The Justicization of Politics: Constitutionalism and Democracy in Germany after 1949

Verena Frick

doi:10.33134/rds.312

The Justicization of Politics: Constitutionalism and Democracy in Germany after 1949

Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory

Volume 22 (2019): Issue 1

By: Verena Frick

Open Access

|Dec 2019

Abstract

By engaging with the historiography of German constitutionalism after 1949, this article reconstructs a profound change of the meaning of the concept of constitution. The constitution evolved from a rather formal and provisional instrument of government to the just value order of politics, which scholars worldwide have celebrated as the value model of constitutionalism. The article critically examines the democratic consequences of this justicization of politics and disentangles the relationship between law and politics within German constitutional thinking by tracing its traditions and transformations back to scholarly debates and early Constitutional Court’s landmark decisions.

References

Ackerman, Bruce. 1997. “The Rise of World Constitutionalism”. Virginia Law Review 83(4): 771–797. DOI: 10.2307/1073748
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Alexy, Robert. 2009. A Theory of Constitutional Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bellamy, Richard. 2007. Political Constitutionalism. A Republican Defense of the Constitutionality of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511490187
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang. [1990] 2017a. “Fundamental Rights as Constitutional Principles: On the Current State of Interpreting Fundamental Rights”. In Constitutional and Political Theory. Selected Writings, edited by Mirjam Künkler, and Tine Stein, 235–265. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714965.003.0014
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang. [1990] 2017b. “Critique of the Value-Based Grounding of Law”. In Constitutional and Political Theory. Selected Writings, edited by Mirjam Künkler, and Tine Stein, 217–234. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714965.003.0013
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang. [1999] 2017. “Constitutional Jurisdiction: Structure, Organization, and Legitimation”. In Constitutional and Political Theory. Selected Writings, edited by Mirjam Künkler, and Tine Stein, 186–205. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714965.003.0011
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Calliess, Christian. 2014. “Dimensions of Fundamental Rights – Duty to Respect v. Duty to Protect”. In Debates in German Public Law, edited by Hermann Pünder, and Christian Waldhoff, 27–42. London: Hart Publishing.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Collings, Justin. 2015. Democracy’s Guardians. A History of the German Federal Constitutional Court, 1951–2001. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198753377.001.0001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ely, Johan Hart. 1980. Democracy and Distrust. A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Frick, Verena. 2018. Die Staatsrechtslehre im Streit um ihren Gegenstand. Die Staats- und Verfassungsdebatten seit 1979. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. DOI: 10.1628/978-3-16-156167-2
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Frick, Verena. 2019. “Abschied von der Ordnung. Zur Ideengeschichte des Verfassungsdenkens angesichts ihrer schwindenden Normativität”. German Political Science Quarterly 60(1): 21–43. DOI: 10.1007/s11615-018-0129-1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Goldoni, Marco. 2012. “Two internal critics of political constitutionalism”. International Journal of Constitutional Law 10(4): 926–949. DOI: 10.1093/icon/mos033
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Grimm, Dieter. 1994. “Human Rights and Judicial Review in Germany”. In Human Rights and Judicial Review. A comparative perspective, edited by David M. Beatty, 267–295. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Grimm, Dieter. 2005. “Integration by Constitution”. International Journal of Constitutional Law 3(2–3): 193–208. DOI: 10.1093/icon/moi014
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Grimm, Dieter. 2016. Constitutionalism: Past, Present, Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Häberle, Peter. [1975] 2018. “‘The open society of constitutional interpreters’ – A contribution to a pluralistic and ‘procedural’ constitutional interpretation”. In Peter Häberle on Constitutional Theory. Constitution as Culture and the Open Society of Constitutional Interpreters, edited by Markus Kotzur, 129–166. Baden-Baden: Nomos. DOI: 10.5771/9783845289519-129
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hailbronner, Michaela. 2014. “Rethinking the Rise of the German Constitutional Court: From anti-Nazism to value formalism”. International Journal of Constitutional Law 12(3): 626–649. DOI: 10.1093/icon/mou047
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hailbronner, Michaela. 2015. Traditions and Transformations. The Rise of German Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735427.001.0001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hennis, Wilhelm. [1968] 1978. “Verfassungsrecht und Verfassungswirklichkeit. Ein deutsches Problem”. In Verfassung, edited by Manfred Friedrich, 232–267. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Herbert, Ulrich. 2006. “Integration der jungen Bundesrepublik durch Verfassungsrecht?” In Das Bonner Grundgesetz. Altes Recht und neue Verfassung in den ersten Jahrzehnten der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (1949–1969), edited by Michael Stolleis, 85–102. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschaftsverlag.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hesse, Konrad. [1959] 1978. “Die normative Kraft der Verfassung”. In Verfassung, edited by Manfred Friedrich, 77–99. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Holmes, Stephen. 1995. Passions and Constraints: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Huscroft, Grant, Bradley W. Miller, and Grégoire Webber (eds.). 2014. Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107565272
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kneip, Sascha. 2016. “The Impact of the German Federal Constitutional Court on Consolidation and Quality of Democracy”. In Constitutional Courts in Comparison. The US Supreme Court and the German Federal Constitutional Court, edited by Ralf Rogowski, and Thomas Gawron, 254–281. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kommers, Donald P. 2002. “Comparative Constitutional Law: Its Increasing Relevance”. In Defining the Field of Comparative Constitutional Law, edited by Vicki C. Jackson, and Mark Tushnet, 61–70. Westport (Conn.)/London: Praeger Publishing.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kommers, Donald P., and Russell A. Miller. 2012. The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany. 3rd edition. Durham/London: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1215/9780822395386
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Korioth, Stefan. 2000. “Rudolf Smend”. In Weimar: A Jurisprudence of Crisis, edited by Arthur J. Jacobson, and Bernhard Schlink, 207–248. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kumm, Mattias. 2006. “Who is afraid of the total constitution? Constitutional Rights as Principles and the Constitutionalization of Private Law”. German Law Journal 7(4): 341–369. DOI: 10.1017/S2071832200004727
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kumm, Mattias. 2007. “Political Liberalism and the Structure of Rights: On the Place and Limits of the Proportionality Requirement”. In Law, Rights and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy, edited by George Pavlakos, 131–166. London: Hart Publishing.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Landfried, Christine. 1994. “The Judicialization of Politics in Germany”. International Political Science Review 15(2): 113–124. DOI: 10.1177/019251219401500203
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Leibholz, Gerhard. 1957. “Einleitung”. In Der Status des Bundesverfassungsgerichts. Eine Materialsammlung mit einer Einleitung von Gerhard Leibholz, edited in Jahrbuch des Öffentlichen Rechts Neue Folge 6: 110–119.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Leibholz, Gerhard. 1974. “Das Bundesverfassungsgericht im Schnittpunkt von Politik und Recht”. Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt, 396–399.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lepsius, Oliver. 2011. “Die maßstabsetzende Gewalt”. In Das entgrenzte Gericht. Eine kritische Bilanz nach sechzig Jahren Bundesverfassungsgericht, edited by Matthias Jestaedt, et al., 159–279. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lepsius, Oliver. 2012. “Kritik der Dogmatik”. In Was weiß Dogmatik? Was leistet und wie steuert die Dogmatik des Öffentlichen Rechts, edited by Gregor Kirchhof, Stefan Magen, and Karsten Schneider, 39–62. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Loewenstein, Karl. 1951. “Verfassungsrecht und Verfassungsrealität. Beiträge zur Ontologie der Verfassungen”. Archiv des Öffentlichen Rechts 77: 387–435.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lübbe-Wolff, Gertrude. 2016. “Die Verfassung als Wertordnung – Was heißt das?”. Merkur 70(801): 47–54.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Maus, Ingeborg. 2004. “Vom Rechtsstaat zum Verfassungsstaat. Zur Kritik juridischer Demokratieverhinderung”. Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik 49(7): 835–850.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mathews, Jud, and Alec Stone Sweet. 2011. “All Things in Proportion? American Rights Review and the Problem of Balancing”. Emory Law Journal 60(797): 797–875.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Möllers, Christoph. 2014. “The Scope and Legitimacy of Judicial Review in German Constitutional Law: Report on a missing debate”. In Debates in German Public Law, edited by Hermann Pünder, and Christian Waldhoff, 3–25. London: Hart Publishing.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Morlok, Martin. 2006. “Art. Verfassung”. In Evangelisches Staatslexikon. Neuausgabe, edited by Werner Heun, et al., 2556–2562. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Müller, Jan-Werner. 2007. Constitutional Patriotism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Müller, Jan-Werner. 2011. Contesting Democracy. Political Ideas in Twentieth-Century Europe. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Münkler, Herfried. 2010. Mitte und Maß. Der Kampf um die richtige Ordnung. Berlin: Rowohlt.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ooyen, Robert Chr. Van. 2008. “Die Integrationslehre von Rudolf Smend und das Geheimnis ihres Erfolgs in Staatslehre und politischer Kultur nach 1945”. Journal der Juristischen Zeitgeschichte 2(2): 52–57.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rensmann, Thilo. 2006. “The Constitution as Normative Order of Values: The Influence of International Human Rights Law on the Evolution of Modern Constitutionalism”. In Völkerrecht als Wertordnung/Common Values in International Law, edited by Pierre-Marie Dupuy, et al., 259–278. Kehl/Strasbourg/Arlington: N. P. Engel Verlag.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schlink, Bernhard. 2007. “Abschied von der Dogmatik. Verfassungsrechtsprechung und Verfassungsrechtswissenschaft im Wandel”. Juristenzeitung 62(4): 157–162. DOI: 10.1628/002268807780223230
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schmitt, Carl. [1979] 2018. The Tyranny of Values and other Texts. Candor: Telos Press Publishing.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schönberger, Christoph. 2011. “Der Aufstieg der Verfassung: Zweifel an einer geläufigen Triumphgeschichte. In Der Eigenwert des Verfassungsrechts. Was bleibt von der Verfassung nach der Globalisierung?, edited by Thomas Vesting, and Stefan Korioth, 7–22. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schönberger, Christoph. 2015. Der “German Approach”. Die deutsche Staatsrechtslehre im Wissenschaftsvergleich. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Smend, Rudolf. [1928] 2010. “Verfassung und Verfassungsrecht”. In Staatsrechtliche Abhandlungen. 119–276. Berlin: Duncker & Humboldt.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Somek, Alexander. 2014. The Cosmopolitan Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stolleis, Michael. 2005. “Die Staatsrechtslehre der fünfziger Jahre”. In Das Lüth-Urteil aus (rechts-)historischer Sicht. Die Konflikte um Veit Harlan und die Grundrechtsjudikatur des Bundesverfassungsgerichts, edited by Thomas Henne, and Arne Riedlinger, 293–300. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschaftsverlag.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sweet, Alec Stone, and Jud Mathews. 2008. “Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism”. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 47(1): 73–165.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tschentscher, Axel. 2014. “Interpreting Fundamental Rights – Freedom v. Optimisation”. In Debates in German Public Law, edited by Hermann Pünder, and Christian Waldhoff, 43–56. London: Hart.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tushnet, Mark. 2000. Taking the Constitution away from the Courts. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9781400822973
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vinx, Lars (ed.). 2015. The Guardian of the Constitution. Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Constitutional Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316136256
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Volkmann, Uwe. 2013. Grundzüge einer Verfassungslehre der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Voßkuhle, Andreas. 2016. Die Verfassung der Mitte. München: Carl Friedrich von Siemens Stiftung.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Waldron, Jeremy. [2009] 2016. Political Political Theory. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Weber, Werner. 1949. Weimarer Verfassung und Bonner Grundgesetz. Göttingen 1949. DOI: 10.1515/juru.1949.1949.10.302
Search in Google Scholar Back to article