References
- “AI’s best use case may actually be in our judicial system”, IASToppers (2023).
https://www.iastoppers.com/articles/ai-s-best-use-case-may-actually-be-in-our-judicial-system [Accessed 02.03.2025] - AI HLEG, Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI (Europa, 2020).
https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/ai-alliance-consultation.1.html [Accessed 02.03.2025] - AI HLEG, White Paper on Artificial Intelligence: a European approach to excellence and trust (Europa, 2020)
https://commission.europa.eu/publications/white-paper-artificial-intelligence-european-approach-excellence-and-trust_en [Accessed 02.03.2025] - Ajunwa Ifeoma, “An auditing imperative for automated hiring systems.” Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 34 (2020).
- Albaroudi Elham, et al., “A Comprehensive Review of AI Techniques for Addressing Algorithmic Bias in Job Hiring” AI 5, no. 1 (2024): 383–404. DOI: 10.3390/ai5010019
- Ali Sajid, et al., “Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): What we know and what is left to attain Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence”, Information Fusion 99 (2023). DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805
- Allsop James, “Technology And The Future of The Courts”, University of Queensland Law Journal 38, no. 1 (2019): 1–14.
https://journal.law.uq.edu.au/index.php/uqlj/article/view/1539/1293 [Accessed 02.03.2025] - Amini Alexander, et al., “The impact of social segregation on human mobility in developing and industrialized regions” EPJ Data Science 3, no. 6 (2014). DOI: 10.1140/epjds31
- Andrus McKane, et al., “What We Can’t Measure, We Can’t Understand: Challenges to Demographic Data Procurement in the Pursuit of Fairness”, FAccT ‘21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (
ACM ,2021 ): 249–260. DOI: 10.1145/3442188.3445888 - Angwin Julia, et al., “Machine Bias”, ProPublica (2016).
https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing [Accessed 02.03.2025] - Baldini Davide, Kate Francis, “AI Regulatory Sandboxes between the AI Act and the GDPR: The role of Data Protection as a Corporate Social Responsibility”, CEUR Proceedings (2024).
https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/en/publications/ai-regulatory-sandboxes-between-the-ai-act-and-the-gdpr-the-role- [Accessed 02.03.2025] - Bannon Alicia, Douglas Keith, “Remote Court: Principles for Virtual Proceedings During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond” Northwestern University Law Review 115, no. 6 (2021): 1875–920.
- Barabas Chelsear, “Beyond Bias. Ethical AI in criminal law” in: The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI, eds. Markus D. Dubber et al. (2020). DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190067397.013.47
- Barysė Dovile, Roee Sarel, “Algorithms in the court: does it matter which part of the judicial decision-making is automated?”, Artificial Intelligence and Law 32, no. 1 (2023): 117–146. DOI: 10.1007/s10506-022-09343-6
- Bingham Tom, Rule of Law (Penguin Books, 2011).
- Brożek Bartosz, et al., “The black box problem revisited. Real and imaginary challenges for automated legal decision making”, Artificial Intelligence and Law 32 (2024): 427–440. DOI: 10.1007/s10506-023-09356-9
- Brownsword Roger, Law 3.0 (Routledge, 2020). DOI: 10.4324/9781003053835
- Bruijne Kars de, Erwin van Veen.
“Mind the Frame: Bias at the Data-Analysis Stage.” Pride and Prejudice: Addressing Bias in the Analysis of Political Violence (Clingendael Institute, 2017).http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep17336.5 [Accessed 02.03.2025] - Buscemi v. Italy, ECtHR Judgement 16.09.1999.
- Carlson Alyssa M, “The Need for Transparency in the Age of Predictive Sentencing Algorithms”, Iowa Law Review 103, no. 1 (2017): 303–329.
- Casaleiro Paula, et al., Judicial Perceptions and Use of Technology. Portuguese Report (University of Coimbra, 2023).
https://estudogeral.uc.pt/bitstream/10316/108789/1/Judicial%20perceptions%20and%20use%20of%20technology.pdf [Accessed 02.03.2025] - CCJE Opinion No. 26 (2023): Moving forward: the use of assistive technology in the judiciary, (Council of Europe, 2023).
https://rm.coe.int/ccje-opinion-no-26-2023-final/1680adade7 [Accessed 02.03.2025] - Changqing Shi, et. al., “The Smart Court – A New Pathway to Justice in China?”, International Journal for Court Administration 12, no. 1 (2021). DOI: 10.36745/ijca.367
- Chatziathanasiou Konstantin, “Beware the Lure of Narratives: “Hungry Judges” Should Not Motivate the Use of “Artificial Intelligence” in Law”, German Law Journal 23, no. 4 (2022): 452–464. DOI: 10.1017/glj.2022.32
- Chen Benjamin M., Zhiu Li, “How Will Technology Change The Face Of Chinese Justice?” Columbia Journal Of Asian Law 34, no. 1 (2021): 1–58.
- Chen Zhisheng, “Ethics and discrimination in artificial intelligence-enabled recruitment practices”, Humanities and Social Sciences Communication 10 (2023). DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-02079-x
- Chomanski Bartolomiej, Lode Lauwaert, “Digital privacy and the law: the challenge of regulatory capture”, AI & Society (2024). DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-02041-8
- Chouldechova Alexandra, “A fair prediction with a disparate impact: a study on bias in recidivism prediction instruments”, Big Data 5, no. 2 (2016). DOI: 10.1089/big.2016.0047
- Christian Brian, Alignment Problem. Machine Learning and Human Values (W.W. Norton, 2020).
- Cofone Ignatio, “Algorithmic Discrimination Is an Information Problem”, Hastings Law Journal 70, no. 6 (2019): 1389–1444.
- Contini Francesco, “Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Humans, Law and Technology Interactions in Judicial Proceedings”, Law, Technology and Humans 2, no. 1 (2020): 4–18. DOI: 10.5204/lthj.v2i1.1478
- Costabel Attilio M, “The Future of Online Justice According to Susskind: From COVID-19 Emergencies to Global Platforms”, Journal of Multidisciplinary Research 15, no. 1 (2023): 79–86.
- COVID-19 Continuity of Court Operations During a Public Health Emergency Workgroup. Post-pandemic recommendations.
https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/judicial/2021-az-post-pandemic-rec.pdf [Accessed 02.03.2025] - Crofts Penny, Honni Rijswijk, Technology: New trajectories in law (Routledge, 2021): 86. DOI: 10.4324/9780429288685-5
- Demková Simona, “The Decisional Value of Information in Semi-Automated Decision-Making”, Review of European Administrative Law 2, no. 14 (2021): 29–50
https://realaw.blog/2021/11/19/the-decisional-value-of-information-in-semi-automated-decision-making-by-simona-demkova/ [Accessed 02.03.2025]. DOI: 10.7590/187479821X16254887670874 - Dustin Jeffrey, Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. Reuters (2018).
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insight/amazon-scraps-secret-ai-recruiting-tool-that-showed-bias-against-women-idUSKCN1MK08G [Accessed 02.03.2025] - Engel Christoph, et al., “Code is law: how COMPAS affects the way the judiciary handles the risk of recidivism” Artificial Intelligence and Law (2024). DOI: 10.1007/s10506-024-09389-8
- Fenwick Mark, et al., “Regulation Tomorrow: What Happens When Technology Is Faster than the Law?”, American University Business Law Review 6, no. 3 (2017).
https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028&context=aublr [Accessed 02.03.2025]. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2834531 - Galán Carlos, “Certification as a control mechanism of Artificial Intelligence in Europe” (Futurium)
https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/c._galan_phd_-_ai_paper.pdf [Accessed 02.03.2025] - Gautrin and Others v. France, ECtHR Judgement 25.10.1998.
- Gualdi Francesco, Antonio Cordella, “Artificial Intelligence and Decision-Making: the question of Accountability” Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, (2021): 2297–2306. DOI: 10.24251/HICSS.2021.281
- Hanafi Imam, et al., “Legal study on ethical issues in the use of artificial intelligence for legal decisions: critical literature review”. Inspirasi Futura: Media kajian Keislaman (2024). DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i2.4659
- Harris David, et al., Law of the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2023). DOI: 10.1093/he/9780198862000.001.0001
- Hinkle Joshua C, David Weisburd, “The irony of broken windows policing: A micro-place study of the relationship between disorder, focused police crackdowns and fear of crime”, Journal of Criminal Justice 36, no. 6 (2008): 503–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2008.09.010
- Hooker Sararh, “Moving beyond “algorithmic bias is a data problem”, Patterns 2, no. 4 (2021)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666389921000611 [Accessed 02.03.2025]. DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100241 - “Independence and Impartiality of the Judiciary An overview of relevant jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights”, The Aire Centre (2021)
https://www.rolplatform.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/independence-and-impartiality-of-judiciary-eng.pdf [Accessed 02.03.2025] - James Gareth, et al.,
“Unsupervised Learning” in: An Introduction to Statistical Learning. Springer Texts in Statistics, ed. Gareth James (Springer, 2023): 503–556. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-38747-0_12 - Janatian Samyar, et al., “From Text to Structure: Using Large Language Models to Support the Development of Legal Expert Systems”, in JURIX 2023: The Thirty-sixth Annual Conference, eds. Giovanni Sielno et al. (
IOS ,2023 ): 379.https://ebooks.iospress.nl/volumearticle/65584 [Accessed 02.03.2025]. DOI: 10.3233/FAIA230962 - Karrar v. Belgium, ECtHR Judgement 31.08.2021.
- Kashif Javed, Li Jianxin, (2024) “Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Adjudication: Semantic Biasness Classification and Identification in Legal Judgement (SBCILJ)”, Heliyon 10, no. 9 (2024). DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30184
- Kerikmäe Tanel, et al., “Frontiers in AI Judiciary: A Contribution to Legal Futurology”, Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum 11, no. 2 (2023): 55–75. DOI: 10.11590/abhps.2023.2.03
- Köchling Alina, Marius C. Wehner, “Discriminated by an algorithm: a systematic review of discrimination and fairness by algorithmic decision-making in the context of HR recruitment and HR development”, Business Research 13 (2020): 795–848. [Accessed 02.03.2025]. DOI: 10.1007/s40685-020-00134-w
- Kordzadeh Nima, Maryam Ghasemaghaei, “Algorithmic bias: review, synthesis, and future research directions”, European Journal of Information Systems 31, no. 3 (2021): 388–409. DOI: 10.1080/0960085X.2021.1927212
- Krištofík Andrej, “Európska a česká perspektíva francúzskeho zákazu profilovania sudcov” Trestněprávní revue – odborný recenzovaný časopis pro trestní parno, no. 4 (2022): 239–245.
- Krištofík Andrej, Pavel Loutocký, “ODR and Online courts: What is their future after the AI Act” Jusletter IT. Die Zeitschrift für IT und Recht 27, no. 1 (2024): 197–204. DOI: 10.38023/9375d02d-afd2-47fd-9e71-ba679710f15a
- Kusner Matt J, et al.,
“Counterfactual Fairness” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, eds. I. Guyon et al. (NIPS, 2017): 4066–76.http://papers.nips.cc/paper/6995-counterfactual-fairness.pdf [Accessed 02.03.2025] - Langford Mikael, Mikael R. Madsen, “France Criminalises Research on Judges” Verfuassunblog (2019).
https://verfassungsblog.de/france-criminalises-research-on-judges/ [Accessed 02.03.2025] - Larson James, “How We Analyzed the COMPAS Recidivism Algorithm”, ProPublica, (2016).
https://www.propublica.org/article/how-we-analyzed-the-compas-recidivism-algorithm [Accessed 02.03.2025] - Lepri Bruno,
“The tyranny of data? The bright and dark sides of data-driven decision-making for social good” , in Transparent Data Mining Big and Small Data, eds. Tania Cerquitelli et al. (Springer, 2017): 3–24. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-54024-5_1 - Letsas George,
“The ECHR as a Living Instrument: Its Meaning and its Legitimacy” in: Constituting Europe, eds. Andreas Follesdal (Cambridge University Press, 2013): 106–141. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139169295.005 - Micallef v. Malta [GC], ECtHR Judgment 15.10.2009. DOI: 10.1016/S1350-4789(09)70022-4
- Mokander Jakob, et al., “Ethics-Based Auditing of Automated Decision-Making Systems: Nature, Scope, and Limitations”, Science and Engineering Ethics 27, no. 44 (2021). DOI: 10.1007/s11948-021-00319-4
- Moore Taylor R, “Trade Secrets and Algorithms as Barriers to Social Justice”, Center for Democracy and Technology (2017).
https://cdt.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/2017-07-31-Trade-Secret-Algorithms-as-Barriers-to-Social-Justice.pdf [Accessed 02.03.2025] - Morewedge Carey K, et al., “Human bias in algorithm design” Nature Human Behaviour 7 (2023): 1822–24. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-023-01724-4
- Niller Eric, “Can AI Be a Fair Judge in Court? Estonia Thinks So”, WIRED (2019).
https://www.wired.com/story/can-ai-be-fair-judge-court-estonia-thinks-so/ [Accessed 02.03.2025] - Pasquini v. San Marino, ECtHR Judgement 08.03.2021.
- Pedersen Tore, Christian Johansen, “Behavioural artificial intelligence: an agenda for systematic empirical studies of artificial inference”, AI & Society 35 (2020): 519–532. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-019-00928-5
- Pescador Valero v. Spain, ECtHR Judgement 17.06.2003.
- Polčák Radim, Internet a proměny práva, (Auditorium, 2009).
- Reichman Amnon, Giovanni Sartor,
“Algorithms and Regulation” in Constitutional Challenges in the Algorithmic Society, eds. Hans-Wolfgang Micklitz et al. (Cambridge University Press, 2021): 131–181. DOI: 10.1017/9781108914857.009 - Reiling Dory, “Courts and Artificial Intelligence”, International Journal for Court Administration 11, no. 2 (2020). DOI: 10.36745/ijca.343
- Reiling Dory, Technology for Justice. How Information Technology can support Judicial Reform (Amsterdam University Press, 2009). DOI: 10.5117/9789087280710
- Roth Andrea L, “Trial by Machine”, Georgetown Law Journal 104, no. 5 (2016): 1245–1306.
- Rovatsos Michael, et al., “Landscape Summary: Bias in Algorithmic Decision-Making”, Centre for Data Ethics & Innovation (2019)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/819055/Landscape_Summary_-_Bias_in_Algorithmic_Decision-Making.pdf [Accessed 02.03.2025]. - Rudin Cynthia, “Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead”, Nature Machine Intelligence 1 (2019): 206–215. DOI: 10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x
- Rudin Cynthia, et al., “The Age of Secrecy and Unfairness in Recidivism Prediction”, Harvard Data Science Review 2, no. 1 (2020). DOI: 10.1162/99608f92.6ed64b30
- Rustavi 2 Broadcasting Company Ltd and Others v. Georgia, ECtHR Judgement 9.12.2019.
- Sances Michael, Hye Y. You, “Who Pays for Government? Descriptive Representation and Exploitative Revenue Sources”, Journal of Politics 79, no. 3 (2017): 1090–4. DOI: 10.1086/691354
- Schwartz Reva, et al.,
“Towards a Standard for Identifying and Managing Bias in Artificial Intelligence” (NIST, 2022).https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.1270.pdf [Accessed 02.03.2025]. DOI: 10.6028/NIST.SP.1270 - Shi Jiahui, “Artificial Intelligence, Algorithms and Sentencing in Chinese Criminal Justice: Problems and Solutions” Criminal Law Forum 33 (2022):121–148. DOI: 10.1007/s10609-022-09437-5
- Sobowale Julia, “How Artificial Intelligence is changing the legal profession”, ABA Journal (2016)
https://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/how_artificial_intelligence_is_transforming_the_legal_profession [Accessed 02.03.2025] - Soukupová Jana, “AI-based Legal Technology: A Critical Assessment of the Current Use of Artificial Intelligence in Legal Practice”, Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology 15, no. 2 (2021): 279–300. DOI: 10.5817/MUJLT2021-2-6
- “State v. Loomis”, Harvard Law Review 130, no. 1530 (2016).
https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-130/state-v-loomis/ [Accessed 02.03.2025] - Straton Papagianneas, “Automating Intervention in Chinese Justice: Smart Courts and Supervision Reform” Asian Journal of Law and Society 10, no. 3 (2023): 463–89. DOI: 10.1017/als.2023.5
- Straton Papagianneas, Nino Junius, “Fairness and justice through automation in China’s smart courts”, Computer Law & Security Review 51, no. 1 (2023).
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364923001073 [Accessed 02.03.2025]. DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105897 - Sunstein Cass, “Algorithms, Correcting Biases”, Social Research: An International Quarterly 86, no. 2 (2019): 499–511. DOI: 10.1353/sor.2019.0024
- Susskind Richard, Online courts and future of justice (Oxford University Press, 2012), 60–1.
- Tata Cyrus, “Introduction: Why Study Judicial Decision Support Systems?” International Review Of Law Computers & Technology 14, no. 3 (2000): 279–82. DOI: 10.1080/713673365
- Tian Niu W, Michael Yuan,
“Intelligent Justice’: AI Implementations in China’s Legal Systems” in Artificial Intelligence and its discontents, ed. Ariane Haneemayer (Springer, 2022): 197–222. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-88615-8_10 - Vardanyan and Nanushyan v. Armenia, ECtHR Judgement 25.10.2016.
- Wang Liyuan, et al., “A Comprehensive Survey of Continual Learning: Theory, Method and Application” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 46 (2024). DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3367329
- Weinberger Ota, Law, Institutions and Legal Politics (Springer, 1991). DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-3458-3
- Xiang Alice, “Mirror, Mirror, on the Wall, Who’s the Fairest of Them All?”, Daedalus 153, no. 1 (2024): 250–267. DOI: 10.1162/daed_a_02058
- Xie Hanbo, “The promising future of cognitive science and artificial intelligence”, Nature Reviews Psychology 202, no. 2 (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s44159-023-00170-3
- Yeung Karen,
“Why Worry about decision-making by machine?” , in Algorithmic regulation, ed. Karen Yeung (Wiley, 2017): 32–33. - Zeleznikow John, “Negotiation, Online Dispute Resolution, and Artificial Intelligence”, in Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation, Negotiation, Online Dispute Resolution, and Artificial Intelligence, eds. Marc Kilgour, Colin Eden (2021):1125–1147. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-49629-6_38
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.598 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 3
Published on: Apr 28, 2025
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2025 Andrej Krištofík, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.