Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Development and application of a method for the objective differentiation of fog life cycle phases Cover

Development and application of a method for the objective differentiation of fog life cycle phases

Open Access
|Jan 2013

Figures & Tables

Table 1. Applied instruments on the Marburg Ground Truth and Profiling Station

InstrumentMeasured parameterTime intervalManufacturer94 GHz FMCW RadarAltitude of cloud top10 secRutherford Appleton
Laboratory, UKCeilometer (CL31)Altitude of cloud base20 secVaisala, FinlandOptical particle counter (CDP with PbP)Drop size spectruma1 secDroplet Measurement
Technologies, USAClimatological stationTemperatureb
Precipitationa
Pressurea
Relative humidityb
Wind directiona
Wind speedc5 minCampbell Scientific, USAPresent weather sensor (HSS VPF-730)Horizontal visibilityb20 secBiral, UK

[i] aMeasured at 2 m height.

[ii] bMeasured at 2 m and 10 m height.

[iii] cMeasured at 10 m height.

Fig. 1

Synoptic weather regimes during the three fog events referring to Hess and Brezowsky (1977) and James (2007) (DWD, 2011): (a) first fog event: 26–27 October 2011; (b) second fog event: 31 October 2011–1 November 2011; (c) third fog event: 13–14 November 2011. Left column: 500 hPa level, right column: surface pressure level.

Fig. 2

Flowchart of the statistical approach for the detection and statistical proof of change point (CP) in double sum curves of measurement series.

{ label needed for table-wrap[@id='UT0002'] }

Table 2. Found potential change points (CP) of the three fog events from the homogeneity test of Mann–Whitney for the cumulative sum of VIS, LWC, N t, r c and r mean

Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3


Fog eventDurationCP1CP2PeriodnPeriodnPeriodn110/26, 19:21–10/27, 08:0510/27, 01:5010/27, 06:0010/26, 19:21–10/27, 01:5039010/27, 01:51–10/27, 06:0025010/27, 06:01–10/27, 08:05125210/31, 17:38–11/01, 07:5510/31, 19:1711/01, 01:5710/31, 17:38–10/31, 19:1710010/31, 19:18–11/01, 01:5740011/01, 01:58–11/01, 07:55358311/13, 18:48–11/14, 08:1511/13, 23:4711/14, 06:2711/13, 18:48–11/13, 23:4730011/13, 23:48–11/14, 06:2740011/14, 06:28–11/14, 08:15108
{ label needed for table-wrap[@id='UT0003'] }

Table 3. Two-sided t-test on the slopes of the phases regarding the microphysical parameters and VIS from the three measured fog events

VISLWCNtrmeanrcFog eventChange pointtˆp (%)tˆp (%)tˆp (%)tˆp (%)tˆp (%)1123.5799.9937.8399.9949.5999.9929.2799.9934.5499.99219.5999.9920.0999.9910.9699.9946.6199.9943.7299.992135.9499.9912.0099.9913.2099.998.7199.9911.4099.99264.3099.9954.5499.9933.1199.99101.1299.9996.7499.9931123.7799.997.56751.1499.9947.1399.9936.6299.99240.0999.9914.3399.9915.1599.9919.0999.9920.2199.99
Fig. 3

Measured data during third fog event: 13–14 November 2011. (a) Horizontal visibility (VIS); (b) microphysical properties: liquid water content (LWC), total number of droplets per cm3 (N t), mean droplet radius (r mean), modal droplet radius (r c); (c) meteorological properties: temperature (T), relative humidity (RH), wind speed; (d) cloud ceilings. The first and last vertical line represent the time when VIS is the first and last time below 1 km during the fog event. The other two vertical lines signify the break points determined by the statistical approach.

Table 4. Overview of the microphysical properties of the three fog measurements differentiated by evolutionary stages liquid water content (LWC), total amount of droplets N t, arithmetic mean of radius r mean, modal value of radius r c, minimum value of radius r min, maximum value of radius r max, range between minimum and maximum value within a drop size spectrum

Min Max MeanStandard deviation Median Min Max MeanStandard deviation Median Min Max MeanStandard deviation MedianFormation stage of 26 October–27 October 2011Formation stage of 31 October–1 November 2011Formation stage of 13 November–14 November 2011LWC (g m−3)0.000.090.010.020.000.000.060.020.020.010.000.020.000.000.00Nt (cm−3)0.02115.6911.0417.832.790.0550.7212.2311.537.850.0016.111.242.650.14rmean (µm)3.159.504.941.254.543.027.615.360.915.272.5012.455.442.064.95rc (µm)2.507.083.820.973.522.504.703.370.593.312.507.133.451.102.93rmin (µm)2.505.213.080.582.892.504.202.750.312.632.5010.954.001.383.75rmax (µm)3.3822.4710.985.7111.153.4322.7016.124.3516.692.5016.567.934.017.18dr (µm)0.0019.977.906.118.150.4420.2013.384.5813.990.0013.183.933.863.12Mature fog of 26 October–27 October 2011Mature fog of 10/31–1 November 2011Mature fog of 13 November–14 November 2011LWC (g m−3)0.000.050.010.010.010.000.060.010.010.010.000.030.010.000.01Nt (cm−3)0.2038.282.153.251.470.0141.434.586.981.900.009.662.731.712.42rmean (µm)4.0311.228.631.628.973.2013.136.541.886.402.5011.506.820.796.89rc (µm)2.5810.255.991.565.932.507.243.710.913.532.506.314.800.654.86rmin (µm)2.507.463.580.993.252.5012.253.451.402.912.5011.503.250.893.00rmax (µm)6.3423.0717.102.6117.253.3822.0514.253.9914.812.5018.7213.882.4414.16dr (µm)3.4620.5713.523.1213.690.3319.5510.804.5011.560.0016.1710.632.9611.06Dissipation stage of 26 October–27 October 2011Dissipation stage of 31 October–1 November 2011Dissipation stage of 13 November–14 November 2011LWC (g m−3)0.000.030.010.010.000.000.030.000.000.000.000.010.000.000.00Nt (cm−3)0.145.661.571.331.070.0033.780.753.580.050.005.430.891.410.02rmean (µm)4.859.637.560.987.502.505.973.880.693.752.758.145.101.045.10rc (µm)2.727.304.980.924.962.503.952.890.302.782.525.743.340.792.91rmin (µm)2.505.143.450.743.292.505.623.500.593.442.538.144.331.214.22rmax (µm)5.9621.1314.613.6414.492.5017.184.732.274.042.7513.766.582.805.42dr (µm)1.9118.5711.164.2210.960.0014.681.222.380.470.0011.142.243.360.18
Fig. 4

Measured data during first fog event: 26–27 October 2011. (a) Horizontal visibility (VIS); (b) microphysical properties: liquid water content (LWC), total number of droplets per cm3 (N t), mean droplet radius (r mean), modal droplet radius (r c); (c) meteorological properties: temperature (T), relative humidity (RH), wind speed; (d) cloud ceilings. The first and last vertical line represent the time when VIS is the first and last time below 1 km during the fog event. The other two vertical lines signify the change point (CP) determined by the statistical approach.

Fig. 5

Measured data during second fog event: 31 October 2011–1 November 2011. (a) Horizontal visibility (VIS); (b) microphysical properties: liquid water content (LWC), total number of droplets per cm3 (N t), mean droplet radius (r mean), modal droplet radius (r c); (c) meteorological properties: temperature (T), relative humidity (RH), wind speed, wind direction; (d) cloud ceilings. The first and last vertical line represent the time when VIS is the first and last time below 1 km during the fog event. The other two vertical lines signify the break points determined by the statistical approach.

Fig. 6

Horizontal visibility (VIS) as a function of (a) liquid water content (LWC) and (b) total number of droplets per cm3 for all three fog events.

Table 5. Comparison of the measured microphysical parameters (LWC, N t, r c) with values from literature compiled in Maier et al. (2012)

LWC (g m−3)Nt (cm−3)rc (µm)


MeasurementsMaier et al. 2012MeasurementsMaier et al. 2012MeasurementsMaier et al. 2012





MinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxMinMaxWhole dataset of measured radiation fog events0.000.090.020.210.00115.6915.90249.932.5010.252.1312.22Formation stage0.000.060.080.170.0550.7221.73138.042.504.703.4910.82Mature fog0.000.060.120.160.0041.4328.0059.022.5010.254.999.00Dissipation stage0.000.030.170.160.0033.7824.1432.512.507.306.9210.10
Language: English
Page range: 19971 - 19971
Submitted on: Oct 25, 2012
Accepted on: May 15, 2013
Published on: Jan 1, 2013
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2013 Frank Maier, Jörg Bendix, Boris Thies, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.