Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The leaky funnel model revisited Cover

The leaky funnel model revisited

Open Access
|Dec 2012

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1. 

Schematic representation of the leaky funnel model. A 3-D view is given in the inset while the main figure consists of a projection onto the xz plane. The leaky funnel extends from x=0 to x=∞ with a decreasing section. The entrance of the funnel is fueled with water from the ocean surface. The porous walls allow water to escape the funnel. Advection and diffusion control the transport within the funnel. At the entrance (boundary at x=0), concentrations are set to unity and ages to zero. It is noteworthy to mention that no assumption is made on the nature of the flow outside the funnel nor on the actual position with respect to the mixed layer.

Fig. 2. 

Global water age distribution ϕ (solid line) versus age in two 3-D OGCMs, UL-OM (top left) and LSG-OM (top right), compared to that predicted by the leaky funnel (dashed line). The leaky funnel curve in each panel is obtained with the parameters appropriate to the corresponding OGCM from Table 1. In the two upper panels, the curve computed with the parameters as estimated by the method of MD08 is also represented (dotted line). The arrow in those two panels points to the actual global mean water age 〈a〉 obtained with each OGCM. The lower two panels allow the comparison of both OGCMs with focus on ages under 2000 years. Global water age distribution ϕ (bottom left) as obtained with LSG-OM (thin solid) and UL-OM (thick solid) and as estimated by the leaky funnel for each OGCM: LSG-OM (dotted) and UL-OM (dashed). Relative difference (bottom right) between the OGCM and the leaky funnel global water age distributions for LSG-OM (thin solid) and UL-OM (thick solid).

Table 1. Parameters A 0 and A D of the leaky funnel model as obtained from a least squares fit to the 3-D model results

OGCM A0 (yr) A D (yr) Peâ〉 (yr) 〈a〉 (yr) UL-OM 1243 1982 1.6 764 764 LSG-OM 644 5249 8.1 574 573

[i] The estimated Pe number and global mean water age are given in columns 4 and 5, respectively. The last column contains the actual global mean water age from the 3-D OGCM experiment.

Fig. 3. 

Global water age distribution ϕ in the leaky funnel (solid line) versus age. The two asymptotes when and are represented by the dashed and dotted-dashed lines, respectively. Also illustrated is the global distribution of mean water age φ (dotted line). We build these curves with the help of the A 0 and A D values obtained with the UL-OM model.

Table 2. Parameters of the leaky funnel model as obtained from a least squares fit to the domain-averaged water ages resulting from several experiments with two 3-D models (UL-OM, column 2, and LSG-OM, column 3)

UL-OM LSG-OM A0 (yr) 1010 690 Pe E 6.4 14.0 Pe N 7.0 2.8 Pe 3.3 2.4 A D (yr) 3333 1656

[i] The values in this Table are obtained by the MD08 method with numerical diffusion explicitly considered. Line 4 gives the effective Peclet number computed from eq. (28) and the last line contains the effective A D scale (A D =Pe A 0).

Fig. 4. 

Difference in CO2 cumulative uptake (thick solid line) by two ocean global carbon models. The individual uptakes (represented as anomalies with respect to 1765 A.D.) are obtained from abiotic constrained CO2 experiments with LSG-OM (dashed line) and UL-OM (dotted line). The thin solid line corresponds to the atmospheric CO2 forcing used in these experiments. Units for the atmospheric CO2 are given on the right axis.

Fig. 5. 

Mean δ14C vertical profiles in several ocean basins from GEOSECS (solid lines; Stuiver et al., 1981) and from two pre-industrial experiments with the OGCM standard versions UL-OM (dashed lines) and LSG-OM (dotted lines). The values in the North, Equatorial and Southern Atlantic and Pacific Oceans are reproduced, respectively, in the upper left and right three panels, with the bottom panel representing the Southern Ocean (south of 50°S). The pre-industrial OGCM δ14C is computed with the simplified method of Toggweiler et al. (1989). The discrepancy between models and data in the upper ocean partly results from the penetration of bomb 14C that is not considered in these numerical experiments.

Table 3. Best fit parameters of the leaky funnel when numerical diffusion is considered (rows 4 and 5) or not (rows 7 and 8) in the least squares fitting procedure of MD08

OGCM A0 (yr) Pe E Pe N Peâ〉 (yr) 〈a〉 (yr) Numerical diffusion considered UL-OM 1010 6.4 7.0 3.3 778 764 LSG-OM 690 14.0 2.8 2.4 485 573 Numerical diffusion neglected UL-OM 884 7.3 – 7.3 778 764 LSG-OM 511 18.9 – 18.9 485 573

[i] For each OGCM (column 1), this table gives the advective timescale (column 2), the Peclet numbers associated to the explicit and numerical diffusivities (columns 3 and 4) and the effective Pe (column 5). Column 6 contains the estimated domain averaged water age 〈â〉 computed from eq. (23) with the help of A 0 and Pe in the present table. The global mean age predicted by the standard version of the OGCMs (that is, for β i i =1) is given in column 7.

Language: English
Page range: 19131 - 19131
Submitted on: May 23, 2011
Accepted on: Jun 29, 2012
Published on: Dec 1, 2012
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2012 Anne Mouchet, Eric Deleersnijder, Francois Primeau, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.