Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Addressing the Data Analytics Gap: A Community-University Partnership to Enhance Analytics Capabilities in the Non-Profit Sector Cover

Addressing the Data Analytics Gap: A Community-University Partnership to Enhance Analytics Capabilities in the Non-Profit Sector

Open Access
|Aug 2020

References

  1. Al-Kodmany, K. (2012). Utilizing GIS in nonprofit organizations for urban planning applications: Experiences from the field. Journal of Geographic Information System, 4(4), 279297. 10.4236/jgis.2012.44034
  2. Barman, E., & Macindoe, H. (2012). Institutional pressures and organizational capacity: The case of outcome measurement. Sociological Forum, 27(1), 7093. 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2011.01302.x
  3. Bonabeau, E. (2003). Don’t trust your gut. Harvard Business Review, 81(5), 11623. https://hbr.org/2003/05/dont-trust-your-gut
  4. Boyer, E. L. (1996). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
  5. Byrd, J. W., & Cote, J. (2017). Accounting and economic biases in donations to NGO’s: Is scaling the new overhead myth in charity giving? 10.2139/ssrn.2934719
  6. Carman, J. G., & Fredericks, K. A. (2008). Nonprofits and evaluation: Empirical evidence from the field. New Directions for Evaluation, 119, 5171. 10.1002/ev.268
  7. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (2007). Carnegie Selects Colleges and Universities for 2015 Community Engagement Classification. https://www.carnegiefoundation.org/newsroom/news-releases/carnegie-selects-colleges-universities-2015-community-engagement-classification/
  8. Collins, J. (2001). Good to Great: Why some companies make the leap… and others don’t. HarperBusiness.
  9. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage Publications.
  10. Davenport, T. H., & Harris, J. G. (2007). Competing on analytics: The new science of winning. Harvard Business School Press.
  11. Garven, S. A., Hofmann, M. A., & McSwain, D. N. (2016). Playing the numbers game: Program ratio management in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership. 26(4). 10.1002/nml.21201
  12. Gill, S. J. (2000). The manager’s pocket guide to organizational learning. HRD Press.
  13. Gill, S. J. (2010). Developing a learning culture in nonprofit organizations. Sage Publications.
  14. Gregory, A., & Howard, D. (2009). The nonprofit starvation cycle. The Stanford Social Innovation Review. 7(4). 4953.
  15. Hackler, D., & Saxton, G. D. (2007). The strategic use of information technology by nonprofit organizations: Increasing capacity and untapped potential. Public Administration Review, 67(3), 474487. 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00730.x
  16. Hager, M., Pollak, T., Wing, K., & Rooney, P. (2004). Getting what we pay for: Low overhead limits nonprofit effectiveness. www.urban.orga/publications/311044.html
  17. Holland, B. (2005). Scholarship and mission in the 21st century: The role of engagement. Proceedings of the Australian Universities Quality Forum.
  18. Holman, P. (2007). Preparing to mix and match methods. In Holman, P., Devane, T., & Cady, S. (Eds.), The change handbook: The definitive resource on today’s best methods for engaging whole systems (pp. 4458). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  19. Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258268. 10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
  20. Johnson, M. P. (2015). Data, analytics and community-based organizations: Transforming data to decisions for community development. I/S: A Journal of Law & Policy for the Information Society, 11(1), 5086.
  21. Lecy, J. D., & Searing, E. A. M. (2014). Anatomy of the Nonprofit Starvation Cycle: An Analysis of Falling Overhead Ratios in the Nonprofit in the Nonprofit Sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 44(3), 539563.
  22. Lenczner, M., & Phillips, S. (2012). From stories to evidence: How mining data can promote data can promote innovation in the nonprofit sector. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(7), 1015. 10.22215/timreview/575
  23. McAfee, A., Brynjolfsson, E., Davenport, T. H., Patil, D. J., & Barton, D. (2012). Big data: The management revolution. Harvard Business Review, 90(10), 6167.
  24. Picciano, A. G. (2012). The evolution of big data and learning analytics in American higher education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. 16(3). 10.24059/olj.v16i3.267
  25. Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2006). Evidence-based management. Harvard Business Review, 84(1), 6274.
  26. Rogge, N., Agasisti, T., & Witte, K. D. (2017). Big data and the measurement of public organizations’ performance and efficiency: The state-of-the-art. Public Policy and Administration, 32(4), 263281. 10.1177/0952076716687355
  27. Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Sage Publications.
  28. Sandmann, L., & Weerts, D. (2008). Reshaping institutional boundaries to accommodate an engagement agenda. Innovative Higher Education, 33(3), 181196. 10.1007/s10755-008-9077-9
  29. Stoecker, R. (2007). Research practices and needs of non-profit organizations in an urban center. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 34(4), 97201. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol34/iss4/6
  30. Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. The Free Press.
  31. Zurada, J., & Karwowski, W. (2011). Knowledge discovery through experiential learning from business and other contemporary data sources: A review and reappraisal. Information Systems Management, 28(3), 258274. 10.1080/10580530.2010.493846
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33596/coll.58 | Journal eISSN: 2638-4396
Language: English
Page range: 11 - 11
Published on: Aug 31, 2020
Published by: University of Miami Libraries
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 Winston Tripp, Danielle Gage, Hillary Williams, published by University of Miami Libraries
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.