Abstract
How can we measure judicial reasoning? This question has been around for a long time and several researchers, judges and sociologists have tried to answer it in an attempt to define the process of measurement. Despite a large body of studies available, there are many diverse opinions about this subject and it is not clear what impact these works have on the ways judicial decisions are justified. The reason for differences in measuring the quality of judicial reasoning and setting clear indicators could be attributed to the complexities involved in identifying the process that lead to measurement of quality of judicial reasoning. Following a conference at the University of Debrecen in Hungary, during which authors have reflected on this issue, a book entitled’’how to measure the quality of judicial reasoning’’ has come.
© 2022 Samira Allioui, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
