Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Concepts We Transform by: Metaphorical Concepts in Post-COVID-19 Transition to Normalcy Cover

Concepts We Transform by: Metaphorical Concepts in Post-COVID-19 Transition to Normalcy

By:   
Open Access
|Jul 2024

References

  1. Alexander, D. E. 2013. “Resilience and Disaster Risk Reduction: An Etymological Journey.” Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 13: 27072716. DOI: 10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013
  2. Balk, David E. 2004. “Recovery Following Bereavement: An Examination of the Concept.” Death Studies 28(4): 361374. DOI: 10.1080/07481180490432351
  3. Balk, David E. 2007. “A Modest Proposal About Bereavement and Recovery.” Death Studies 32(1): 8493. DOI: 10.1080/07481180701743448
  4. Blumenberg, Hans. 2010. Paradigms for a Metaphorology, trans. Robert Savage, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. DOI: 10.7591/9780801460043
  5. Blumenberg, Hans. 2020. “Observations Drawn from Metaphors,” In History, Metaphors, Fables: A Hans Blumenberg Reader, edited by Hannes Bajohr, Florian Fuchs, and Joe Paul Kroll, 209–238. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. DOI: 10.7591/cornell/9781501732829.003.0010
  6. Boin, Arjen and Michael J. G. van Eeten. 2013. “The Resilient Organization.” Public Management Review 15(3): 429445. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2013.769856
  7. Brandt, Allan M., and Alyssa Botelho. 2020. “Not a Perfect Storm: Covid-19 and the Importance of Language.” The New England Journal of Medicine 382(6): 14931495. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp2005032
  8. Bundesministerium für Finanzen. 2021 “Österreichischer Aufbau- und Resilienzplan 2020-2026.” https://www.bundeskanzleramt.gv.at/dam/jcr:daa6ed52-1070-41d5-acf6-5f980dc6e0dd/Oesterreichischer-Aufbau-und-Resilienzplan-2020-2026.pdf.
  9. Bundesregierung. 2022a. “Deutscher Aufbau- und Resilienzplan.” https://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/DE/Standardartikel/Themen/Europa/DARP/deutscher-aufbau-und-resilienzplan.html.
  10. Bundesregierung. 2022b. “Deutscher Aufbau- und Resilienzplan: Teil 4: Wirkungsanalyse.” https://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/DE/Standardartikel/Themen/Europa/DARP/4-wirkungsanalyse.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=4.
  11. Cammaerts, Bart. 2012. “The Strategic Use of Metaphors by Political and Media Elites: The 2007–11 Belgian Constitutional Crisis.” International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics 8(2–3): 229249. DOI: 10.1386/macp.8.2-3.229_1
  12. Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230000612
  13. Corr, Charles A., Clyde M. Nabe, and Donna M. Corr. 2009. Death & Dying, Life & Living, 6th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  14. Council of the European Union. “Council Regulation 2020/2094 of 14 December 2020 Establishing a European Union Recovery Instrument to Support the Recovery in the Aftermath of the COVID-19 Crisis.” http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/2094/oj.
  15. Crouch, Colin. 2022. “Reflections on the COVID Moment and Life Beyond Neoliberalism.” Transfer 2022; 28(1): 3145. DOI: 10.1177/10242589221078125
  16. Delanty, Gerard, ed. 2021. Pandemics, Politics, and Society: Critical Perspectives on the Covid-19 Crisis. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110713350
  17. Duit, Andreas. 2016. “Resilience Thinking: Lessons for Public Administration.” Public Administration 94(2): 364380. DOI: 10.1111/padm.12182
  18. European Economic and Social Committee (EESC). 2021. “Shifting Priorities Towards Post-COVID Sustainable Reconstruction and Recovery.” https://www.eesc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/files/qe-02-21-886-en-n.pdf.
  19. Exit- ja jälleenrakennustyöryhmä. 2020. “Koronakriisin jälkihoito ja jälleenrakennus.” https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/162272/VN_2020_17.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y.
  20. Folkhälsomyndigheten. 2021. “FNs politiska högnivåforum för hållbar utveckling (HLPF): Agenda 2030 och strategisk folkhälsoarbete för återmäntning bortom pandemin.” https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/contentassets/5eaada1451994c7ebfeb77099085350f/fn-s-politiska-hognivaforum-hallbar-utveckling-hlpf.pdf.
  21. Gouvernement. 2021. “National Recovery and Resilience Plan: Summary.” https://www.economie.gouv.fr/files/files/PDF/2021/PNRR-SummaryEN.pdf.
  22. Greer, Scott L., Elizabeth J. King, Elize Massard da Fonseca, and André Peralta-Santos, (eds). 2021. Coronavirus Politics: The Comparative Politics and Policy of COVID-19. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. DOI: 10.3998/mpub.11927713
  23. Grogan, Joelle. 2022. “Impact of COVID-19 Measures on Democracy and Fundamental Rights: Best Practices and Lessons Learned in the Member States and Third Countries.” https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2022/734010/IPOL_STU(2022)734010_EN.pdf.
  24. Hale, Thomas. 2020, “An Immune System for the Body Politic: Using Social Science to Control COVID-19.” Accessed December 8, 2022. https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/blog/immune-system-body-politic-using-social-science-control-covid-19.
  25. Hamann, Ralph. 2020. “The Promise and Peril of ‘Building Back Better.’” Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 62(6): 4150. DOI: 10.1080/00139157.2020.1820296
  26. Hanne, Michael. 2022. “How We Escape Capture by the ‘War’ Metaphor for Covid-19.” Metaphor and Symbol 37(2): 88100. DOI: 10.1080/10926488.2021.1935261
  27. HealthyRecovery. 2020. [no title]. Accessed March 8, 2023. https://healthyrecovery.net/.
  28. International Labor Organization (ILO). 2021. “Global Call to Action for a Human-Centered Recovery from the COVID-19 Crisis That is Inclusive, Sustainable, and Resilient.” https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_806092.pdf.
  29. International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2020. “Greening the Recovery.” https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/SPROLLs/covid19-special-notes.
  30. Joseph, Jonathan, and Juncos, Ana E. 2019. “Resilience as an Emergent European Project? The EU’s Place in the Resilience Turn.” Journal of Common Market Studies 57(5): 9951012. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12881
  31. Koselleck, Reinhart. 2004. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time, trans. Keith Tribe. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  32. Koselleck, Reinhart. 2006. “Crisis.” Trans. Michaela Richter. Journal of the History of Ideas 67(2): 357400. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30141882. DOI: 10.1353/jhi.2006.0013
  33. Koselleck, Reinhart. 2011. “Introduction (Einleitung) to the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe.” Trans. Michaela Richter, Contributions to the History of Concepts 6(1): 725. DOI: 10.3167/choc.2011.060102
  34. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  35. Luo, Chih-Mei. 2022. “The COVID-19 Crisis: The EU Recovery Fund and Its Implications for European Integration—A Paradigm Shift.” European Review 30(3): 374392. DOI: 10.1017/S106279872100003X
  36. Manyena, Siambabala Bernard, Geoff O’Brien, Phil O’Keefe, and Joanne Rose. 2011. “Disaster Resilience: A Bounce Back or Bounce Forward Ability?” Local Environment 16(5): 417424. DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2011.583049
  37. Mazzucato, Claudia. 2020. “To Heal Covid-19 Wounds We Need a Truth and Reconciliation Commission: Reflections from Lombardy, Italy.” https://www.euforumrj.org/en/heal-covid-19-wounds-we-need-truth-and-reconciliation-ommission.
  38. Ministerie van Financiën. 2022. “Het Nederlandse Herstel- en Veerkrachtplan.” https://open.overheid.nl/documenten/ronl-abc474ae7a39fe82e5f6f276ab663739cdb56902/pdf.
  39. Mišík, Matúš, and Veronika Oravcová. 2022. “Ex Ante Governance in the European Union: Energy and Climate Policy as a ‘Test Run’ for the Post-Pandemic Recovery.” Energy Policy 167: 113076. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113076
  40. Musolff, Andreas. 2004. Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230504516
  41. Musolff, Andreas. 2022. “‘War against Covid-19’: Is the Pandemic Management as War Metaphor Helpful or Hurtful?” In Pandemic and Crisis Discourse: Communicating Covid-19 and Public Health Strategy, edited by Andreas Musolff, Ruth Breeze, Kayo Kondo, and Sara Vilar-Lluch, 307320. London: Bloomsbury. DOI: 10.5040/9781350232730.ch-017
  42. NextGen Belgique. 2023a. “Gemeinsam bringen wir Belgien auf einern erfolgreichen Weg in die Zukunft.” Accessed March 8, 2023. https://nextgenbelgium.be/de/.
  43. NextGen Belgique. 2023b. “À propos du plan.” Accessed March 8, 2023. https://nextgenbelgium.be/fr/a-propos-de-nous.
  44. Norris, Fran H., Susan P. Stevens, Betty Pfefferbaum, Karen F. Wyche, and Rose L. Pfefferbaum. 2008. “Community Resilience as a Metaphor, Theory, Set of Capacities, and Strategy for Disaster Readiness.” American Journal of Community Psychology 41(1–2): 127150. DOI: 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
  45. OECD. 2020. “Building Back Better: A Sustainable, Resilient Recovery after COVID-19.” https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref=133_133639-s08q2ridhf&title=Building-back-better-_A-sustainable-resilient-recovery-after-Covid-19.
  46. OED. 2023. Oxford English Dictionary. https://www.oed.com/.
  47. Or, Zeynep, Corali Gandré, Isabelle Durand-Zaleski, and Monika Steffen. 2022. “France’s Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic: Between a Rock and a Hard Place.” Health Economics, Policy and Law 17(1): 1426. DOI: 10.1017/S1744133121000165
  48. Pykett, Jessica, and Anna Lavis. 2021. “Governance and Policy in Pandemics: Approaches to Crisis, Chaos, and Catastrophe.” In Living with Pandemics, edited by John R. Bryson et al., 227236. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DOI: 10.4337/9781800373594.00032
  49. Regeringen. 2021. “Sveriges återhämtningsplan.” https://www.regeringen.se/rapporter/2021/05/sveriges-aterhamtningsplan/.
  50. Rodríguez Reveggino, Bruno, and Ángel Becerra-Bolãnos. 2022. “Transitional Justice after the Covid-19 Pandemic.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19: 12388. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912388
  51. Rogers, Peter. 2017. “The Etymology and Genealogy of a Contested Concept.” In The Routledge Handbook of International Resilience, edited by David Chandler and Jon Coaffee, 1325. London: Routledge.
  52. Rogers, Peter, Jim. J. Bohland, and Jennifer Lawrence. 2020. “Resilience and Values: Global Perspectives on the Values and Worldviews Underpinning the Resilience Concept.” Political Geography 83: 102290. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102280
  53. Rosenblatt, Paul C. 2007. “Recovery Following Bereavement: Metaphor, Phenomenology, and Culture.” Death Studies 32(1): 616. DOI: 10.1080/07481180701741228
  54. Schmidt, Vivien A. 2008. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11(1): 303326. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
  55. Schoch-Spana, Monica, and Sanjana Ravi. 2023. “The US Needs a Truth Commission to Heal Unresolved COVID Trauma.” Accessed June 10, 2023. https://thehill.com/opinion/healthcare/4051818-the-us-needs-a-truth-commission-to-heal-unresolved-covid-trauma/.
  56. Schwab, Klaus, and Thierry Malleret. 2020. COVID-19: The Great Reset. Geneva: Forum Publishing.
  57. Shen, Yongdon, Yuan (Daniel) Cheng, and Jianxing Yu. 2022. “From Recovery Resilience to Transformative Resilience: How Digital Platforms Reshape Public Service Provision During and Post COVID-19.” Public Management Review 25: 710733. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2022.2033052
  58. Sontag, Susan. 2002. “Real Battles and Empty Metaphors.” The New York Times, September 10.
  59. Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2020. “Recovering from the Pandemic: An Appraisal of Lessons Learned,” Accessed March 8, 2023. https://feps-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/downloads/publications/feps%20covid%20paper%2010%20stiglitz.pdf.
  60. Susskind, Daniel, James Manyika, Jean Saldanha, Sharan Burrow, Sergio Rebelo, and Ian Bremmer. 2023. “How will the World be Different After COVID-19?” Accessed March 8, 2023. https://www.imf.org/Publications/fandd/issues/2020/06/how-will-the-world-be-different-after-COVID-19.
  61. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. 2020. “WHO Manifesto for a Healthy Recovery from COVID-19.” https://www.healthynewbornnetwork.org/news-item/who-manifesto-for-a-healthy-recovery-from-covid-19/.
  62. Tocci, Nathalie. 2017. Framing the EU Global Strategy: A Stronger Europe in a Fragile World. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-55586-7
  63. Torero, Maxim. 2020. “A Post-War Playbook for a Post-COVID Recovery.” Accessed March 8, 2023. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/covid19-postwar-playbook-for-economic-recovery-by-maximo-torero-2020-12.
  64. UN. 2020a. “UN Research Roadmap for the COVID-19 Recovery: Leveraging the Power of Science for a More Equitable, Resilient, and Sustainable Future.” https://www.un.org/en/pdfs/UNCOVID19ResearchRoadmap.pdf.
  65. UN. 2020b. “Shared Responsibility, Global Solidarity: Responding to the Socio-Economic Impacts of COVID-19.” https://unsdg.un.org/sites/default/files/2020-03/SG-Report-Socio-Economic-Impact-of-Covid19.pdf.
  66. UN. 2020c. “COVID-19: Towards an Inclusive, Resilient and Green Recovery: Building Back Better Through Regional Cooperation.” https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/45551/4/COVID19TowardsAnInclusive_en.pdf.
  67. UNICEF. 2020. “COVID-19 Response: Mobilizing Supply Operations to Fight the Pandemic.” Accessed March 8, 2023. https://www.unicef.org/supply/stories/covid-19-response-mobilizing-supply-operations-fight-pandemic.
  68. Urquhart Stewart, Justin. 2020. “After an Economic Heart Attack—A Global Resuscitation?” Accessed March 8, 2023. https://www.neweurope.eu/article/after-a-economic-heart-attack-a-global-resuscitation/.
  69. Valtioneuvosto. 2021. “Suomen kestävän kasvun ohjelma: Elpymis- ja palautumissuunnitelma.” https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/163176.
  70. Valtioneuvosto. 2022. “Societal Impacts of the COVID-19 Crisis in Finland: Medium-Term Estimates.” https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/163983/VN_2022_37.pdf?sequence=7&isAllowed=y.
  71. Wagner, Wolfgang, and Rosanne Anholt. 2016. “Resilience as the EU Global Strategy’s New Leitmotif: Pragmatic, Problematic or Promising?” Contemporary Security Policy 37(3): 414430. DOI: 10.1080/13523260.2016.1228034
  72. Walby, Sylvia. 2021. “The COVID Pandemic and Social Theory: Social Democracy and Public Health in the Crisis.” European Journal of Social Theory 24(1): 2243. DOI: 10.1177/1368431020970127
  73. Wilkinson, Alissa. 2020. “Pandemics Are Not Wars: There Are Better Metaphors to Describe What’s Happening Right Now.” Accessed December 8, 2022. https://www.vox.com/culture/2020/4/15/21193679/coronavirus-pandemic-war-metaphor-ecology-microbiome.
  74. Williams, Blair, and Brent Greer. 2023. “All’s Fair in Pandemic and War? A Gendered Analysis of Australian Coverage of Covid-19.” Media and Communication 11(1): 91101. DOI: 10.17645/mac.v11i1.6139
  75. World Bank. 2020. “World Bank Group and IMF Mobilize Partners in the Fight against COVID-19 in Africa.” Accessed March 8, 2023. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2020/04/17/world-bank-group-and-imf-mobilize-partners-in-the-fight-against-covid-19-in-africa.
  76. World Vision. 2020. “Mobilising Against COVID-19 Toolkit.” Accessed March 8, 2023. https://www.wvi.org/publications/child-participation/mobilising-against-covid-19-toolkit.
  77. Zill, Rüdiger. 2002. “‘Substrukturen des Denkens’: Grenzen und Perspektiven einer Metapherngeschichte nach Hans Blumenberg.” In Begriffsgeschichte, Diskursgeschichte, Metapherngeschichte, edited by Hans Erich Bödeker, 209258. Göttingen: Wallstein.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/rds.425 | Journal eISSN: 2308-0906
Language: English
Page range: 6 - 25
Submitted on: Dec 1, 2023
Accepted on: May 24, 2024
Published on: Jul 9, 2024
Published by: Helsinki University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Timo Pankakoski, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.