References
- Benkin, S. Comparative examination of mathematical models for calculating the judicial workload, Master’s thesis (2020), Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.
- Bogetoft, P. and J. Wittrup, Benefit of the Doubt Approach to Workload indicators: Simplifying the use of Case Weights in Court Evaluations. Omega (2021) 13 102375, pp. 1–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2020.102375
- Dalkey N. C., The Delphi Method: An Experimental Study of Group Opinion, Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, 1969a, available at: <
https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM5888.html > [accessed 10 May 2024]. - Dalkey, N.C., Brown, B. and S. Cochran, The Delphi Method III: Use of Self Ratings to Improve Group Estimates, Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, 1969b, available at: <
https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM6115.html > [accessed 10 May 2024]. - European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice, Case weighting in judicial systems. CEPEJ Studies n. 28, CEPEJ 2020(9), available at
https://rm.coe.int/study-28-case-weighting-report-en/16809ede97”https://rm.coe.int/study-28-case-weighting-report-en/16809ede97 [accessed 11 May 2024]. - European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice, CEPEJ Glossary, CEPEJ(2020)Rev1, (3 February 2020) available at: <
https://rm.coe.int/cepej-2019-5final-glossaire-en-version-10-decembre-as/1680993c4c > [accessed 10 May 2024]. - European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice of the Council of Europe, Towards European Timeframes for Judicial Proceedings. Implementation Guide, CEPEJ 2016/5, Strasbourg, Council of Europe, 2016.
- Fabri, M. and P. Langbroek, Is There a Right Judge for Each Case? A Comparative Study of Case Assignment in Six European Countries. European Journal of Legal Studies (2007) Vol 1(2) pp. 292–315, available at: <
https://ejls.eui.eu/wp-content/uploads/sites/32/pdfs/Autumn_Winter2007/Full_Autumn_Winter2007.pdf > [accessed 11 May 2024]. - Flanders, S., 1979 Federal District Court Time Study, Federal Judicial Center, Washington D.C., 1980, available at: <
https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/2012/1979Time.pdf > [accessed 10 May 2024]. - Flango, E. and B.J. Ostrom, Assessing the Need for Judges and Court Support Staff, National Center for State Courts, Williamsburg, VA, 1996, available at: <
https://www.ncsc.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/5258/assessingneed.pdf > [accessed 10 May 2024]. - Gordon, T.J., The Delphi Method, Futures Research Methodology, AC/UNU Millennium Project, 1994, available at: <
https://eumed-agpol.iamm.fr/private/priv_docum/wp5_files/5-delphi.pdf > [accessed 10 May 2024]. - Gramckow, H., Estimating Staffing Needs in the Justice Sector, World Bank, Washington D.C., 2012, available at: <
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/63a7fbdb-1aaa-51fd-9dcd-21ff026bc4aa/content > [accessed 10 May 2024]. - Hammergren L., Harley G. and S. Petkova, Case-Weighting Analyses a Tool to Promote Judicial Efficiency: Lesson, Substitutes and Guidance, The World Bank Group, Kingdom of the Netherlands, Washington D.C., 2017, available at: <
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986 > [accessed 10 May 2024]. - Kleiman, M., et al, Case Weighting a Common Yardstick: A Comparative Review of Current Uses and Future Direction, Onati Socio-Legal Series, 2017, vol. 7, n. 4, pp. 640/660, available at:
http://opo.iisj.net - Lienhard, A. and D. Kettiger, Research on the Caseload Management of Courts: Methodological Questions. Utrecht Law Review (2011) 7 (1) pp. 66–73, available at: <
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7bc2/47bd1e29718a75d9c4ee9b43c8438a5a3aa1.pdf > [accessed 10 May 2024]. - Linstone, H. and M. Turoff (eds.), The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications, 2002, available at: <
https://web.njit.edu/~turoff/pubs/delphibook/delphibook.pdf > [accessed 10 May 2024]. - McDonald, H.G. and C.P. Kirsch, Use of the Delphi Method as a Means of Assessing Judicial Manpower Needs. The Justice System Journal (1978) 3(3) pp. 314–321.
- Mozuni, M. and W. Jonas, An Introduction to the Morphological Delphi Method for Design: A Tool for Future-Oriented Design Research. The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation (2017) 3(4) pp. 303–318. DOI: 10.1016/j.sheji.2018.02.004
- Orkényi, L., A New Method for an Objective Measurement of the Judicial Workload – the Application of a Prediction Model Based on an Algorithm Formed by Multiple Linear Regression in Court Administration. International Journal of Court Administration (2021) 12(1). DOI: 10.36745/ijca.407
- Orkényi, L., Duration of Courts Events for Litigation – An Empirical Study to Provide a Theoretical Basis for an Objective Measurement System for Judicial Workload. International Journal of Court Administration (2022) 13(1). DOI: 10.36745/ijca.370
- Partovi, F. Y. and J. Burton, Using the analytic hierarchy process for ABC analysis. International Journal of Operations & Production Management (1993) 13(9) pp. 29–44. DOI: 10.1108/01443579310043619
- Rand Corporation, ‘The Delphi Method’ <
https://www.rand.org/topics/delphi-method.html > [accessed 28 March 2023]. - Shapard, J., The 1987 District Court Case Time Study: A Brief Description, Federal Judicial Center, Washington, D.C., 1990.
- Winkler D. et al., Combining a weighted caseload study with an organizational analysis in courts: first experiences with a new methodological approach in Switzerland. International Journal for Court Administration, (2015) 7(1) pp. 27–36, available at: <
https://www.iacajournal.org/articles/abstract/10.18352/ijca.174/ > [accessed 10 May 2024].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.579 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 4 - 4
Published on: Jun 10, 2024
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2024 Marco Fabri, Shanee Benkin, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.