Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assessing Awareness of Genetic Risks among Pregnant Mothers in Consanguineous Marriages: A Cross-Sectional Study in Government Healthcare Settings Cover

Assessing Awareness of Genetic Risks among Pregnant Mothers in Consanguineous Marriages: A Cross-Sectional Study in Government Healthcare Settings

Open Access
|May 2026

References

  1. Ansari MA, Ismail H, Muhammad IA, et al. Consanguinity, as a cause of deafness and hearing impairment in Karachi. Pakistan J Otolaryngol. 2004;20:22–6.
  2. Bittles A. Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics. Clinical Genetics. 2001;60(2):89–98. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2001.600201.x
  3. Khayat AM, Alshareef BG, Alharbi SF, AlZahrani MM, Alshangity BA, Tashkandi NF. Consanguineous marriage and its association with genetic disorders in Saudi Arabia: A review. Cureus. 2024;16(2):e53888. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53888.
  4. Tadmouri GO, Nair P, Obeid T, Al Ali MT, Al Khaja N, Hamamy HA. Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs. Reprod Health. 2009;6:17. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-6-17.
  5. Temaj G, Nuhii N, Sayer JA. The impact of consanguinity on human health and disease with an emphasis on rare diseases. J of Rare Dis. 2022;1:2. doi: 10.1007/s44162-022-00004-5.
  6. Hussain R, Bittles AH. The prevalence and demographic characteristics of consanguineous marriages in Pakistan. J Biosoc Sci. 1998;30(2):261–75. doi: 10.1017/s0021932098002612.
  7. Hoodfar E, Teebi AS. Genetic referrals of Middle Eastern origin in a western city: inbreeding and disease profile. J Med Genet. 1996 Mar;33(3):212–5. doi: 10.1136/jmg.33.3.212.
  8. Akram DS, Arif F, Fayyaz JF. How Frequent are Consanguineous Marriages? J Dow Univ Health Sci (JDUHS) [Internet]. 2008 Jul. 24;2(2):76–9. https://jduhs.com/index.php/jduhs/article/view/1273.
  9. Joseph N, Pavan KK, Ganapathi K, Apoorva P, Sharma P, Jhamb JA. Health awareness and consequences of consanguineous marriages: a community-based study. J Prim Care Community Health. 2015;6(2):121–7. doi: 10.1177/2150131914557496. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
  10. Sullivan KM, Pezzullo JC, Dean AG, Mir RA. Sample Size for a Proportion or Descriptive Study. OpenEpi. Accessed April 28, 2026. https://www.openepi.com/SampleSize/SSPropor.htm
  11. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2023.
  12. Hamamy H. Consanguineous marriages: Preconception consultation in primary health care settings. J Community Genet. 2012;3(3):185–92. doi: 10.1007/s12687-011-0072-y.
  13. Arumugam S, Kalluri SS, Sharmila V, Mocherla A, Subbiah NK, Kulkarni JP, et al. Understanding the awareness of prenatal genetic screening tests among pregnant women in India: A cross-sectional study. Cureus. 2024;16(3):e56932. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56932.
  14. Jameel T, Baig M, Murad MA, Gazzaz ZJ, Mal Y, Alyoubi WE, et al. Consanguineous marriages, premarital screening, and genetic testing: a survey among Saudi university students. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1328300. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1328300.
  15. Oliveri S, Ongaro G, Cutica I, Menicucci G, Belperio D, Spinella F, et al. Decision-making process about prenatal genetic screening: how deeply do moms-to-be want to know from non-invasive prenatal testing? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05272-z.
  16. Yousef NA, ElHarouni AA, Shaik NA, Banaganapalli B, Al Ghamdi AF, Galal AH, et al. Nationwide survey on awareness of consanguinity and genetic diseases in Saudi Arabia: challenges and potential solutions to reduce the national healthcare burden. Hum Genomics. 2024;18(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s40246-024-00700-x.
  17. Mehdi MAH, Ali NT, Saleh R. Genetic disorders caused by consanguineous marriage in Radfan districts – Yemen. BMC Med Genomics. 2025;18(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12920-025-02267-5.
  18. Akhtar SO, Raza AA, Abdullah Y, Samadi A. Exploring the role of consanguinity in thalassemia prevalence in Pakistan: an in-depth analysis of genetic and cultural factors affecting public health. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025;87(7):4222–8. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003404.
  19. Farrell RM, Pierce M, Collart C, Yao M, Coleridge M, Chien EK, et al. Decision-making for prenatal genetic screening: how will pregnant women navigate a growing number of aneuploidy and carrier screening options? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):806. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04282-7.
  20. Yeşilçinar İ, Şahin E, Tutar SO. Pregnant individuals' genetic literacy and decisional conflict about prenatal screening tests: A cross-sectional study. J Genet Couns. 2025;34(2):e1951. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1951.
  21. Wilson RD. Antenatal reproductive screening for pregnant people including preconception: Provides the best reproductive opportunity for informed consent, quality, and safety. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2024;96:102520. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2024.102520.
  22. Nawaz A, Zaman M, Malik S. Consanguinity, inbreeding coefficient, fertility and birth-outcome in population of Okara district, Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(3):770–5. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.3.2263.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34763/jmotherandchild.20263001.d-26-00013 | Journal eISSN: 2719-535X | Journal ISSN: 2719-6488
Language: English
Page range: 93 - 101
Submitted on: Mar 17, 2026
Accepted on: Apr 16, 2026
Published on: May 31, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Saim Mahmood Khan, Jawairiya Muhammad Hussain, Laiba Bukhari, Mahnoor Khan, Zarnab Saleem, Aroobah Jawwad, Mahnoor Sheikh, Fizzah Iftikhar, Surraiya Riaz Mahmood Khan, published by Institute of Mother and Child
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.