Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
E-Justice Platforms: Challenges for Judicial Governance Cover

E-Justice Platforms: Challenges for Judicial Governance

Open Access
|Apr 2022

References

  1. A. McAfee. “Mastering the Three Worlds of Information Technology.” Harvard Business Review 2006, no. November (11) (2006): 14149. https://hbr.org/archive-toc/BR0611.
  2. A. Momoh, R. Roy, and E. Shehab. “Challenges in Enterprise Resource Planning Implementation: State-of-the-Art.” Business Process Management Journal 16, no. 4 (2010): 53765. DOI: 10.1108/14637151011065919
  3. A. Pentland. “A Perspective on Legal Algorithms.” MIT Computational Law Report. (May 25, 2020 2020): 46 https://law.mit.edu/pub/aperspectiveonlegalalgorithms/release/3.
  4. A. Uzelac. “Supreme Courts in the 21st Century: Should Organisation Follow the Function?”. Studia Iuridica LXXXI (2019): 12538. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0013.5464
  5. A. Wallace. “Ten Questions for Dory Reiling – Developing It for Courts.” International Journal for Court Administration 10, no. 1 (2019): 13. DOI: 10.18352/ijca.293
  6. A. Wallace, and K. Laster. “Courts in Victoria, Australia, During Covid: Will Digital Innovation Stick?”. IACA Journal 12, no. 2 (2021): Art. 9 119. DOI: 10.36745/ijca.389
  7. C. Ciborra, ed. From Control to Drift. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  8. CEPEJ. European Ethical Charter on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems and Their Environment. Council of Europe, (Strasburg: Council of Europe, Adopted at the 31st plenary meeting of the CEPEJ Strasbourg, 3–4 December 2018).
  9. CEPEJ. Guidelines on How to Drive Change Towards Cyberjustice, Stock-Taking of Tools Deployed and Summary of Good Practices. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (Strasburg: C. o. Europe, 2016). https://edoc.coe.int/en/efficiency-of-justice/7501-guidelines-on-how-to-drive-change-towards-cyberjustice-stock-taking-of-tools-deployed-and-summary-of-good-practices.html#.
  10. D. C. Steelman, J. Goerdt, and J. E. McMillan. Caseflow Management: The Heart of Court Management in the New Millennium. Third edition with reviews ed. Williamsburg, Va.: National Center for State Courts, 2004. http://cdm16501.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/ctadmin/id/1498.
  11. D. Carnevali, ed. Soggetti Smarriti. Perchè Innovazione E Giustizia Non Si Incontrano Quasi Mai. Milano: FrancoAngeli, 2011.
  12. D. Reiling. “Courts and Artificial Intelligence.” International Journal for Court Administration 11, no. 2 (2020): 8. DOI: 10.36745/ijca.343
  13. D. Reiling. “Digital Justice, Nice to Have but Hard to Achieve.” In Technology, Innovation and Access to Justice, edited by S. P. de Souza and M. Spohr, 13143. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press 2021.
  14. D. Reiling. “Hypes, Hopes and Dreams.” In New Pathways to Civil Justice in Europe, Challenges of Access to Justice, edited by X. Kramer, A. Biard, J. Hoevenaars and E. Themeli, 4360. Heidelberg: Springer, 2021.
  15. D. Reiling. Technology for Justice. How Information Technology Can Support Judicial Reform. Leiden Leiden University Press, 2009. http://home.hccnet.nl/a.d.reiling/html/dissertation%20texts/Reiling%20Technology%20for%20Justice.pdf.
  16. F. Contini. “Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Humans, Law and Technology Interactions in Judicial Proceedings.” Law, Technology and Humans 2, no. 1 (2020): 418. DOI: 10.5204/lthj.v2i1.1478
  17. F. Contini, and D. Reiling. “Double Normalization: When Procedural Law Is Made Digital.” Oñati Socio-legal Series, no. Special Issue: Technologies of normalization (2022 forthcoming): 135. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4.ch001
  18. F. van den Borne, L. Cox, Y. Cremers, D. Groenewoud, S. Schaghen, and T. Stijns. Het Stopzettenvan Kei-Civiel Nader Bezien. Een Gordiaanse Knoop? Maastricht Law Series. Maastricht: Boom juridisch, July 2020, 2021.
  19. G. Borsari. “Processo Civile Telematico “Online Civil Trial”.” Conferenza internazionale – e-Justice and e-Law conference, Rome, 2014.
  20. G. F. Lanzara. “Building Digital Institutions: Ict and the Rise of Assemblages in Government “. In Ict and Innovation in the Public Sector. European Studies in the Making of E-Government, edited by F. Contini and G. F. Lanzara, 949. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Mcmillan, 2009. DOI: 10.1057/9780230227293_2
  21. I. Fedele. Processo Civile Telematico. Rassegna Tematica Della Giurisprudenza Di Legittimità Aggiornata Con Le Decisioni Pubblicate Al 31 Dicembre 2019. Corte di Cassazione, Ufficio del Massimario e Ruolo (Roma: Corte di Cassazione, 2020).
  22. J. Nandhakumar, M. Rossi, and J. Talvinen. “The Dynamics of Contextual Forces of Erp Implementation.” Journal of Strategic Information Systems 14, no. 2005 (2005): 22142. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsis.2005.04.002
  23. M. Fabri. “The Italian Style of E-Justice in a Comparative Perspective.” In Information and Communication Technologies in the Court System, edited by A. Cerrillo and P. Fabra. Hershey PA, USA: IGI Global, 2009.
  24. M. Fabri. “Policies to Enhance the Quality of Justice in Europe.” In L’administration De La Justice En Europe Et L’évaluation De Sa Qualité, edited by M. Fabri, H. Pauliat and P. Langbroek, 6983. Paris: Montchrestien, 2005.
  25. M. Hildebrandt. “Algorithmic Regulation and the Rule of Law.” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A., no. 376 (2018): 11. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2017.0355
  26. M. Hildebrandt. “The Circulation of Agency in Judicial Proceedings: Designing for Interoperability and Complexity.” Chap. 1 In The Circulation of Agency in E-Justice, edited by F. Contini and G. F. Lanzara. Law, Governance and Technology Series, 332. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2014. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7525-1_1
  27. P. Bing, M. K. Sharma, and J. K. Godla. “Critical Issues Affecting an Erp Implementation.” Information Systems Management 16, no. 3 (1999): 714. DOI: 10.1201/1078/43197.16.3.19990601/31310.2
  28. R. Pichler. Agile Product Management with Scrum. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2010.
  29. R. Susskind. Online Courts and the Future of Justice. Oxford: OUP, 2019. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198838364.001.0001
  30. S. Gosain. “Enterprise Information Systems as Objects and Carriers of Institutional Forces: The New Iron Cage?”. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5, no. 4 (2004): 15182. DOI: 10.17705/1jais.00049
  31. T. Bunjevac. Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium. An Institutional and Policy Framework. Singapore: Springer, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-33-6506-3
  32. T. E. Bell, and T. A. Thayer. “Software Requirements: Are They Really a Problem?” Paper presented at the ICSE ‘76 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Software engineering, 1976.
  33. TRConsult. Quick Scan Review Kei. Review Op Risicobeheersing En Basis Succescondities Voor Grote Ict-Trajecten. Rechtspraak (Den Haag: 5 April 2018 2018). https://www.rechtspraak.nl/SiteCollectionDocuments/2018-rapport-review-commissie.pdf.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.445 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 6 - 6
Published on: Apr 22, 2022
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2022 Dory Reiling, Francesco Contini, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.