Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Odyssey to the Model Norwegian State: De/Constructing Migration Journeys Step-by-Step from Students’ Digital Stories Cover

Odyssey to the Model Norwegian State: De/Constructing Migration Journeys Step-by-Step from Students’ Digital Stories

Open Access
|Jul 2023

References

  1. Abram, S. 2008. Reproducing the Norwegian myth: Egalitarianism and the normal. CTCC Research Papers. Leeds: Center for Tourism and Cultural Change.
  2. Alexandra, D. 2008. Digital storytelling as transformative practice: Critical analysis and creative expression in the representation of migration in Ireland. Journal of Media Practice, 9(2): 101112. DOI: 10.1386/jmpr.9.2.101_1
  3. Andersson, L, Jakobsson, N and Kotsadam, A. 2012. A field experiment of discrimination in the norwegian housing market: Gender, class, and ethnicity. Land Economics, 88: 233240. DOI: 10.3368/le.88.2.233
  4. Bamberg, M. 2004. Considering counter narratives. In: Bamberg, M et al. (eds.), Considering Counter Narratives: Narrating, Resisting, Making Sense, 351371. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/sin.4.43bam
  5. Bangstad, S. 2011. The morality police are coming! Muslims in Norway’s media discourses. Anthropology Today, 17(5): 37. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8322.2011.00825.x
  6. Bansel, P. et al. 2016. Young newly arrived migrants and refugees in Australia. Using digital storytelling practices to capture settlement experiences and social cohesion. Melbourne: Young and Well Cooperative Research Centre.
  7. Barab, S and Squire, K. 2004. Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1): 114. DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
  8. Bezemer, J and Mavers, D. 2011. Multimodal transcription as academic practice: A social semiotic perspective. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(3): 191206. DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2011.563616
  9. Birkelund, GE, Heggebø, K and Rogstad, J. 2016. Additive or multiplicative disadvantage? The scarring effects of unemployment. European Sociological Review, 33: 1729. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcw030
  10. Brook, MI and Ottemöller, FG. 2020. A new life in Norway: The adaptation experiences of unaccompanied refugee minor girls. Children and Youth Services Review, 117: 105287. DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105287
  11. Chingona, A, et al. 2010. An empirical survey on domestication of ICT in schools in disadvantaged communities in South Africa. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 6(2): 2132.
  12. Daiute, C. 2014. Narrative inquiry: A dynamic approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications. DOI: 10.4135/9781544365442
  13. Darvin, R and Norton, B. 2014. Transnational identity and migrant language learners: The promise of digital storytelling. Education Matters, 2(1): 5566.
  14. Delgado, R. 1995. Legal storytelling: Storytelling for oppositionists and others: A Plea for narrative. In: Delgado, R. (ed.), Critical Race Theory: The Cutting Edge, 6474. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  15. Friberg, JH. 2021. Who wants to be Norwegian – who gets to be Norwegian? Identificational assimilation and nonrecognition among immigrant origin youth in Norway. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 44(16): 2124. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2020.1857813
  16. Gullikstad, B, Kristensen, GK and Sætermo, TF. (eds.) 2021. Fortellinger om integrering i norske lokalsamfunn. [Stories about integration in Norwegian local communities]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. DOI: 10.18261/9788215042961-2021
  17. Harris, AM, Carney, S and Fine, M. 2001. Counter work: Introduction. In: Fine, M. and Harris, AM (eds.), Under the Covers: Theorising the Politics of Counter Stories, 618. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
  18. Hermansen, AS. 2016. Moving up or falling behind? Intergenerational Socioeconomic Transmission among Children of Immigrants in Norway. European Sociological Review, 32: 675–689. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcw024
  19. Jewitt, C. 2006. Technology, literacy and learning: A multimodal approach. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
  20. Jewitt, C. 2013. Multimodal methods for researching digital technologies. In: Price, S, et al. (eds.), SAGE Handbook of Digital Technology Research. London: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781446282229.n18
  21. Keskinen, S, Skaptadóttir, UD and Toivanen, M. (eds.) 2019. Undoing homogeneity in the Nordic region. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315122328
  22. Lambert, J. 2013. Digital storytelling: Capturing lives, creating community. New York: Routledge.
  23. Lawrence, RL and Cranton, P. 2015. A novel idea: Researching transformative learning in fiction. In A Novel Idea: Researching Transformative Learning in Fiction. Boston, MA: Sense. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6300-037-6
  24. Leavy, P. 2013. Fiction as research practice: Short stories, novellas, and novels. Left Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
  25. Lenette, C, et al. 2019. ‘Better than a pill’: Digital storytelling as a narrative process for refugee women. Media Practice and Education, 20(1): 6786. DOI: 10.1080/25741136.2018.1464740
  26. Midtbøen, AH. 2016. Discrimination of the second generation: Evidence from a field experiment in norway. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 17: 253272. DOI: 10.1007/s12134-014-0406-9
  27. Midtbøen, AH and Kitterød, RH. 2019. Beskytter assimilering mot diskriminering? [Does assimilation protect against discrimination?] Norsk sosiologisk tidsskrift, 3: 353371. DOI: 10.18261/issn.2535-2512-2019-05-04
  28. Norwegian Ministries. 2019. Immigration and integration 2017–2018: Report for Norway to the OECD. Oslo: Government.no.
  29. O’ Grady, G, Clandinin, J and O’ Toole, J. 2018. Engaging in educational narrative inquiry: Making visible alternative knowledge. Irish Educational Studies, 37(2): 153157. DOI: 10.1080/03323315.2018.1475149
  30. Ohler, J. 2013. Digital storytelling in the classroom: New media pathways to literacy, learning, and creativity. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press. DOI: 10.4135/9781452277479
  31. Reimann, P. 2011. Design-based research. In: Markauskaite, L et al. (eds.), Methodological Choice and Design. Scholarship, Policy and Practice in Social and Educational Research, 3750. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-8933-5_3
  32. Riessman, CK. 2008. Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  33. Sadik, A. 2008. Digital storytelling: A meaningful technology-integrated approach for engaged student learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(4): 487506. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-008-9091-8
  34. Sanghera, GS and Thapar-Björkert, S. 2012. The imagination and social capital: Transnational agency and practices among Pakistani Muslims in the UK. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 2(2): 141. DOI: 10.2478/v10202-011-0036-7
  35. Sen, A. 2006. Identity and violence: The illusion of destiny. New York: Norton.
  36. Skrefsrud, T. 2018. Barriers to intercultural dialogue. Studies in Interreligious Dialogue, 28(1): 4357. DOI: 10.2143/SID.28.1.3285343
  37. Skrefsrud, T. 2020. Teachers as intercultural bridge-builders: Rethinking the metaphor of bridge-building. Teaching Theology and Religion, 23: 151162. DOI: 10.1111/teth.12550
  38. Statistics Norway. 2017. From asylum seeker to refugee – before and after the crisis of 2015. Article written by Lars Østby, 2 February 2017. Available at https://www.ssb.no/en/befolkning/artikler-og-publikasjoner/from-asylum-seeker-to-refugee-before-and-after-the-crisis-of-2015 Accessed 23.10.2021.
  39. Statistics Norway. 2021. Holdninger til innvandrere og innvandring. [Attitudes towards refugees and migration]. Report 2021/36.
  40. Svendsen, SHB. 2013. Learning racism in the absence of ‘race.’ European Journal of Women’s Studies, 21(1): 924. DOI: 10.1177/1350506813507717
  41. Svendsen, SHB, et al. 2022. Migration narratives in educational digital storytelling: which stories can be told? Learning, Media and Technology, 47(2): 201215. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2021.1954949
  42. United Nations Development Programme. 2019. 2019 Human development index ranking. New York: UNDP.
  43. Vesterlind, M and Winman, T. 2015. Knowing in practice: The use of dialogue as a pedagogical method in integration work. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 5(4): 168176. DOI: 10.1515/njmr-2015-0025
  44. World Economic Forum. 2020. Gender gap report 202. Geneva: WEC.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/njmr.480 | Journal eISSN: 1799-649X
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 1
Submitted on: May 24, 2021
Accepted on: Dec 13, 2022
Published on: Jul 5, 2023
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2023 Kristine Øygardslia, Priscilla Ringrose, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.