Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
‘Migrant Carer- Wives’ – Between Transnational Marriages, Care Work for Older Husbands and Gendered Precarity Cover

‘Migrant Carer- Wives’ – Between Transnational Marriages, Care Work for Older Husbands and Gendered Precarity

Open Access
|Jun 2022

References

  1. Al Ajlan, A. 2019. Older refugees in Germany: What are the reasons for the difficulties in language-learning? Journal of Refugee Studies. DOI: 10.1093/jrs/fez056
  2. Andersson, B. 2000. Doing the dirty work? The global politics of domestic labour. New York: Zed Books.
  3. Andersson, K. 2012. Paradoxes of gender in elderly care: The case of men as care workers in Sweden. NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 20(3): 166181. DOI: 10.1080/08038740.2012.667001
  4. Baldassar, L. 2008. Transnational Families and the Obligation to Care. In: Grillo, R (ed.), Immigrant Families in Multicultural Europe: Debating Cultural Difference, 269291. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. DOI: 10.1017/9789048501533.013
  5. Balistreri, KS, Joyner, K and Kao, G. 2017. Trading youth for citizenship? The spousal age gap in cross-border marriages. Population and Development Review, 43(3): 443466. DOI: 10.1111/padr.12072
  6. Baykara-Krumme, H and Platt, L. 2018. Life satisfaction of migrants, stayers and returnees: Reaping the fruits of migration in old age? Ageing and Society, 38(4): 721745. DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X16001227
  7. Becker, G. 1981. A treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  8. Bjerke, KM. 2020. Transnational aging in place – The case of Pakistani and Polish migrants in Norway. Unpublished thesis (PhD), University of Bergen.
  9. Blackwell, DL and Lichter, DT. 2004. Homogamy among dating, cohabiting, and married couples. Sociological Quarterly, 45(4): 719737. DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2004.tb02311.x
  10. Bloksgaard, L. 2011. Masculinities, femininities and work – The horizontal gender segregation in the Danish labour market. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 1(2): 521. DOI: 10.19154/njwls.v1i2.2342
  11. Brettell, CB. 2017. Marriage and migration. Annual Review of Anthropology, 46: 8197. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041237
  12. Brown, SL, Lin, IF, Hammersmith, AM and Wright, MR. 2019. Repartnering following gray divorce: The roles of resources and constraints for women and men. Demography, 56: 503523. DOI: 10.1007/s13524-018-0752-x
  13. Choi, YJ, Elkins, J and Disney, L. 2016. A literature review of intimate partner violence among immigrant populations: Engaging the faith community. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 29: 19. DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2016.05.004
  14. Cindoglu, D, Cemrek, M, Toktas, S and Zencirci, G. 2011. The Family in Turkey. In: Hennon, CB and Wilson, SM (eds.), Families in a Global Context, 235263. New York: Routledge.
  15. Ciobanu, RO, Fokkema, T and Nedelcu, M. 2017. Ageing as a migrant: Vulnerabilities, agency and policy implications. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(2): 164181. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2016.1238903
  16. Coe, C. 2019. The new American servitude: Political belonging among African immigrant home care workers. New York: New York University Press. DOI: 10.18574/nyu/9781479831012.001.0001
  17. Constable, N. 2005. Cross-border marriages – Gender and mobility in transnational Asia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI: 10.9783/9780812200645
  18. Constable, N. 2009. The commodification of intimacy: Marriage, sex, and reproductive labor. Annual Review of Anthropology, 38: 4964. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085133
  19. Dahl, HM. 2019. Et forandret landskab for ældreomsorg. Politica – Tidsskrift for politisk videnskab, 51(1): 82101.
  20. de Valk, HAG and Schans, D. 2008. ‘They ought to do this for their parents’: Perceptions of filial obligations among immigrant and Dutch older people. Ageing and Society, 28(1): 4966. DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X07006307
  21. Denktas, S. 2011. Health and health care use of elderly immigrants in the Netherlands. Unpublished thesis (PhD), Erasmus University Rotterdam.
  22. Eggebø, H and Brekke, JP. 2019. Family migration and integration: The need for a new research agenda. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 9(4): 425444. DOI: 10.2478/njmr-2019-00030
  23. Elwert, A. 2016. Opposites attract – Evidence of status exchange in ethnic intermarriages in Sweden. Lund papers in economic history. Population Economics, 147.
  24. England, P and McClintock, EA. 2009. The gendered double standard of aging in US marriage markets. Population and Development Review, 35(4): 797816. DOI: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00309.x
  25. Erez, E, Adelman, M and Gregory, C. 2009. Intersections of immigration and domestic violence. Feminist Criminology, 4(1): 3256. DOI: 10.1177/1557085108325413
  26. Esping-Anderson, G. 1990. Three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeston: Princeton University Press.
  27. Faier, L. 2007. Filipina migrants in rural Japan and their professions of love. American Ethnologist, 34(1): 148162. DOI: 10.1525/ae.2007.34.1.148
  28. Forssell, E. 2013. Transnational aging, care and the welfare state. Transnational Social Review, 3(1): 8399. DOI: 10.1080/21931674.2013.10820749
  29. Frericks, P, Jensen, PH and Pfau-Effinger, B. 2014. Social rights and employment rights related to family care: Family care regimes in Europe. Journal of Aging Studies, 29(1): 6677. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaging.2013.12.002
  30. Hansen, EB and Siganos, G. 2009. Ældre danskeres og indvandreres brug af pleje- og omsorgsydelser. Copenhagen: AKF – Anvendt Kommunal Forskning.
  31. Hochschild, AR. 2003. Love and Gold. In: Ehrenreich, B and Hochschild, AR (eds.), Global Woman: Nannies, Maids and Sex Workers in the New Economy. New York: Holt/Metropolitan Books. pp. 1530.
  32. Hsieh, HF and Shannon, SE. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9): 12771288. DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687
  33. Hymes, D. 1977. Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Tavistock: Tavistock Publications Limited.
  34. Ismail, AM. 2021. Care in practice: Negotiations regarding care for the elderly in multigenerational Arab Muslim families in Denmark. Contemporary Islam, 118. DOI: 10.1007/s11562-020-00458-8
  35. Jackson, M. 2007. Excursions. Durham: Duke University Press.
  36. Kalpagam, U. 2008. ‘American Varan’ Marriages among Tamil Brahmins: Preferences, Strategies and Outcomes. In: Palriwala, R and Uberoi, P (eds.), Marriage, Migration and Gender, 98124. New York: Sage Publishing. DOI: 10.4135/9788132100324.n4
  37. Kapur, R. 2002. The tragedy of victimization rhetoric: Resurrecting the ‘native’ subject in international/post-colonial feminist legal politics. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 15: 137.
  38. Lan, PC. 2002. Subcontracting filial piety. Journal of Family Issues, 23(7): 812835. DOI: 10.1177/019251302236596
  39. Lan, PC. 2008. New global politics of reproductive labor: Gendered labor and marriage migration. Sociology Compass, 2(6): 18011815. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00176.x
  40. Lauser, A. 2008. Philippine women on the move: Marriage across borders. International Migration, 46(4): 85110. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2008.00473.x
  41. Levchenko, P and Solheim, C. 2013. International marriages between Eastern European-born women and U.S.-born men. Family Relations, 62(1): 3041. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00746.x
  42. Levitt, P and Schiller, NG. 2004. Conceptualizing simultaneity: A transnational social field perspective on society. International Migration Review, 38(3): 10021039. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00227.x
  43. Lichter, DT and Qian, Z. 2019. The Study of Assortative Mating: Theory, Data, and Analysis. In: Schoen, R. (ed.) Analytical Family Demography, 303337. Basel: Springer International. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-93227-9_13
  44. Liversage, A. 2013a. Transnational Families Breaking up: Divorce among Turkish Immigrants in Denmark. In: Charsley, K (ed.), Transnational Marriage: New Perspectives from Europe and Beyond, 145160. London: Routledge.
  45. Liversage, A. 2013b. Gendered struggles over residency rights when Turkish immigrant marriages break up. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 3(6): 10701090.
  46. Liversage, A and Jakobsen, V. 2016. Ældre fra Tyrkiet – hverdagsliv og vilkår. Roskilde: Roskilde University Press.
  47. Liversage, A. 2021. Remarriage among older immigrants and their host country peers – a countrywide study. Migration Letters, 18(3): 349360. DOI: 10.33182/ml.v18i3.1224
  48. Lutz, H. 2011. The new maids of Europe: Transnational women and the care economy. London: Zed Books. DOI: 10.5040/9781350223356
  49. Lutz, H and Palenga-Möllenbeck, E. 2010. Care work migration in Germany: Semi-compliance and complicity. Social Policy and Society, 9(3): 419430. DOI: 10.1017/S1474746410000138
  50. Mahler, SJ and Pessar, PR. 2001. Gendered geographies of power: Analyzing gender across transnational spaces. Identities, 7(4): 441459. DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.2001.9962675
  51. Milewski, N and Hamel, C. 2010. Union formation and partner choice in a transnational context: The case of descendants of Turkish immigrants in France. International Migration Review, 44(3): 615658. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2010.00820.x
  52. Nielsen, TR, Waldemar, G and Nielsen, DS. 2020. Rotational care practices in minority ethnic families managing dementia: A qualitative study. Dementia. DOI: 10.1177/1471301220914751
  53. Nieswand, B. 2011. Theorizing transnational migration: The status paradox of migration. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203810439
  54. Oxlund, B. 2018. The life course in a migrating world: Hybrid scripts of ageing and imaginaries of care. Advances in Life Course Research, 38(September): 7279. DOI: 10.1016/j.alcr.2018.08.001
  55. Parrenas, RS. 2007. The gender ideological clash in globalization: Women, migration and the modernization building project of the Philippines. Social Thought and Research, 28: 3756. DOI: 10.17161/STR.1808.5223
  56. Piper, N and Lee, S. 2016. Marriage migration, migrant precarity, and social reproduction in Asia: An overview. Critical Asian Studies, 48(4): 473493. DOI: 10.1080/14672715.2016.1226598
  57. Qureshi, K. 2016. Shehri (city) brides between Indian Punjab and the UK: Transnational hypergamy, Sikh women’s agency and gendered geographies of power. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(7): 12161228. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2015.1068107
  58. Raj, A and Silverman, JG. 2002. Intimate partner violence against South Asian women in greater Boston. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association, 57(2): 111114.
  59. Rytter, M. 2012. Between preferences: Marriage and mobility among Danish Pakistani youth. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 18(3): 572590. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2012.01777.x
  60. Rytter, M and Sparre, SL. 2021. Between care and contract: Aging Muslim immigrants, self-appointed helpers and ambiguous belonging in the Danish welfare state. Anthropology and Aging, 42(1): 112128. DOI: 10.5195/aa.2021.279
  61. Rytter, M, Sparre, SL, Ismail, AM and Liversage, A. 2021. Minoritetsældre og selvudpegede hjælpere – kommunal velfærd og omsorg i forandring. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
  62. Saville-Troike, M. 2003 [1982]. The ethnography of communication. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. DOI: 10.1002/9780470758373
  63. Schans, D and Komter, A. 2010. Ethnic differences in intergenerational solidarity in the Netherlands. Journal of Aging Studies, 24(3): 194203. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaging.2008.10.007
  64. Schimmele, CM and Wu, Z. 2016. Repartnering after union dissolution in later life. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(4): 10131031. DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12315
  65. Sparre, SL and Rytter, M. 2019. ‘Selvudpegede hjælpere’ som omsorgsgivere for plejekrævende ældre indvandrere og flygtninge. Tidsskriftet Gerontologi, 35(2): 2632.
  66. Spencer, K. 2011. Mahr as contract: Internal pluralism and external perspectives. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 1(2): 320.
  67. Staver, AB, Brekke, JP and Søholt, S. 2019. Scandinavia’s segregated cities - policies, strategies and ideals. NIBR Report 2019:8. Oslo: Oslo Metropolitan University.
  68. Thai, HC. 2005. Clashing Dreams in the Vietnamese Diaspora: Highly Educated Overseas Brides and Low-Wage U.S. Husbands. In: Constable, N (ed.), Cross-Border Marriages: Gender and Mobility in Transnational Asia, 14565. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI: 10.9783/9780812200645.145
  69. Thai, HC. 2008. For better or for worse – Vietnamese international marriages in the new global economy. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
  70. Tsai, MC. 2011. ‘Foreign brides’ meet ethnic politics in Taiwan. International Migration Review, 45(2): 243268. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2011.00847.x
  71. Voolma, H. 2018. ‘I must be silent because of residency’: Barriers to escaping domestic violence in the context of insecure immigration status in England and Sweden. Violence Against Women, 24(15): 18301850. DOI: 10.1177/1077801218755974
  72. Williams, F and Brennan, D. 2012. Care, markets and migration in a globalising world: Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(4): 355362. DOI: 10.1177/0958928712449777
  73. Yamaura, C. 2015. Marrying transnational, desiring local: Making ‘marriageable others’ in Japanese–Chinese cross-border matchmaking. Anthropological Quarterly, 88(4): 10291058. DOI: 10.1353/anq.2015.0046
  74. Yeoh, BSA, Chee, HL and Vu, TKD. 2014. Global householding and the negotiation of intimate labour in commercially-matched international marriages between Vietnamese women and Singaporean men. Geoforum, 51: 284293. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.09.012
  75. Zelizer, VA. 2000. The purchase of intimacy. Law and Social Inquiry, 25: 81748. DOI: 10.1515/9781400826759
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/njmr.427 | Journal eISSN: 1799-649X
Language: English
Page range: 156 - 173
Submitted on: Jan 15, 2021
Accepted on: Oct 29, 2021
Published on: Jun 1, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2022 Anika Liversage, Abir Mohamad Ismail, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.