Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Digital Acceleration During Covid-19 Pandemic: How the Indonesian Constitutional Court Brings the Citizens Justice Cover

Digital Acceleration During Covid-19 Pandemic: How the Indonesian Constitutional Court Brings the Citizens Justice

Open Access
|Sep 2023

References

  1. Access to Justice During the Covid-19 Pandemic, https://reproductiverights.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Access-to-Justice-During-the-COVID-19-Pandemic-Factsheet.pdf.
  2. Aditya, Z. F., and Al-fatih, S. (2021), “Indonesian constitutional rights: expressing and purposing opinions on the internet”, The International Journal of Human Rights, 25 (9), 13951419. DOI: 10.1080/13642987.2020.1826450
  3. Aditya, Z. F., and Al-Fatih, S. (2021). “Legal Protection of Indigenous People’s Rights Through Strengthening the Licensing Principles Based on Social Sensitivity”, Journal of Indonesia Legal Studies, 6 (1), 134. DOI: 10.15294/jils.v6i1.44671
  4. AlAfghani, M. M. (2023). “Strengths and Limitations of The Indonesian Constitutional Court’s “6 Basic Principles” in Resolving Water Conflicts”, Constitutional Review, 9 (1), 179200. DOI: 10.31078/consrev916
  5. Baidhowah, A. R. (2021). “Defender of Democracy: The Role of Indonesian Constitutional Court in Preventing Rapid Democratic Backsliding”, Constitutional Review, 7(1). DOI: 10.31078/consrev715
  6. Charta Politica Indonesia, Rilis Survei Nasional Refleksi Akhir Tahun 2021 : Kondisi Politik, Ekonomi dan Hukum di Masa Pandemi, (Jakarta: Charta Politica Indonesia, 2021).
  7. Crouch, M. (2021). “The Challenges for Court Reform after Authoritarian Rule: The Role of Specialized Courts in Indonesia”, Constitutional Review, 7 (1). DOI: 10.31078/consrev711
  8. Deutsch, M. (2011). “Justice and Conflict,” in the Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice, Morton Deutsch, Peter T. Coleman, Eric C. Marcus, eds. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  9. Division for Social Policy and Development United Nations. (2006). The International Forum for Social Development Social Justice in an Open World The Role of the United Nations. New York: United Nations.
  10. Equality and Human Rights Commission, “Following Grenfell: Access to Justice”, equalityhumanrights.com/sites/default/files/following-grenfell-briefing-access-to-justice.pdf [accessed 2 February 2023].
  11. Hukum Online, “Video Conference MK Siap Digunakan”, [Constitutional Court Video Conference Ready to Use] https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/ivideo-conferencei-mk-siap-digunakan-hol20737 [accessed 15 January 2023]
  12. Jarvis, S. Coronavirus: The Latest Court Closures and Restrictions, LAW 360, (last updated May 11, 2020), available at https://www.law360.com/articles/1252836/coronavirus-the-latest-court-closures-and-restrictions?nl_pk=cb03fbd8-cfbf-41b8-ac9-b1c2df4487315&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=special [accessed 15 January 2023].
  13. Küpper, H. (2021). “The Indonesian Constitution Read with German Eyes”, Constitutional Review, 7 (1). DOI: 10.31078/consrev713
  14. Minister of Home Affairs Instruction Number 15 Year 2021.
  15. Ministry of Justice And Correctional Services, Directions Issued in Terms of Regulation 10 of the Regulations under the Disaster Management Act, 2002, No. R. 440, (issued March 31, 2020), https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/202004/43191rg11076-gon440.pdf. [accessed 15 January 2023]
  16. Müller-Merbach, H., (2006). “Heraclitus: Philosophy of Change, a Challenge for Knowledge Management?”, Knowledge Management Research & Practices, 4, 171172. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500094
  17. OECD, “Leveraging the SDGs for inclusive Growth: Delivering Access to Justice for All”, https://www.oecd.org/gov/delivering-access-to-justice-for-all.pdf, [accessed 2 February 2023]
  18. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), Coronavirus Emergency: Challenges for the Justice System, Special Rapporteur on Independence of Judges (2020), https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2020/04/coronavirus-emergency-challenges-justice-system?LangID=E&NewsID=25810 [accessed 10 January 2023]
  19. Reis, J.C., Amorim, M., and Melao, N. (2018). “Digital Transformation: A Literature Review and Guidelines for Future Research”, In book: Trends and Advances in Information Systems and Technologies. Berlin: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-77703-0_41
  20. Safa’at, M. A. (2022). “The Roles of the Indonesian Constitutional Court in Determining State-Religion Relations”, Constitutional Review, 8 (1), 113150. DOI: 10.31078/consrev815
  21. Shrager, D., Frost, E., eds. (1986). The Quotable Lawyer. New York, London: Facts on File New England Publishing Associates.
  22. Sourdin, T., and Burstyner, N. (2014). “Justice Delayed is Justice Denied”, Victoria University Law and Justice Journal, 4 (1), 4962. DOI: 10.15209/vulj.v4i1.61
  23. Supreme Court of Nepal, Press Release on COVID-19, available at http://www.supremecourt.gov.np/web/indexhttp://www.supremecourt.gov.np/web/assets/downloads/covid_19_press_20770128.pdf see also, Supreme Court of India, Circular, New Delhi, (March 14, 2020), available at https://main.sci.gov.in/pdf/Notice/14032020_093925.pdf [accessed 15 January 2023].
  24. The Constitutional Court Decision Number 2-3/PUU-V/2007 on Judicial Review of Law Number 22 of 1997 on Narcotics.
  25. The Constitutional Court Decision Number 14/PUU-VI/2008 on Judicial Review of Criminal Code.
  26. The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2018). Annual Report 2017. Jakarta: The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
  27. The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2021). Annual Report 2020. Jakarta: The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
  28. The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2022), Annual Report 2021. Jakarta: The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
  29. The Constitutional Court Regulation 18 of 2009 concerning Guidelines for Electronic Filling and Video Conference Examination.
  30. Triyana, H. J. (2022). “Conscientious Objection Before the Indonesian Constitutional Court”, Constitutional Review, 8 (2), 323360. DOI: 10.31078/consrev825
  31. Tyler, T. R. (1998). “What is Procedural Justice?: Criteria Used by Citizens to Assess the Fairness of Legal Procedures”, Law & Society Review 22 (1), 103135. DOI: 10.2307/3053563
  32. Wang, Y., (2000). “Philospohy of Change and the Deconstruction of Self in the Zhuangzi”, Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 27 (3), 345360. DOI: 10.1163/15406253-02703006
  33. World Health Organization. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19–11 March 2020, https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020 11 March 2020 [accessed 12 January 2023].
  34. Yulistyaputri, R., Aditya, Z.F., and Fuadi, A.B. (2021). “Social Distancing during the Covid-19 Pandemic: Overcoming or Deprivation of Individual Rights?”, In-Prolegurit (International Proceeding: Legal, Human Rights and Technology), 1 (1), 176186.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.504 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 1
Published on: Sep 6, 2023
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2023 Muhidin, Eman Suparman, Indra Perwira, M. Guntur Hamzah, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.