Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Ministerial Emergency Powers Over Court Administration in the Israeli Judiciary Cover

Ministerial Emergency Powers Over Court Administration in the Israeli Judiciary

By:   
Open Access
|May 2021

References

  1. Albert, R. and Y. Roznai (eds.), Constitutionalism under Extreme Conditions: Law, Emergency, Exception. Springer, Switzerland, 2020. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-49000-3
  2. Andenas, M. and D. Fairgrieve, Judicial Independence and Accountability: National Traditions and Standards, in: Canivet, G, Andenas, M. and D. Fairgrieve (eds.), Independence, Accountability, and the Judiciary. BIICL, London, 2006.
  3. Baar, C, Benyekhlef, K, Gélinas, F, Hann, R. and L. Sossin, Alternative Models of Court Administration, Canadian Judicial Council, 2006.
  4. Bermant, G. and R. R. Wheeler, Federal Judges and the Judicial Branch: Their Independence and Accountability. Mercer Law Review, vol. 46, 1994, p. 836
  5. Blisa, A. and D. Kosař, Court Presidents: The Missing Piece in the Puzzle of Judicial Governance. German Law Journal, vol. 19, 2018, p. 2031. DOI: 10.1017/S2071832200023324
  6. Burbank, S. B. and B. Friedman, Reconsidering Judicial Independence, in: S. B. Burbank and B. Friedman (eds.), Judicial Independence at the Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Approach, Sage, London 2002.
  7. Cohen, A, Checks and Balances: The Override Clause and its Effect on the Three Branches of Government. Israel Democracy Institute, Jerusalem, 2018 [Hebrew].
  8. Contini, F. and R. Mohr, Reconciling Independence and Accountability in Judicial Systems. Utrecht Law Review, vol. 3, 2007, p. 26. DOI: 10.18352/ulr.46
  9. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ), National judiciaries’ COVID-19 emergency measures of COE member States. Strasbourg, Council of Europe/CEPEJ, 2021 <https://www.coe.int/en/web/cepej/national-judiciaries-covid-19-emergency-measures-of-coe-member-states> [accessed 8 February 2021].
  10. Ferejohn, J. A. and L. D. Kramer, Independent Judges, Dependent Judiciary: Institutionalizing Judicial Restraint. New York University Law Review, vol. 77, 2002, p. 962.
  11. Ferejohn, J. A. and P. Pasquino, The Law of the Exception: A Typology of Emergency Powers. International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 2, 2004, 210. DOI: 10.1093/icon/2.2.210
  12. Fitzpatrick, P. J, Management of the Courts: the Irish Experience. International Journal for Court Administration, vol. 2, 2008, 56. DOI: 10.18352/ijca.103
  13. Garoupa, N. and T. Ginsburg, Judicial Reputation: A Comparative Theory. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2015. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226290621.001.0001
  14. Gibson, J. L, Caldeira, G. A. and L. K. Spence, Measuring Attitudes toward the United States Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 47, 2003, p. 354. DOI: 10.1111/1540-5907.00025
  15. Gross, O, Chaos and Rules: Should Responses to Violent Crises Always be Constitutional? The Yale Law Journal, vol. 112, 2003, 1011. DOI: 10.2307/3657515
  16. Gross, O. and F. N. Aoláin, Law in Times of Crisis: Emergency Powers in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511493997
  17. Guarnieri, C, Judicial Independence in Europe: Threat or Resource for Democracy?. Representations, vol. 49, 2013, p. 347. DOI: 10.1080/00344893.2013.830486
  18. Jarvis, S, Coronavirus: The Latest Court Closures and Restrictions. Law360, 5 February 2021, <https://www.law360.com/articles/1252836/coronavirus-the-latest-court-closures-and-restrictions> [accessed 8 February 2021].
  19. Kahana, A, How Is the Court System Dealing with Corona Limitations? Makor Rishon, 15 November 2020, <https://www.makorrishon.co.il/news/282781/> [accessed 10 December 2020].
  20. Kershner, I, Citing Threat to Israeli Democracy, Netanyahu Opponents Take Battle to Supreme Court. New York Times (22 March 2020).
  21. Kosař D, Beyond Judicial Councils: Forms, Rationales and Impact of Judicial Self-Governance in Europe. German Law Journal, vol. 19, 2018, p. 1567. DOI: 10.1017/S2071832200023178
  22. Kosař, D, Perils of Judicial Self-Government in Transitional Societies. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2016. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316282519
  23. Langer, M. and D. A. Sklansky, Prosecutors and Democracy: A Cross-National Study. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2017. DOI: 10.1017/9781316941461
  24. Langbroek, P. M, Organization Development of the Dutch Judiciary, between Accountability and Judicial Independence. International Journal for Court Administration, vol. 2, 2010, p. 21. DOI: 10.18352/ijca.39
  25. Liptak A, Latest Question for Supreme Court: How to Rule on a Crowded Docket During a Pandemic. The New York Times (9 April 2020).
  26. Lurie, G, Reichman, A. and Y. Sagy, Agencification and the Administration of Courts in Israel. Regulation and Governance, vol. 14, 2020, pp. 718740. DOI: 10.1111/rego.12236
  27. Mak, E, Judicial Self Government in the Netherlands: Demarcating Autonomy. German Law Journal, vol. 19(7), 2018, pp. 18011838. DOI: 10.1017/S2071832200023245
  28. Mikuli, P, Fox, N. and R. Puchta, Ministers of Justice in Comparative Perspective, The Netherlands: Eleven International Publishing, 2019.
  29. Millar, P. S. and C. Baar, Judicial Administration in Canada. McGill-Queens University Press, 1981. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1w1vn82
  30. Neocleous, M, The Problem with Normality: Taking Exception to ‘Permanent Emergency’. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, vol. 31, 2006, p. 191. DOI: 10.1177/030437540603100204
  31. Pasquino, P, Prolegomena to a Theory of Judicial Power: The Concept of Judicial Independence in Theory and History. The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, vol. 2, 2003, p. 11. DOI: 10.1163/157180303100420177
  32. Popova, M, Politicized Justice in Emerging Democracies: A Study of Courts in Russia and Ukraine. CUP, Cambridge, 2012. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139055345
  33. Schmitt, C, Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006 [1922]. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226738901.001.0001
  34. Shetreet, S, Judicial Independence: New Conceptual Dimensions and Contemporary Challenges, in: Shetreet, S. and J. Deschênes eds., Judicial Independence: The Contemporary Debate. Kluwer Law International, 1985.
  35. Smith, B. C, Models of Judicial Administration and the Independence of the Judiciary: A Comparison of Romanian Self-Management and the Czech Executive Model. Public Administration Developments, vol. 28, 2008, p. 85. DOI: 10.1002/pad.483
  36. Susskind, R, The Future of Courts. The Practice, vol. 6(5), July 2020.
  37. Tonry, M. (ed.), Prosecutors and Politics: A Comparative Perspective. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2012. DOI: 10.1086/666975
  38. Urbániková, M. and K. Šipulová, Failed Expectations: Does the Establishment of Judicial Councils Enhance Confidence in Courts?. German Law Journal, vol. 19(7), 2018, pp. 21052136. DOI: 10.1017/S2071832200023348
  39. van Dijk, F. and H. Dumbrava, Judiciary in Times of Scarcity: Retrenchment and Reform. International Journal for Court Administration, vol. 5, 2013, p. 15. DOI: 10.18352/ijca.4
  40. Vapnek, J, 21 Cost-Saving Measures for the Judiciary. International Journal for Court Administration, vol. 5, 2013, p. 55. DOI: 10.18352/ijca.7
  41. Voermans, W, Councils for the Judiciary in Europe. Tilburg Foreign Law Review, vol. 8, 2000, p. 121. DOI: 10.1163/221125900X00116
  42. Wallace, C, Judicial Administration in a System of Independents: A Tribe with Only Chiefs. Brigham Young University Law Review, vol. 1978, 1978, p. 39.
  43. Woodhouse, D, The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 – Defending Judicial Independence the English Way. International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 5, 2007, p. 153. DOI: 10.1093/icon/mol039
  44. Yein Ng, G, Quality of Judicial Organisation and Checks and Balances. Intersentia, Antwerp, 2007.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.383 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 8 - 8
Published on: May 6, 2021
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Guy Lurie, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.