Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Unboxing Generative AI for the Legal Professions: Functions, Impacts and Governance Cover

Unboxing Generative AI for the Legal Professions: Functions, Impacts and Governance

Open Access
|Aug 2024

References

  1. “Bring Your Best Ideas to Life with Gemini for Google Workspace.” Google, 2024, accessed April 29, 2024, https://workspace.google.com/intl/en_uk/solutions/ai/.
  2. California State Bar. Practical Guidance for the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Practice of the Law. California State Bar (California State Bar, 16 November 2023). https://www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/ethics/Generative-AI-Practical-Guidance.pdf.
  3. Casanovas, Pompeu, Mustafa Hashmi, and Marta Poblet. “Generative Ai and the Rule of Law.” Paper presented at the Artificial Intelligence Governance Ethics and Law (AIGEL), Barcelona, December 19 2022.
  4. Castelli, Claudio. “Banca Dati Nazionale Della Giurisprudenza, Come Funziona E Gli Impatti Sugli Uffici Giudiziari.” Agenda Digitale. (8 feb 2024). Accessed 10 June 2024. https://www.agendadigitale.eu/documenti/giustizia-digitale/banca-dati-nazionale-della-giurisprudenza-come-funziona-e-gli-impatti-sugli-uffici-giudiziari/.
  5. CCJE. Compilation of Responses to the Questionnaire for the Preparation of the Ccje Opinion No. 26 (2023) “Moving Forward: Use of Modern Technologies in the Judiciary”. Consultative Council of European Judges, (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 23 March 2023). https://rm.coe.int/compilation-of-responses-for-opinion-no-26-2023-/1680ab4f2a.
  6. CEPEJ. Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Ai) by Judicial Professionals in a Work-Related Context. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice, Council of Europe, Working group on Cyberjustice and Artificial Intelligence (Strasbourg: 12 February 2024). https://rm.coe.int/cepej-gt-cyberjust-2023-5final-en-note-on-generative-ai/1680ae8e01.
  7. Chien, Colleen V, Miriam Kim, Akhil Raj, and Rohit Rathish. “How Generative Ai Can Help Address the Access to Justice Gap through the Courts.” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (2024 (forthcoming)). https://ssrn.com/abstract=4683309.
  8. Ciborra, Claudio U. “The Platform Organization: Recombining Strategies, Structures, and Surprises.” Organization Science 7, no. 2 (1996): 10318. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.7.2.103
  9. Contini, Francesco. “Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Humans, Law and Technology Interactions in Judicial Proceedings.” Law, Technology and Humans 2, no. 1. (2020): 418. DOI: 10.5204/lthj.v2i1.1478
  10. Cordella, Antonio, and Francesco Contini. Digital Technologies for Better Justice. A Toolkit for Action. Washington DC: IADB, 2020. https://publications.iadb.org/en/digital-technologies-for-better-justice-a-toolkit-for-action. DOI: 10.18235/0002297
  11. Cost, Ben. “Judge Asks Chatgpt to Decide Bail in Murder Trial.” New York Post (New York), 29 March 2023. https://nypost.com/2023/03/29/judge-asks-chatgpt-for-decision-in-murder-trial/.
  12. Courts of New Zealand. Guidelines for Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Courts and Tribunals (Judges, Judicial Officers, Tribunal Members and Judicial Support Staff). Courts of New Zealand (7 December 2023). https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/assets/6-Going-to-Court/practice-directions/practice-guidelines/all-benches/20231207-GenAI-Guidelines-Judicial.pdf.
  13. Courts and Tribunals Judiciary. Artificial Intelligence (Ai) Guidance for Judicial Office Holders. Courts and Tribunals Judiciary (12 December 2023). https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/AI-Judicial-Guidance.pdf.
  14. Deloitte Legal. Legal Tech Landscape. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu limited (2023). https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/nl/Documents/legal/deloitte-nl-legaltech-landscape.pdf.
  15. Farah, Hibaq. “Court of Appeals Judge Praises ‘Jolly Useful’ Chatgpt after Asking It for Legal Summary.” The Guardian, 15 September 2023. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/sep/15/court-of-appeal-judge-praises-jolly-useful-chatgpt-after-asking-it-for-legal-summary.
  16. Fenwick, Marks, Wulf A. Kaal, and Erik P. M. Vermeulen. “Regulation Tomorrow: What Happens When Technology Is Faster Than the Law.” American University Business Law Review 6, no. 3 (2017): 56194. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Print?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/aubulrw6&id=596.
  17. Galli, Federico, and Giovanni Sartor. “Ai Approaches to Predictive Justice: A Critical Assessment.” Humanities and Rights Global Network Journal 5, no. 1 (2023): 165217. https://www.humanitiesandrights.com/journal/index.php/har.
  18. Gandarez, Carlos. “Practical Guide to Access to Justice. (Gpj – Guia Prático De Acesso À Justiça).” CEPEJ Webinar Generative AI in the field of Justice, online, CEPEJ, 20 February 2024.
  19. Gartner. What’s New in the 2023 Gartner Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies Gartner Group (2023). https://www.gartner.com/en/articles/what-s-new-in-the-2023-gartner-hype-cycle-for-emerging-technologies.
  20. “Gpt-4 Alone Is Not a Reliable Legal Solution—but It Does Enable One: Cocounsel Harnesses Gpt-4’s Power to Deliver Results That Legal Professionals Can Rely On.” Casetext, 2023, accessed June 7, 2024.
  21. Governatori, Guido, Trevor Bench-Capon, Bart Verheij, Michał Araszkiewicz, Enrico Francesconi, and Matthias Grabmair. “Thirty Years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: The First Decade.” Artificial Intelligence and Law 30, no. 4 (2022): 481519. DOI: 10.1007/s10506-022-09329-4
  22. Grossman, Maura R, Paul W Grimm, and Daniel G Brown. “Is Disclosure and Certification of the Use of Generative Ai Really Necessary?”. Judicature 107, no. 2 (2023): 6977.
  23. Grossman, Maura R, Paul W Grimm, Daniel G Brown, and Molly (Yiming) Xu. “The Gptjudge: Justice in a Generative Ai World.” Duke Law & Technology Review 23, no. 1 (2023): 134. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1378&context=dltr.
  24. Gutiérrez, Juan David. “Critical Appraisal of Large Language Models in Judicial Decision-Making.” In Handbook on Public Policy and Ai, edited by Regine Paul, Emma Carmel and Jennifer Cobbe, 32338. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024. DOI: 10.4337/9781803922171.00033
  25. Hatzius, Jan, Joseph Briggs, Devesh Kodnani, and Giovanni Pierdomenico. The Potentially Large Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Economic Growth. Goldman Sachs (2023).
  26. Hernández, Javier. Generative Ai. Insights from the Spanish Moj. Directorate-General for the Digital Transformation of the Administration of Justice, Ministry of the Presidency, Justice and Parliamentary Relations of Spain (Madrid: March 2024).
  27. Kolt, Noam. “Governing Ai Agents.” Available at SSRN. (2024): 147. Accessed 2 April 2024. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4772956
  28. Küspert, Sabrina, Nicolas Moës, and Connor Dunlop, “The Value Chain of General-Purpose Ai. A Closer Look at the Implications of Api and Open-Source Accessible Gpai for the Eu Ai Act”, Ada Lovelace Instiute Blog, 10 February, 2023, https://www.adalovelaceinstitute.org/blog/value-chain-general-purpose-ai/.
  29. LexisNexis. Lawyers Cross into the New Era of Generative Ai. LexisNexis (London: 2024). https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/insights/lawyers-cross-into-the-new-era-of-generative-ai/index.html#group-section-AI-adoption-CIm7Y03Umf.
  30. “Lexisnexis Launches Second-Generation Legal Ai Assistant on Lexis+ Ai.” 2024, https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/pressroom/b/news/posts/lexisnexis-launches-second-generation-legal-ai-assistant-on-lexis-ai.
  31. Madiega, Tambiama. General-Purpose Artificial Intelligence. European Parliamentary Research Service (Bruxelles: European Parliament, 2023).
  32. Magesh, Varun, Mirac Suzgun, Faiz Surani, Christopher D. Manning, Matthew Dahl, and Daniel E. Ho. “Hallucination-Free? Assessing the Reliability of Leading Ai Legal Research Tools.” arXiv:2405.20362 [cs.CL] (2024): 38. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.20362.
  33. Martins, José, Frederico Branco, and Henrique Mamede. “Combining Low-Code Development with Chatgpt to Novel No-Code Approaches: A Focus-Group Study.” Intelligent Systems with Applications 20 (2023): 112. DOI: 10.1016/j.iswa.2023.200289
  34. Mazzucato, Mariana. “Preventing Digital Feudalism.” Project Syndacate. (Oct 2, 2019 2019). Accessed June 7, 2024. https://www.project-syndicate.org/.
  35. Microsoft News Center. “Introducing Microsoft 365 Copilot: Your Copilot for Work”, news.microsoft.com. Microsoft, 16 March, 2023, https://news.microsoft.com/2023/03/16/introducing-microsoft-365-copilot-your-copilot-for-work/.
  36. Murray, Michael D. “Artificial Intelligence and the Practice of Law Part 2: Working with Your New Ai Staff Attorney.” (June 14, 2023 2023). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4478748
  37. Nencini, Alessandro. Relazione Sull’amministrazione Della Giustizia Nel Distretto, Anno 2023. Corte d’Appello di Firenze (Corte d’Appello di Firenze: 27 Gennaio 2024 2024). https://ca-firenze.giustizia.it/cmsresources/cms/documents/inaugurazione_2024_signed.pdf.
  38. Niiler, Eric. “Can Ai Be a Fair Judge in Court? Estonia Thinks So.” Wired. (25 March 2019). Accessed 28 January, 2020. https://www.wired.com/story/can-ai-be-fair-judge-court-estonia-thinks-so/.
  39. Pierce, Natalie A., and Stephanie L. Goutos. “Why Lawyers Must Responsibly Embrace Generative Ai.” Berkeley Business Law Journal 21, no. 2 (2024 forthcoming). Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4477704#.
  40. Pierce, Natalie, and Stephanie Goutos. “Why Lawyers Must Responsibly Embrace Generative Ai.” Berkeley Business Law Journal 21, no. 2 (2024): 51. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4477704
  41. Predictice. Charte Pour Une Utilisation Responsable De L’intelligence Artificielle Générative. Predictrice (Paris: 2023).
  42. Rao, Jay, and Babu Kariyaden Parambath. “Best Practices to Build Generative Ai Applications on Aws”, AWS Machine Learning Blog, 14 March, 2024, https://aws.amazon.com/it/blogs/machine-learning/best-practices-to-build-generative-ai-applications-on-aws/.
  43. Reiling, Dory. “Courts and Artificial Intelligence.” International Journal for Court Administration 11, no. 2 (2020): 110. DOI: 10.36745/ijca.343
  44. Rouvroy, Antoinette. “Adopt Ai, Think Later”. The Coué Method to the Rescue of Artificial Intelligence. (2020). https://www.academia.edu/42067794/_Adopt_AI_think_later_The_Cou%C3%A9_method_to_the_rescue_of_artificial_intelligence?.
  45. Shneiderman, Ben. “Bridging the Gap between Ethics and Practice.” ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems 10, no. 4 (2020): 131. DOI: 10.1145/3419764
  46. The European Bars Federation. European Lawyers in the Era of Chatgpt. The European Bars Federation (June 2023 2023). https://www.fbe.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/European-lawyers-in-the-era-of-ChatGPT-FBE-Guidelines-on-how-lawyers-should-take-advantage-of-the-opportunities-offered-by-large-language-models-and-gene-kopia.pdf.
  47. Thomson Reuters Institute. Chatgpt and Generative Ai within Law Firms. Law Firms See Potential, Eye Practical Use Cases and More Knowledge around Risks. Thomson Reuters (2023).
  48. Tuulik, Maria Elisa. “Estonia Does Not Develop Ai Judge.” news release, 16 February, 2022, https://www.just.ee/en/news/estonia-does-not-develop-ai-judge.
  49. Varoufakis, Yanis. Technofeudalism. What Killed Capitalism. The Bodley Head, 2023.
  50. Web Desk. “Pakistani Court Announces First Ever Decision with Chatgpt Help in ‘Sex Case’.” Daily Pakistan. (11 April 2023). Accessed 10 June, 2024. https://en.dailypakistan.com.pk/11-Apr-2023/pakistani-court-announces-first-ever-decision-with-chatgpt-help-in-rape-case.
  51. Weiser, Benjamin. “Here’s What Happens When Your Lawyer Uses Chatgpt.” The New York Times. (27 May 2023 2023). Accessed June 8 2024. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/27/nyregion/avianca-airline-lawsuit-chatgpt.html.
  52. Westermann, Hannes, Jaromir Savelka, and Karim Benyekhlef. “Llmediator: Gpt-4 Assisted Online Dispute Resolution.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ICAIL 2023 Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Access to Justice co-located with 19th International Conference on AI and Law, 2023.
  53. White, Jules, Quchen Fu, Sam Hays, Michael Sandborn, Carlos Olea, Henry Gilbert, Ashraf Elnashar, Jesse Spencer-Smith, and Douglas C. Schmidt. “A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with Chatgp.” arXiv:2302.11382 [cs.SE] (2023): 119.
  54. “What Is Retrieval-Augmented Generation (Rag)?” NVIDIA, 2024, accessed 7 June, 2024, https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/glossary/retrieval-augmented-generation/.
  55. Zeng, Shenglai, Jiankun Zhang, Pengfei He, Yue Xing, Yiding Liu, Han Xu, Jie Ren, et al. “The Good and the Bad: Exploring Privacy Issues in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (Rag).” arXiv:2402.16893 [cs.CR]. (23 February 2024): 18. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.16893.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.604 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 1
Published on: Aug 20, 2024
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Francesco Contini, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.