Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Overgeneralisation effect in trait inferencing about a child with craniofacial microsomia by medical students and child’s relatives Cover

Overgeneralisation effect in trait inferencing about a child with craniofacial microsomia by medical students and child’s relatives

Open Access
|Jan 2021

References

  1. Ortopedia szczękowa: zasady i praktyka; podręcznik dla studentów stomatologii. Pod. red. Łabiszewskiej-Jaruzelskiej F; aut. Grzesiewska K et al. Wyd. 3. Warszawa: Wydaw. Lekarskie PZWL, 1995; 359, [1] s. ISBN 8320019249.
  2. Szulman-Wardal A, Mański, A. The image of a child with facial dysmorphism in a mother’s perception. Acta Neuropsychol. 2016;14(2):165–80. doi: 10.5604/17307503.1213004.
  3. Zebrowitz L. First impressions from faces. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2017;26(3):237–42. doi: 10.1177/0963721416683996.
  4. Wronka E. Mózgowe podłoże rozpoznawania ekspresji emocjonalnej. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2012: 264, [1] s. ISBN 9788323333579
  5. Bruce V, Young A. Understanding face recognition. Br J Psychol. 1986;77(3):305–27. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02199.x.
  6. Ellis H. Delusions: a suitable case for imaging? Int J Psychophysiol. 2007;63(2):146–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.03.015.
  7. Hofman E, Haxby J. Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3(1): 80–4. doi: 10.1038/71152.
  8. Gobbini M, Haxby J. Neural response to the visual familiarity of faces. Brain Res Bull. 2006;71(1–3):76–82. doi: 10.1016/j.brain-resbull.2006.08.003.
  9. Maurer D, Grand R, Mondloch C. The many faces of configural processing. Trends Cogn Sci. 2002;6(6):255–60. doi: 10.1016/ S1364-6613(02)01903-4.
  10. Mański A. Dziecko z dysmorfią twarzy: badania empiryczne uwarunkowań jego percepcji u matek i nauczycieli. Warszawa: Difin; 2016: 211 s. ISBN 9788380852532.
  11. Dunbar R, Shultz S. Why are there so many explanations for primate brain evolution? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017;372(1727):20160244. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0244.
  12. Gibson JJ. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979; 332 pp. ISBN 978- 0395270493.
  13. Zebrowitz L, Montepare J. The ecological approach to person perception: evolutionary roots and contemporary offshoots. 81–113. In: Schaller M, Simpson JA, Kenrick DT, editors. Evolution and social psychology. New York: Psychology Press, 2006: 400 pp. ISBN 9780203782965.
  14. Zebrowitz LA, Montepare JM. Social psychological face perception: why appearance matters. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2008;2(3):1497–517. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00109.x.
  15. Zebrowitz L, Hall J, Murphy N, Rhodes G. Looking smart and looking good: facial cues to intelligence and their origins. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2002;28(2):238–49. doi: 10.1177/0146167202282009.
  16. Zebrowitz LA, Rhodes G. Sensitivity to “Bad Genes” and the anomalous face overgeneralization effect: cue validity, cue utilization, and accuracy in judging intelligence and health. J Nonverbal Behav. 2004;28(3):167–85. doi: 10.1023/B:JONB.0000039648.30935.1b.
  17. Zebrowitz L, Fellous J, Mignault A, Andreoletti C. Trait impressions as overgeneralized responses to adaptively significant facial qualities: evidence from connectionist modeling. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2003;7(3):194–215. doi: 10.1207/S15327957P-SPR0703_01
  18. Eibl-Eibesfeldt I. Human ethology. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1989: 848 pp. ISBN 978-0202309705.
  19. Lorenz K. Die angeborenen Formen möglicher Erfahrung [The innate forms of potential experience]. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie. 1943;5(2):235–409. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1943.tb00655.x.
  20. Keating C, Doyle J. The faces of desirable mates and dates contain mixed social status cues. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2002;38(4):414–24. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00007-0.
  21. Riklin E, Andover M, Annunziato R. The effects of society on the psychosocial functioning of those with a facial difference. Health Psychol Rep. 2019;7(2):87–102. doi: 10.5114/hpr.2019.85657.
  22. Bogart K, Tickle-Degnen L, Joffe M. Social interaction experiences of adults with Moebius Syndrome: a focus group. J Health Psychol. 2012;17(8):1212–22. doi: 10.1177/1359105311432491.
  23. Rowland M, Bell E. Measuring the attitudes of sighted college students toward blindness. J Blindness Innovation Res. 2012;2(2). doi: 10.5241/2F2-24.
  24. Mański A, Anikiej P, Domysławska A. Dysmorfie twarzy w zwierciadle społecznych ustosunkowań. Societas/Communitas. 2018;26(2–2):141–59.
  25. Gorlin RJ, Cohen MM Jr, Hennekam RCM. Syndromes of the head and neck. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001:1332 pp. (Oxford monographs on medical genetics; No. 42). ISBN 0-19-511861-8.
  26. Goffman E; przekł. Dzierżyńska A, Tokarska-Bakir J; wstęp do wyd. pol. Tokarska-Bakir J. Piętno: rozważania o zranionej tożsamości. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, 2005:198 s. ISBN 83-89574-74-8.
  27. Berry D, McArthur L. Perceiving character in faces: the impact of age-related craniofacial changes on social perception. Psychol Bull. 1986;100(1):3–18. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.100.1.3.
  28. Blair I, Judd C, Sadler M, Jenkins C. The role of Afrocentric features in person perception: judging by features and categories. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;83(1):5–25. doi: 10.1037/00223514.83.1.5.
  29. Rhodes G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57(1):199–226. doi: 10.1146/annurev. psych.57.102904.190208.
  30. Zebrowitz L, Kikuchi M, Fellous J. Facial resemblance to emotions: group differences, impression effects, and race stereotypes. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010;98(2):175–89. doi: 10.1037/a0017990.
  31. Willis J, Todorov A. First impressions: making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychol Sci. 2006;17(7):592–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x.
  32. Olivola C, Todorov A. Elected in 100 milliseconds: appearance-based trait inferences and voting. J Nonverbal Behav. 2010;34(2):83–110. doi: 10.1007/s10919-009-0082-1.
  33. Rule N, Ambady N. Face and fortune: inferences of personality from Managing Partners’ faces predict their law firms’ financial success. Leadersh Q. 2011;22(4):690–6. doi: 10.1016/j. leaqua.2011.05.009.
  34. Zebrowitz L, McDonald S. The impact of litigants’ baby-facedness and attractiveness on adjudications in small claims courts. Law Hum Behav. 1991;15(6):603–23. doi: 10.1007/BF01065855.
  35. Zebrowitz L, White B, Wieneke K. Mere exposure and racial prejudice: exposure to other-race faces increases liking for strangers of that race. Soc Cogn. 2008;26(3):259–75. doi: 10.1521/ soco.2008.26.3.259.
  36. Kowalik S. Upośledzenie umysłowe: teoria i praktyka rehabilitacji. Warszawa: PWN, 1989:247, [1] s. ISBN 8301093137.
  37. Antonak R, Livneh H. A hierarchy of reactions to disability. Int J Rehabil Res. 1991;14(1):13–24. doi: 10.1097/00004356199103000-00002.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34763/jmotherandchild.20202403.2025.d-20-00010 | Journal eISSN: 2719-535X | Journal ISSN: 2719-6488
Language: English
Page range: 25 - 31
Published on: Jan 29, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Katarzyna A. Milska, Arkadiusz Mański, Jolanta Wierzba, published by Institute of Mother and Child
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.