Advantage and Risks of the Specialization of Courts in Social and Labor Disputes
References
- Abdigalimov, S. (2013). Podvedomstvennyy sudu. Konstitutsionnaya zashchita prav rabotnikov i rabotodateley. (Sayat Abdigalimov, predsedatel’ Alakol’skogo rayonnogo suda № 1 Almatinskoy oblasti)
https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31351896&pos=6;-106#pos=6;-106 ). 2013. - Akhmetzharov, S., & Orazgaliyev, S. (2021). Labor unions and institutional corruption: The case of Kazakhstan. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 12(2), 133–144. DOI: 10.1177/18793665211041198
- Baum, L. (2009). Probing the Effects of Judicial Specialization. Duke Law Journal, 58(7), 1667–1684.
- Baum, L. (2011). Specializing the Courts. University of Chicago Press.
- Berger, H., & Neugart, M. (2011). Labor courts, nomination bias, and unemployment in germany. European Journal of Political Economy, 27(4), 659–673. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2011.05.006
- Berger, H., & Neugart, M. (2012). How german labor courts decide: An econometric case study. German Economic Review, 13(1), 56–70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0475.2011.00539.x
- Bruff, H. H. (1991). Specialized courts in administrative law. Admin. L. Rev., 43, 329.
- Burdina, E. V., & Petuhov, N. A. (2018). Efficiency of the use of judicial resources and problems of court organization. Ekonomicheskaya Politika, 13(2), 126–147. DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2018-2-07
- Burton, M. (2018). Specialist domestic violence courts for child arrangement cases:Safer courtrooms and safer outcomes? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 40(4), 533–547. DOI: 10.1080/09649069.2018.1519657
- Casey, P., & Rottman, D. B. (2000). Therapeutic jurisprudence in the courts. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18(4), 445–457. DOI: 10.1002/1099-0798(2000)18:4<;445::AID-BSL371>3.0.CO;2-J
- Castelliano, C., Grajzl, P., Alves, A., & Watanabe, E. (2021). Adjudication forums, specialization, and case duration: Evidence from brazilian federal courts. Justice System Journal, 42(1), 50–77. DOI: 10.1080/0098261X.2020.1854905
- Cheng, E. K. (2008). The myth of the generalist judge. Stanford Law Review, 61(3), 519–572.
- Colàs-Neila, E., & Yélamos-Bayarri, E. (2020). Access to justice: A literature review on labour courts in Europe and Latin America.
- Coviello, D., Ichino, A., & Persico, N. (2019). Measuring the gains from labor specialization. Journal of Law and Economics, 62(3), 403–426. DOI: 10.1086/704244
- Damle, S. V. (2005). Specialize the Judge, Not the Court: A Lesson from the German Constitutional Court. Virginia Law Review, 1267–1311.
- Davies, A. C. L. (2012). The court of justice as a labour court. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 14, 145–175. DOI: 10.1017/S1528887000002226
- Dreyfuss, R. C. (1990). Specialized Adjudication. BYU Law Review, 1990(1), 377–441.
- Gioia, G. (2013). Labor process and Labor Alternative dispute resolution in the Italian System. Comparative labor law and policy journal, 34(4), 813–842.
- Gramckow, H., & Walsh, B. (2013). Developing specialized court services. International experiences and lessons learned. Justice and Development Working Paper Series, 24.
- Gutiérrez, A. I. L. (2011). Specialised justice for gender-based violence in spain. [Justicia especializada en violencia de género en España] Revista De Derecho, 24(2), 205–223. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-09502011000200009
- Hansford, E. (2011). Measuring the effects of specialization with circuit split resolutions. Stanford Law Review, 63(5), 1145–1176.
- Jaimes, A., Crocker, A., Bédard, É., & Ambrosini, D. L. (2009). Mental health courts: Therapeutic jurisprudence in action. [Les tribunaux de santé mentale: Déjudiciarisation et jurisprudence thérapeutique] Sante Mentale Au Quebec, 34(2), 171–197. DOI: 10.7202/039131ar
- Kazakhstan. (2020). Sbornik Pravosudiye Kazakhstana: realii, trendy, perspektivy. URL:
https://sud.gov.kz/sites/default/files/pagefiles/sbornik_na_01.01.2021_rus.pdf - Kazakhstan. (2022). Otchety o rabote sudov pervoy instantsii po grazhdanskim delam, dannyye informatsionnoy sluzhby Komiteta pravovoy statistiki i spetsial’nogo ucheta General’noy prokuratury Respubliki Kazakhstan. URL:
https://qamqor.gov.kz - Khamzina, Z. A., Buribayev, Y., Turlykhankyzy, K., Moidakhmetova, Z., Koshpenbetov, B., & Nessibeli, K. (2021). Unloading the judicial system in kazakhstan? alternative ways of resolving individual labour disputes. Comparative Law Review, 27, 275–296. DOI: 10.12775/CLR.2021.011
- Kleandrov, M. I. (2021). On the directions of improving the mechanism of judicial power in ensuring the fairness of justice. Gosudarstvo i Pravo, 2021(3), 7–23. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520014034-8
- Kuanova, I. Z. (2014). Metodika sudebnogo razbiratel’stva i sostavleniya sudebnogo resheniya po trudovym sporam. Prakticheskoye posobiye. Astana. Prosper Print, 2014. 84 s.
https://www.sud.gov.kz/sites/default/files/trudovye_spory_metodika.pdf - Lee, N., & Zhang, L. (2017). Specialized IP courts in China – judicial governance of intellectual property rights. IIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 48(8), 900–924. DOI: 10.1007/s40319-017-0642-6
- Lurigio, A. J., Watson, A., Luchins, D. J., & Hanrahan, P. (2001). Therapeutic jurisprudence in action: Specialized courts for the mentally ill. Judicature, 84(4), 184.
- Pakhomova, L. A. (2010). Trebovaniya, pred”yavlyayemyye k forme i soderzhaniyu postanovleniy suda pervoy instantsii v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve. Avtoref. diss.… kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov.
- Petrukhin, I. L., Baturov, G. P., & Morshchakova, T. G. (1979). Teoreticheskiye osnovy effektivnosti pravosudiya. Nauka.
- Satpayev, D., & Umbetaliyeva, T. (2015). The protests in Zhanaozen and the Kazakh oil sector: Conflicting interests in a rentier state. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 6(2), 122–129. DOI: 10.1016/j.euras.2015.03.005
- Serhii, P., Olha, S., & Ilkin, N. (2022). JUDICIAL SPECIALISATION THROUGH THE PRISM OF THE PRINCIPLE OF A ‘NATURAL COURT’: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 5(1), 100–115. DOI: 10.33327/AJEE-18-5.1-n000103
- Silvestri, E. (2014). Judicial specialization: In search of the ‘right’ judge for each case? Russian Law Journal, 2(4), 165–175. DOI: 10.17589/2309-8678-2014-2-4-165-175
- Terekhova, L. (2014). Grounds for the specialization of courts and judges in russiaRussia. Russian Law Journal, 2(4), 176–186. DOI: 10.17589/2309-8678-2014-2-4-176-186
- Uzelac, A. (2014). Mixed blessing of judicial spec ialisation: The devil is in the det ail. Russian Law Journal, 2(4), 146–164. DOI: 10.17589/2309-8678-2014-2-4-146-164
- Venn, D. (2009).
Legislation, Collective Bargaining and Enforcement: Updating the OECD Employment Protection Indicators (No. 89) . OECD Publishing. - Zimmer, M. (2009). Overview of Specialized Courts. International Journal for Court Administration, 2(1), 46–60. DOI: 10.18352/ijca.111
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.477 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 3
Published on: Apr 14, 2023
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2023 Yermek Buribayev, Zhanna Khamzina, Gakku Rakhimova, Kuralay Turlykhankyzy, Nessibeli Kalkayeva, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.