Judicial Responses to COVID-19 Attack: Impacts on the Working Conditions of Portuguese Courts
References
- A. Blackham, Reconceiving Judicial Office through a Labour Law lens. Federal Law Review, 47(2) pp. 203–230. DOI: 10.1177/0067205X19831826
- A. C. Ferreira, J. P. Dias, M. Duarte, P. Fernando, A. Campos, Quem são os nossos magistrados? Caracterização profissional dos juízes e magistrados do Ministério Público em Portugal, Coimbra, CES/UC. 2014 <
https://estudogeral.sib.uc.pt/bitstream/10316/86801/1/Relat%c3%b3rio%20Final%20Quem%20s%c3%a3o%20os%20nossos%20magistrados%202014.pdf > [accessed 21 April 2020]. - A. N. Gonçalves, Administrador judiciário: um ano na nova estrutura judiciária. Revista Julgar, 27 pp. 177–191.
- C. Na, T. Choo, J. A. Klingfuss, The causes and consequences of job-related stress among prosecutors. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 43 pp. 329–35. DOI: 10.1007/s12103-017-9396-4
- C. Thomas, 2014 UK Judicial Attitude Survey. Report of findings covering salaried judges in England & Wales courts and UK Tribunals, London, UCL Judicial Institute, 2015.
- C. Thomas, 2016 UK Judicial Attitude Survey. Report of findings covering salaried judges in England & Wales courts and UK Tribunals, London, UCL Judicial Institute, 2017.
- CSM. 2020. O Conselho Superior da Magistratura é um órgão constitucional, colegial e autónomo. <
https://www.csm.org.pt/csm/ > [accessed 13 October 2020]. - CSMP. 2020. Conselho Superior do Ministério Público. <
https://www.ministeriopublico.pt/pagina/conselho-superior-do-ministerio-publico > [accessed 13 October 2020]. - CSTAF. 2020. Apresentação. <
http://www.cstaf.pt/ > [accessed 13 October 2020]. - D. M. Flores, M. K. Miller, J. Chamberlain, J. T. Richardson, B. H. Bornstein, Judges’ Perspectives on Stress and Safety in the Courtroom: An Exploratory Study. Court Review: The Journal of the American Judges Association, 45(3) pp. 76–89.
- DGAJ. 2020. About DGAJ. <
https://dgaj.justica.gov.pt/English/About-DGAJ > [accessed 13 October 2020]. - IGFEJ. 2020. Quem Somos. <
https://igfej.justica.gov.pt/Sobre-o-IGFEJ/Quem-somos > [accessed 13 October 2020]. - J. P. Dias, C. Gomes, Judicial Reforms ‘Under Pressure’: The New Map/Organisation of the Portuguese Judicial System. Utrecht Law Review, 14(1) pp. 174–186. DOI: 10.18352/ulr.448
- K. Mack, S. Roach Anleu, The National Survey of Australian Judges: An overview of findings. Journal of Judicial Administration, 18(1) pp. 5–21.
- P. Branco, Courthouses as Spaces of Recognition, Functionality and Access to Law and Justice: A Portuguese Reflection. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 6(3) pp. 426–441.
- P. Casaleiro, T. Maneca Lima, A. P. Relvas, M. Henriques, J. P. Dias, Working conditions and Quality of work: reflections for a study of judicial professions. International Journal on Working Conditions, 18 pp. 83–97.
- P. Fernando, Intertwining Judicial Reforms and the Use of ICT in Courts: A Brief Description of the Portuguese Experience. European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities, 8(2) pp. 7–20.
- P. R. Gil-Monte, J. López-Víllchez, J. Llorca-Rubio, J. Sánchez Piernas, Prevalencia de riesgos psicosociales en personal de la administración de justicia de la Comunidad Valenciana (España). Liberabit, 22(1) pp. 7–19. DOI: 10.24265/liberabit.2016.v22n1.01
- Palumbo, Giuliana; Giupponi, Giulia; Nunziata, Luca; Mora-Sanguinetti, Juan,
Judicial Performance and its Determinants: A Cross-Country Perspective , OECD Economic Policy Papers, No. 5, OECD Publishing, Paris. - PGR. 2020. Prosecutor General’s Office. <
https://en.ministeriopublico.pt/node/4083 > [accessed 13 October 2020]. - R. Ludewig, J. Lallave,
Professional Stress, Discrimination and Coping Strategies: Similarities and Differences between Female and Male Judges in Switzerland , in: U. Schultz, G. Shaw (eds.), Gender and Judging, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2013, pp. 233–252. - S. L. Lustig, K. Delucchi, L. Tennakoon, B. Kaul, D. L. Marks, D. Slavin, Burnout and Stress Among United States Immigration Judges. Bender’s Immigration Bulletin, 13 pp. 22–30.
- T. Hagen, S. Bogaerts, Work Pressure and Sickness Absenteeism Among Judges. Psychiatry Psychology and Law, 21 pp. 92–111. DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2013.790003
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.382 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 7 - 7
Published on: May 6, 2021
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2021 João Paulo Dias, Paula Casaleiro, Teresa Maneca Lima, Conceição Gomes, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.