Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Democratic Strategic Litigation and Defence of ‘LGBTI+’ Rights Cover

Democratic Strategic Litigation and Defence of ‘LGBTI+’ Rights

Open Access
|Jul 2025

References

  1. Altwegg-Boussac, Manon. 2021. “La ‘nature’ de ‘l’appréciation du Parlement’ selon le Conseil constitutionnel : la société, la science, et cetera.” La Revue des droits de l’homme 20. Accessed March 2025. http://journals.openedition.org/revdh/12773.
  2. Astolfi, Roberta. 2017. “Legal Gap: Porosity as Opportunity.” ARSP: Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie/Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy 103(4): 517529. DOI: 10.25162/arsp-2017-0252
  3. Barberá, Pablo, Anita R. Gohdes, Evgeniia Iakhnis, and Thomas Zeitzoff. 2024. “Distract and Divert: How World Leaders Use Social Media During Contentious Politics.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 29(1): 4773. DOI: 10.1177/19401612221102030
  4. Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 2009. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  5. Beer, Samuel H. 1957. “The Representation of Interests in British Government: Historical Background.” The American Political Science Review 51(3): 613650. DOI: 10.2307/1951852
  6. Bell, Derrick A. Jr. 1980. “Brown v. Board of Education and the Interest–Convergence Dilemma.” Harvard Law Review 93: 518553. DOI: 10.2307/1340546
  7. Bentham, Jeremy. (1791) 1999. Political Tactics. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI: 10.1093/oseo/instance.00077252
  8. Bligh, Gregory. 2021. “Du réalisme juridique à l’intersectionnalité. Une affaire de juristes.” La Revue des droits de l’homme 19. Accessed March 31, 2024. DOI: 10.4000/revdh.11549
  9. Blondiaux, Loïc. 2001. “La délibération : norme de l’action publique contemporaine ?” Projet 268: 8190. DOI: 10.3917/pro.268.0081
  10. Blondiaux, Loïc, and Yves Sintomer. 2002. “L’impératif délibératif.” Politix 57(15): 1735. Accessed March 31, 2024. DOI: 10.3406/polix.2002.1205
  11. Bouvard, Hugo. 2019. “Faire des gays et des lesbiennes des citoyen.ne.s responsables. Construction élitaire d’un public minoritaire par un dispositif de démocratie participative à Boston au début des années 1980.” Participations 25: 5982. DOI: 10.3917/parti.025.0059
  12. Brennecke, Nicolas. 2017. “Facilitating Public Interest Environmental Litigation through Locus Standi Requirements: A Comparative Analysis of South Africa and Germany.” LL.M. diss., University of Cape Town.
  13. Brodie, Ian. 2001. “Interest Group Litigation and the Embedded State: Canada’s Court Challenges Program.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 34(2): 357376. DOI: 10.1017/S0008423901777931
  14. Canan, Penelope, and George W. Pring. 1988. “Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation.” Social Problems 35(5): 506519. DOI: 10.2307/800612
  15. Cardinal, Linda. 2000. “Le pouvoir exécutif et la judiciarisation de la politique au Canada. Une étude du Programme de contestation judiciaire.” Politique et Sociétés 19(2–3): 4364. DOI: 10.7202/040224ar
  16. Carpenter, Daniel P., and David A. Moss, eds. 2014. Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How to Limit It. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139565875
  17. Cheung, Alvin. 2022. “Legal Astroturfing.” Queen’s University Legal Research Paper. Accessed March 31, 2024. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4279133
  18. Chevallier, Jacques. 2002. “La crise de la démocratie: Mythe ou réalité.” In Mélanges en l’honneur de Benoît Jeanneau – Les mutations contemporaines du droit public, edited by C.-A. Garbar, 361381. Paris: Dalloz.
  19. Council of Europe, European Commission for Democracy through Law. 2000. The Right to a Fair Trial. Science and Technique of Democracy, no. 28. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
  20. Dávid-Barrett, Elizabeth. 2023. “State Capture and Development: A Conceptual Framework.” Journal of International Relations and Development 26(2): 224244. DOI: 10.1057/s41268-023-00290-6
  21. DDD, Défenseur des droits. 2023. “Avis n° 23-06 sur la proposition de loi no 1494 visant à lutter contre les discriminations par la pratique de tests individuels et statistiques.” Accessed March 31, 2024. https://juridique.defenseurdesdroits.fr/doc_num.php?explnum_id=21879.
  22. DDD, Défenseur des droits. 2024. “Avis n° 24-01 sur la proposition de loi no 420 relative au régime juridique des actions de groupe.” Accessed March 31, 2024. https://juridique.defenseurdesdroits.fr/doc_num.php?explnum_id=22009.
  23. Delpeuch, Thierry, and Margarita Vassileva. 2009. “Contribution à une sociologie politique des entrepreneurs internationaux de transferts de réformes judiciaires.” L’Année sociologique 59(2): 371402. DOI: 10.3917/anso.092.0371
  24. Dick, Hannah. 2021. “Advocating for the Right: Alliance Defending Freedom and the Rhetoric of Christian Persecution.” Feminist Legal Studies 29: 375397. DOI: 10.1007/s10691-021-09468-0
  25. Dickson, Brice, ed. 2007. Judicial Activism in Common Law Supreme Courts. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199213290.001.0001
  26. Dunlop, Claire A. 2024. “LGBTIQ+ Lobbying: Advocacy, Advice and Regulation.” In Handbook on Lobbying and Public Policy, edited by David Coen and Alexander Katsaitis, 471486. Handbooks of Research on Public Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: 10.4337/9781800884717.00047
  27. Eliantonio, Mariolina, Marc Hertogh, Emma L. K. M. J. Boland, and Bettina Beyers. 2012. “Standing up for Your Right(s) in Europe: A Comparative Study on Legal Standing (Locus Standi) before the EU and Member States’ Courts.” Study for the European Parliament (PE 462.478). Accessed March 31, 2024. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/IPOL-JURI_ET(2012)462478.
  28. Epp, Charles R. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226772424.001.0001
  29. European Parliament. 2022. Resolution Aiming to Establish a Transparent, Ethical, and Responsible Framework for the Private Funding of Litigation, 13 Sept. 2020/2130(INL).
  30. European Parliamentary Research Service. 2021. “Responsible Private Funding of Litigation: European Added Value Assessment.” Accessed March 31, 2024. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/662612/EPRS_STU(2021)662612_EN.pdf.
  31. European Parliamentary Research Service. 2022. “The Rights of LGBTI People in the European Union.” Accessed March 31, 2024. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2022/729426/EPRS_BRI(2022)729426_EN.pdf.
  32. Fearon, James D. 1998. “Deliberation as Discussion.” In Deliberative Democracy, edited by Jon Elster, 4468. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139175005.004
  33. Flamant, Anouk. 2016. “Donner la parole aux étrangers? De la création d’une participation politique à l’usage ethnicisé de la catégorie d’étranger par les municipalités.” Participations 14 (1): 237264. DOI: 10.3917/parti.014.0237
  34. Fraley, Jill M. 2024. “What Roosevel Did to Brown v. Board of Education, or Race and Court Packing.” Nebraska Law Review 102: 575614.
  35. FRA (Fundamental Rights Agency of the European Union), and Council o. Europe. 2016. Handbook on European Law Relating to Access to Justice. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Accessed March 31, 2024. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/handbook_access_justice_eng.
  36. Girard, Charles. 2011. “La démocratie doit-elle être délibérative ?” Archives de philosophie 74: 223240. DOI: 10.3917/aphi.742.0223
  37. Girard, Charles. 2013. “La démocratie par la délibération ?” Idées économiques et sociales 173: 816. DOI: 10.3917/idee.173.0008
  38. Gourgues, Guillaume, and Alice Mazeaud. 2023. “Why Are Powerless Democratic Innovations Still Successful? A Political Sociology of the ‘Participatory State’ in France.” In The Impacts of Democratic Innovations, edited by Vincent Jacquet, Matt Ryan, and Ramon van der Does, 5174. Colchester: European Consortium for Political Research.
  39. Graser, Alexander, and Christian Helmrich, eds. 2019. Strategic Litigation: Begriff und Praxis. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag. DOI: 10.5771/9783845298276
  40. Grimmel, Andreas, ed. 2019. The Crisis of the European Union: Challenges, Analyses, Solutions. London: Routledge.
  41. Guillaumin, Colette. 1985. “Sur la notion de minorité.” L’Homme et la société 77–78: 101109. DOI: 10.3406/homso.1985.2224
  42. Hameleers, Michael. 2022. Populist Disinformation in Fragmented Information Settings: Understanding the Nature and Persuasiveness of Populist and Post-Factual Communication. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. DOI: 10.4324/9781003194668
  43. Harouel, Jean-Louis. 1987. “Le roi et les parlements.” In Le miracle capétien, edited by Stéphane Rials, 231240. Paris: Perrin. DOI: 10.3917/perri.rials.1987.01.0231
  44. Helmrich, Christian. 2019. “Strategic Litigation rund um die Welt.” In Strategic Litigation: Begriff und Praxis, edited by Alexander Graser and Christian Helmrich, 115140. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG. DOI: 10.5771/9783845298276-115
  45. Hess, Burkhard. 2022. “Strategic Litigation: A New Phenomenon in Dispute Resolution.” MPILux Research Paper 3: 135. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4107384
  46. Israel, Liora. 2021. Causes suprêmes ? Les mobilisations politiques du droit devant les Hautes Cours. Paris: Mission de recherche Droit et Justice. Accessed March 31, 2024. http://www.gip-recherche-justice.fr/publication/causes-supremes-les-mobilisations-politiques-du-droit-devant-les-hautes-cours/.
  47. Karwacki, Judy M. R. 1994. “The Two Passions of Pierre Elliott Trudeau: Language and Rights. The Court Challenges Program, 1978–1994.” LL.M. diss., University of Saskatchewan. Accessed March 31, 2024. https://harvest.usask.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/25383e32-79b5-4454-ba26-b98fa9372e22/content.
  48. Katz, Leo. 2010. “A Theory of Loopholes.” The Journal of Legal Studies 39(1): 131. DOI: 10.1086/649046
  49. Kelemen, R. Daniel. 2011. Eurolegalism: The Transformation of Law and Regulation in the European Union. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. DOI: 10.4159/harvard.9780674061057
  50. Kolbe-André, Jimmy, and Benjamin Moron-Puech. 2023. “L’avis de la Défenseure des droits sur l’action de groupe, vers un cadre juridique pour les procès stratégiques ?” Recueil Dalloz (20): 102122.
  51. Kostruba, Anatoliy, Valeriy Khrystych, Anna Ivanova, and Mykola Dovhan. 2023. “Legal Gaps: Concept, Content, Problems of the Role of Legal Doctrine in Overcoming Them.” Statute Law Review 44(2): 112. DOI: 10.1093/slr/hmac016
  52. Landemore, Hélène. 2012. Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.23943/princeton/9780691155654.001.0001
  53. Landemore, Hélène. 2020. Open Democracy: Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-First Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.23943/princeton/9780691181998.001.0001
  54. Lang, Marion. 2021. “Les limites de la participation ou la mise à l’écart des groupes ethniques minorisés. Une enquête à Marseille.” Espaces et sociétés 183: 8398. DOI: 10.3917/esp.183.0083
  55. Laplanche-Servigne, Soline, and Marie-Hélène Sa Vilas Boas. 2019. “Introduction. Les catégorisations des publics minorisés en question.” Participations 25(3): 531. DOI: 10.3917/parti.025.0005
  56. Lasser, Mitchel de S.-O.-I’E. 2009. Judicial Transformations: The Rights Revolution in the Courts of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  57. LDL, Ligue des droits et libertés. 2012. Les indicateurs de droits humains: outil de mesure nécessaire ou technicisation des droits? Accessed March 31, 2024. https://liguedesdroits.ca/wp-content/fichiers/indicateurs_final.pdf.
  58. Lefebvre, Rémi. 2019. “La politique, une affaire de ‘professionnels’?” In Manuel indocile de sciences sociales. Pour des savoirs résistants, edited by Fondation Copernic, 408417. Paris: La Découverte. DOI: 10.3917/dec.coper.2019.01.0408
  59. Leonard, Arthur S. 2018. “Citing Baker’s ‘Win,’ Arizona Court Rejects Stationary Store’s Opt-Out Claim.” Gay City News, June 21–July 4: 26. Accessed March 31, 2024. https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1356&context=fac_other_pubs.
  60. Levitsky, Steven, and Daniel Ziblatt. 2019. How Democracies Die. New York: Broadway Books.
  61. Manin, Bernard. 1985. “Volonté générale ou délibération. Esquisse d’une théorie générale de la délibération politique.” Le Débat 33(1): 7294. DOI: 10.3917/deba.033.0072
  62. Manin, Bernard. 2017. “Political Deliberation and the Adversarial Principle.” Daedalus 146(3): 3950. DOI: 10.1162/DAED_a_00445
  63. Manin, Bernard. 2021. “Délibération politique et principe du contradictoire.” In Le tournant délibératif de la démocratie, edited by Bernard Manin and Loïc Blondiaux, 117133. Paris: Les Presses de Sciences Po. DOI: 10.3917/scpo.blond.2021.01.0117
  64. Mazeaud, Alice, and Magali Nonjon. 2016. “Vers un standard participatif mondial? Enjeux, conditions et limites de la standardisation internationale de la participation publique.” Participations 14(1): 121151. Accessed March 31, 2024. DOI: 10.3917/parti.014.0121
  65. Mény, Yves. 2019. Imparfaites démocraties. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po. DOI: 10.3917/scpo.meny.2019.01
  66. Monédiaire, Gérard. 2011. “La participation du public organisée par le droit: des principes prometteurs, une mise en œuvre circonspecte.” Participations 1(1): 134155. DOI: 10.3917/parti.001.0134
  67. Moron-Puech, Benjamin. 2017. “Le droit des personnes intersexuées.” Socio 9: 215237. DOI: 10.4000/socio.2983
  68. Moron-Puech, Benjamin. 2023. “L’office du juge dans les procès stratégiques mettant en cause les libertés économiques.” Paper presented at Les libertés économiques face aux défis du XXIe siècle: quel équilibre jurisprudentiel ?, organized by Valérie Goesel-Le Bihan and Jérémy Heyman, Université Lumière Lyon 2, November 31. https://hal.science/hal-04486540v2.
  69. Moron-Puech, Benjamin. 2024. “Penser l’injustice des minoritaires pour renforcer la justice. À propos de B. Perreau, Sphères d’injustices. Pour un universalisme minoritaire, Paris, La Découverte, 2023.” Grief 11(2): 99105. DOI: 10.3917/grief.242.0099
  70. Mouffe, Chantal. 2018. “Populists Are on the Rise but This Can Be a Moment for Progressives Too.” The Guardian, September 10. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/sep/10/populists-rise-progressives-radical-right.
  71. Nash, Catherine Jean, and Kath Browne. 2020. Heteroactivism: Resisting Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans Rights and Equalities. London: Bloomsbury. DOI: 10.5040/9781350225503
  72. Ordover, Janusz A., and Philipp Weitzman. 1977. “On the Efficient Organization of Trials: A Comment.” Kyklos 30: 511516. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.1977.tb02208.x
  73. Palomars, Élise, and Aude Rabaud. 2006. “Minoritaires et citoyens? Faites vos preuves!” L’Homme & la Société 160–161: 135160. DOI: 10.3917/lhs.160.0135
  74. Perreau, Bruno. 2023. Sphères d’injustice. Pour un universalisme minoritaire. Paris: La Découverte.
  75. Ramsden, Michael, and Kris Gledhill. 2019. “Defining Strategic Litigation.” Civil Justice Quarterly 4: 407426.
  76. Sa Vilas Boas, Marie-Hélène. 2015. “Politiser les ‘différences’: les rapports sociaux en débat au sein des conférences municipales des femmes de Recife.” Participations 12: 139165. DOI: 10.3917/parti.012.0139
  77. Sheldrick, Byron. 2014. Blocking Public Participation: The Use of Strategic Litigation to Silence Political Expression. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press. DOI: 10.51644/9781554589302
  78. Smith, Graham. 2009. Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511609848
  79. Talpin, Julien. 2016. Community Organizing: De l’émeute à l’alliance des classes populaires aux États-Unis. Paris: Raisons d’agir.
  80. Testard, Christophe. 2018. Pouvoir de décision unilatérale de l’administration et démocratie administrative. Paris: LGDJ.
  81. Thomassen, Jacques, ed. 2014. Elections and Democracy: Representation and Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716334.001.0001
  82. Trettel, Marina. 2015. “The Politics of Deliberative Democracy: A Comparative Survey of the ‘Law in Action’ of Citizen Participation.” Revista de Derecho Político 1(94): 85112. DOI: 10.5944/rdp.94.2015.15738
  83. Tushnet, Mark. 2004. “Some Legacies of Brown v. Board of Education.” Virginia Law Review 90(6): 16931720. DOI: 10.2307/3202411
  84. Urbinati, Nadia. 2014. Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth, and the People. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. DOI: 10.4159/harvard.9780674726383
  85. Van der Pas, Kris. 2021. “Conceptualising Strategic Litigation.” Oñati Socio-Legal Series 11(6): 116145. DOI: 10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1226
  86. Vanhala, Lisa. 2009. “Anti-discrimination Policy Actors and Their Use of Litigation Strategies: The Influence of Identity Politics.” Journal of European Public Policy 16(5): 738754. DOI: 10.1080/13501760902983473
  87. Van Ham, Carolien, Jacques JA Thomassen, Kees Aarts, and Rudy B. Andeweg, eds. 2017. Myth and Reality of the Legitimacy Crisis: Explaining Trends and Cross-National Differences in Established Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198793717.001.0001
  88. Voeffray, François. 2004. L’actio popularis ou la défense de l’intérêt collectif devant les juridictions internationales. Geneva: Graduate Institute Publications. DOI: 10.4000/books.iheid.1185
  89. Wirth, Louis. 1945. “The Problem of Minority Groups.” In The Science of Man in a World Crisis, edited by Ralph Linton, 347372. New York: Columbia University Press.
  90. Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/rds.445 | Journal eISSN: 2308-0906
Language: English
Page range: 83 - 103
Submitted on: Apr 1, 2024
Accepted on: May 20, 2025
Published on: Jul 3, 2025
Published by: Helsinki University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Benjamin Moron-Puech, Marion Pollaert, Jimmy Kolbe-André, Julien Béal-Long, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.