Innovating Judicial Performance Evaluations: Toward Academic-Style Peer Review?
References
- Bencze M, Kovács Á and Ződi Z,
‘The Evaluation and Development of the Quality of Justice in Hungary’ in Francesco Contini (ed), Handle with Care Assessing and designing methods for the evaluation and development of the quality of justice (IRSIG-CNR 2017) <https://www.academia.edu/36129389/Handle_with_Care_Assessing_and_designing_methods_for_the_evaluation_and_development_of_the_quality_of_justice > accessed 14 May 2023 - Benvenuti S, ‘The Italian System of Judicial Governance: An Arena of Confronting Informal Practices and the Push Towards Formalization’ (2023) 24 German Law Journal 1373. DOI: 10.1017/glj.2023.67
- Berch RW and Bass EN, ‘Judicial Performance Review in Arizona: A Critical Assessment’ (2014) 4 Oñati Socio-Legal Series 927
- Berger R, Government by Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment (1977) (2nd edn, Liberty Fund 1997)
- Bork RH, Tempting of America. The Political Seduction of the Law (Simon & Schuster 1990)
- Burdese A, ‘Voce Magistrato (Dir. Rom.)’ 187
- Catino M, Dallara C and Rocchi S, ‘The Organizational Reasons for Wrongdoing. The Case of Italy’s Superior Council of the Judiciary (CSM)’ (2023) 79 Crime, Law and Social Change 453. DOI: 10.1007/s10611-022-10064-9
- Choi S and Gulati M, ‘A Tournament of Judges?’ (2004) 92 California Law Review 299. DOI: 10.2307/3481449
- Contini F (ed), Handle with Care Assessing and Designing Methods for the Evaluation and Development of the Quality of Justice (IRSIG-CNR 2017) <
https://www.academia.edu/36129389/Handle_with_Care_Assessing_and_designing_methods_for_the_evaluation_and_development_of_the_quality_of_justice > accessed 14 May 2023 - Contini F, Mohr R and Velicogna M, ‘Formula over Function? From Algorithms to Values in Judicial Evaluation’ (2014) 4 Oñati Socio-Legal Series 1099
- Di Federico G (ed), Recruitment, Professional Evaluation and Career of Judges and Prosecutors in Europe: Austria, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain (Lo scarabeo 2005)
- Di Federico G,
‘Magistrati ordinari: Organico, Reclutamento, Valutazioni della professionalità, Carriera, Tramutamenti e attribuzione delle funzioni giudiziarie, Trattamento economico’ in Giuseppe Di Federico (ed), Ordinamento giudiziario: uffici giudiziari, CSM e governo della magistratura (Bononia University Press 2019) - Di Federico G, ‘Riforma delle valutazioni di professionalità e delle disfunzioni ad essa connesse, in prospettiva comparata’ [2022] Diritto di difesa 1
- Elek J and Rottman D, ‘Methodologies for Measuring Judicial Performance: The Problem of Bias’ (2014) 4 Oñati Socio-Legal Series 863
- Elek JK, ‘Judicial Perspectives on Emotion, Emotion Management, and Judicial Excellence in the USA’ (2019) 9 Oñati Socio-Legal Series 865. DOI: 10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1033
- Fabri M,
‘Clash of Visions: Regulating Judges and Prosecutors in Italy’ , Regulating Judges (Edward Elgar Publishing 2016) <https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/edcoll/9781786430786/9781786430786.00018.xml > accessed 22 April 2024. DOI: 10.4337/9781786430793.00018 - Gill RD, ‘Implicit Bias in Judicial Performance Evaluations: We Must Do Better Than This’ (2014) 35 Justice System Journal 301. DOI: 10.1080/0098261X.2013.873290
- Gill RD, Lazos SR and Waters MM, ‘Are Judicial Performance Evaluations Fair to Women and Minorities? A Cautionary Tale from Clark County, Nevada’ (2011) 45 Law & Society Review 731. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00449.x
- Hagsgård MB, ‘Internal and External Dialogue: A Swedish Approach to Quality Work in Courts’ (2014) 4 Oñati Socio-Legal Series 993
- Hamřík L, ‘Actors of Informal Judicial Institutions and Practices’ (2023) 24 German Law Journal 1520. DOI: 10.1017/glj.2023.91
- Hurst W, ‘Who Is the “Great” Appellate Judge?’ (1949) 24 Indiana Law Journal 394
- Kearney RC, ‘Judicial Performance Evaluation in the States’ (1999) 22 Public Administration Quarterly 468
- Kischel U,
‘Tertium Comparationis’ in Jan M Smits and others (eds), Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law (Edward Elgar Publishing Limited 2023) <https://www.elgaronline.com/display/book/9781839105609/b-9781839105609.tertium.comparationis.xml > accessed 23 October 2023. DOI: 10.4337/9781839105609.tertium.comparationis - Kosař D, ‘The Least Accountable Branch’ (2013) 11 International Journal of Constitutional Law 234. DOI: 10.1093/icon/mos056
- Lawson G, ‘Equivocal Originalism’ (2022) 27 Texas Review of Law and Politics 309. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4050058
- Leiter B, ‘Legal Indeterminacy’ (1995) 1 Legal Theory 481. DOI: 10.1017/S1352325200000227
- Lüscher TF, ‘Measuring the Unmeasurable: Assessing the Quality of Science and Scientists’ (2018) 39 European Heart Journal 1765. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy295
- Mangione G, ‘Some Brief Remarks on the Controversial Relationship Between the Judiciary and Politics in Italy’ (2021) 27 Comparative Law Review 79. DOI: 10.12775/CLR.2021.003
- Mayden KD, ‘Peer Review: Publication’s Gold Standard’ (2012) 3 Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology 117. DOI: 10.6004/jadpro.2012.3.2.8
- McIntyre J, ‘Evaluating Judicial Performance Evaluation: A Conceptual Analysis’ (2014) 4 Oñati Socio-Legal Series 898
- Melville A, ‘Evaluating Judicial Performance and Addressing Gender Bias’ (2014) 4 Oñati Socio-Legal Series 880
- Mitchell G,
‘Evaluating Judges’ in David E Klein and Gregory Mitchell (eds), The Psychology of Judicial Decision Making (Oxford University Press 2010) accessed 15 May 2023. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367584.003.0014 - Musolf L, ‘Performance Evaluation of Federal Administrative Law Judges: Challenge for Public Administration?’ (1998) 28 The American Review of Public Administration 390. DOI: 10.1177/027507409802800404
- Niiniluoto I,
‘Scientific Progress’ in Edward N Zalta (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University 2019) <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/scientific-progress/ > accessed 23 October 2023 - OECD, Government at a Glance 2021 (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2021) <
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/government-at-a-glance-2021_1c258f55-en > accessed 22 October 2023 - Olanescu A, ‘Discretionary Power and Abuse of Power in the Activity of State Institutions’ (2021) 84 Curentul Juridic 80
- Pauliat H and others,
‘The Evaluation and Development of the Quality of Justice in France’ in Francesco Contini (ed), Handle with Care Assessing and designing methods for the evaluation and development of the quality of justice (IRSIG-CNR 2017) <https://www.academia.edu/36129389/Handle_with_Care_Assessing_and_designing_methods_for_the_evaluation_and_development_of_the_quality_of_justice > accessed 14 May 2023 - Posner EA,
‘The Constitution of the Roman Republic’ in Giuseppe Dari-Mattiacci and Dennis P Kehoe (eds), Roman Law and Economics: Institutions and Organizations Volume I (Oxford University Press 2020) DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198787204.003.0003 accessed 14 May 2023 - Preshova D, Damjanovski I and Nechev Z, ‘The Effectiveness of the “European Model” of Judicial Independence in the Western Balkans: Judicial Councils as a Solution or a New Cause of Concern for Judicial Reforms’ [2017] Cleer Papers 7
- Przybyszewski L, ‘The Dilemma of Judicial Biography or Who Cares Who Is the Great Appellate Judge? Gerald Gunther on Learned Hand’ (1996) 21 Law & Social Inquiry 135. DOI: 10.1086/492542
- Quine WVO, From Stimulus to Science (Harvard University Press 1998)
- Reddick M and Love Kourlis R,
‘Judicial Performance Evaluation’ in Peter Koelling and Rebecca Love Kourlis (eds), The improvement of the administration of justice (American Bar Association 2016) - Singer JM, ‘Judicial Performance Evaluation in the States: The IAALS JPE 2.0 Pre-Convening White Paper’ [2022] SSRN Electronic Journal <
https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=4505778 > accessed 22 October 2023. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4505778 - Solum LB, ‘A Tournament of Virtue Symposium: Empirical Measures of Judicial Performance’ (2005) 32 Florida State University Law Review 1365. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.588322
- Solum LB, ‘Originalist Methodology’ (2017) 84 University of Chicago Law Review 269
- Stella A, ‘Intervista al professor Di Federico: “Grazie a Palamara hanno fatto carriera anche i giudici che lo giudicheranno”’ Il Riformista (22 July 2020) <
https://www.ilriformista.it/intervista-al-professor-di-federico-grazie-a-palamara-hanno-fatto-carriera-anche-i-giudici-che-lo-giudicheranno-134353/ > accessed 14 May 2023 - Stella V, ‘Intervista a Eugenio Albamonte. «Valutare Noi Toghe? No a Un’élite Di Eccellenti, Ma i Capi Vanno Formati»’ Il Dubbio (24 March 2021) 1
- Stiers D, ‘Performance Voting, Retrospective Voting, and Economic Voting. Conceptual Clarity and Empirical Testing’ (2022) 103 Social Science Quarterly 399. DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13125
- Tate CN and Vallinder T (eds), The Global Expansion of Judicial Power (New York University Press 1995)
- Textor M,
‘States of Affairs’ in Edward N Zalta (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University 2021) <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/states-of-affairs/ > accessed 23 October 2023 - Tsereteli N, ‘Constructing the Pyramid of Influence: Informal Institutions as Building Blocks of Judicial Oligarchy in Georgia’ (2023) 24 German Law Journal 1469. DOI: 10.1017/glj.2023.74
- Van Dijk D and Schodl MM,
‘Performance Appraisal and Evaluation’ in James D Wright (ed), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition) (Elsevier 2015) <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080970868220345 > accessed 12 May 2023. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.22034-5 - Vinceti SR, ‘Standardisation and Authority in Judicial Discipline: A Comment on Italy and Ireland’s Experiences’ (2022) 6 Irish Judicial Studies Journal 55
- Vincze A, ‘Schrödinger’s Judiciary—Formality at the Service of Informality in Hungary’ (2023) 24 German Law Journal 1432. DOI: 10.1017/glj.2023.71
- Warren M, ‘From Evaluation to Improvement: A Chief Justice’s Perspective’ (2014) 4 Oñati Socio-Legal Series 953
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.576 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 2 - 2
Published on: Jun 10, 2024
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2024 Silvio Roberto Vinceti, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.