Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Relying on the Courts: About Collegiate Collaboration in Courts as a Counterbalance to Professional Hierarchy and as a Necessary Precondition for Efficiently Delivering, Timely and Consistent Justice Cover

Relying on the Courts: About Collegiate Collaboration in Courts as a Counterbalance to Professional Hierarchy and as a Necessary Precondition for Efficiently Delivering, Timely and Consistent Justice

Open Access
|Aug 2024

References

  1. Abraham, M., and T. Spapens, (2021), Keeping drug crime under control. The efforts of 25 years (Drugscriminaliteit beheersbaar houden. De inspanningen van 25 jaar) Justitiële Verkenningen, nr, 6 pp. 85100. DOI: 10.5553/JV/016758502021047004007
  2. Antonioni, A. et al., (2018), Collaborative hierarchy maintains cooperation in asymmetric games, Sci Rep 8, p. 5375. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-23681-z
  3. Bader, M. Oksana Huss, Andriy Meleshevych and Oksana Nesterenko, (2019), Civil Society Against Corruption in Ukraine: Pathways to Impact, Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal 5, pp. 235. DOI: 10.18523/kmlpj189975.2019-5.1-35
  4. Barendrecht, M., (2019), The best possible adjudication (de best mogelijke rechtspraak) Justitiële Verkenningen 2019-1 pp. 97114 (in Dutch). DOI: 10.5553/JV/016758502019045001008
  5. Barendrecht, M., (2022), Making conflicts manageable, Strengthening the role of law (Conflicten hanteerbaar maken, De rol van het recht versterken), Nederlands Juristenblad, pp. 22382572 (in Dutch).
  6. Bazaluk, O. A., (2016). Corruption in Ukraine rulers’ mentality and the destiny of the nation, geophilosophy of Ukraine. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  7. Berge, J. B. J. M., ten, Contouren van een kwaliteitsbeleid voor de rechtspraak, in: Langbroek, P. M. and K. Lahuis (Eds.), (1998) Kwaliteit van Rechtspraak op de Weegschaal, Tjeenk Willink, Deventer.
  8. Berggren, R., Johanna E. Pregmark, Tobias Fredberg and Björn Frössevi, Change in tightly coupled systems: the role and actions of middle managers, in: Noumair, D. A., & Shani, A. B. (Eds.) (2020). Research in organizational change and development. Emerald Publishing, p. 183209. DOI: 10.1108/S0897-301620200000028007
  9. Blaug, R., (2009), Why is there hierarchy? Democracy and the question of organisational form Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 12, 1 p. 8599. DOI: 10.1080/13698230902738635
  10. Bovend’Eert, P. P. T., (2016), The legal nature of procedural rules and other court regulations, (Het rechtskarakter van procesreglementen en andere rechtersregelingen), Nederlands Juristenblad– 5-2-2016 – AFL. 5 p. 257326.
  11. Bovend’Eert, P. P. T., (2010), The Judge as legislator: uniform application of law in court regulations from a constitutional perspective (De rechter als wetgever: uniforme rechtstoepassing in rechtersregelingen vanuit staatsrechtelijk perspectief), RegelMaat 2010 (25) 1, p. 1728.
  12. Cronin, K., D. Acheson and P. Hernández, (2015), Hierarchy is Detrimental for Human Cooperation. Sci Rep 5, p. 18634. DOI: 10.1038/srep18634
  13. Demartini, M. C., & Otley, D. (2020), Beyond the System vs. Package Dualism in Performance Management Systems Sesign: A loose Coupling Approach, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 86. DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2019.101072
  14. Diefenbach, T. (2013), Hierarchy and Organisation: Toward a General Theory of Hierarchical Social Systems (Ser. Routledge studies in management, organizations, and society, 24). Routledge.
  15. Dijksterhuis, B. M. (2008), Judges Standardize the Amount of Alimony: An Empirical Study of Judicial Cooperation in the Working Group on Maintenance Standards (1975–2007) (Rechters normeren de alimentatiehoogte: een empirisch onderzoek naar rechterlijke samenwerking in de werkgroep alimentatienormen (1975–2007)), Dissertation, Leiden University Press (in Dutch). DOI: 10.5117/9789087280451
  16. Doornbos, N. and Romy Hanoeman, Working Method and Results of the Eindhoven District Court, The Person Behind the File (Werkwijze en resultaten van de Wijkrechtbank Eindhoven, De persoon achter het dossier), Research Memoranda Number 3/2021 (in Dutch).
  17. European Commission, Commission Staff Working Document, 2020 Rule of Law Report Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Greece SWD (2020) 307 final.
  18. European Court of Auditors, Special Report 01/2022: EU Support to the Rule of Law in the Western Balkans.
  19. Gargiulo, Martin. and Gokhan Ertug, The Power of the Weak, in: Brass, D. J., Borgatti, S. P., Halgin, D. S., Labianca, G., & Mehra, A. (2014) (Eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Networks (First edition, 2014). p. 179198. DOI: 10.1108/S0733-558X(2014)0000040009
  20. Grootelaar, H., D. Schelfhout and I. van Duijneveldt, (2020), Evaluation Rotterdam local Rule Judge and the Hague local quarter judge (Evaluatie Rotterdamse Regelrechter en Haagse Wijkrechter), Research Report, Research Memoranda Number 1/Volume 15.
  21. Habib, Allen, “Promises”, in: Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (Eds), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2022 Edition).
  22. Hatzis, A. N., Greece’s institutional trap. Managerial and Decision Economics 39, p. 840. DOI: 10.1002/mde.2970
  23. Hazelzet, E., I. Houkes, H. Bosma, and A. de Rijk, (2022), How a Steeper Organisational Hierarchy Prevents Change Adoption and Implementation of a Sustainable Employability Intervention for Employees in Low-Skilled Jobs: A Qualitative Study, Bmc Public Health 22. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14754-w
  24. Hobbes, T (1984), Leviathan, 165, Penguin, Middlesex.
  25. Hunter, S. D., Bentzen, H. & Taug, J., (2020), On the “missing link” between formal organization and informal social structure, J Org Design 9, 13. DOI: 10.1186/s41469-020-00076-x
  26. Ioannidis, M., The Judiciary, in: K Featherstone, D. A. Sotiropoulos (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Modern Greek Politics, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2020, p. 127. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198825104.013.8
  27. Johnston, M., (2005), Syndromes of Corruption: Wealth, Power, and Democracy, Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511490965
  28. Kraats, K. G. F. van der (2022), Civil procedural law as a stumbling block, on the legal protection of people without legal knowledge (Het civiele procesrecht als struikelblok, over de rechtsbescherming van mensen zonder juridische kennis), BoomJuridisch, The Hague (in Dutch).
  29. Kraats, K. van der (2019), Experiments in civil justice: a solution to which problem? (‘Experimenten in de civiele rechtspraak: een oplossing voor welk probleem?) Justitiële Verkenningen1, pp. 8296 (in Dutch).
  30. Kronman, A. T., (1993), The Lost Lawyer, Failing Ideals of the Legal Profession, Cambridge, London.
  31. Mein, A. and F. de Meere (2018), Motives of citizens to (not) go to court (Motieven van burgers om (niet) naar de rechter te gaan), Research report/Research Memoranda Number 3 (in Dutch).
  32. Merryman J. H., (1996), The French deviation, The American Journal of Comparative Law Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 109119 Published By: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.2307/840522
  33. Merryman, J. H. and Pérez-Perdomo, R. (2007). The Civil Law Tradition, 3rd Edition (3rd ed.). Stanford University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9780804768337
  34. Mitsopoulos, M. and Pelagidis, T. (2010), Greek appeals courts’ quality analysis and performance, European Journal of Law and Economics, pp. 1739. DOI: 10.1007/s10657-009-9128-4
  35. Nam, N., Reform of Asset and Interest Disclosure in Ukraine, World Bank Group (26 January 2021).
  36. Nelen J. M. and D. Siegel, (Eds.) (2021), Contemporary Organized Crime: Developments, Challenges and Responses, Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-56592-3
  37. Papaioannou, E. and S. Karatza, (February 2018), The Greek Justice System: Collapse and Reform, Discussion Paper DP12731, 17, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262035835.003.0012
  38. Reznik, O, O. Bondarenko, M. Utkina, O. Klypa and L. Bobrishovab, (2023), Anti-Corruption Transformation Processes in the Conditions of the Judicial Reform in Ukraine Implementation International Journal for Court Administration 14(1). DOI: 10.36745/ijca.400
  39. Sakellaropoulou, K, N. Michalis, N. Pikramenis, I. Symeonidis, V. P. Androullakis, T. Nikolaidis, L. Tsogas and P. Alikakos, (February 2019), Justice In Greece Proposals for a modern judicial system Dianeosis Research and Policy Institute, (Η Δικαιοςύνη ΣΤην ΕλΛάδα, ΠροΤάςεις για ένα ςύγχρονο, δικαςΤικό ςύςΤημα, ΚαΤερίνα Ν. Σακελλαροπούλου, Μιχάλης Ν. Πικραμένος, Ιωάννης Συμεωνίδης. Βαςίλειος Π. ΑνδρουΛάκης, ΘεοκΤή Νικολαΐδου, Λάμπρος Τςόγκας, ΠέΤρος Αλικάκος (Φεβρουάριος 2019)).
  40. Schmeets, H., J. Exel, (31 March 2022), ‘Vertrouwen in medemens en instituties voor en tijdens de pandemie’ (Trust in Fellow Human Beings and Institutions Before and During the Pandemic) Central Bureau of Statistics.
  41. Sillen, J., (2019), The Concept of ‘Internal Judicial Independence’ in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights, European Constitutional Law Review 15 pp. 104133. DOI: 10.1017/S1574019619000014
  42. Slade, S., (2018), Going Horizontal: Creating a Non-hierarchical Organization, One Practice at a Time, Berrett-Koehler.
  43. Stawa, G., Wilma Van Benthem and Reda Moliene, (2018), Selection and Evaluation of Judges in Ukraine, Pravo Justice (November 2018).
  44. Tops P. W. and J. Tromp, (2020), The Netherlands Drug Country: the Call of the Money, the Power of criminals, the Need to Break it (and How to Do That) (Nederland drugsland: de lokroep van het geld, de macht van criminelen, de noodzaak die te breken (en hoe dat dan te doen)), Uitgeverij Balans.
  45. Terlouw, A., (2003), Judgment and Agreement: Cooperation Between Immigration Judges in the Absence of an Appeal. (Uitspraak en afspraak: samenwerking tussen vreemdelingenrechters bij ontbreken van hoger beroep), Boom Juridische uitgevers (in Dutch).
  46. Teuben, K., (2004), Judges’ Regulations in Civil (Procedural) Law, (Rechtersregelingen in het burgerlijk (procesrecht)), Kluwer, Deventer (in Dutch).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.527 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 5
Published on: Aug 20, 2024
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Philip Langbroek, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.