References
- Carnevali,
D. (2009).
“E-Justice and Policies for Risk Management” , in Cerrillo, M. and P. Fabra (eds.), E-Justice: ICT in the Court System, Hershey, PA, IGI Global: 19–35. - Carnevali,
D. (2010),
Identification of best practices on the use of new technologies in
judicial sector. Database,
Project Effective Justice, The Role of new Technologies in the Transformation of the Judicial System , Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC, USA. - Chapman,
P. (2020),
Understanding Access to Justice, World
Justice Project, October 2020,
https://worldjusticeproject.org/news/understanding-access-justice-covid-19-era . - Ciborra, C. and O. Hanseth (1998), “From Tool to Gestell”, Information Technology and People, 11(4): 305–27. DOI: 10.1108/09593849810246129
- Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE) (2011), Opinion 14 on Justice and Information Technologie”, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France
- Contini
F. (2000),
“Reinventing the Docket, Discovering the Data Base: The Divergent Adoption of IT in the Italian Judicial Offices” , in Fabri, M. and P. M. Langbroek. (eds.), The Challenge of Change for Judicial System, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, IOS Press. - Contini
F. (2001),
“Dynamics of ICT Diffusion in European Judicial Systems” , in Fabri, M. and Contini, F. (eds.) Justice and Technology in Europe. How ICT is Changing Judicial Business, The Hague, The Netherlands, Kluwer Law International. - Contini, F. and A. Cordella (2015), Assembling Law and Technology in the Public Sector: The Case of e-Justice Reforms. Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research 30: 124–32. DOI: 10.1145/2757401.2757418
- Contini F. and G.F. Lanzara (eds) (2009), ICT and Innovation in the Public Sector, Trowbridge, UK, Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230227293
- Cordella, A. and C. M. Bonina (2012), “A Public Value Perspective for ICT-Enabled Public Sector Reforms: A Theoretical Reflection”, Government Information Quarterly 29(4): 512–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.004
- Cordella
A. and
F.
Contini (2020),
Digital Technologies for Better Justice: A toolkit for
Action, Inter-American Development Bank/World
Bank, Washington D.C.,
https://publications.iadb.org/en/digital-technologies-for-better-justice-a-toolkit-for-action . DOI: 10.18235/0002297 - Cordella, A. and N. Tempini (2015), “E-government and Organizational Change: Reappraising the Role of ICT and Bureaucracy in Public Service Delivery”, Government Information Quarterly 32: 279–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.005
- Cusatellia C. and M. Giacalone (2014), Evaluation indices of the judicial system and ICT developments in civil procedure, Innovation and Society Conference, IES 2013, Procedia Economics and Finance 17, 2014, 113–120. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00885-5
- Doteveryone
(2018), People, Power and Technology: the 2018 Digital
Attitudes Report,
https://www.doteveryone.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/People-Power-and-Technology - Dutch temporary committee on
government ICT projects (2014), Conclusions
and recommendations, October 2014,
https://www.houseofrepresentatives.nl/sites/default/files/news_items/conclusions_and_recommendations_0.pdf . - European Commission for the
Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) (2016), European
Judicial Systems, Use of Information Technology in European Courts in
2016,
Council of Europe , Strasbourg, France: CEPEJ – Council of Europe,https://public.tableau.com/profile/cepej#!/vizhome/CEPEJ-GlobalIT-2016/ITDashboard . - European Commission for the
Efficiency of Justice (2017), Guidelines on
how to drive change towards Cyberjustice. Stock-tacking of tools deployed
and summary of good practices, as adopted at the 28th meeting of
CEPEJ, 7
December 2016,
https://edoc.coe.int/en/efficiency-of-justice/7501-guidelines-on-how-to-drive-change-towards-cyberjustice-stock-taking-of-tools-deployed-and-summary-of-good-practices.html - European Commission for the
Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) (2019a),
Promoting Cyberjustice in Spain through Change Management and
Improvement of Data Collection,
https://www.coe.int/en/web/cepej/promoting-cyberjustice-in-spain-through-change-management-and-improvement-of-data-collection - European Commission for the
Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) (2019b), CEPEJ
European Ethical Charter on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in
judicial systems and their environment, Council of
Europe, Strasbourg, France,
https://www.coe.int/en/web/cepej/cepej-european-ethical-charter-on-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-ai-in-judicial-systems-and-their-environment . - European Commission for the
Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) (2020a),
European judicial systems evaluation report 2020 evaluation cycle
(2018 data), Strasbourg,
Council of Europe,
https://rm.coe.int/evaluation-report-part-1-english/16809fc058 - European Commission for the
Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) (2020b), CEPEJ
declaration. Lessons learnt and challenges faced by the judiciary during and
after the Covid-19 pandemic,
https://www.coe.int/en/web/cepej/impact-and-lessons-of-the-health-crisis-on-the-efficiency-of-justice-and-the-functioning-of-judicial-systems . - European Union
Commission (2019), eGovernment Benchmark 2019.
Empowering Europeans through trusted digital public services,
https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/sites/digital-agenda/files/newsroom/egovernment_benchmark_2019_insight_report_f-01-small_50357.jpg - European Union
Commission (2020a), The 2020
EU Justice Scoreboard,
https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/justice_scoreboard_2020_en.pdf - European Union
Commission (2020b), Digital Economy and
Society Index Report (DESI) 2020 Digital public services,
https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/digital-public-services-scoreboard - European Union
Commission (2020c), Digital Economy and
Society Index Report (DESI) 2020 – Use of Internet Services,
https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/use-internet - European Union
Commission (2020d), Communication from the
Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic
and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions, Digitalisation of justice
in the European Union. A toolbox of opportunities,
December 2020,
https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12547-Digitalisation-of-justice-in-the-European-Union - European Union
Commission (2020e), Algorithmic
Awareness-Building, Policy, June 2020,
https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/algorithmic-awareness-building - European Union
Commission (2020f), Comparative Table on
Covid-19 Impact on Civil Proceedings, European Commission, Directorate
General Justice and Consumers,
https://e-justice.europa.eu/content_impact_of_the_covid19_virus_on_the_justice_field-37147-en.do - European Union Ministerial
Meeting (2017), Tallin declaration on
e-government, 6
October 2017,
https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/ministerial-declaration-egovernment-tallinn-declaration - Fabri
M. (2001),
“State of the Art, Critical Issues and Trends of ICT in European Judicial Systems” , in:Fabri, M. and Contini, F. (eds.), Justice and Technology in Europe. How ICT is Changing the Judicial Business, The Hague, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International - Fabri
M. (2004),
“Information and Communication Technology for Justice: the Italian Experience” , in Oskamp, A., A.R. Lodder and M. Apistola (eds), IT Support of the Judiciary, The Hague, Asser/Cambridge University Press - Fabri M. (ed.) (2008), ICT for the Public Prosecutor’s Offices, Bologna, Italy, Clueb
- Fabri
M. (2009),
“E-justice in Finland and in Italy: Enabling versus Constraining Models” , in F. Contini and G.F. Lanzara (eds), ICT and Innovation in the Public Sector, Trowbridge, UK, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 115–146. DOI: 10.1057/9780230227293_6 - Fabri
M. (2009a),
“The Italian Style of E-Justice in a Comparative Perspective” , in A. Cerrillo and P. Fabra (eds), Information and Communication Technologies in the Court System, Hershey, PA., USA, IGI Publishing, 2009, pp. 1–19. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4.ch001 - Fabri M (2012), Some European and Australian e-Justice services, Bologna, IRSIG-CNR, ISBN 978-88-97439-04-2.
- Fabri M. and F. Contini (eds.) (2001), Justice and Technology in Europe. How ICT is Changing Judicial Business, The Hague, The Netherlands, Kluwer Law International
- Fabri M. and F. Contini (eds.) (2003), Judicial Electronic Data Interchange in Europe: Applications, Policies and Trends, Bologna, Italy: Lo Scarabeo
- Fielding,
N. et al (2020),
Video Enabled Justice Evaluation,
University of Surrey,
http://spccweb.thco.co.uk/media/4807/university-of-surrey-video-enabled-justice-final-report-ver-11.pdf - HM Courts & Tribunals
Service (2016), Modernisation of justice
through technology and innovation,
https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/modernisation-of-justice-through-technology-and-innovation - Houg B.R. (2012), “Let’s not make it worse: Issues to consider in adopting new technology”, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 26, n. 1, pp. 256–266.
- Houg B.R. and R. Zorza (2012), “Tech-supported triage: the key to maximizing effectiveness and access”, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 26, n. 1, pp. 292–304.
- Kallinikos,
J. (2009),
“Institutional complexities and functional simplification. The case of Money Claims Online. ICT and innovation in the public sector” , in Contini F. and G. F. Lanzara (eds.) European studies in the making of e-government, Basingstoke (UK), Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230227293_8 - Kujanen,
K. and
S.
Sarvilinna (2001),
“Approaching Integration: ICT in the Finnish Judicial System” , in Fabri M. and F. Contini (eds.) Justice and Technology in Europe: How ICT is Changing Judicial Business, The Hague, The Netherlands, Kluwer Law International. - Justice
(2018), Preventing Digital Exclusion from Online
Justice,
https://justice.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Preventing-Digital-Exclusion-from-Online-Justice.pdf - (The) Law Society
(2019), Technology, Access to Justice and the Rule of
Law,
https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/support-services/research-trends/documents/technology-access-to-justicerule-of-law-report/ - (The) Law Society
(2020), The Law Society’s response to the Civil
Justice Council’s rapid consultation on the impact of COVID-19
measures on the civil justice system, May 2020,
https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/campaigns/consultation-responses/civil-justice-council-impact-of-covid-19-measures-on-the-civil-justice-system - Lupo
G. (2014),
“Law Technology and System Architecture: Critical
Design Factors for Money Claim and Possession Claim Online in England and
Wales” in Contini,
F. and
Lanzara,
G.F. (eds.), The
Circulation of Agency in e-Justice, Interoperability and infrastructures for
Europe trans-border judicial proceedings,
Dordrecht,
Springer . DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7525-1_4 - Lupo
G. (2016),
“Evaluating e-Justice: The Design of an Assessment Framework for e-Justice Systems” , in Benyekhlef K., J. Bailey, J. Burkell and F. Gélinas (Eds.), Access to Justice, University of Ottawa Press, Canada,https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/j.ctt1wn0qx3.7.pdf - Lupo,
G. (2019),
“Regulating (Artificial) Intelligence in Justice: How
Normative Frameworks Protect Citizens from the Risks Related to AI Use in
the Judiciary”, European Quarterly of
Political Attitudes and Mentalities,
8(2),
75–96.
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-62463-8 - Ministero della
Giustizia (2017), Tre anni di
obbligatorietà del processo civile telematico (PCT),
presentazione,
https://www.processociviletelematico.it/2017/08/01/processo-civile-telematico-i-dati-ufficiali-del-ministero-della-giustizia-a-3-anni-dall-obbligatorieta/ - OECD
(2016), Skills for a Digital World. Policy brief on the
future of work, OECD Publishing,
Paris.
https://www.oecd.org/els/emp/Skills-for-a-Digital-World.pdf - OECD (2020), COVID and access to justice, forthcoming.
- OECD and World Justice Project (2019), White paper on Building a Business Case for Access to Justice, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and World Justice Project.
- Office of National
Statistics (2019), Exploring the UK’s
Digital Divide 2019.
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/householdcharacteristics/homeinternetandsocialmediausage/articles/exploringtheuksdigitaldivide/2019-03-04 - Parliamentary Assembly of the
Council of Europe (2015), Resolution 2054.
Equality and non-discrimination in the access to justice,
http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=21753&lang=en - Plotnikoff,
J.,
Woolfson,
R., and
Lyons,
S. (2001),
“The Technological Challenge of a Fragmented Justice System: ICT in England and Wales” , in Fabri, M. and F. Contini (eds.) Justice and Technology in Europe: How ICT is Changing the Judicial Business, The Hague, The Netherlands, Dodrecht, Kluwer Law International - Pope
R. (2020), The
Online Resolution Service: a prototype of a shared platform for online
complaints,
https://www.doteveryone.org.uk/2020/05/the-online-resolution-service-a-prototype-of-a-shared-platform-for-online-complaints/ - Reiling, D. (2009), Technology for Justice. How Information Technology can support Judicial Reform, Leiden University Press, The Netherlands. DOI: 10.5117/9789087280710
- Susskind, R. (2017), Tomorrow’s lawyers. An introduction to our future, Oxford University Press. UK
- UNODOC
(2020), Ensuring Access to Justice in the
Context of COVID-19, United Nations Development Program, May
2020,
https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/democratic-governance/access_to_justiceandruleoflaw/ensuring-access-to-justice-in-the-context-of-covid-19-.html - Velicogna,
M. (2007),
Justice Systems and ICT. What can be learned from Europe,
“Utrecht Law Review”, Vo.
3, n. 3, pp.
129–147,
https://www.utrechtlawreview.org/articles/abstract/10.18352/ulr.41/ . DOI: 10.18352/ulr.41 - Velicogna,
M. (2009), Use
of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in European Judicial
Systems, European Commission for the Efficiency of
Justice, Council of Europe, Strasbourg,
France,
http://euromed-justiceii.eu/files/repository/20090706170627_UseofinformationandcommunicationtechnologiesinEuropeansystems.Coe.pdf - Velicogna,
M. (2020),
Cross-border civil litigation in the EU: what can we learn from
Covid-19 emergency national e-justice experiences?,
paper prepared for the “e Meets justice
websact:e-justiceas enabler for cross-border e-commerce in
Europe?, 30
November 2020,
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3737648 . DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3737648 - Wallace,
A. (2003),
“Judicial Electronic Data Interchange in Australia” in M. Fabri and F. Contini (eds.) Judicial Electronic Data Interchange in Europe: Applications, Policies and Trends, Bologna, Lo Scarabeo: 67–102 - Wallace,
A. (2009),
“E-Justice: an Australian Perspective” , in Cerrillo, A. and P. Fabra (eds.) E-Justice: Information and Communication Technologies in the Court System, Hershey, IGI, 204–228. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-998-4.ch014 - Zorza, R. (2013), Principles and Best Practices for Access-Friendly Court Electronic Filing, National Center for State Courts, Williamsburg, VA
- Zou,
M. (2020),
Virtual Justice in the Time of COVID-19,
University of Oxford Business Law Blog,
March 2020,
https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/business-law-blog/blog/2020/03/virtual-justice-time-covid-19
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.384 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 2 - 2
Published on: May 6, 2021
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2021 Marco Fabri, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.