque né del a justice prédictive, in
“Archives de Philisophie du Droiit, Tome 60 , pp. 287–295, Dalloz. DOI: 10.3917/apd.601.0302 - Chapman, P. (2020), Understanding Access to Justice, World Justice Project, October 2020,
https://worldjusticeproject.org/news/understanding-access-justice-covid-19-era - Contini F. (2000), Reinventing the Docket, Discovering the Data Base: The Divergent Adoption of IT in the Italian Judicial Offices, in Fabri, M. and P. M. Langbroek. (eds.), The Challenge of Change for Judicial System, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, IOS Press
- Contini F. (2001), Dynamics of ICT Diffusion in European Judicial Systems, in Fabri, M. and Contini, F. (eds.) Justice and Technology in Europe. How ICT is Changing Judicial Business, The Hague, The Netherlands, Kluwer Law International
- Contini, F. and A. Cordella (2015), Assembling Law and Technology in the Public Sector: The Case of e-Justice Reforms, Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, pp. 124–132,.
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2757401.2757418 . DOI: 10.1145/2757401.2757418 - Contini, F. and D. Reiling (2022), Double normalization: When procedural law is made digital, in “Onati Socio-Legal Series, Vol. 12, n. 3, p. 672. DOI: 10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1305
- Contini F. and G.F. Lanzara (eds) (2009), ICT and Innovation in the Public Sector, Trowbridge, UK, Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230227293
- Cordella A. and F. Contini (2020), Digital Technologies for Better Justice: A toolkit for Action, Inter-American Development Bank/World Bank, Washington D.C.,
https://publications.iadb.org/en/digital-technologies-for-better-justice-a-toolkit-for-action . DOI: 10.18235/0002297 - Council of the European Union (2019a), 2019-2023 Strategy on e-Justice,
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52019XG0313%2801%29 - Council of the European Union (2019b), 2019-2023 Action Plan European e-Justice,
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52019XG0313(02) - Council of the European Union (2023), European e-Justice Strategy 2024-2028, Brussels, Belgium, 17 November 2023,
https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-15509-2023-INIT/en/pdf . - Cusatellia C. and M. Giacalone (2014), Evaluation indices of the judicial system and ICT developments in civil procedure, Innovation and Society Conference, IES 2013,
Procedia Economics and Finance 17 , pp. 113–120. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00885-5 - Droit au Droit – Right to Law (2012), E-Tools for Criminal Case Management within Selected EU Member States,
https://www.dadinternational.org/images/PDF/5_Belgium.pdf - Dutch Temporary Committee on Government ICT projects appointed by the House of representatives (2014), Conclusions and Recommendations, October 2014,
https://www.houseofrepresentatives.nl/sites/default/files/news_items/conclusions_and_recommendations.pdf - European Union Commission (2020a), The 2020 EU Justice Scoreboard,
https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/justice_scoreboard_2020_en.pdf - European Union Commission (2020b), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions, Digitalisation of justice in the European Union. A toolbox of opportunities, December 2020 COM(2020) 710 final,
https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/b94fc82c-3588-11eb-b27b-01aa75ed71a1/language-en - European Union Commission (2020c), Comparative Table on Covid-19 Impact on Civil Proceedings, European Commission, Directorate General Justice and Consumers,
https://e-justice.europa.eu/content_impact_of_the_covid19_virus_on_the_justice_field-37147-en.do - European Union Commission (2021), The 2021 EU Justice Scoreboard
https://commission.europa.eu/document/c6121790-3c0a-4b98-b49a-adc7cc9cd7c6_en?prefLang=it - European Union Commission (2022), The 2022 EU Justice Scoreboard
https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/123138e5-f651-44e4-963e-65b721c4f5e7_en?filename=eu_justice_scoreboard_2022.pdf&prefLang=it - European Union Commission (2023), The 2023 EU Justice Scoreboard,
https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/db44e228-db4e-43f5-99ce-17ca3f2f2933_en?filename=Justice%20Scoreboard%202023_0.pdf - European Union Commission, European Research Council Executive Agency (2024), Mapping ERC frontier research artificial intelligence, Publications Office of the European Union,
https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2828/163337 - Fabri M. (2000), Selected Issues of Judicial Administration in a Comparative Perspective, in M. Fabri and P. Langbroek (eds), The Challenge of Change for European Judicial Systems. Developing a Public Administration Perspective, IOS Press, The Netherlands
- Fabri M. (2001), State of the Art, Critical Issues and Trends of ICT in European Judicial Systems, in Fabri, M. and Contini, F. (eds.), Justice and Technology in Europe. How ICT is Changing the Judicial Business, The Hague, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International
- Fabri M. and F. Contini (eds.) (2001), Justice and Technology in Europe. How ICT is Changing Judicial Business, The Hague, The Netherlands, Kluwer Law International
- Fabri M. and F. Contini. (eds.) (2003), Judicial Electronic Data Interchange in Europe: Applications, Policies and Trends, Bologna, Italy, Lo Scarabeo
- Fabri M. (2004), Information and Communication Technology for Justice: the Italian Experience, in Oskamp, A., A.R. Lodder and M. Apistola (eds), IT Support of the Judiciary, The Hague, Asser/Cambridge University Press
- Fabri M. (ed.) (2008), Information and Communication Technology for the Public Prosecutor’s Office, Bologna, CLUEB
- Fabri M. (2009a), E-justice in Finland and in Italy: Enabling versus Constraining Models, in F. Contini and G.F. Lanzara (eds), ICT and Innovation in the Public Sector, Trowbridge, UK, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 115–146. DOI: 10.1057/9780230227293_6
- Fabri M. (2009b), The Italian Style of E-Justice in a Comparative Perspective, in A. Cerrillo and P. Fabra (eds), Information and Communication Technologies in the Court System, Hershey, PA., USA, IGI Publishing, 2009, pp. 1–19. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4.ch001
- Fabri M. (ed.) (2011), L’altra e-Justice. Analisi delle sentenze e durata dei procedimenti, Bologna, CLUEB
- Fabri M (2012), Some European and Australian e-Justice services, Bologna, IRSIG-CNR, ISBN 978-88-97439-04-2
- Fielding, N. et al (2020), Video Enabled Justice Evaluation, University of Surrey,
http://spccweb.thco.co.uk/media/4807/university-of-surrey-video-enabled-justice-final-report-ver-11.pdf - Fabri, M. (2021), Will COVID-19 Accelerate Implementation of ICT in Courts?, in “International Journal for Court Administration”, 12(2). DOI: 10.36745/ijca.384
- Gali, F. and G. Sartor (2023), AI approaches to Predictive Justice: a Critcial assessment, in “Humanties and righrs, Global Network Journal”, Vol. 5, n. 2, pp. 166–217,
https://cris.unibo.it/retrieve/079bb8ae-b3fb-42e1-a93f- - Garapon A. et J. Lassègue (2018), Justice digitale. Révolution graphique et rupture anthropologique, Paris, PUF
- Gigerenzer, G. (2024), Foreword, European Commission, European Research Council Executive Agency, Mapping ERC frontier research artificial intelligence, Publications Office of the European Union,
https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2828/163337 - HM Courts & Tribunals Service (2016), Modernisation of justice through technology and innovation,
https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/modernisation-of-justice-through-technology-and-innovation - Houg B.R. (2012), Let’s not make it worse: Issues to consider in adopting new technology, in “Harvard Journal of Law and Technology”, Vol. 26, n. 1, pp. 256–266.
- Houg B.R. and R. Zorza (2012), Tech-supported triage: the key to maximizing effectiveness and access, in “Harvard Journal of Law and Technology”, Vol. 26, n. 1, pp. 292–304.
- Kallinikos, J. (2009), Institutional complexities and functional simplification. The case of Money Claims Online. ICT and innovation in the public sector, in Contini F. and G. F. Lanzara (eds.) European studies in the making of e-government, Basingstoke (UK), Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230227293_8
- Kujanen, K. and S. Sarvilinna (2001), Approaching Integration: ICT in the Finnish Judicial System, in Fabri M. and F. Contini (eds.) Justice and Technology in Europe: How ICT is Changing Judicial Business, The Hague, The Netherlands, Kluwer Law International
- Lupo G. (2014), Law Technology and System Architecture: Critical Design Factors for Money Claim and Possession Claim Online in England and Wales, in Contini, F. and Lanzara, G.F. (eds.), The Circulation of Agency in e-Justice, Interoperability and infrastructures for Europe trans-border judicial proceedings, Dordrecht, Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7525-1_4
- Lupo, G. (2019), Regulating (Artificial) Intelligence in Justice: How Normative Frameworks Protect Citizens from the Risks Related to AI Use in the Judiciary, in “European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities EQPAM”, Vol. 8, n. 2,
https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/62463/ssoar-eqpam-2012-2-lupo-Regulating_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Justice.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y&lnkname=ssoar-eqpam-2012-2-lupo-Regulating_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Justice.pdf . - Morison, J. and H., Adam (2019), Re-Engineering Justice? Robot Judges, Computerised Courts and (Semi) Automated Legal Decision-Making, in “Legal Studies”, March 15,
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3369530 . DOI: 10.1017/lst.2019.5 - OECD (2016), Skills for a Digital World. Policy brief on the future of work, OECD Publishing, Paris,
https://www.oecd.org/els/emp/Skills-for-a-Digital-World.pdf - OECD and World Justice Project (2019), White paper on Building a Business Case for Access to Justice, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and World Justice Project
- Ontanu, E.A. (2019), Adapting Justice to Technology and Technology to Justice. A Coevolution Process to -justice Cross-border Litigation, in “European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities EQPAM, Vol. 8, n. 2,
https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/62449/ssoar-eqpam-2012-2-ontanu-Adapting_Justice_to_Technology_and.pdf?isAllowed=y&lnkname=ssoar-eqpam-2012-2-ontanu-Adapting_Justice_to_Technology_and.pdf&sequence=1 - Ontanu, E.A. (2023), The Digitalisation of European Union Procedures: A New Impetus Following a Time of Prolonged Crisis, in “Law Technology and Humans” Vol. 5,
https://lthj.qut.edu.au/article/view/2706/1370 . DOI: 10.5204/lthj.2706 - Ontanu, E.A. (2024), e-Justice Governance in the EU, in D. Ramiro Troitiño (ed.), E-Governance in the European Union, Springer, forthcoming June 2024.
- Ortolani, P. (2023), Digital Dispute Resolution. Blurring the Boundaries of ADR, in Di Matteo et al (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Lawyering in the Digital Age, Cambridge University Press,
https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/240063/240063.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y - Plotnikoff, J., Woolfson, R., and Lyons, S. (2001), The Technological Challenge of a Fragmented Justice System: ICT in England and Wales, in Fabri, M. and F. Contini (eds.) Justice and Technology in Europe: How ICT is Changing the Judicial Business, The Hague, The Netherlands, Dodrecht, Kluwer Law International
- Prensky, M. (2001),
Digital Native, Digital Immigrants, in “On the Horizon , MCB University Press, Vol. 9, n. 5,https://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf . DOI: 10.1108/10748120110424816 - Reiling, D. (2009), Technology for Justice. How Information Technology can support Judicial Reform, Leiden University Press, The Netherlands,
https://www.academia.edu/60127178/Reiling_Technology_for_Justice . DOI: 10.5117/9789087280710 - Reling, D. and F. Contini (2022),
E-Justice Platforms: Challenges for Judicial Governance , “Internationl Journal for Court Administration, n. 6. DOI: 10.36745/ijca.445 - Sève, R. (ed.) (2018), La justice predictive, in “Archives de philoposphie e droit,” Dalloz.
- Sourdin T. and R. Cornes (2018), Do Judges Need to Be Human? The Implications of Technology for Responsive Judging,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326244385_Do_Judges_Need_to_Be_Human_The_Implications_of_Technology_for_Responsive_Judging . DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-1023-2_4 - Sourdin, T. and McNamara D. (2020),
Court innovation and access to justice in times of crisis , Health Policy Technology, 9(4), pp. 447–453.,https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7456584 . DOI: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.020 - Spasojevic, D (2020), Study on the use of innovatie technologies in the justice field. Final report, European Commission, Bruxelles, Belgium,
https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4fb8e194-f634-11ea-991b-01aa75ed71a1/language-en - Susskind, R. (2017), Tomorrow’s lawyers. An introduction to our future, Oxford University Press.
- (The) Law Society (2019), Technology, Access to Justice and the Rule of Law,
https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/support-services/research-trends/documents/technology-access-to-justicerule-of-law-report/ - (The) Law Society (2020), The Law Society’s response to the Civil Justice Council’s rapid consultation on the impact of COVID-19 measures on the civil justice system, May 2020,
https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/campaigns/consultation-responses/civil-justice-council-impact-of-covid-19-measures-on-the-civil-justice-system . - UNODOC (2020), Ensuring Access to Justice in the Context of COVID-19, United Nations Development Program, May 2020,
https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/ librarypage/democratic-governance/access_to_justiceandruleoflaw/ensuring-access-to-justice-in-the-context-of-covid-19-.html - Velicogna, M. (2007), Justice Systems and ICT. What can be learned from Europe, in “Utrecht Law Review”, Vol. 3, n. 3, pp. 129–147,
https://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/abstract/10.18352/ulr.41/ . DOI: 10.18352/ulr.41 - Velicogna, M. (2009), Use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in European Judicial Systems, European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France,
http://euromed-justiceii.eu/files/repository/20090706170627_UseofinformationandcommunicationtechnologiesinEuropeansystems.Coe.pdf - Velicogna, M. (2020), Cross-border civil litigation in the EU: what can we learn from Covid- 19 emergency national e-justice experiences?, paper prepared for the “’e’ Meets justice websact: e-justice as enabler for cross-border e-commerce in Europe?,
November 2020 ,https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3737648 . DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3737648 - Zou, M. (2020), Virtual Justice in the Time of COVID-19, University of Oxford Business Law Blog, March 2020,
https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/business-law-blog/blog/2020/03/virtual-justice-time-covid-19
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.640 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 7 - 7
Published on: Oct 21, 2024
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2024 Marco Fabri, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.