Sobre La Defensa De Las Intuiciones Filosóficas
References
- BEALER, G. (1998). Intuition and the Autonomy of Philosophy. In M. DePaul and W. Ramsey (eds.), Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield
- BEALER, G. (2000). A Theory of the A Priori. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 81, pp. 1-30.
- BENGSON, J. (2015). The intellectual given. Mind, 124(495), 707–760.
- CAPPELEN, H. (2012). Philosophy Without Intuitions. Oxford University Press.
- CHUDNOFF, E. (2013). Intuition. OUP Oxford.
- CULLEN, S. (2010). Survey-driven romanticism. Review of philosophy and psychology, 1(2), 275-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-009-0016-1
- DEVITT, M. (2006). Intuitions. In Ontology Studies Cuadernos de Ontología: Proceedings of VI International Ontology Congress, pp. 169–176.
- DEVITT, M. (2010). What “intuitions” are linguistic evidence?. Erkenntnis, 73(2), 251-264.
- DEVITT, M. (2015). Relying on Intuitions: Where Cappelen and Deutsch Go Wrong. Inquiry, 58, 669–699.
- DOTSON, K. (2014). Conceptualizing epistemic oppression. Social Epistemology, 28(2), 115–138.
- GARCÍA-ARNALDOS, M. D. (2018). ¿Intuición o confianza racional? Quaderns de filosofía, 5(2), 49-71.
- GOLDMAN, A. (2007). Philosophical Intuitions: Their target, their source, and their epistemic status. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 74, 1–26.
- HALES, S. (2006). Relativism and the Foundations of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- HANNON, M. (2018). Intuitions, reflective judgments, and experimental philosophy. Synthese, 195(9), 4147-4168.
- HESNI, S. (2025). Philosophical intuitions about socially significant language. Hypatia, 40(1), 82–106.
- HORVATH, J. (2010). How (not) to react to experimental philosophy. Philosophical Psychology 23: 447–480.
- KAHNEMAN, D.; KLEIN, G. (2009). Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. American Psychologist, pp. 515–526.
- KNOBE, J. M.; NICHOLS, S. (eds.) (2008). Experimental Philosophy. Oxford University Press. KNOBE, J. (2006). Experimental philosophy. Philosophy Compass, 2(1), 81–92.
- LEWIS, D. (1983). Philosophical papers (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195032047.001.0001
- LUDWIG, K. (2007). The epistemology of thought experiments: First person versus third person approaches. Midwest Studies in Philosophy: Philosophy and the Empirical, 31, 128–159.
- MACHERY, E. (2011). Thought experiments and philosophical knowledge. Metaphilosophy, 42(3), 191–214.
- MACHERY, E. (2012). Expertise and Intuitions about Reference. THEORIA, 27(1), 37–54.
- MACHERY, E. (2015). The illusion of expertise. In Experimental Philosophy, Rationalism, and Naturalism, pp. 188–203. Routledge.
- MACHERY, E. (2017). Philosophy within its proper bounds. Oxford University Press.
- MACHERY, E.; MALLON, R.; NICHOLS, S.; STICH, S. P. (2004). Semantics, cross-cultural style. Cognition, 92, (3):1–12.
- MACHERY, E.; MALLON, R.; NICHOLS, S.; STICH, S. P. (2012). If folk intuitions vary, then what? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 3, 618–635.
- NADO, J. (2012). Philosophical expertise. Philosophy Compass, 9(9), 631–641.
- NADO, J. (2014). Why intuition? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 89(1), 15–41.
- NADO, J. (2015a). Philosophical expertise and scientific expertise. Philosophical Psychology, 28(7), 1026–1044.
- NADO, J. (2015b). Intuition, Philosophical Theorising, and the Threat of Scepticism. In Fischer, E.; Collins, J. (eds.), Experimental Philosophy, Rationalism, and Naturalism: Rethinking Philosophical Method. Routledge, pp. 204–221.
- NADO, J. (2025). Intuition: A Brief Introduction. In Joachim Horvath, Steffen Koch & Michael G. Titelbaum, Methods in Analytic Philosophy: A Primer and Guide. London, ON: Phil-Papers Foundation. pp. 159-170.
- NAGEL, J. (2013). Defending the evidential value of epistemic intuitions: A reply to Stich. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 87(1), 179–199.
- PÉREZ OTERO, M. (2017). Teorías de la referencia, filosofía experimental y calibración de intuiciones. Theoria: an international journal for theory, history and foundations of science, 32(1), 41-62.
- PUST J. (2000). Intuitions as Evidence. New York and London: Garland Publishing,
- SOSA, E. (1991). Knowledge in Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- SOSA, E. (1997). Reflective knowledge in the best circles. The Journal of Philosophy, 94(8), 410–430. https://doi.org/10.2307/2564607
- SOSA, E. (1998). Minimal intuition. In Depaul, M.; Ramsey, W. (eds.), Rethinking Intuition. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
- SOSA, E. (2001). Human knowledge, animal and reflective. Philosophical Studies, 106(3), 193–196. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013300923093
- SOSA, E. (2006). Intuitions and Truth. In P. Greenough, & Lynch, M. P. (Eds.), Truth and realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 208-226.
- SOSA, E. (2007a). A virtue epistemology: Apt belief and reflective knowledge (Vol. I). Oxford University Press.
- SOSA, E. (2007b). Experimental philosophy and philosophical intuition. Philosophical studies, 132(1), 99-107.
- SOSA, E. (2007c). Intuitions: Their nature and Epistemic Efficacy. In Beyer, C.; Burri, A. (eds.), Philosophical Knowledge: Its Possibility and Scope. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
- SOSA, E. (2009). A defense of the use of intuitions in philosophy. In Murphy, D.; Bishop, M. (eds.), Stich and his Critics. John Wiley & Sons, pp. 101–112.
- SOSA, E. (2010). La epistemología de las virtudes. KRK ediciones. Oviedo.
- SOSA, E. (2013). Intuitions and Foundations. The Relevance of Moore and Wittgenstein. In Casullo, A.; Thurow, J. C. (eds.), The A Priori in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- SOSA, E. (2018a). Una epistemología de virtudes: Creencia apta y conocimiento reflexivo (vol. I). Zaragoza: Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza
- SOSA, E. (2018b). Conocimiento reflexivo: Creencia apta y conocimiento reflexivo (vol. II). Zaragoza: Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza.
- SOSA, E.; KIM, J.; FANTL, J.; MCGRATH, M. (eds.) (2008). Epistemology: An Anthology. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
- STICH, S. (1988). Reflective Equilibrium, Analytic Epistemology and the Problem of Cognitive Diversity. Synthese, vol. 74, nº 3, p. 391–413.
- WEINBERG, J.; NICHOLS, S.; STICH, S. (2008). Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions. In: Ernest Sosa, Jaegwon Kim, Jeremy Fantl, and Matthew McGrath. Epistemology: an anthology (2nd ed). Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp. 625-646. (Originally published in Philosophical Topics 29, 1 and 2 (2001), pp. 429-60).
- WEINBERG, J. M., GONNERMAN, C., BUCKNER, C., & ALEXANDER, J. (2010). Are philosophers expert intuiters? Philosophical Psychology, 23(3), 331-355.
- WILLIAMSON, T. (2004). Philosophical ‘intuitions’ and scepticism about judgement. Dialectica, 58(1), 109-153.
- WILLIAMSON, T. (2007). The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.
Language: Spanish
Page range: 57 - 78
Submitted on: Oct 20, 2025
Accepted on: Feb 16, 2026
Published on: Apr 30, 2026
Published by: Pontifical University of Salamanca
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2026 María Dolores García-Arnaldos, published by Pontifical University of Salamanca
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.