Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Network design for mesoscale inversions of CO2 sources and sinks Cover

Network design for mesoscale inversions of CO2 sources and sinks

Open Access
|Jan 2012

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1. 

CO2 fluxes from June to December in TgC.degree−2 over the MCI from the SiBcrop vegetation model (a), our reference case TR0, i.e. the inverse system using the entire network of observation sites (b), using only the sites outside of the Corn Belt area (c), using the sites only within the Corn Belt area (d), using a sparser network (e) and using a minimal configuration of two sites (one in the Corn Belt and one out) (f).

Table 1. Regional CO2 flux balance from June to December 2007 in TgC over the MCI (first line), and averaged fluxes over the corn-dominated area (which corresponds to 23% of the domain) and out of it in gC m−2, for Sibcrop (prior fluxes), using the complete observation network (posterior or TR0), using towers around the corn belt (NON-CORN), using towers within the corn belt area (CORN), using a sparser network of towers (SPARSE), and using only two towers (MIN)

Prior Posterior (TR0) NON-CORN (five sites) CORN (three sites) SPARSE (five sites) MIN (two sites) Regional carbon balance (TgC) −110 −194 −179 −159 −185 −177 Total flux error (TgC) 35.5 32.1 32.7 33.1 32.5 33.6 Corn area averaged flux (gC m−2) −335.7±98.6 −343.84±88.16 −280.62±92.39 −372.38±88.92 −328.9±89.56 −336.85±92.03 Out-of-corn averaged flux (gC m−2) −27.3±36.13 −110.71±32.86 −114.49±32.87 −69.56±34.75 −108.23±33.26 −97.75±34.55
Fig. 2. 

CO2 flux correction from June to December in TgC.degree−2 over the MCI using the SiBcrop prior fluxes, with our reference case, i.e. the inverse system using the entire network of observation sites (a), with the entire network but the flux error correlation is built on an exponentially decreasing model only (b), using only the sites out of the Corn Belt area (c), using the sites only within the Corn Belt area (d), using a sparser network (e) and using a minimal configuration of two sites (one in the Corn Belt and one out) (f).

Fig. 3. 

Error reduction in % using all the towers and prior flux errors with ecosystem-based standard deviations (RMS) and spatial correlations based on ecosystems and distances between pixels (case TR0) (a) and the second case considering correlations with distance only (exponentially decaying model) (TRD) (b).

Table 2. Mixing ratio residuals in ppm for each tower, averaged over the 7 months (mean) and their related RMSE at the hourly time scale before and after inversion. The three lines correspond to the initial mismatch between modelled and observed mixing ratios (a priori), posterior residuals after inversion using the eight towers (a posteriori) and residuals from each inversion excluding the tower indicated in the first line, used for validation (LOOCV)

Centerville Kewanee Round Lake Mead Galesville Missouri WBI LEF A priori Mean −1.708 −1.248 −0.583 −1.025 −1.912 −0.578 −1.203 −0.167 RMSE 7.641 7.169 7.284 6.858 7.970 7.884 8.341 6.786 A posteriori Mean −0.103 −0.028 −0.104 −0.074 −0.162 0.102 0.467 0.171 RMSE 3.711 3.757 3.638 3.511 4.244 4.067 4.269 3.837 LOOCV Mean −1.045 −0.283 −0.613 −0.883 −1.371 −0.119 0.235 0.865 RMSE 7.003 7.564 7.479 6.794 7.602 7.727 7.656 7.848

[i] Residuals in LOOCV correspond to cross-validation of the inverse fluxes retrieved from the Leave-One-Out experiments. Values closer to zero compared with the a priori mismatch indicate an improvement.

Language: English
Page range: 17980 - 17980
Submitted on: Mar 4, 2012
Accepted on: Apr 26, 2012
Published on: Jan 1, 2012
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2012 T. Lauvaux, A. E. Schuh, M. Bocquet, L. Wu, S. Richardson, N. Miles, K. J. Davis, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.