Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Five years of carbon fluxes and inherent water-use efficiency at two semi-arid pine forests with different disturbance histories Cover

Five years of carbon fluxes and inherent water-use efficiency at two semi-arid pine forests with different disturbance histories

Open Access
|Jan 2012

Figures & Tables

Table 1. Ponderosa pine stands in central Oregon, USA referred to in the text. The CWD (coarse woody debris) is >10 cm dia and >1 m length. FWD (fine woody debris) is >6 mm and <10 cm. LF (litterfall) includes foliage and wood <1 cm dia. The 5-year average (2004–2008) LAI is 1.5 at the young plantation and 3.3 at the mature forest

Young plantation Mature forest Year of measurement 2003 2001 Latitude (deg N) 44.315 44.451 Longitude (deg E) −121.608 −121.558 Elevation (m) 1005 1255 Mean age (years) 16 56 Oldest 10% 16 89 Mean height (m) 3.3 14.0 Tallest 10% 4.1 19.8 Density (trees ha−1) 260 325 Soil depth (m) 0.5 1.5 Rooting depth (m) 0.5 1.5 CWD (g C m−2) 27 1519 FWD (g C m−2) 200 382 LF (g C m−2 yr−1) 17 67
Fig. 1. 

The 5-year average weekly means of air temperature, vapour pressure deficit (VPD), soil water content (SWC) in the top 30 cm, and the 16-cm soil temperature for the mature pine (dashed) and the young plantation (solid). The sharp peaks in VPD are from extreme hot and dry events that survive the 5-year averaging.

Table 2. Estimates of mean annual gross ecosystem production (−GEP), ecosystem respiration (ER) and net ecosystem exchange (−NEE) (g C m−2 yr−1) based on eddy-covariance measurements. The uncertainty (one standard deviation) in an individual estimate of annual NEE due to gap-filling and flux partitioning is shown in parenthesis

Young plantation Mature forest −GEP ER −NEE −GEP ER −NEE 2004 810 708 102 (16) 1444 1042 402 (64) 2005 669 620 49 (8) 1398 999 399 (63) 2006 839 710 129 (21) 1331 983 348 (56) 2007 767 617 150 (24) 1517 1054 463 (74) 2008 818 619 199 (32) 1490 1029 461 (73) Mean 781 655 126 1436 1021 415 SD 68 49 56 74 30 48 Range 170 93 150 186 71 115
Fig. 2. 

Cumulative estimates of total ecosystem respiration (ER) for the mature pine (dashed) and the young plantation (solid) for the eddy-covariance method (heavy curves) and the chamber-based method (light curves).

Fig. 3. 

Annual −NEE based on eddy-covariance and storage measurements and NEP based on biometric measurements for the mature pine (top) and the young plantation (middle). The bottom panel is the difference (mature minus young) between sites using NEE (solid) and NEP (dashed).

Table 3. Five-year average (2004–2008) quantities described in the text, except for the biological estimates at the young plantation which are 4-year averages (2004–2007)

Young plantation Mature forest LAI 1.5 3.3 −GEP (g C m−2 yr−1) 781 1436 ER (g C m−2 yr−1) 655 1021 −NEE (g C m−2 yr−1) 126 415 ET (mm) 365 515 PPT (mm) 360 480 IWUE (g C hPa)/(kg H2O) 20 15 ANPP (g C m−2 yr−1) 65 299 BNPP (g C m−2 yr−1) 67 233 NPP (g C m−2 yr−1) 132 532 Rh (g C m−2 yr−1) 167 364 NEP (g C m−2 yr−1) −35 168
Fig. 4. 

The 5-year average monthly mean carbon fluxes for the mature pine (dashed) and young plantation (solid). Error bars denote ±1 standard error based on the interannual variability.

Fig. 5. 

The 5-year average of the 30-day running mean GEP ratio (GEP at mature site divided by GEP at young plantation, dashed) and the ER ratio (solid).

Fig. 6. 

The 5-year average monthly mean water fluxes (PPT from rain gauges and ET from eddy-covariance) for the mature pine (dashed) and young plantation (solid). Error bars denote ±1 standard error based on the interannual variability. The bottom panel is the difference (PPT–ET).

Fig. 7. 

The average diel cycle of −GEP at the mature site (top) and the young plantation for 15 May to 15 June (solid) and 15 July to 15 August (dotted).

Fig. 8. 

Interannual variability of −NEE at the mature site (dashed) and the young plantation (solid). Error bars denote the 90% confidence interval based on the uncertainty in the annual average due to gap-filling and flux partitioning.

Fig. 9. 

The 5-year average seasonal pattern of daily inherent water-use efficiency (IWUE =−GEP×VPD/ET) for the mature pine (dashed) and young plantation (solid). The bottom panel is the actual water-use efficiency (WUE = −GEP/ET). Daily values have been smoothed with a 15-day running average for display.

Fig. 10. 

The 2-year average (2004 and 2006) seasonal pattern of the normalised tree transpiration from sapflow measurements for the mature pine (dashed) and the young plantation (solid) for April–November.

Language: English
Page range: 17159 - 17159
Submitted on: Jul 7, 2011
Published on: Jan 1, 2012
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2012 Dean Vickers, Christoph K. Thomas, Cory Pettijohn, Jon G. Martin, Beverly E. Law, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.