Politics for Exclusion and Strategies for Inclusion: A Scoping Review of Nordic Family Reunification Policies, Practices, and Impact on Refugees
By: Marguerite Daniel and Ørjan Skaga
References
- Adamo, S. 2007. The legal position of migrants in Denmark: Assessing the context around the “Cartoon Crisis”. European Journal of Migration and Law, 9: 1–24. DOI: 10.1163/138836407X179283
- Adamo, S. 2022. “Please sign here”: Integration contracts between municipalities and foreigners in Denmark. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 23: 321–342. DOI: 10.1007/s12134-021-00834-0
- Andreasson, J and Herz, M. 2022. Family practices, deportability and administrative violence: An ethnographic study on asylum seekers family life in the Swedish migration context. Families, Relationships and Societies, 11: 157–174. DOI: 10.1332/204674321X16381850636644
- Antonovsky, A. 1979. Health, stress and coping. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Antonovsky, A. 1996. The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promotion International, 11: 11–18. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/11.1.11
- Arksey, H and O’Malley, L. 2005. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8: 19–32. DOI: 10.1080/1364557032000119616
- Balakian, S. 2023. Of aunts and mothers: Refugee resettlement, the nuclear family, and caring for “Other” children in Kenya. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 46: 213–232. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2022.2063693
- Bech, EC, Borevi, K and Mouritsen, P. 2017. A ‘civic turn’ in Scandinavian family migration policies? Comparing Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Comparative Migration Studies, 5: 1–24. DOI: 10.1186/s40878-016-0046-7
- Bech, EC and Mouritsen, P. 2013.
Restricting the right to family migration in Denmark: When human rights collide with a welfare state under pressure . In: Brochman, G and Jurado, E (eds.), Europe’s Immigration Challenge: Re-Thinking Immigration after the Downturn. London: I.B. Tauris & Co. LTD. DOI: 10.5040/9780755619931.ch-009 - Borevi, K. 2015. Family migration policies and politics: Understanding the Swedish Exception. Journal of Family Issues, 36: 1490–1508. DOI: 10.1177/0192513X14558297
- Bratu, C, Dahlberg, M, Engdahl, M and Nikolka, T. 2020. Spillover effects of stricter immigration policies. Journal of Public Economics, 190: 104239. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104239
- Brekke, JP and Grønningsæter, AG. 2017. Family reunification regulations in Norway and the EU. Oslo: Institutt for samfunnsforskning.
- Eggebø, H and Brekke, JP. 2019. Family migration and integration: The need for a new research agenda. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 9: 425–444. DOI: 10.2478/njmr-2019-00030
- Emilsson, H. 2020.
Continuity or change? The impact of the refugee crisis on Swedish political parties’ migration policy preferences . In: Fingerle, M and Wink, R (eds.), Forced Migration and Resilience. Berlin: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-27926-4_6 - Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. 2017.
Refugee policy as ‘negative nation branding’: The case of Denmark and the Nordics . In: Fischer, K and Mouritzen, H. (eds.), Danish Foreign Policy Yearbook 2017. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3902589 - Gustafsson, H. 2022. Collectivity in waiting: transnational experiences in Swedish family reunification. European Journal of Social Work, 25: 1–13. DOI: 10.1080/13691457.2022.2064434
- Hagelund, A. 2020. After the refugee crisis: Public discourse and policy change in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Comparative Migration Studies, 8: 1–17. DOI: 10.1186/s40878-019-0169-8
- Halme-Tuomisaari, M, Tapaninen, AM and Aunela, H. 2019. Where’s the well: DNA evidence, personal narratives and unpredictability in Finnish family reunification. Migration Studies, 7: 245–265. DOI: 10.1093/migration/mny002
- Helén, I. 2014. Biological citizenship across the borders: Politics of DNA profiling for family reunification. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15: 343–360. DOI: 10.1080/1600910X.2014.923321
- Helén, I and Tapaninen, AM. 2013. Closer to the truth: DNA profiling for family reunification and the rationales of immigration policy in Finland. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 3: 153–161. DOI: 10.2478/njmr-2013-0006
- Hernes, V. 2018. Cross-national convergence in times of crisis? Integration policies before, during and after the refugee crisis. West European Politics, 41: 1305–1329. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2018.1429748
- Hiitola, J. 2019. Locating forced migrants’ resources: Residency status and the process of family reunification in Finland. Social Inclusion, 7: 190–191. DOI: 10.17645/si.v7i4.2327
- Hiitola, J. 2021. Everyday (in) security and transnational family relationships in the lives of young forced migrants. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 11: 1012–1035. DOI: 10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1202
- Hiitola, J and Vähä-Savo, V. 2021. Genres of departure: Forced migrants’ family separation and personal narratives. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 11: 235–249. DOI: 10.33134/njmr.372
- Hvidtfeldt, C, Petersen, JH and Norredam, M. 2022. Waiting for family reunification and the risk of mental disorders among refugee fathers: A 24-year longitudinal cohort study from Denmark. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 57: 1061–1072. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-021-02170-1
- Hyökki, L. 2019. The EU and human rights as institutional facts in the Finnish political discourse on family reunification. Migration Letters, 16: 317–328. DOI: 10.33182//ml.v16i2.744
- Lee, C and Voigt, TH. 2020. DNA testing for family reunification and the limits of biological truth. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 45: 430–454. DOI: 10.1177/0162243919862870
- Leinonen, J and Pellander, S. 2020.
Temporality and everyday (in)security in the lives of separated refugee families . In: Hiitola, J, Turtiainen, K, Gruber, S and Tiilikainen, M (eds.), Family Life in Transition: Borders, Transnational Mobility, and Welfare Society in Nordic Countries. Milton Park: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429024832-11 - Levac, D, Colquhoun, H and O’Brien, KK. 2010. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5: 1–9. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
- Löbel, LM. 2020. Family separation and refugee mental health – A network perspective. Social Networks, 61: 20–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2019.08.004
- Olwig, KF. 2022. The right to a family life and the biometric ‘truth’ of family reunification: Somali Refugees in Denmark. Ethnos, 87: 275–289. DOI: 10.1080/00141844.2019.1648533
- Østergaard-Nielsen, E. 2003. Counting the costs: Denmark’s changing migration policies. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27: 448–454. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.00457
- Palander, J, Baraka, U, Gustafsson, H, Kvalvaag, AM, Lokot, M, Martuscelli, N, Mesgena, HY, Tuzi, I and Wray, H. 2023.
International human rights frameworks in relation to national family reunification policy and administrative practice . In: Tiilikainen, M, Hiitola, J, Ismail, A and Palender, J (eds.), Forced Migration and Separated Families: Everyday Insecurities and Transnational Strategies. Milton Park: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-24974-7_2 - Phillimore, J, D’Avino, G, Strain-Fajth, V, Papoutsi, A and Ziss, P. 2023. Family reunion policy for resettled refugees: Governance, challenges and impacts. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 5: 1075306. DOI: 10.3389/fhumd.2023.1075306
- Slootjes, J, Keuzenkamp, S and Saharso, S. 2017. The mechanisms behind the formation of a strong Sense of Coherence (SOC): The role of migration and integration. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 58: 571–580. DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12400
- Sourander, A. 2003. Refugee families during asylum seeking. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 57: 203–207. DOI: 10.1080/08039480310001364
- Staver, A. 2015. Hard work for love: The economic drift in Norwegian family immigration and integration policies. Journal of Family Issues, 36: 1453–1471. DOI: 10.1177/0192513X14557491
- Tapaninen, AM, Halme-Tuomisaari, M and Kankaanpää, V. 2019. Mobile lives, immutable facts: Family reunification of children in Finland. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45: 825–841. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2017.1405725
- Tapaninen, AM and Helén, I. 2020. Making up families: How DNA analysis does/does not verify relatedness in family reunification in Finland. BioSocieties, 15: 376–393. DOI: 10.1057/s41292-019-00148-6
- UNGA. 1948. Universal declaration of human rights. New York: United Nations General Assembly.
- UNGA. 1966a. International covenant on civil and political rights. New York: United Nations General Assembly.
- UNGA. 1966b. International covenant on economic, social and cultural rights. New York: United Nations General Assembly.
- UNHCR. 2018. The right to family life and family unity of refugees and others in need of international protection and the family definition applied. Geneva: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.
- Zand, F. 2006. En kamp imod vejrmøller [A struggle against windmills]. Psyke & Logos, 27: 700–709. DOI: 10.7146/pl.v27i2.8313
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/njmr.785 | Journal eISSN: 1799-649X
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 1
Submitted on: Aug 12, 2023
Accepted on: Jan 26, 2024
Published on: Jul 17, 2024
Published by: Helsinki University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2024 Marguerite Daniel, Ørjan Skaga, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.