Conocimiento, Democracia Y Riesgo Epistémico. Una Propuesta De Epistemología Política
References
- Alfano, Mark (2014). “Stereotype threat and intellectual virtue”. In Owen Flanagan & Abrol Fairweather, Naturalizing Virtue. Cambridge University Press. pp. 155-74.
- Anderson Elizabeth (1999) “What is the Point of Equality?” Ethics, 103, pp. 287–337.
- Anderson Elizabeth (2009) “Democracy: Instrumental vs. Non‐Instrumental Value” (in Chris-tiano T. and Christman J. (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell,, pp. 213–227;
- Arneson Richard (2003) “Debate: Defending the Purely Instrumental Account of Democratic Legitimacy,” Journal of Political Philosophy, 11, pp. 122–132;
- Baehr Jason (2010) “ ‘Is There A Value Problem?’”, in Adrian Haddock, Alan Millar, and Duncan Pritchard (eds.) The Nature and Value of Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press
- Beerbohm, Eric (2012). In our name: the ethics of democracy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
- Brennan Jason (2011) The Ethics of Voting, Princeton: Princeton University Press, Brennan Jason “The Right to a Competent Electorate,” Philosophical Quarterly, 61(2011), pp. 700–724,
- Brennan, Jason (2016) Against Democracy, Princeton University Press
- Brighouse Harry (1996), “Egalitarianism and Equal Availability of Political Influence,” The Journal of Political Philosophy, 4, pp. 118–141
- Brighouse Harry “Democracy and Inequality,” (in A. Carter A. & G. Stokes, (eds.), Democratic Theory Today, Cambridge: Cambridge Polity Press, 2002);
- Brighouse Harry “Egalitarianism and Equal Availability of Political Influence,” Journal of Political Philosophy 4(1996), pp. 118–141,
- Brighouse Harry, “Political Equality and the Funding of Political Speech,” Social Theory and Practice, 21(1995), pp. 473–500;
- Broncano, Fernando (2020) “Teoría y práctica de las fraternidades epistémicas”, Dilemata, 33, 11-21
- Broncano-Berrocal, Fernando & Vega-Encabo, Jesús (2020). “A taxonomy of types of epistemic dependence: introduction to the Synthese special issue on epistemic dependence”. Synthese 197 (7):2745-2763.
- Broncano-Berrocal, Fernando (2017). “Epistemic dependence and cognitive ability.” Synthese 197 (7):2895-2912.
- Broncano-Berrocal, Fernando (2019). “Luck as Risk”. In Ian M. Church & Robert J. Hartman, The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy and Psychology of Luck. New York: Routledge
- Buchanan Allen, “Political Legitimacy and Democracy,” Ethics, 122(2002), pp. 689–719;
- Certeau, Michel de (1990) La invención de lo cotidiano. I Artes de hacer, trad. de Alejandro Pescador, Ciudad de México, Universidad Iberoamericana (2000)
- Charles Beitz, Political Equality: An Essay in Democratic Theory (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989);
- Christiano Thomas (1996), The Rule of the Many: Fundamental Issues in Democratic Theory, Boulder: Westview Press
- Christiano Thomas (2003) “Is Democracy merely a Means to Social Justice?” in Reeve A. and Williams A. (eds.), Real Libertarianism Assessed: Political Theory after Van Parijs, New York: Palgrave Macmillan,, pp. 172–200,
- Christiano Thomas (2008) The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and its Limits, Oxford University Press.
- Christiano Thomas “Is Democracy Merely a Means to Social Justice?” (in Andrew Reeve and Andrew Williams, (eds.), Real Libertarianism Assessed: Political Theory after Van Parijs, New York: Palgrave Macmillian, 2003),
- Christiano Thomas, “Debate: Estlund on Democratic Authority” Journal of Political Philosophy 17(2009), pp. 228–240;
- Code, Lorraine (1987). Epistemic responsibility. Hanover, N.H.: Brown University Press by University Press of New England.
- Cohen Joshua “Democratic Equality,” Ethics 99(1989), pp. 727–775;
- Cohen Joshua, “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy” (in Alan Hamlin and Philip Pettit (eds.), The Good Polity, Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell, 1989), Craig, Edward (1999) Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis, Oxford: Oxford University Press
- Dworkin Ronald, “What is Equality? Part 4: Political Equality,” University of San Francisco Law Review, 22(1987), pp. 1–30;
- Eric Beerbohm, In Our Name: The Ethics of Democracy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012);
- Estlund David, Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008).
- Fantl, Jeremy; Mcgrath, Matthew (2007) “On Pragmatic Encroachment in Epistemology”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (3):558-589.
- Fricker, Miranda (2009). The Value of Knowledge and The Test of Time. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 64:121-138
- Fricker, Miranda (2017) Injusticia epistémica: El poder y la ética del conocimiento, trad. Alicia García, Barcelona: Herder, orig. 2007, Oxford University Press
- Goguen, S. (2019) “Positive Stereotypes” en Sherman, Benjamin R.; Goguen, Stacey (eds.) (2019) Overcoming Epistemic Injustice: Social and Psychological Perspectives (Collective Studies in Knowledge and Society. Londres: Bloomsbury Publishing
- Goldberg, Sandy (2011) “The Division of Epistemic Labor” Episteme 8.1: 112–125, p112 Goldman, Alvin (1999) Knowledge in a Social World, Oxford: Clarendon Press
- Goldman, Alvin (2010) “System-Oriented Social Epistemology”, Szabó Gendler, Tamar & Hawthorne, John (eds) Oxford Studies in Epistemology vol. 3, Oxford University Press. Goodin Robert (2003), Reflective Democracy, Oxford University Press.
- Goodin, Robert E. & Spiekermann, Kai (2018). An Epistemic Theory of Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Griffin Christopher (2003) “Democracy as a NonInstrumentally Just Procedure,” Journal of Political Philosophy, 111, pp. 111–121
- Griffin Christopher (2016) “Voting turnout, Equality, Liberty and Representation: Epistemic Versus Procedural democracy,” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 19, pp. 283–300
- Griffin Christopher G. (2003), “Democracy as a Non-instrumentally Just Procedure,” Journal of Political Philosophy 111, pp. 111–121;
- Howard Jeffry (2019), “The Labors of Justice: Democracy, Respect, and Judicial Review,” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 22, pp. 179–199
- Kitcher, Philip (2001) Science, Truth, and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press
- Kolodny, Niko (2014a). “Rule Over None I: What Justifies Democracy?” Philosophy and Public Affairs 42 (3):195-229.
- Kolodny, Niko (2014b) “Rule Over None II: Social Equality and the Justification of Democracy”. Philosophy and Public Affairs 42 (4):287-336.
- Kvanvig, Jonathan L (2005) “Truth is not the Primary Epistemic Goal”, in Matthias Steup & John Turri, Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 285-295
- Lackey, Jennifer, 2007, “Why We Don’t Deserve Credit for Everything We Know”, Synthese, 158(3): 345–361
- Landemore Hélène (2017) Democratic reason: Politics, collective intelligence, and the rule of the many, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- López-Guerra Claudio (2014) Democracy and Disenfranchisement: The Morality of Electoral Exclusions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Luhmann, Niklas (1993) “The concept of Risk”, in Risk: A Sociological Theory, trad. Rhodes Barrett, Berlín: De Gruyter Brill
- Medina, José (2011). “Toward a Foucaultian Epistemology of Resistance: Counter-Memory, Epistemic Friction, and Guerrilla Pluralism”. Foucault Studies 12:9-35.
- Medina, José (2013) The Epistemology of Resistance, Oxford: Oxford University Press
- Medina, José (2017) “Varieties of Hermeneutical Injustice.” en The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice, eds- Ian James Kidd, José Medina y Gaile Pohlhaus Jr., New York: Routledge.
- Medina, José (2023) The Epistemology of Protest: Silencing, Epistemic Activism, and the Communicative Life of Resistance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Mouffe, Chantal (1999). El retorno de lo político: Comunidad, ciudadanía, pluralismo, democracia radical. Barcelona: Paidós.
- Mouffe, Chantal (2000). The Democratic Paradox. Londres: Verso.
- Mouffe, Chantal (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. Londres: Verso.
- Mulligan Thomas “On the Compatibility of Epistocracy and Public Reason,” Social Theory and Practice 41(2015), pp. 458–476);
- Mulligan Thomas, “Plural Voting for the Twenty-first Century,” The Philosophical Quarterly 68(2017), pp. 286–306,
- Ober Josiah (2010) Democracy and Knowledge: Innovation and Knowledge in Classical Athens, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Pettigrew, Richard, (2019), “Veritism, Epistemic Risk, and the Swamping Problem”, Austral-asian Journal of Philosophy, 97(4): 761–74.
- Pritchard Duncan, 2009, “The Value of Knowledge”, The Harvard Review of Philosophy, 16(1): 86–103.
- Pritchard, Duncan (2007) Epistemic Luck. Oxford: Oxford University Press
- Queloz, Matthieu (2021) The Practical Origins of Ideas. Genealogy as Conceptual Reverse-Engineering, Oxford: Oxford University Press
- Saffon Maria Paula and Urbinati Nadia, “Procedural Democracy, the Bulwark of Equal Liberty,” Political Theory 41(2013), pp. 441–481;
- Scheffler, Samuel, “What is Egalitarianism?,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 31(2003), pp. 5–39.
- Scott, James (1990) Los dominados y el arte de la resistencia, Ciudad de México: Ediciones Era (2000)
- Sen Amartya (1999) Development as Freedom, New York: Afred A. Knopf Inc, 1999)
- Shklar, Judith (1990) The Faces of Injustice Yale: University Press, 1990
- Somin Ilya (2013), Democracy and Political Ignorance: Why Smaller Government is Smarter, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Sosa, Ernest (2021) Epistemic Explanations: A Theory of Telic Normativity, and What it Explains, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Sperber, Dan ; Clément, Fabrice ; Heintz, Christophe ; Mascaro, Olivier ; Mercier, Hugo ; Origgi, Gloria & Wilson, Deirdre (2010). “Epistemic Vigilance”. Mind and Language 25 (4):359-393.
- Talisse Robert (2009), Democracy and Moral Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Talisse, Robert, Aikin, Scott. (2014) Why We Argue (And How We Should): A Guide to Political Disagreement, Londres: Routledge
- Urbinati Nadia (2014), Democracy Disfigured (Cambridge: Harvard University Press,.
- Van Parijs Philippe (1996), “Is Democracy Compatible with Justice?” The Journal of Political Philosophy 4, pp. 101–117.
- Vega-Encabo, Jesús (forthcoming). Autonomy and knowledge: comments on Adam Carter’s Autonomous Knowledge. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
- Walzer Michael (1983) Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality, Oxford: Martin Robertson
- Williams, Bernard (2002) Verdad y veracidad. Una aproximación genealógica, trad. Alberto Ávarez, Rocío Orsi, Madrid: Tusquets 2006 (original Truth and Truthfulness, Princeton: Princeton University Press)
- Ziliotti, Elena (2020). “Democracy’s Value: A Conceptual Map”. Journal of Value Inquiry 54 (3):407-427.
- Zimmerman, Michael J. and Ben Bradley (2025) “Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Value”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2025/entries/value-intrinsic-extrinsic/>.
Language: Spanish
Page range: 15 - 42
Submitted on: Oct 16, 2025
Accepted on: Feb 16, 2026
Published on: Apr 30, 2026
Published by: Pontifical University of Salamanca
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2026 Fernando Broncano, published by Pontifical University of Salamanca
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.