Table 1
Organizational size and funding sources of participating organizations (n = 24).
| ORGANIZATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS | MEAN | MEDIAN | MIN | MAX | SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual revenue (thousand USD) | 2,298 | 225 | 0 | 40,000 | 8,378 |
| Number of funding sources | 2.96 | 3.5 | 0 | 5 | 1.52 |
| Funding sources (%) | |||||
| Government funding (%) | 22.6 | 10 | 0 | 97 | 28 |
| Foundation support (%) | 16.6 | 9 | 0 | 67 | 20.3 |
| Fee-for-service (%) | 2.3 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 8.5 |
| Private donation (%) | 43 | 40 | 0 | 100 | 35.6 |
| Corporate contribution (%) | 5.2 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 7.6 |
| Membership fee | 3 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 10.4 |
| Number of Full-time employees | 15.6 | 2 | 0 | 250 | 51.3 |
| Professional employees* (%) | 53.9 | 62.5 | 0 | 87.5 | 37.3 |
| Organizational age | 25 | 10.5 | 2 | 150 | 31.9 |
[i] *Employees who have professional degrees, certificate, or training.
Table 2
Racial diversity of the organizations (n = 24).
| MEAN (SD) | MIN | MAX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Board Members | 9.5 (5.35) | 4 | 24 |
| Number of volunteers (per month) | 29 (46.64) | 0 | 200 |
| Employee BIPOC | 0.40 (0.38) | 0 | 0.88 |
| Board BIPOC | 0.46 (0.34) | 0 | 1 |
| Volunteer BIPOC | 0.41 (0.38) | 0 | 0.88 |
| CEO BIPOC | 0.38 (0.49) | 0 | 1 |
| CEO gender | 0.65 (0.49) | 0 | 1 |
Table 3
Decrease in resources and disruption in service/program (n = 24).
| IMPACT OF THE PANDEMIC | MEAN (SD) | MIN | MAX |
|---|---|---|---|
| Program disruption | 4.25 (1.03) | 2 | 5 |
| Program operation stop (%) | 10.04 (0.17) | 0 | 62.5 |
| Decrease in overall revenue | 2.45 (1.61) | 1 | 5 |
| Decrease in gov. grants or contracts | 2.30 (0.97) | 1 | 5 |
| Decrease in fee-for-service | 2.59 (1.22) | 1 | 5 |
| Decrease in donation | 3.78 (1.35) | 1 | 5 |
| Decrease in volunteers | 4.22 (1.16) | 1 | 5 |
[i] Note: To measure the decrease in resources, we used five Likert scales including, ‘greatly decreased (5)’, ‘somewhat decreased (4)’, ‘neither decreased nor increased (3)’, ‘somewhat increased (2)’, and ‘greatly increased (1)’.
Table 4
The important roles of the Pillar (n = 35).
| EXPECTED PILLAR’S ROLES | MEAN (SD) | MIN | MAX |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharing collaboration opportunity | 4.68 (0.63) | 2 | 5 |
| Sharing grant application opportunity | 4.53 (0.85) | 1 | 5 |
| Promoting networks (e.g., regular in-person meeting) | 4.51 (0.81) | 1 | 5 |
| Regular information sharing about community development, service opportunity, recruitment, events, etc. | 4.40 (0.76) | 2 | 5 |
| Providing education and training seminars (e.g., grant writing, fundraising strategy) | 4.31 (0.98) | 2 | 5 |
| Providing an opportunity for student volunteers or interns | 4.26 (1.02) | 2 | 5 |
Appendix
Correlation coefficient matrix for organizational resource, leadership, and the impact of COVID-19.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. CEO BIPOC | |||||||||||||||
| 2. Board BIPOC | .67*** | ||||||||||||||
| 3. Board size | –.50** | –.04 | |||||||||||||
| 4. Revenue | –.68*** | –.56*** | .44** | ||||||||||||
| 5. Gov grant (%) | –.02 | –.10 | .44** | .08 | |||||||||||
| 6. Foundation (%) | –.53*** | –.33 | .29 | .48** | –.23 | ||||||||||
| 7. Donation (%) | .16 | .19 | –.41** | –.18 | –.62*** | –.21 | |||||||||
| 8. Revenue diversification | –.62*** | –.47** | .32 | .72*** | .03 | .64*** | –.16 | ||||||||
| 9. FTE | –.21 | .07 | .65*** | .34 | .44** | .06 | –.29 | .21 | |||||||
| 10. Age | –.38* | –.14 | .45** | .21 | .22 | –.12 | –.15 | .27 | .26 | ||||||
| 11. Gov grant decrease | .34 | .22 | –.32 | –.40* | –.35* | –.37* | .08 | –.61*** | –.10 | –.30 | |||||
| 12. Donation decrease | –.02 | .03 | –.33 | –.27 | –.32 | –.08 | .21 | –.29 | –.08 | .20 | .15 | ||||
| 13. Volunteer decrease | –.06 | .00 | .08 | .03 | .01 | –.20 | .07 | –.11 | .11 | .29 | –.06 | .38* | |||
| 14. Budget decrease | .21 | .08 | –.53*** | –.40* | –.37* | –.44** | .33 | –.47** | –.25 | –.10 | .68*** | .43** | .20 | ||
| 15. Operation stop | .31 | .54*** | –.16 | –.41** | –.25 | –.41* | .18 | –.35* | –.14 | .24 | .18 | .24 | .11 | .25 | |
| 16. Program disruption | –.62*** | –.24 | .13 | .11 | –.22 | .12 | .06 | .15 | –.02 | .31 | .22 | .35* | .09 | .29 | .06 |
[i] Note. Correlation coefficient with *** if p < .01, ** if p < .05, * if p < .1.