Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Civic Integration through Commissioned Communities: On the Cross-Sector Co-Production of Conditioned and Clientised Participation Cover

Civic Integration through Commissioned Communities: On the Cross-Sector Co-Production of Conditioned and Clientised Participation

By:  and    
Open Access
|Sep 2022

References

  1. Ahlén, A and Boräng, F. 2018. Immigration control in disguise? Civic integration policies and immigrant admission. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 8(1): 314. DOI: 10.1515/njmr-2018-0004
  2. Bonjour, S and Duyvendak, JV. 2018. The ‘migrant with poor prospects’: Racialized intersections of class and culture in Dutch civic integration debates. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 41(5): 882900. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2017.1339897
  3. Borevi, K, Jensen, KK and Mouritsen, P. 2017. The civic turn of immigrant integration policies in the Scandinavian welfare states. Comparative Migration Studies, 5(1): 9. DOI: 10.1186/s40878-017-0052-4
  4. Brandsen, T and Pestoff, V. 2006. Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services: An introduction. Public Management Review, 8(4): 493501. DOI: 10.1080/14719030601022874
  5. Brandsen, T, Steen, T and Verschuere, B. 2018. Co-production and co-creation: Engaging citizens in public services. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315204956
  6. Bygballe Jensen, LS and Kirchner, LM. 2020. Acts of volunteering for refugees: Local responses to global challenges. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 10(4): 2640. DOI: 10.33134/njmr.367
  7. Carlsen, HB, Doerr, N and Toubøl, J. 2020. Inequality in interaction: Equalising the helper–recipient relationship in the refugee solidarity movement. Voluntas. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-020-00268-9
  8. De Graauw, E. 2016. Making immigrant rights real: Nonprofits and the politics of integration in San Francisco. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. DOI: 10.7591/cornell/9781501700187.001.0001
  9. Eliasoph, N. 2011. Making volunteers: Civic life after welfare’s end. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.23943/princeton/9780691147093.001.0001
  10. Fehsenfeld, M and Levinsen, K. 2019. Taking care of the refugees: Exploring advocacy and cross-sector collaboration in service provision for refugees. Voluntas, 30: 422435. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-019-00097-5
  11. Folketing Hansard. 2015–2016. L87: The Aliens Act Amendment Act. Available at https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=176273 [Last accessed 26 March 2020].
  12. Frederiksen, M and Grubb, A. 2021. The politics of insufficiency: Ambivalence and boundary work in the co-production of welfare services. Public Management Review, 121. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2021.1978759
  13. Goodman, SW. 2010. Integration requirements for integration’s sake? Identifying, categorizing and comparing civic integration policies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(5): 753772. DOI: 10.1080/13691831003764300
  14. Goodman, SW. 2012. Fortifying citizenship: Policy strategies for civic integration in Western Europe. World Politics, 64(4): 659698. DOI: 10.1017/S0043887112000184
  15. Goodman, SW and Wright, M. 2015. Does mandatory integration matter? Effects of civic requirements on immigrant socio-economic and political outcomes. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(12): 18851908. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2015.1042434
  16. Grubb, A and Frederiksen, M. 2021. Speaking on behalf of the vulnerable? Voluntary translations of citizen needs to policy in community co-production. Public Management Review, 120. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2021.1945665
  17. Handy, F and Greenspan, H. 2009. Immigrant volunteering: A stepping stone to integration? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(6): 956982. DOI: 10.1177/0899764008324455
  18. Hesse, A, Kreutzer, K and Diehl, M-J. 2018. Dynamics of institutional logics in a cross sector social partnership: The case of refugee integration in Germany. Journal of Business Ethics, 159: 679704. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-017-3775-0
  19. Howard, MM. 2009. The politics of citizenship in Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511819124
  20. Hustinx, L. 2010. Institutionally individualized volunteering: Towards a late modern re-construction. Journal of Civil Society, 6(2), 165179. DOI: 10.1080/17448689.2010.506381
  21. Hustinx, L and Lammertyn, F. 2003. Collective and reflexive styles of volunteering: A sociological modernization perspective. Voluntas, 14(2): 167187. DOI: 10.1023/A:1023948027200
  22. Ibsen, B. (ed.) 2021. Voluntary and public sector collaboration in Scandinavia: New approaches to co-production. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-72315-6
  23. Ilcan, S and Basok, T. 2004. Community government: Voluntary agencies, social justice, and the responsibilization of citizens. Citizenship Studies, 8(2): 129144. DOI: 10.1080/1362102042000214714
  24. Jegermalm, M, Wilinska, M, Bravell, ME, Bülow, P, Bülow, P and Torgé, CJ. 2020. Filling the gaps? The role of voluntary organizations in supporting older people with severe mental illnesses. Nordic Social Work Research, 10(3): 219229. DOI: 10.1080/2156857X.2018.1555096
  25. Joppke, C. 2007. Beyond national models: Civic integration policies for immigrants in Western Europe. West European Politics, 30(1): 122. DOI: 10.1080/01402380601019613
  26. Joppke, C. 2017. Civic integration in Western Europe: Three debates. West European Politics, 40(6): 11531176. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2017.1303252
  27. Koopmans, R, Michalowski, I and Waibel, S. 2012. Citizenship rights for immigrants: National political processes and cross-national convergence in Western Europe, 1980–2008. American Journal of Sociology, 117(4): 12021245. DOI: 10.1086/662707
  28. la Cour, A. 2019. The management quest for authentic relationships in voluntary social care. Journal of Civil Society, 15(1): 117. DOI: 10.1080/17448689.2018.1551864
  29. Lichterman, P. 2006. Social capital or group style? Rescuing Tocqueville’s insights on civic engagement. Theory and Society, 35: 529563. DOI: 10.1007/s11186-006-9017-6
  30. Lichterman, P and Eliasoph, N. 2014. Civic action. American Journal of Sociology, 120(3): 798863. DOI: 10.1086/679189
  31. Luhtakallio, E and Eliasoph, N. 2014. Ethnography of Politics and Political Communication: Studies in Sociology and Political Science. In: Kenski, K and Jamieson, KH (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.28
  32. Meer, N, Mouritsen, P, Faas, D and de Witte, N. 2015. Examining ‘postmulticultural’ and civic turns in the Netherlands, Britain, Germany, and Denmark. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(6): 702726. DOI: 10.1177/0002764214566496
  33. Meyer, M and Simsa, R. 2018. Organizing the unexpected: How civil society organizations dealt with the refugee crisis. Voluntas, 29: 11591175. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-018-00050-y
  34. Mouritsen, P, Jensen, KK and Larin, J. 2019. Introduction: Theorizing the civic turn in European integration policies. Ethnicities, 19(4): 595613. DOI: 10.1177/1468796819843532
  35. OECD. 2018. Working together for local integration of migrants and refugees. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at https://www.oecd.org/publications/working-together-for-local-integration-of-migrants-and-refugees-9789264085350-en.htm (Last accessed 11 August 2021).
  36. Osborne, SP. 2006. The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3): 377387. DOI: 10.1080/14719030600853022
  37. Osborne, SP, Radnor, Z and Strokosch, K. 2016. Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: A suitable case for treatment? Public Management Review, 18(5): 639653. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927
  38. Pedersen, MH and Rytter, M. 2011. Islam og muslimer i Danmark: Religion, identitet og sikkerhed efter 11. September 2001 [Islam and Muslims in Denmark: Religion, identity and safety after September 11, 2001]. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanums Forlag.
  39. Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling alone. New York: Simon & Schuster. DOI: 10.1145/358916.361990
  40. Ramakrishnan, SK and Bloemraad, I. 2008. Chapter 2: Making Organisations Count: Immigrant Civic Engagement in California Cities. In: Ramakrishnan, SK and Bloemraad, I (eds.) Civic Hopes and Political Realities: Immigrants, Community Organizations, 4576. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  41. Regeringen. 2017. Strategi for et stærkere civilsamfund [Strategy for a stronger civil society]. Copenhagen: Børne – og Socialministeriet. Available at https://www.regeringen.dk/aktuelt/publikationer-og-aftaletekster/strategi-for-et-staerkere-civilsamfund/ (Last accessed 11 August 2021).
  42. Sandberg, M and Andersen, DJ. 2020a. Europe trouble: Welcome culture and the disruption of the European border regime. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 10(4): 19. DOI: 10.33134/njmr.388
  43. Sandberg, M and Andersen, DJ. 2020b. Precarious citizenship and melancholic longing: On the value of volunteering after the refugee arrivals to Europe 2015. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 10(4): 4156. DOI: 10.33134/njmr.357
  44. Schinkel, W and Van Houdt, F. 2010. The double helix of cultural assimilationism and neo-liberalism: Citizenship in contemporary governmentality. The British Journal of Sociology, 61(4): 696715. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01337.x
  45. Schmid, V, Evers, A and Mildenberger, G. 2019. More or less political: Findings on a central feature of local engagement for refugees in Germany. Social Inclusion, 7(2): 165175. DOI: 10.17645/si.v7i2.1939
  46. Simsa, R, Rameder, P, Aghamanoukjan, A and Totter, M. 2019. Spontaneous volunteering in social crises: Self-organization and coordination. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(2_suppl): 103S122S. DOI: 10.1177/0899764018785472
  47. Skelcher, C, Mathur, N and Smith, M. 2005. The public governance of collaborative spaces: Discourse, design and democracy. Public Administration, 83(3): 573596. DOI: 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00463.x
  48. Strokosch, K and Osborne, SP. 2016. Asylum seekers and the co-production of public services: Understanding the implications for social inclusion and citizenship. Journal of Social Policy, 45(4): 673690. DOI: 10.1017/S0047279416000258
  49. Suvarierol, S. 2021. National fields of civic integration: Operationalization of citizenship requirements. Ethnicities, 21(2): 352374. DOI: 10.1177/1468796820963979
  50. Torfing, J and Triantafillou, P. 2017. Introduktion: New Public Governance på dansk [Introduction to the New Public Governance in Danish]. In: Torfing, J and Triantafillou, P (eds.), New Public Governance på dansk, 739. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.
  51. Trägårdh, L, Selle, P, Henriksen, LS and Hallin, H. 2013. Indledning: Civilsamhället klämt mellan stat och kapital [Civil Society between the State and the Market]. In: Trägårdh, L et al. (eds.), Civilsamhället klämt mellan stat och kapital – Välfård, Mångfald, Framtid, 929. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.
  52. Udlændinge og Integrationsministeriet. 2019. Available at https://uim.dk/nyheder/2017/2017-05/et-travlt-og-produktivt-ar-i-udlaendinge-og-integrationsministeriet (Last accessed 12 August 2019).
  53. van der Veer, L. 2020. Treacherous elasticity, callous boundaries: Aspiring volunteer initiatives in the field of refugee support in Rotterdam. Voluntas. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-020-00260-3
  54. Verschuere, B, Brandsen, T and Pestoff, V. 2012. Co-production: The state of the art in research and the future agenda. Voluntas, 23(4): 10831101. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8
  55. Vitus, K and Jarlby, F. 2021. Between integration and repatriation–frontline experiences of how conflicting immigrant integration policies hamper the integration of young refugees in Denmark. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 119. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2021.1873112
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/njmr.421 | Journal eISSN: 1799-649X
Language: English
Page range: 326 - 345
Submitted on: Jan 15, 2021
Accepted on: Oct 29, 2021
Published on: Sep 27, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2022 Ane Grubb, Kathrine Vitus, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.