Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Care for the Visa: Maximising Mobility from Northwest Russia to the Schengen Area Cover

Care for the Visa: Maximising Mobility from Northwest Russia to the Schengen Area

By:   
Open Access
|Jun 2021

References

  1. Bærenholdt, JO. 2013. Governmobility: The Powers of Mobility. Mobilities, 8(1): 2034. DOI: 10.1080/17450101.2012.747754
  2. Bhattacharya, T. 2017. Introduction: Mapping Social Reproduction Theory. In: Bhattacharya, T (ed.), Social Reproduction Theory: Remapping Class, Recentering Oppression. London: Pluto Press. pp. 120. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1vz494j.5
  3. Brabandt, H and Mau, S. 2013. Liberal Cosmopolitanism and Cross-Border Mobility: The Case of Visa Policies. Global Society, 27(1): 5372. DOI: 10.1080/13600826.2012.734285
  4. Czaika, M and Neumayer, E. 2017. Visa restrictions and economic globalisation. Applied Geography, 84: 7582. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.04.011
  5. Dekalchuk, A. 2014. Schengen Borders in Practice: Facts about Finland (and Russia). Working Paper. Series IR “International Relations”. No. WP BRP 05/IR/2014. Moscow: National Research University – Higher School of Economics. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2498374
  6. Endres, M, Manderscheid, K and Mincke, C. 2016. Discourses and ideologies of mobility: An introduction. In: Endres, M, et al. (eds.), The Mobilities Paradigm: Discourses and Ideologies. London & New York: Routledge. pp. 17. DOI: 10.4324/9781315555515-1
  7. EUR-Lex. 2007. Agreement between the European Community and the Russian Federation on the facilitation of the issuance of visas to the citizens of the European Union and the Russian Federation. 17 May 2007. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:22007A0517(01) [Last accessed 27 April 2020].
  8. EUR-Lex. 2009. Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 establishing a Community Code on Visas (Visa Code), 10 May 2009. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32009R0810 [Last accessed 27 April 2020].
  9. EUR-Lex. 2018. Regulation (EU) 2018/1806 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement, 28 November 2018. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32018R1806 [Last accessed 27 April 2020].
  10. Findicator. 2020. Border crossing, 23 March. Available at https://findikaattori.fi/en/105 [Last accessed 27 April 2020].
  11. Foucault, M. 1994 [1978]. Governmentality. In: Rabonow, P, et al. (eds.), The Essential. New York: The New Press. pp. 229245.
  12. Franklin, A. 2004. Tourism as an ordering: Towards a new ontology of tourism. Tourist Studies, 4(3): 277301. DOI: 10.1177/1468797604057328
  13. Freudendal-Pedersen, M. 2009. Mobility in Daily Life: Between Freedom and Unfreedom. Surrey: Ashgate.
  14. Glick Schiller, N and Salazar, NB. 2013. Regimes of Mobility Across the Globe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(2): 183200. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2013.723253
  15. Green, P. 2015. Mobility Regimes in Practice: Later-life Westerners and Visa Runs in South-East Asia. Mobilities, 10(5): 748763. DOI: 10.1080/17450101.2014.927203
  16. Gülzau, F, Mau, S and Zaun, N. 2016. Regional Mobility Spaces? Visa Waiver Policies and Regional Integration. International Migration, 54(6): 164180. DOI: 10.1111/imig.12286
  17. Hall, CM. 2015. On the mobility of tourism mobilities. Current Issues in Tourism, 18(1): 710. DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2014.971719
  18. Jansen, S. 2009. After the red passport: Towards an anthropology of the everyday geopolitics of entrapment in the EU’s ‘immediate outside.’ Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 15(4): 815832. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2009.01586.x
  19. Jensen, A. 2013. Mobility Regimes and Borderwork in the European Community. Mobilities, 8(1): 3551. DOI: 10.1080/17450101.2012.747780
  20. Krivonos, D and Näre, L. 2019. Imagining the ‘West’ in the Context of Global Coloniality: The Case of Post-Soviet Youth Migration to Finland. Sociology, 53(6): 11771193. DOI: 10.1177/0038038519853111
  21. Levada-Center. 2016. Nalichie zagranpasporta i poezdki za rubezh [Possession of international passport and travells abroad], Press Release, 4 April 2016. Available at http://www.levada.ru/2016/04/26/nalichie-zagranpasporta-i-poezdki-za-rubezh/ [Last accessed 27 April 2020].
  22. Manderscheid, K. 2016. Who does the move? Affirmation or deconstruction of the solitary mobile subject. In: Endres, M, et al. (eds.), The Mobilities Paradigm: Discourses and Ideologies. London & New York: Routledge. pp. 91113. DOI: 10.4324/9781315555515-6
  23. Mau, S. 2010. Mobility Citizenship, Inequality, and the Liberal State: The Case of Visa Policies. International Political Sociology, 4: 339361. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2010.00110.x
  24. Mau, S, Brabandt, H, Laube, L and Roos, C. 2012. Liberal States and the Freedom of Movement: Selective Borders, Unequal Mobility. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9781137016751
  25. Mau, S, Gülzau, F, Laube, L and Zaun, N. 2015. The Global Mobility Divide: How Visa Policies Have Evolved over Time. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(8): 11921213. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2015.1005007
  26. Mincke, C. 2016. From mobility to its ideology: When mobility becomes an imperative. In: Endres, M, et al. (eds.), The Mobilities Paradigm: Discourses and Ideologies. London & New York: Routledge. pp. 1133. DOI: 10.4324/9781315555515-2
  27. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland. 2018. Visa applications by Russians up nearly 60 per cent. Press Release, 19 January 2018. Available at https://um.fi/current-affairs/-/asset_publisher/gc654PySnjTX/content/venalaisten-viisumihakemukset-lisaantyivat-lahes-60-prosenttia?curAsset=0&stId=47307 [Last accessed 27 April 2020].
  28. Navaro-Yashin, Y. 2007. Make-believe papers, legal forms and the counterfeit: Affective interactions between documents and people in Britain and Cyprus. Anthropological Theory, 7(1): 7998. DOI: 10.1177/1463499607074294
  29. Neumayer, E. 2010. Visa Restrictions and Bilateral Travel. The Professional Geographer, 62(2): 171181. DOI: 10.1080/00330121003600835
  30. Olimpieva, I, Pachenkov, O, Ezhova, L and Gordy, E. 2007. Informal Economies of St. Petersburg: Ethnographic Findings on the Cross-border Trade. Jefferson Institute.
  31. Passport Index. 2020. Global Passport Power Rank. Available at https://www.passportindex.org/byRank.php [Last accessed 27 April 2020].
  32. Richardson, T. 2013. Borders and Mobilities: Introduction to the Special Issue. Mobilities, 8(1): 16. DOI: 10.1080/17450101.2012.747747
  33. Salter, MB. 2006. The Global Visa Regime and the Political Technologies of the International Self: Borders, Bodies, Biopolitics. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 31(2): 167189. DOI: 10.1177/030437540603100203
  34. Salter, MB. 2013. To Make Move and Let Stop: Mobility and the Assemblage of Circulation. Mobilities, 8(1): 719. DOI: 10.1080/17450101.2012.747779
  35. Schenk, C. 2018. Why control immigration? Strategic uses of migration management in Russia. Toronto, Buffalo, London: University of Toronto Press. DOI: 10.3138/9781487516352
  36. Schnepel, B and Alpers, EA. (eds.) 2018. Connectivity in Motion: Island Hubs in the Indian Ocean World. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-59725-6
  37. Shamir, R. 2005. Without Borders? Notes on Globalization as a Mobility Regime. Sociological Theory, 23(2): 197217. DOI: 10.1111/j.0735-2751.2005.00250.x
  38. Sheller, M. 2018. Mobility Justice: The Politics of Movement in an Age of Extremes. Verso.
  39. Sheller, M and Urry, J. (eds.) 2004. Tourism Mobilities: Places to Play, Places in Play. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203340332
  40. Sheller, M and Urry, J. 2016. Mobilizing the new mobilities paradigm. Applied Mobilities, 1(1): 1025. DOI: 10.1080/23800127.2016.1151216
  41. ShengenVisaInfo.com. 2020. Country-Specific Schengen Visa Statistics. Available at https://statistics.schengenvisainfo.com/ [Last accessed 27 April 2020].
  42. Stammler-Gossmann, A. 2010. “Winter-tyres-for-a-flower-bed”: Shuttle trade on the Finish-Russian border. In: Bruns, B, et al. (eds.), Subverting borders: Doing research on smuggling and small-scale trade. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. pp. 225247.
  43. Studzińska, D, Sivokoz, A and Domaniewski, S. 2018. Russian cross-border shopping tourists in the Finnish and Polish borderlands. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography, 72(2): 115126. DOI: 10.1080/00291951.2018.1451365
  44. Tronto, JC. 2010. Creating Caring Institutions: Politics, Plurality, and Purpose. Ethics and Social Welfare, 4(2): 158171. DOI: 10.1080/17496535.2010.484259
  45. Van der Duim, R, Ren, C and Jóhannesson, GT. 2013. Ordering, Materiality, and Multiplicity: Enacting Actor-Network Theory in Tourism. Tourist Studies, 13(1): 320. DOI: 10.1177/1468797613476397
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/njmr.408 | Journal eISSN: 1799-649X
Language: English
Page range: 108 - 123
Submitted on: Dec 25, 2019
Accepted on: Oct 26, 2020
Published on: Jun 4, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Olga Tkach, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.