Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Necessity of Unsettling Encounters in Collaborative Research – Reflections of Two Researchers without Experiential Expertise Cover

The Necessity of Unsettling Encounters in Collaborative Research – Reflections of Two Researchers without Experiential Expertise

Open Access
|Jan 2022

References

  1. Abma, T.A., Banks, S., Cook, T., Dias, S., Madsen, W., Springett, J., & Wright, M. (2019). Participatory research for health and social well-Being. Springer.
  2. Adams, T.E. (2008). A review of narrative ethics. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(2), 175194. 10.1177/1077800407304417
  3. Banks, S. (2013). Negotiating personal engagement and professional accountability: Professional wisdom and ethics work. European Journal of Social Work, 16(5), 587604. 10.1080/13691457.2012.732931
  4. Banks, S. (2016). Everyday ethics in professional life: social work as ethics work. Ethics and Social Welfare, 10(1), 3552. 10.1080/17496535.2015.1126623
  5. Banks, S. & Brydon-Miller, M. (Eds). (2019). Ethics in participatory research for health and social well-being: Cases and commentaries. Routledge.
  6. Barnes, C. (1996). Disability and the myth of the independent researcher. Disability & Society, 11(1), 107110. 10.1080/09687599650023362
  7. Barnes, C. (2003). What a difference a decade makes: Reflections on doing ‘emancipatory’ disability research. Disability & Society, 18(1), 317. 10.1080/713662197
  8. Belenky, M.F., Clinchy, B.M., Goldberger, N.R. & Tarule, J.M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. Basic Books.
  9. Bigby, C., Frawley, P., & Ramcharan, P. (2014). A collaborative group method of inclusive research. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 27(1), 5464. 10.1111/jar.12082
  10. BMBF (2016). Grundsatzpapier des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung zur partizipation [Position paper from the Ministry for Education and Research concerning participation]. https://vdivde-it.de/sites/default/files/document/BMBF_grundsatzpapier_partizipation_barrierefrei.pdf
  11. Boevink, W. (2017). Planting a tree: On recovery, empowerment, and experiential expertise in psychiatry. Trimbos Instituut/Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, https://www.trimbos.nl/docs/e5b58bcc-d191-4b8a-9113-7b9cdbb92624.pdf
  12. Bos, G.F. (2016). Antwoorden op andersheid. Over ontmoetingen tussen mensen met en zonder verstandelijke beperking in omgekeerde-integratiesettingen. [Responding to otherness: About encounters between people with and without intellectual disabilities in ‘reversed integration’ settings] [Doctoral dissertation]. Amsterdam: VU University. https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/antwoorden-op-andersheid-over-ontmoetingen-tussen-mensen-met-en-z
  13. Bos, G.F. & Abma, T.A. (2021). Putting down verbal and cognitive weaponry: The need for ‘experimental-relational spaces of encounter’ between people with and without severe intellectual disabilities. Disability & Society. Advance online publication. 10.1080/09687599.2021.1899896
  14. Bos, G.F., & Kal, D. (2016). The value of inequality. Social Inclusion, 4(4), 129139. 10.17645/si.v4i4.689
  15. Boumans, J. (2012). Het subject als maatstaf? Een essay over de valkuilen van het onderzoek naar ervaringskennis. [The subject as measuring stick? An essay on the pitfalls of research into experiential expertise.] In J. Jansen, (red.), T. Dobbelaar (red.), Zie meer, kijk anders. Tien jonge wetenschappers over disability studies (pp. 7185). [See more, look differently: Ten young scientists on disability studies.] ZonMw.
  16. Bradbury, H. (2015). Introduction: How to situate and define action research. In H. Bradbury (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of action research (pp. 19). Sage.
  17. Broznan, L. (2019). The lion’s den: The epistemic dimension of invisible emotional Labour in service-user involvement spaces. Journal of Ethics in Mental Health, Special Theme Issue VI: Disordering Social Inclusion: Ethics, Critiques, Collaborations, Futurities, 10, 114. https://jemh.ca/issues/v9/documents/JEMH%20Inclusion%20xi.pdf
  18. Campbell, F. K. (2019). Precision ableism: A studies in ableism approach to developing histories of disability and abledment. Rethinking History, 23(2), 138156. 10.1080/13642529.2019.1607475
  19. Carr, S. (2019). ‘I am not your nutter’: a personal reflection on commodification and comradeship in service user and survivor research. Disability & Society, 34(7-8), 11401153. 10.1080/09687599.2019.1608424
  20. Chalachanová, A., Nind, M., Østby, M., Power, A., Tilley, L., Walsmley, J. (2020). Building relationships in inclusive research in diverse contexts. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 22(1), 147157. 10.16993/sjdr.681
  21. Chamberlin, J. (2005). User/consumer involvement in mental health service delivery. Epidemiologia e Psychiatria Sociale, 14(1), 1015. 10.1017/S1121189X00001871
  22. Chapman, C. (2014). How I came to accept restraining and confining disabled Aboriginal children. In B. Burstow, B. Lefrancois, & S. Diamon [Eds], Psychiatry disrupted: Theorizing resistance and crafting the (r)evolution. Queens University Press.
  23. Church, K. (2008). Exhibiting as inquiry: Travels of an accidental curator. In J.G. Knowles & A.L. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues (pp. 421434). Sage.
  24. Church, K. (1995). Forbidden narratives: Critical autobiography as social science. Routledge.
  25. Davidow, S. (2020, January 11). Power means: Never say you’re sorry. Mad in America: Science, psychiatry and social justice. https://www.madinamerica.com/2020/01/power-means-never-say-youre-sorry/
  26. De Schauwer, E., Daelman, S., Vandenbussche, H., Sergeant, S., Van de Putte, I., & Davies, B. (2021). Desiring and critiquing humanity/ability/personhood: disrupting the ability/disability binary. Disability & Society, 36(2), 286305. 10.1080/09687599.2020.1735306
  27. Denzin, N. (2000). The practices and politics of interpretation. In N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research, (pp. 897922). Sage.
  28. Ellis, C. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Altamira Press.
  29. Embregts, P., Tamianiau, E., Heerkens, L., Schippers, A. & van Hove, G. (2018). Collaboration in inclusive research: Competencies considered important for people with and without intellectual disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 15(3), 193201. 10.1111/jppi.12248
  30. Feder-Kittay, E. (2009). The personal is philosophical is political: A philosopher and mother of a cognitively disabled person sends notes from the battlefield. Metaphilosophy, 40(3–4), 606627. 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01600.x
  31. Frankena, T.K. (2019). Optimizing inclusive health research. Meaningful collaboration with people with intellectual disabilities [Doctoral Dissertation], Radboud UMC. https://0da93f8e-6ee7-45d9-be21-eecb55ca3e69.filesusr.com/ugd/01fbc4_06f4528f53c84e7ea958d7a309321645.pdf
  32. Frankena, T. K., Naaldenberg, J., Cardol, M., & Garcia Iriarte, E. e.a. (2019). A consensus statement on how to conduct inclusive health research. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 63(1), 111. 10.1111/jir.12486
  33. Frankena, T.K., Naaldenberg, J., Cardol, M., Linehan, C., & van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk, H. (2015). Active involvement of people with intellectual disabilities in health research: A structured literature review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 45-46, 271283. 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.08.004
  34. Gergen, K.J. (2012). An invitation to social construction (2nd ed.). Sage.
  35. Gilbert, T. (2004). Involving people with learning disabilities in research: Issues and possibilities. Health and Social Care in the Community, 12(4), 298308. 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2004.00499.x
  36. Gillard, S., Borschmann, R., Turner, K., Goodrich-Prunell, N., Lovell, K., & Chambers, M. (2010), ‘What difference does it make?’ Finding evidence of the impact of mental health service user researchers on research into the experiences of detained psychiatric patients. Health Expectations, 13(2), 185194. 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00596.x
  37. Gillard, S., Turner, K., & Gibson, K. (2013). Balancing good research with good mental health: A step-by-step guide to employing and supporting service user researchers. National Institute for Health Research. http://www.rds-sw.nihr.ac.uk/documents/NIHR_MHRN_Involving_Mental_Health_Problems_Research2013.pdf
  38. Green, G. (2016). Power to the people: to what extent has public involvement in applied health research achieved this? Research Involvement and Engagement, 2(1), 113. 10.1186/s40900-016-0042-y
  39. Groot, B. & Abma, T.A. (2019). Partnership, collaboration, and power. In S. Banks & M. Brydon-Miller (Eds.), Ethics in participatory research for health and social well-being: Cases and commentaries (pp. 103130). Routledge.
  40. Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage.
  41. Habermas, J. (1981/1995). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns (Vol. I: Handlungs-rationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung). [Theory of communicative action (Vol 1: Action rationality and societal rationalisation)]. Suhrkamp.
  42. Happell, B., Gordon, S., Bocking, J., Ellis, P., Roper, C., Liggins, J., Platania, C., & Scholz, B. (2018). How did I not see that? Perspectives of nonconsumer mental health researchers on the benefits of collaborative research with consumers. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 27(84), 12301239. 10.1111/inm.12453
  43. Happell, B., & Scholz, B. (2018). Doing what we can, but knowing our place: Being an ally to promote consumer leadership in mental health. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 27(1), 440447. 10.1111/inm.12404
  44. Hochschild, A.R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.
  45. Hosking, D.M. & Bouwen, R. (2000). Organizational learning: Relational-constructionist approaches. An overview. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9(2), 129132. 10.1080/135943200397897
  46. ICPHR – International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research (2013). Position paper 1: What is participatory health research? International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research.
  47. Jones, N., & Cutler, E. (2018, July 2). “The angry consumer”: Embracing difficult conversations. Mad in America: Science, psychiatry and social justice. https://www.madinamerica.com/2018/07/angry-consumer-emotions/
  48. King, C., & Gillard, S. (2019). Bringing together coproduction and community participatory research approaches: Using first person reflective narrative to explore coproduction and community involvement in mental health research. Health Expectations, 22(4), 701708. 10.1111/hex.12908
  49. Kunneman, H. (2017). Amor complexitatis. Bouwstenen voor een kritisch humanisme. Deel 2. [Amor complexitatis: Building blocks for a critical humanism. Part 2.]. Humanistic University Press.
  50. Lambert, N., & Carr, S. (2018). ‘Outside the Original Remit’: Co-production in UK mental health research, lessons from the field. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 27(4), 12731281. 10.1111/inm.12499
  51. Leget, C., Van Nistelrooij, I. & Visse, M. (2017). Beyond demarcation: Care ethics as an interdisciplinary field of inquiry, Nursing Ethics, 26(1), 19. 10.1177/0969733017707008
  52. Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage.
  53. Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba E.G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. In D.D. Williams (Ed.), Naturalistic evaluation: New directions for program evaluation, (pp. 7384). Yossey-Bass.
  54. Lutz, K., Offergeld, J., Freymuth, N., Arp, A.L., Benz, B., Schönig, B & Walther, K. (2020). Gemeinsam Forschung gestalten – Handreichung zur partizipativen Forschung. [Shaping shared research – Manual for participatory research]. https://www.s-inn.net/fileadmin/redaktion/bilder/SOWILA/Handreichung_Gemeinsam_Forschung_gestalten.pdf
  55. Lyotard, J.F. (1988). The differend: Phrases in dispute. University of Minnesota Press.
  56. Maccarthy, J., Guerin, S., Wilson, A.G., & Dorris, E.R. (2019). Facilitating public and patient involvement in basic and preclinical health research. PLoS ONE, 14(5): e0216600. 10.1371/journal.pone.0216600
  57. Madison, D.S. (2005). Critical ethnography: Method, ethics, and performance. Sage.
  58. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. (C. Smith, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1945).
  59. MHRN (2013). Good practice guidance for involving people with experience of mental health problems in research. National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network. http://www.rds-sw.nihr.ac.uk/documents/NIHR_MHRN_Involving_Mental_Health_Problems_Research2013.pdf
  60. Moss, C., Warner, T., Happell, B., & Scholz, B. (2021). Motivations for allyship with mental health consumer movements. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(4), 601618. 10.1080/14780887.2020.1718814
  61. Muhammad, M., Wallerstein, N., Sussman, A. L., Avila, M., Belone, L., & Duran, B. (2014). Reflections on researcher identity and power: The impact of positionality on community based participatory research (CBPR) processes and outcomes. Critical Sociology, 41(7–8), 10451063. 10.1177/0896920513516025
  62. Nierse, C. & Abma, T. A. (2011). Developing voice and empowerment: The first step towards a broad consultation in research agenda setting. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 55(4), 41121. 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01388.x
  63. Nind, M. (2014). What is inclusive research? Bloomsbury.
  64. Nind, M. (2017). The practical wisdom of inclusive research. Qualitative Research, 17(3), 278288. 10.1177/1468794117708123
  65. Peels, H. (2019, Aug. 7). Experiences in belonging. [Paper]. IASSIDD Conference, Glasgow.
  66. Pharos (2020). Infosheet Inclusief onderzoek [Info sheet Inclusive research]. Pharos National Expertise Centre on Health differences. https://www.pharos.nl/infosheets/inclusief-onderzoek/
  67. Puyalto, C., Pallisera, M., Fullana, J., & Vila, M. (2016). Doing research together: A study on the views of advisors with intellectual disabilities and non-disabled researchers collaborating in research. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 29, 146159. 10.1111/jar.12165
  68. Rose, D. (2017). Service user/survivor-led research in mental health: Epistemological possibilities. Disability & Society, 37(6), 773789. 10.1080/09687599.2017.1320270
  69. Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 765771. 10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3
  70. Russo, J. (2012). Survivor-controlled research: A new foundation for thinking about psychiatry and mental health [95 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(1), Art. 8. 10.17169/fqs-13.1.1790
  71. Russo, J., & Beresford, P. (2014). Between exclusion and colonisation: Seeking a place for mad people’s knowledge in academia. Disability & Society, 30(1), 153157. 10.1080/09687599.2014.957925
  72. Sandvoort, H. (2017). Vlog: Terugblik congres in Leuven. Het verslag – in het lang en in het breed – van het congres in Leuven. [Extensive report from the Leuven congress]. Retrieved on September 30th, 2019, from https://www.kennispleingehandicaptensector.nl/nieuws/vlog-congres-leuven-netwerk-samen-werken-samen-leren
  73. Scholz, B., Roper, C., Juntanamalaga, P., & Happell, B. (2019). Understanding the role of allies in systemic consumer empowerment: A literature review. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 20(4), 354361. 10.1080/01612840.2018.1553004
  74. Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. Ashgate Publishing Limited.
  75. Sergeant, S. & Sandvoort, H. (2019, May 26). ‘Zet uw hulpverlenersknop uit!’ [Switch of your caregivers switch]. Kennisplein gehandicaptensector. https://www.kennispleingehandicaptensector.nl/nieuws/ervaringskennis-vlog-netwerk-samen-werken-samen-leren
  76. Smaling, A. (2008). Dialoog en empathie in de methodologie [Dialogue and empathy in methodology]. SWP.
  77. Spandler, H. (August 22, 2018). Uncomfortable relations: Reflections on learning from psychiatric survivors. Mad in America: Science, Psychiatry and Social Justice. https://www.madinamerica.com/2018/08/uncomfortable-relations-reflections-on-learning-from-psychiatric-survivors/
  78. Stake, R.E. (1975). To evaluate an arts program. In R.E. Stake (Ed.), Evaluating the arts in education: A responsive approach. Merril.
  79. Stony Brook University (2010, December 6). Provost lecture – Bernhard Waldenfels: Response and trust: Some aspects of responsive ethics. [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6iOsQ_ho94
  80. Stuhlfauth, S., Knutzsen, I., Foss, C. (2019). Coming from two different worlds: A qualitative, exploratory study of the collaboration between patient representatives and researchers. Health Expectations, 22(3), 496503. 10.1111/hex.12875
  81. Sweeney, A., & Morgan, L. (2009). The levels and stages of service user/survivor involvement in research. In J. Wallcraft, B. Schrank, & M. Amering (Eds.), Handbook of service user involvement in mental health research. Wiley-Blackwell.
  82. Tervalon, M. & Murray-García, J. (1998). Cultural humility versus cultural competence: A critical distinction in defining physician training outcomes in multicultural education. Journal of Healthcare for the Poor and Underserved, 9(2), 117125. 10.1353/hpu.2010.0233
  83. Thompson, E., & Varela, F.J. (2001). Radical embodiment: Neural dynamics and consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(10), 418425. 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01750-2
  84. Tillmann-Healy, L.M. (2003). Friendship as method. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(5), 729749. 10.1177/1077800403254894
  85. Tillmann-Healy, L.M. & Kiesinger, C. (2001). Mirrors: Seeing each other and ourselves through fieldwork. In K. Gilbert (Ed.), The emotional nature of qualitative research, (pp. 81108). CRC Press.
  86. Tronto, J.C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge.
  87. Van der Lans, J. (2019). Niet-normaal. Ontwikkelingen en dilemma’s in de Nederlandse gehandicaptenzorg (pp. 197208). [Abnormal. Developments and dilemma’s in the Dutch care for people with intellectual disabilities]. De Graaff.
  88. Van Manen, M., & Li, S. (2002). The pathic principle of pedagogical language. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 215224. 10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00065-8
  89. von Peter, S. (2017). Partizipative und kollaborative forschungsansätze in der psychiatrie [Participatory and collaborative strategies in psychiatric Research]. Psychiatrische Praxis, 44(8), 43143. 10.1055/s-0043-120241
  90. Voronka, J. (2016). The politics of ‘people with lived experience’: Experiential authority and the risks of strategic essentialism. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology, 23(3/4), 189201. 10.1353/ppp.2016.0017
  91. Wakeford, T. & Sanchez Rodriguez, J. (2018). Participatory action research: Towards a more fruitful knowledge. In L. Facer, L. & K. Dunleavy (Eds.), Connected communities foundation series. University of Bristol/AHRC Connected Communities Programme.
  92. Waldenfels, B. (2011). In place of the other. Continental Philosophy Review, 44, 151164. 10.1007/s11007-011-9180-y
  93. Walmsley, J. (2001). Normalisation, emancipatory research and inclusive research in learning disability. Disability and Society, 16(2), 187205. 10.1080/09687590120035807
  94. Walmsley, J. (2004). Inclusive learning disability research: The (nondisabled) researcher’s role. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 6571. 10.1111/j.1468-3156.2004.00281.x
  95. Walmsley, J., & Johnson, K. (2003). Inclusive research with people with learning disabilities: Past, present and futures. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  96. Wildhood, M. (2019, August 15). In defense of anger. Mad in America: Science, psychiatry and social justice. https://madinamerica.com/2019/08/in-defense-of-anger/
  97. Woelders, S. (2020). Power-ful patient participation: Opening spaces for silenced knowledge [Doctoral dissertation]. VU University. https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/power-full-patient-participation-opening-spaces-for-silenced-know
  98. Woelders, S., Abma, T.A., Visser, T. & Schipper, K. (2015). The power of inclusive research. Disability & Society, 30(4), 528542. 10.1080/09687599.2015.1031880
  99. Wright, M., & Kongats, K. (2019). Participatory Health Research-Voices from around the World. Springer.
  100. Young, I.M. (1997). Asymmetrical reciprocity: On moral respect, wonder, and enlarged thought. Constellations, 3(3), 340363. 10.1111/j.1467-8675.1997.tb00064.x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33596/coll.78 | Journal eISSN: 2638-4396
Language: English
Page range: 4 - 4
Published on: Jan 27, 2022
Published by: University of Miami Libraries
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2022 Sebastian von Peter, Gustaaf F. Bos, published by University of Miami Libraries
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.