Interpreters’ Experiences of Asylum Interviews in Sweden. Working Conditions and Interpreting Literacy
By: Kristina Gustafsson and Lisa Ottosson
References
- Angelelli, C.V. 2004. Medical interpreting and cross‑cultural communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Angu, P.E. and Gustafsson, K. 2022.
‘The politics of interpreting during asylum interviews: Processes, challenges and the implications for the legitimacy of claims in South Africa’ , in M.K. Ralarala, R.H. Kaschula and G. Heydon (eds.). Language and the law: Global perspectives in forensic linguistics from Africa and beyond. Stellenbosch: Africa Sun Media/Sun Press, pp. 63–76. - Barsky, R.F. 1996. ‘The interpreter as intercultural agent in convention refugee hearings’, The Translator, 2(1), pp. 45–63.
- Barton, D. and Hamilton, M. 1998. Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. London: Routledge.
- Blommaert, J. 2001. ‘Investigating narrative inequality: African asylum seekers´ stories in Belgium’, Discourse and Society, 12(4), pp. 413–449.
- Bohmer, C. and Shuman, A. 2018. Political asylum deceptions: The culture of suspicion. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Craig, S. and Zwaan, K. 2019.
‘Legal overview’ , in N. Gill and A. Good (eds.). Asylum determination in Europe: Ethnographic perspectives. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 27–49. - Dahlvik, J. 2018. Inside asylum bureaucracy: Organising refugee status determination in Austria. Switzerland: Springer Open.
- Davies, C.A. 2008. Reflexive ethnography: A guide to researching selves and others. London: Routledge.
- Dnr. 2020. Ethical Approval from the Swedish Ethical Review Agency Dnr (2020:02101). Sweden.
- Elsrud, T. and Lalander, P. 2022. ‘Precariousness among young migrants in Europe: A consequence of exclusionary mechanisms within state‑controlled neoliberal social work in Sweden’, Critical and Radical Social Work: An International Journal, 10(1), pp. 77–92.
- Fassin, D. 2013. ‘The precarious truth of asylum’, Public Culture, 25, pp. 39–63. Available at: 10.1215/08992363‑;1890459.
- Gibney, M.J. 2004. The ethics and politics of asylum: Liberal democracy and the response to refugees. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Gibb, R. and Good, A. 2014. ‘Interpretation, translation and intercultural communication in refugee status determination procedures in the UK and France’, Language and Intercultural Communication, 14(3), pp. 385–399. Available at: 10.1080/14708477.2014.918314.
- Gill, N. and Good, A. 2019. Asylum determination in Europe: Ethnographic perspectives. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Goodwin‑Gill, S.G. and McAdam, J. 2007. The refugee in international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Gustafsson, K., Åberg, L. and Norström, E. 2024. ‘A project for making interpreters’ silent knowledge heard’, in E. Monzó‑Nebot and M. Lomeña‑Galiano (eds.). Toward inclusion and social justice in institutional translation and interpreting: Revealing hidden practices of exclusion. New York: Routledge, pp. 130–152. Available at:
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-128629 . - Gustafsson, K., Åberg, L., Gruber, S. and Norström, E. 2023. ‘Social work in a multilingual world’, Nordic Journal of Social Work, 13(4), pp. 501–509.
- Gustafsson, K. 2023.
‘The ambiguity of interpreting: Ethnographic interviews with public service interpreters’ , in L. Gavioli and C. Wadensjö (eds.). Routledge handbook on public service interpreting. London: Routledge, pp. 32–45. - Gustafsson, K., Norström, E. and Fioretos, I. 2013.
‘The interpreter – a cultural broker?’ , in C. Schäffner, K. Kredens and Y. Fowler (eds.). Interpreting in a changing landscape: Selected papers from Critical Link 6. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 187–202. - Hale, S. 2007. Community interpreting. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Hall, J. and Valdiviezo, S. 2020. ‘The social worker as language worker in a multilingual world: Educating for language competence’, Journal of Social Work Education, 56(1), pp. 17–29.
- Hathaway, C.J. 2005. The rights of refugees under international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hedlund, D. 2017. ‘Constructions of credibility in decisions concerning unaccompanied minors’, Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care, 13(2), pp. 157–172.
- Herlihy, J. and Turner, S. 2007. ‘Memory and seeking asylum’, European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counseling, 9(3), pp. 267–276.
- Inghilleri, M. 2005. ‘Mediating zones of uncertainty: Interpreter agency, the interpreting habitus and political asylum adjudication’, The Translator, 11(1), pp. 69–85. Available at: 10.1080/13556509.2005.10799190.
- Johnson, C. 2015. ‘Failed asylum seekers in South Africa: Policy and practice’, African Human Mobility Review, 1(2), pp. 201–227.
- Kammarkollegiet. 2019. God tolksed: Kammarkollegiets råd till auktoriserade tolkar. Stockholm: Kammarkollegiet.
- Keselman, O., Cederborg, A‑C. and Linell, P. 2010. ‘“That is not necessary for you to know”: Negotiation of participation status of unaccompanied children in interpreter‑mediated asylum hearings’, International Journal of Research on Practice in Interpreting, 12(1), pp. 83–104.
- Kjelsvik, B. 2014. ‘“Winning a battle, but losing the war”: Contested identities, narratives, and interaction in asylum interviews’, Text & Talk, 34(1), pp. 89–115.
- Lee, J. 2013. ‘A pressing need for the reform of interpreting service in asylum settings: A case study of asylum appeal hearings in South Korea’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 27(1), pp. 62–81.
- Liodden, T.M. 2022. ‘The map and the territory: The use of country information in asylum’, International Migration Review, 56(1), pp. 29.
- Maryns, K. 2013. ‘Disclosure and (re)performance of gender‑based evidence in an interpreter‑mediated asylum interview’, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 17(5), pp. 661–686.
- May, S. 2017.
‘National and ethnic minorities: Language rights and recognition’ , in S. Canagarajah (ed.). The Routledge handbook on language and migration. London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 149–167. - Määttä, S.K., Puumula, E. and Ylikomi, R. 2021. ‘Linguistic, psychological and epistemic vulnerability in asylum procedures: An interdisciplinary approach’, Discourse Studies, 23(1), pp. 46–66.
- Nikolaidou, Z., Rehnberg, H.S. and Wadensjö, C. 2023. ‘“Do I have to say exactly word by word?”: (Re)producing and negotiating asymmetrical relations in asylum interviews’, Journal of International Migration and Integration, 24, pp. 745–768.
- Norström, E., Fioretos, I. and Gustafsson, K. 2012. ‘Working conditions of community interpreters in Sweden: Opportunities and shortcomings’, Interpreting: International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting, 14(2), pp. 242–260.
- Nutbeam, D. 2008. ‘The evolving concept of health literacy’, Social Sciences & Medicine, 67, pp. 2072–2078.
- Ottosson, L., Angu, P. and Gustafsson, K. 2024. ‘Mismanagement and misinterpretations in asylum interviews: Perspectives from South Africa and Sweden’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 37(3), pp. 785–799. Available at: 10.1093/jrs/feae054.
- Piller, I. 2016. Linguistic diversity and social justice: An introduction to applied sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Pokorn, N. and Južnič, T.M. 2020. ‘Community interpreters versus intercultural mediators: Is it really about ethics?’, Translation and Interpreting Studies, 15(1), pp. 80–107. Available at: 10.1075/tis.20027.koc.
- Puumala, E., Ylikomi, R. and Ristimäki, H‑L. 2017. ‘Giving an account of persecution: The dynamic formation of asylum narratives’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 31(2), pp. 197–215.
- Pöllabauer, S. 2004. ‘Interpreting in asylum hearings: Issues of role, responsibility and power’, Interpreting, 6(2), pp. 143–180. Available at: 10.1075/intp.6.2.03pol.
- Rapley, T. 2011.
‘Some pragmatics of qualitative data analysis’ , in D. Silverman (ed.). Qualitative research. Los Angeles: SAGE, pp. 273–290. - Schuster, L. 2020. ‘Fatal flaws in the UK asylum decision‑making system: An analysis of Home Office refusal letters’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(7), pp. 1371–1387. Available at: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1552827.
- Skaaden, H. 2013. Den topartiske tolken: Lærebok i tolking. Oslo: Universitetsforl.
- Skaaden, H. 2019. ‘Invisible or invincible? Professional integrity, ethics and voice in public service interpreting’, Perspectives, 27(5), pp. 704–717.
- SOU. 2018. Understanding and being understood – a reformed framework for interpreters in spoken language [Att förstå och bli förstådd – ett reformerat regelverk för tolkar i talade språk] (2018:83).
https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2018/12/sou-201883/ . - SSB. 2005. The Swedish Alien Act (2005:716/2025:225). Sweden.
- SSB. 2009. The Swedish Language Act (2009:600). Sweden.
- SSB. 2016. The Public Procurement Act (2016:1145). Sweden.
- SSB. 2016. The Swedish Public Procurement Act (2016:1145). Sweden.
- SSB. 2017. The Swedish Administrative Procedure Act (2017:900). Sweden.
- Sweeney, J.A. 2007.
‘The “lure” of facts in asylum appeals: Critiquing the practice of judges’ , in S.R. Smith (ed.). Applying theory to policy and practice: Issues for critical reflection. Hampshire: Ashgate, pp. 19–35. - Tipton, R. 2008. ‘Reflexivity and the social construction of identity in interpreter‑mediated asylum interviews’, The Translator, 14(1), pp. 1–19.
- UNHCR. 2017. Handbook for interpreters in asylum procedures. Available at:
https://www.unhcr.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/27/2017/09/AUT_Handbook-Asylum-Interpreting_en.pdf . - UNHCR. 2019. Handbook on procedures and criteria for determining refugee status and guidelines on international protection. Available at:
https://www.unhcr.org/media/handbook-procedures-and-criteria-determining-refugee-status-under-1951-convention-and-1967 . - United Nations. 1951. Convention relating to the status of refugees. 189 UNTS 137.
- Valero‑Garcés, C. 2017. ‘Training interpreters and translators in Spain’s asylum and refugee office (OAR): A case study’, International Journal of Interpreter Education, 8(2), pp. 7–23.
- Veglio, M. 2024.
‘Linguistic and epistemic discrimination against migrants in Italian asylum procedures’ , in E. Monzó‑Nebot and M. Lomeña‑Galiano (eds.). Toward inclusion and social justice in institutional translation and interpreting: Revealing hidden practices of exclusion. New York: Routledge, pp. 47–76. - Wadensjö, C. 2018. Kontakt genom tolk. Stockholm: Dialogos.
- Wadensjö, C., Rehnberg, H.S. and Nikolaidou, Z. 2021. Tolkfunktionen i asylprocessen. Stockholm: Delmi Kunskapsöversikt, p. 4.
- Wadensjö, C., Rehnberg, H.S. and Nikolaidou, Z. 2022. ‘Managing a discourse of reporting: The complex composing of an asylum narrative’, Multilingua, 42(2), pp. 191–213.
- Wikström, H. and Johansson, T. 2013. ‘Credibility assessments as “normative leakage”: Asylum applications, gender and class’, Social Inclusion, 1(2), pp. 92–101.
- Young, I.M. 2000. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/njmr.958 | Journal eISSN: 1799-649X
Language: English
Page range: 7 - 7
Submitted on: Nov 21, 2024
Accepted on: Jun 27, 2025
Published on: Sep 4, 2025
Published by: Helsinki University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2025 Kristina Gustafsson, Lisa Ottosson, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.