References
- A. Wallace, 2008, “Virtual Justice in the Bush’: The Use of Court Technology in Remote and Regional Australia” (2008) 19 Journal of Law, Information and Science 1
- A. Wallace, Sh. Roach Anleu & K. Mack, 2018. Judicial engagement and AV links: judicial perceptions from Australian courts, International Journal of the Legal Profession, DOI: 10.1080/09695958.2018.1490294
- A. Wallace, K. Lester, 2021, Courts in Victoria during COVID: Will digital innovation stick? International Journal for Court Administration, in this special issue. CCJE, 2020, 2 Statement of the president of the CCJE (2020) The role of judges during and in the aftermath of the Covid-19 pandemic: lessons and challenges
- Civil Justice Council,
2020, Report on the impact of COVID-19 measures
on the civil justice system,
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/CJC-Rapid-Review-Final-Report-f-1.pdf (last visited 29.12.2020). DOI: 10.1017/err.2020.118 - D. Kettiger, Gerichtsverhandlungen, Anhörungen und Einvernahmen mittels Videokonferenz, Jusletter 4. Mai 2020
- G. Irskens, 2020, Videoverhandlungen in der Praxis – Ein Erfahrungsbericht, BDVR-Rundschreiben, 52 (4) 9–14.
- Herbert, 2019,
91a FGO , in Gräber (ed) Finanzgerichtsordnung Kommentar, CH Beck Verlag, Munich, 9th edition. - H. Sauerwein, 2002, Die Anwendung moderner Kommunikationstechnologie im deutschen und internationalen Zivilverfahrensrecht
- J.
Fritsche, 2020,
§ 128a ZPO , in Münchener Kommentar ZPO, CH Beck Verlag, Munich 6th ed. - J. Schmidt, D. Saam, 2020, Videokonferenzen im Zivilprozess, Deutsche Richter Zeitschrift, p. 216–219
- J.
Sorabji,
Developing the new normal for English civil procedure post-Covid-19 forthcoming , in B. Krans & A. Nylund (eds) Civil Courts Coping with Covid-19, Eleven Publishing, forthcoming. - J
Sorabji,
St
Vaughan, “This Is Not
A Rule”: COVID-19 in England & Wales and Criminal Justice
Governance via Guidance, forthcoming in European
Journal of Risk Regulation
1–21.
(
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-journal-of-risk-regulation/article/this-is-not-a-rule-covid19-in-england-wales-and-criminal-justice-governance-via-guidance/D3F23B17170970F2806F07ADC582E323 ). DOI: 10.1017/err.2020.118 - M. Grab, 2020, Mündliche Verhandlungen im Wege der Videokonferenz, 60 JuS (6) 521–523.
- N.
Byrom, 2020,
What we know about the impact of remote hearings on access to
justice: a rapid evidence review, Nuffield Family Justice Observatory/The
Legal Education Foundation
https://www.nuffieldfjo.org.uk/app/nuffield/files-module/local/documents/nfjo_remote_hearings_vulnerable%20groups_rapid%20review_20200506.pdf (last visited 30.12.2020). - ODIHR,
2020, OSCE, The functioning
of Courts in the Covid-19 pandemic, October 2020;
https://www.osce.org/odihr/469170 (last visited 29.12.2020) - Oireachtas Library & Research Service, 2020, L&RS Note: Remote Court Hearings, 28.07.2020
- R. Susskind, 2019, Online Courts and the Future of Justice, OUP
- SIFCC
2020, The Standing International Forum of Commercial
Courts, Delivering justice during the Covid-19 pandemic and the future use
of technology, Memorandum, 29
May 2020
https://sifocc.org/app/uploads/2020/05/SIFoCC-Covid-19-memorandum-29-May-2020.pdf (last visited 29.12.2020)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36745/ijca.379 | Journal eISSN: 2156-7964
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 3
Published on: May 6, 2021
Published by: International Association for Court Administration
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2021 Anne Sanders, published by International Association for Court Administration
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.