Abstract
I am grateful that A. van Delden has pointed out some inadequacies of mesoscale entrainment instability (MEI) as an explanation for mesoscale cellular convection (MCC). I agree that the MEI model for MCC suffers because of the requirement that lateral diffusion acts as the large wavenumber cut-off. In order for lateral diffusion to effectively damp out scales immediately smaller than those with the maximum growth rate, the diffusivity K is constrained by
k2m K ≈ σm
where km is the horizontal wavenumber and σ3 the growth rate of the fastest growing mode. (The above criterion can also apply to linear convective models.) For MCC, km≈10-4m-1. Any mesoscale instability worthy of the name would need σm > 10-5 s-1. K must be at least 1000 m2 s-1 if MEI is to account for the cell-size of MCC.
© 1985 Brian H. Fielder, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
