Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Barrier Layer of the Atlantic warm pool: Formation mechanism and influence on the mean climate Cover

The Barrier Layer of the Atlantic warm pool: Formation mechanism and influence on the mean climate

Open Access
|Dec 2012

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1. 

Mean biases in the model simulation. (a) SST ( C), (b) SSS (g kg−1), (c) precipitation (mm d−1) and (d) BLT (m).

Fig. 2. 

Regions and the magnitudes of the forcing applied in model experiments.

Table 1. Description of various model simulations performed

Experiment Description CR Control run, 50 yr long EXP1 Five 10-yr runs with freshening in the Amazon region EXP2 Five 10-yr runs with both, freshening in the Amazon region as well as increased salinity in the subtropical salinity maxima region EXP3 Five 10-yr runs with double the forcing in EXP2
Fig. 3. 

Mean changes in EXP1 (a) SST ( C), (b) SSS (g kg−1), (c) MLD (m) and (d) BLT (m) (closed contours show those regions where the changes satisfy the Student's t-test for statistical significance at 95% confidence level).

Fig. 4. 

The mean changes along 57 W and between 10 N and 25 N for (a) SSS (g kg−1), (b) d(▵SSS)/dy (g kg−1 m−1) and changes in (c) MLD (m).

Fig. 5. 

Illustration of the mean salinity changes (g kg−1) induced in EXP2. The change in surface salinity is shown in (a), the subsurface salinity change along 60 W in (b) and along 20 N in (c).

Fig. 6. 

The results from EXP2 are shown. The mean change in SST ( C) is shown in (a), the mean precipitation change (mm d−1) in (b), the MLD change (m) in (c) and the mean BLT change (m) in (d) (closed contours show those regions where the changes satisfy the Student's t-test for statistical significance at 95% confidence level).

Fig. 7. 

Idem as for Fig. 7, but now for EXP3.

Fig. 8. 

The mean changes in circulation of surface winds in EXP3. The units are in N m−2.

Fig. 9. 

Mean changes in vertical velocity along the equator and between 40 W and 20 W. Velocity is positive downwards and each unit is 10−6 m s−1.

Fig. 10. 

Winter vertical subsurface temperature and salinity differences below the mixed layer plotted against each other for the three experiments. Values have been averaged over the region between 65 W and 50 W and between 18 N and 20 N.

Fig. 11. 

The subsurface temperature during the winter of year 4 in the CR is shown in (a). (b) and (c) show the subsurface salinity anomaly and the subsurface temperature, respectively, during the winter of year 4 in EXP3. Values have been averaged over the region between 65 W and 50 W and between 18 N and 20 N.

Fig. 12. 

Time evolution of the MLH budget terms (W m−2) with error bars indicated. The evolution of MLH in (a), SHF in (b), AHF in (c) and THF in (d) for the various cases as depicted in the legend. All time series are at a running mean of 5 months. The first and last years have been removed due to box-car smoothing. All values have been averaged over the region between 65 W and 50 W and between 18 N and 20 N.

Fig. 13. 

The seasonal cycle of BLT (m) for the region averaged over (a) 65 W–50 W, 10 N–20 N and (b) 50 W–30 W, 25 N–30 N. (c) The seasonal cycle of SSS (g kg−1) averaged over the region 50 W–30 W, 25 N–30 N. (d) The mean subsurface salinity averaged over the region 65 W–50 W, 10 N–20 N.

Language: English
Page range: 18162 - 18162
Submitted on: Aug 25, 2011
Published on: Dec 1, 2012
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2012 K. Balaguru, P. Chang, R. Saravanan, C. J. Jang, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.