Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
‘Shameful is the Only Word for It’: Hegel on Kant’s Sexual and the Social Contract Cover

‘Shameful is the Only Word for It’: Hegel on Kant’s Sexual and the Social Contract

Open Access
|Jul 2020

References

  1. Benbow, Heather Merle. 2005. “‘The Woman Should Reign and the Man Govern’: Gendering Kant’s Body Politic.” Melbourne Journal of Politics 30: 8097.
  2. Benhabib, Seyla. 1992. Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. New York: Polity Press.
  3. Bobako, Monika. 2008. “Gender Difference. An Incomplete Sublation at the Core of Hegel’s ‘Sittlichkeit’.” Hegel Jahrbuch, 296299. DOI: 10.1524/hgjb.2008.10.jg.296
  4. Brunner, Otto. 1956. Neue Wege der Sozialgeschichte. Vorträge u. Aufsätze. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
  5. Cesaroni, Pierpaolo. 2017. “Polizia o corporazione. Abitudine, istituzione e governo in Hegel.” Politica & Società 3: 44364.
  6. De Laurentiis, Allegra. 2000. “Kant’s Shameful Proposition: A Hegel-Inspired Criticism of Kant’s Theory of Domestic Right.” International Philosophical Quarterly 40(3): 297312. DOI: 10.5840/ipq200040313
  7. Duso, Giuseppe. 2010. “Thinking about Politics beyond Modern Concepts.” The New Centennial Review 2: 7397. DOI: 10.1353/ncr.2010.0029
  8. Duso, Giuseppe. 2013. Libertà e costituzione in Hegel. Milan: FrancoAngeli.
  9. Hanley, Ryan Patrick. 2014. “Kant’s Sexual Contract.” The Journal of Politics 76(4): 91427. DOI: 10.1017/S0022381614000462
  10. Hanley, Sarah. 1989. “Engendering the State: Family Formation and State Building in Early Modern France.” French Historical Studies 1: 427. DOI: 10.2307/286431
  11. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1894. Lectures on the History of Philosophy, vol. II, trans. by E. S. Haldane and Frances H. Simson. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  12. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1983. Hegel and the Human Spirit. A Translation of the Jena Lectures on the Philosophy of Spirit (1805–6) with Commentary, trans. by Leo Rauch. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
  13. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1991. The Encyclopaedia Logic (with the Zusätze), trans. by Theodore F. Geraets, Wallis Arthur Suchting and Henry Stilton Harris. Indianapolis: Hackett.
  14. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1995. Lectures on Natural Right and Political Science: The First Philosophy of Right (Heidelberg, 1817–1818, with Additions from the Lectures of 1818–1819), trans. by J. Michael Stewart and Peter C. Hodgson. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  15. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1999. “On the Scientific Ways of Treating Natural Law, on its Place in Practical Philosophy, and its Relation to the Positive Sciences of Right.” In Political Writings, edited by Laurence Dickey and H. B. Nisbet, 102180. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511808029.007
  16. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 2004. Philosophy of Nature, trans. by A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  17. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 2008. Outlines of the Philosophy of Right, trans. by T. M. Knox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  18. Hobbes, Thomas. 1998. Leviathan, edited by J. C. A. Gaskin. New York: Oxford University Press.
  19. Hofmann, Hasso. 2003. Repräsentation: Studien zur Wort- und Begriffsgeschichte von der Antike bis ins 19. Jahrhundert. Berlin: Dunker & Humblot.
  20. Huddock, Bruce. 1994. “Hegel’s Critique of the Theory of Social Contract.” In The Social Contract from Hobbes to Rawls, edited by D. Boucher and P. Kelly, 141164. London: Routledge.
  21. Hutchings, Kimberly. 2000. “Beyond Antigone: Towards a Hegelian Feminist Philosophy.” Hegel Bulletin 41/42: 12031. DOI: 10.1017/S0263523200007436
  22. Hutchings, Kimberly. 2017. “Living the Contradictions: Wives, Husbands and Children in Hegel’s Elements of the Philosophy of Right.” In Hegel’s Elements of the Philosophy of Right: A Critical Guide, edited by D. James, 97115. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781139939560.006
  23. Kant, Immanuel. 1991. The Metaphysics of Morals, trans. by Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Kant, Immanuel. 2003a. “The Contest of Faculties.” In Political Writings, edited by Victor Gourevitch, 176190 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Kant, Immanuel. 2003b. “Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch.” In Political Writings, edited by Victor Gourevitch, 93130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  26. Kant, Immanuel. 2003c. “On the Common Saying: ‘This May be True in Theory, but It Does Not Apply in Practice.’” In Political Writings, edited by Victor Gourevitch, 6192. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Kant, Immanuel. 2006. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, trans. by Robert B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  28. Kervégan, Jean-François. 2018. The Actual and the Rational: Hegel and Objective Spirit, trans. by Daniela Ginsburg and Martin Shuster. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226023946.001.0001
  29. Kneller, Jane. 2006. “Kant on Sex and Marriage Right.” In The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy, edited by Paul Guyer, 447476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CCOL052182303X.014
  30. Kuster, Friederike. 2008. “Vom Naturzwang zur Sittlichkeit. Stationen der bürgerlichen Familie: Rousseau-Kant-Hegel.” Hegel Jahrbuch: 28895. DOI: 10.1524/hgjb.2008.10.jg.288
  31. Losurdo, Domenico. 2004. Hegel and the Freedom of Moderns, trans. by Marella Morris and Jon Morris. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv125jmgh
  32. Luther, Timothy C. 2009. Hegel’s Critique of Modernity: Reconciling Individual Freedom and the Community. Lanham: Lexington Books.
  33. Mendus, Susan. 1992. “Kant: ‘An Honest but Narrow-Minded Bourgeois?’” In Essays on Kant’s Political Philosophy, edited by Howard Williams, 166190. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
  34. Merrick, Jeffrey. 2009. “Fathers and Kings: Patriarchalism and Absolutism in Eighteenth-Century French Politics.” In Order and Disorder under the Ancien Regime, edited by Jeffrey Merrick, 102123. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  35. Nance, Michael. 2017. Hegel’s Jena Practical Philosophy. In The Oxford Handbook on Hegel, edited by Dean Moyar, 3160. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199355228.013.3
  36. Nuzzo, Angelica. 2011. “Arbitrariness and Freedom: Hegel on Rousseau and Revolution.” In Rousseau and Revolution, edited by Holger Ross Lauritsen and Mikkel Thorup, 6480. New York: Bloomsbury.
  37. Okin, Susan Moller. 1982. “Women and the Making of the Sentimental Family.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 1: 6588.
  38. Pateman, Carole. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  39. Pateman, Carole. 1989. “‘God Hath Ordained to Man a Helper’: Hobbes, Patriarchy and Conjugal Right.” British Journal of Political Science 4: 44563. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123400005585
  40. Pateman, Carole. 1996. “Hegel, Marriage, and the Standpoint of Contract.” In Feminist Interpretations of Hegel, edited by Patricia Jagentowicz Mills, 209223. University Park: Penn State University Press.
  41. Patten, Alan. 2002. Hegel’s Idea of Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/0199251568.001.0001
  42. Pulkkinen, Tuija. 2010. “Differing Spirits – Reflections on Hegelian Inspiration in Feminist Theory.” In Hegel’s Philosophy and Feminist Thought: Beyond Antigone?, edited by Kimberly Hutchings and Tuija Pulkkinen, 1937. London: Palgrave. DOI: 10.1057/9780230110410_2
  43. Ritter, Joachim. 2003. Metaphysik und Politik: Studien zu Aristoteles und Hegel. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
  44. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1994. The Social Contract. In Discourse on Political Economy and The Social Contract, trans. by Christopher Betts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 43168.
  45. Rustighi, Lorenzo. 2017. Il governo della madre. Percorsi e alternative del potere in Rousseau. Milan: FrancoAngeli.
  46. Rustighi, Lorenzo. 2018. “The Good Prince or The Good Mother: Reassessing the Question of Gender in Rousseau’s Political Theory.” Gender & History 1: 3051. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0424.12336
  47. Rustighi, Lorenzo. 2020. “Rethinking the Sexual Contract: The Case of Thomas Hobbes.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 3: 274301. DOI: 10.1177/0191453718814881
  48. Schochet, Gordon. 1975. Patriarchalism in Political Thought: The Authoritarian Family and Political Speculation and Attitudes Especially in Seventeenth-Century England. New York: Basic Books.
  49. Schott, Robin May. 1997. “The Gender of Enlightenment.” In Feminist Interpretations of Immanuel Kant, edited by Robin May Schott, 319337. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
  50. Sedgwick, Sally. 1996. “Hegel’s Critique of Kant’s Empiricism and the Categorical Imperative.” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 4: 56384.
  51. Stone, Alison. 2018. Nature, Ethics and Gender in German Romanticism and Idealism. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
  52. Weiß, Stefan. 2001. “Otto Brunner und das Ganze Haus oder Die zwei Arten der Wirtschaftsgeschichte.” Historische Zeitschrift 2: 33569. DOI: 10.1524/hzhz.2001.273.jg.335
  53. Wolgast, Elizabeth H. 1980. Equality and the Rights of Women. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/rds.329 | Journal eISSN: 2308-0906
Language: English
Page range: 4 - 19
Submitted on: Jun 11, 2020
Accepted on: Jun 11, 2020
Published on: Jul 13, 2020
Published by: Helsinki University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 Lorenzo Rustighi, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.