Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A novel method to improve temperature simulations of general circulation models based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition and its application to multi-model ensembles Cover

A novel method to improve temperature simulations of general circulation models based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition and its application to multi-model ensembles

By:  and    
Open Access
|Dec 2014

Figures & Tables

Table 1. Brief description of the eight GCMs

Model nameResolutionCountry/Institute
BCC-CSM1-1 (BCC)1.875°×1.875°China/BCCCanESM2 (CAN)2.0°×2.0°Canada/CCCMACNRM-CM5 (CNRM)2.8°×2.8°France/CNRMGISS-E2-H (GISSH)4.0°×5.0°American/GISSGISS-E2-R (GISSR)5.0°×4.0°American/GISSINM-CM4 (INM)5.0°×4.0°Russia/INMIPSL-CM5A-LR (IPSL)3.75°×2.5°France/IPSLNorESM1-M (NOR)3.75°×3.75°Norway/NCC
Fig. 1

The six IMFs (components) of the observation (CRU) decomposed by the EEMD method (C1 minus C6) and the six IMFs of model BCC decomposed by the EEMD method (B1 minus B6). The correlations (r) were calculated between the different IMFs of BCC and their corresponding IMFs of CRU.

Fig. 2

The global mean temperature, which was simulated by the BCC-CSM1-1 (BCC) model, its EEMD-improved simulations (BCC minus EEMD), its WTM-improved simulations (BCC minus WTM) and the observation (CRU) from 1901 to 2005.

Fig. 3

Correlation, bias and RMSE of the original model simulations, EEMD-improved series and WTM-improved series for every model at the global scale.

Table 2. Statistics (correlation, bias, RMSE) between EEMD-improved model series and original model series (E minus O) and its percentage variation [calculated by (E−O)/O×100]

CorrelationBiasRMSE


E minus O%E minus O%E minus O%
BCC0.0230.03130.0310CAN0.0670.04190.0517CNRM0.09120.04190.0519GISSH0.0450.0290.029GISSR0.0330.0170.027INM0.0230.02110.016IPSL0.0450.04160.0413NOR0.0790.04220.0520
Fig. 4

Correlation, bias and RMSE of original model simulations, EEMD-improved series and WTM-improved series for every model in the six continents.

Fig. 5

The statistics (correlation, bias, and RMSE) of MME forecasts calculated by the four MME methods (Bayesian, Linear, SVD, and AEM) based on the original and EEMD-improved model simulations at the global scale.

Table 3. Differences between the statistics (correlation, bias, RMSE) between ensemble forecasts based on EEMD-improved model series and original model series (E minus O) and the percentage differences [calculated by (E−O)/O×100]

StatisticsE minus OPercentage difference
CorrelationBayesian0.0091.094Linear0.0172.000SVD0.0212.481AEM0.0091.094BiasBayesian−0.0064.316Linear−0.0106.844SVD−0.0096.769AEM−0.0064.644RMSEBayesian−0.0063.501Linear−0.0094.823SVD−0.0116.122AEM−0.0103.606
Fig. 6

The statistics (correlation, bias, RMSE) of MME simulations calculated by the four MME methods (Bayesian, Linear, SVD, AEM) based on the original and EEMD-improved model simulations in six continents.

Fig. 7

Multi-model ensemble mean simulations of global annual mean temperatures for future scenarios (RCP2.6, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) and their EEMD-improved series (RCP26 minus EEMD, RCP45 minus EEMD and RCP85 minus EEMD).

Language: English
Page range: 24846 - 24846
Submitted on: May 4, 2014
Accepted on: Jun 23, 2014
Published on: Dec 1, 2014
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2014 Xianliang Zhang, Xiaodong Yan, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.