Taking and Sharing Photographs of Virtual Court Proceedings to Social Media: A Critical Appraisal on the Law of Contempt in Malaysia
References
- A G Kalidas, President of Malaysian Bar. (14 Jan 2022). Speech at the Opening of the Legal Year 2022 (at Palace of Justice, Putrajaya).
https://www.malaysianbar.org.my/cms/upload_files/document/Speech%20by%20A%20G%20Kalidas%20(President,%20Malaysian%20Bar)%20at%20the%20Opening%20of%20the%20Legal%20Year%202022%20(14%20Jan%202022).pdf - Aileen Wingblad. (8.1.2020). Supreme Court gives OK for public to bring phones, laptop into court. The Oakland Press.
https://www.theoaklandpress.com/news/local/supreme-court-gives-ok-for-public-to-bring-cell-phones-laptops-into-court/article_68034dc2-3239-11ea-86ac-2f22514f250c.html - Albert Fox Cahn & Melissa Giddings. (17.07.2020). Virtual Justice: Online Courts During Covid-19. Surveillance Technology Oversight Project.
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5c1bfc7eee175995a4ceb638/t/5f11ee5cc2f36c756ea9620d/1595010663758/Online+courts+white+paper - Anis Hazim. (17 Jan 2022). Virtual court hearing to remain post-Covid. The Malaysian Reserve website.
https://themalaysianreserve.com/2022/01/17/virtual-court-hearing-to-remain-post-covid/ - Anjelica Cappellino, J.D. (31.08.2020). Texas Court Hears Nation’s First Criminal Jury Trial Via Zoom. Expert Institute.
https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/texas-court-hears-nations-first-criminal-jury-trial-via-zoom/ - Apoorva Mandhani. (26.08.2020). Contempt against lawyer for posting screenshot of hearing, HC lets him go after apology. The Print (Judiciary).
https://theprint.in/judiciary/contempt-against-lawyer-for-posting-screenshot-of-hearing-hc-lets-him-go-after-apology/489400/ - Ariana Tanoos. (2017). Shielding the Presumption of Innocence from Pretrial Media Coverage. Vol. 5, Indiana Law Review. 997–1022.
https://mckinneylaw.iu.edu/ILR/pdf/vol50p997.pdf . DOI: 10.18060/4806.1159 - Bar Council Circular Malaysia. (18.08.2020). Circular No. 265/2020. Malaysian Bar.
https://www.malaysianbar.org.my/cms/upload_files/document/Circular%20No%20265-2020.pdf - Bernama. (13 July 2019). Man goes berserk in Court. Daily Express website.
http://www.dailyexpress.com.my/news/137734/man-goes-berserk-in-court/ - Browning, J. (2014). #Snitches get stitches: Witness intimidation in the age of Facebook and twitter. Pace Law Review, 35(1), 192–214.
- Charnley, M. V. (1950). Should courtroom proceedings be broadcast. Federal Communications Bar Journal, 11(2), 64–72.
- Chief Justice Federal Court of Malaysia. (10 September 2021). Malaysian Chief Justice’s Practice Direction No.10/2021.
https://intranet.kehakiman.gov.my/EAA/arahanamalan/84282-2021-EAA.pdf - Clerk’s Office, Circuit Court for Calvent County, MD (2021). Policy Regarding Cell Phones and Other Electronic Device. Maryland Courts.
https://www.courts.state.md.us/clerks/calvert/cellphones - Cooper, MN. (2002). Inequality in digital society: why the digital divide deserves all the attention it gets. Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, 20(1): 73–134.
- Cunliffe, E. (2012). Open justice: Concepts and judicial approaches. Federal Law Review, 40(3), 385–412. DOI: 10.22145/flr.40.3.4
- David W. Robertson. (1959). Constitutional Law – Contempt Conviction for Out-of-Court Photography. 19 La. L. Rev. 693–700.
https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2718&context=lalrev - Department of Health & Social Care (UK). (26.3.2020). Guidance: What the Coronavirus Bill will do. Gov.UK.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-bill-what-it-will-do/what-the-coronavirus-bill-will-do - Diamond L. (2010). Liberation technology. Journal of Democracy, 21(3): 69–83. DOI: 10.1353/jod.0.0190
- Femminella, J. (2003). Online Terms and Conditions Agreements: Bound by the Web. St. John’s Journal of Legal Commentary, 17(1), 87–126.
- Frederick I. Lederer. (1998). The Courtroom as a Stop on the Information Superhighway. 71 AustralianJ.L.Reform 4.
- Hutchinson, T. (2015). The Doctrinal Method: Incorporating Interdisciplinary Methods in Reforming the Law. Erasmus Law Review, 8(3), 130–[i]. DOI: 10.5553/ELR.000055
- Jason Bosland and Judith Townend. (2018). Open Justice, Transparency, and the Media: Representing the Public Interest in the Physical and Virtual Courtroom.’ (2018) 23(4) Communications Law 183.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3336948 - John Nevin (Communications Director). (08.01.2020). Supreme Court Adopts Rule Change to Allow Cell Phones in Courts. Michigan Courts New Release.
https://www.courts.michigan.gov/48daf4/siteassets/news-releases/media-release-cell-phone-order-final.pdf - Jones, R. (1940). Law of Journalism, including Matters Relating to the Freedom of the Press, Libel, Contempt of Court, Property Rights in News, and Regulation of Advertising. Washington, D.C., Washington Law Book Co.
- Livingston, M. (2000). Disobedience and contempt. Washington Law Review, 75(2), 345–428.
- Malaysian Bar. (29.04.2020). Remote Hearing Protocol: Practice and Procedures.
https://www.malaysianbar.org.my/cms/upload_files/document/Remote%20Hearing%20Protocol%20%7C%20Practice%20and%20Procedures%20%7C%20A%20Proposal.pdf - Michael Legg & Anthony Song. (2021). The Courts, the remote hearing and the pandemic: from action to reflection. UNSW Law Journal, 44(1), 126 – 166. DOI: 10.53637/ZATE4122
- Nelson Anguilar. (27.03.2020). Disable Photo, Screen & URL Sharing for Participants on Zoom To Prevent Unwanted Images during Video Calls. Gadget Hacks.
https://smartphones.gadgethacks.com/how-to/disable-photo-screen-url-sharing-for-participants-zoom-prevent-unwanted-images-during-video-calls-0279848/ - Nurbaiti Hamdan. (23.04.2020). Historic first as Court of Appeal successfully hears appeal via tele-conference. The Star.
https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2020/04/23/historic-first-as-court-of-appeal-successfully-hears-appeal-via-teleconference - Official Portal of Office of the Chief Registrar Federal Court of Malaysia. (Updated 2021). Open Court Etiquette. Kehakiman.
http://www.kehakiman.gov.my/en/node/1939 > - Panduan Pelaksanaan Sistem E-Appellate. Kehakiman.
http://www.kehakiman.gov.my/ms/infografik-garis-panduan-pelaksanaaan-sistem-e-appellate - Pejabat Ketua Pendaftar Mahkamah Persekutuan Malaysia. (31.10.2020). Infografik Garis
- Pekeliling. (16.03.1999). Pekeliling Ketua Pendaftar Bil 1 Tahun 1999. Mahkamah Persekutuan Malaysia Bangunan Sultan Abdul Samad.
https://intranet.kehakiman.gov.my/EAA/arahanamalan/38%20Pekeliling%20KP%20Bil%201%201999.pdf - Rebecca Ratcliffe and agencies. (20.05.2020). Singapore sentences man to death via zoom call. The Guardian.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/20/singapore-sentences-man-to-death-via-zoom-call - Richard B. Kuhns. (1978). The Summary Contempt Power: A critique and a New Perspective. The Yale Law Journal, 88(39), 39–124. DOI: 10.2307/795678
- Sarvinder Kaur. (2011).
Potential Challenges in a Witness Protection Programme in Malaysia . PertanikaJ. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 19(2): 363–368 © Universiti Putra Malaysia Press. - Shahrul Mizan Ismail. (2016). The Right to Fair Trial: A Primordial Protection or A Maladroit Marchen? The Law Review. Sweet & Maxwell. 402–414.
- Sharanjit Singh. (9 May 2019). Najib: I did not take a selfie in court. New Straits Times website.
https://www.nst.com.my/news/crime-courts/2019/05/487055/najib-i-did-not-take-selfie-court - Shelly Banjo. (07.04.2020). Digital Courtrooms Put Justice on Youtube, Zoom. Bloomberg.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2020-04-07/digital-courtrooms-put-justice-on-youtube-zoom - Sira Habibu. (08.07.2020). Zoom-ing on justice: Courts to use videoconferencing to hear criminal cases in Sabah and Sarawak. The Star.
https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2020/07/08/zoom-ing-in-on-justice-courts-to-use-video-conferencing-to-hear-criminal-cases-in-sabah-and-sarawak - Slater, C. (2018). The Duet on the Internet: Balancing Sharing Information and Protecting the Right of Publicity on Social Media. AIPLA Quarterly Journal, 46(4), 457–512.
- States Court Singapore. (06.05.2021). Information for Visitors. A Singapore Government Agency Website.
https://www.statecourts.gov.sg/cws/Pages/Information-for-visitors.aspx - Tan Sri Idrus bin Harun, The Attorney General of Malaysia. (14 Jan 2022). Speech at the Opening of the Legal Year 2022 (at Palace of Justice, Putrajaya).
https://www.kehakiman.gov.my/sites/default/files/2021-12/Ucapan/SP20220114AG.pdf - The Right Honourable The Chief Justice of Malaysia, Tun Tengku Maimun binti Tuan Mat. (2022). Access to Justice and New Normal. Journal of Malaysian Judiciary, 1–16.
https://www.jac.gov.my/spk/images/stories/4_penerbitan/journal_malaysian_judiciary/januari2022.pdf - The Sun. (14 Jan 2022). Online court proceedings are here to stay, says chief justice.
https://www.thesundaily.my/local/online-court-proceedings-are-here-to-stay-says-chief-justice-HX8761238 - Venugopal, A.V, ‘Uncertainties and Inconsistencies in the Law of Contempt of Court in Malaysia’ [2012] Tesis FUU UKM 1 – 321.
- Walker, C., Cram, I., & Brogarth, D. (1992). The Reporting of Crown Court Proceedings and the Contempt of Court Act 1981. Modern Law Review, 55(5), 647–669. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.1992.tb02840.x
- W.G.Soden, Registrar. (25.03.2014). Communication Devices. Federal Court of Australia.
https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/law-and-practice/communication-devices - Youm, K. (2012). Cameras in the courtroom in the twenty-first century: The U.S. supreme court learning from abroad. Brigham Young University Law Review, 6, 1989–2032.
- Zachariah B. Parry. (2009). Digital Manipulation and Photographic Evidence: Defrauding the Courts one Thousand Words at a Time. Vol.1, Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, 175–202.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.406 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 4 - 4
Published on: Aug 10, 2022
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2022 Shahrul Mizan Ismail, Teoh Shu Yee, Safinaz Mohd Hussein, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.