Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Diversity Policies as Tools to Increase Participation and Encounters Cover

Diversity Policies as Tools to Increase Participation and Encounters

By:   
Open Access
|Dec 2021

References

  1. Alexander, M. 2003. Local policies toward migrants as an expression of Host-Stranger relations: a proposed typology. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 29(3): 411430. DOI: 10.1080/13691830305610
  2. Ambrosini, M and Boccagni, P. 2015. Urban multiculturalism beyond the “backlash”: New discourses and different practices in immigrant policies across European cities. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 36(1): 3553. DOI: 10.1080/07256868.2014.990362
  3. Amin, A. 2002. Ethnicity and the Multicultural City: Living with Diversity. London: Economic and Social Research Council.
  4. Amin, A. 2011. Urban planning in an uncertain world. In: Bridge, G and Watson, S. (eds). The New Blackwell Companion to the City. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  5. Aure, M, Førde, A and Magnussen, T. 2018. Will migrant workers rescue rural regions? Challenges of creating stability through mobility. Journal of Rural Studies, 60: 5259. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.03.005
  6. Beebeejaun, Y. 2006. The participation rap: The limitations of participation for ethnic and racial groups. International Planning Studies, 11(1): 318. DOI: 10.1080/13563470600935008
  7. Bernt, M. 2019. Migration and strategic urban planning. disP–The Planning Review, 55(3): 5566. DOI: 10.1080/02513625.2019.1671002
  8. Bodø Municipality. 2019. Retningslinjer for flekulturelt råd. Bodø.
  9. Bogason, P. 2003. New Modes of Local Organizing: Local Government Fragmentation in Scandinavia. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
  10. Burayidi, MA. 2015. Cities and the Politics of Difference. Multiculturalism and Diversity in Urban Planning. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  11. Castles, S and Miller, M. 2003. The Age of Migration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  12. de Graauw, E and Vermeulen, F. 2016. Cities and the politics of immigrant integration: A comparison of Berlin, Amsterdam, New York City and San Francisco. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(6): 9891012. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2015.1126089
  13. EUROCITIES. 2010. Charter on integrating cities–Our commitment to integrating migrants and migrant communities in European Cities. Brussels.
  14. Fainstein, SS. 2014. The just city. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18(1): 118. DOI: 10.1080/12265934.2013.834643
  15. Fincher, R and Iveson, K. 2008. Planning and Diversity in the City. Redistribution, Recognition and Encounter. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  16. Fincher, R, Iveson, K, Leitner, H and Preston, V. 2014. Planning in the multicultural city: Celebration diversity or reinforcing difference? Progress in Planning, 92: 155. DOI: 10.1016/j.progress.2013.04.001
  17. Foner, N, Duyvendak, JW and Kasinitz, P. 2017. Introduction: Super-diversity in everyday life. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 42(1): 116. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2017.1406969
  18. Førde, A. 2019. Enhancing urban encounters. The transformative powers of creative integration initiatives. Urban Planning, 4(1): 4452. DOI: 10.17645/up.v4i1.1713
  19. Gressgård, R and Jensen, TG. 2016. Planning for pluralism in Nordic cities. Key terms and themes. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 6(1): 18.
  20. Guentner, S and Stanton, R. 2013. Urban citizenship through democratic variety: Reflections on the local political participation of migrants in European cities. Open Citizenship, 4(2): 3853.
  21. Guest, G, MacQuieen, M and Namey, EE. 2012. Applied Thematic Analyses. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  22. Hall, S. 1993. Culture, community, nation. Cultural Studies, 7: 349363. DOI: 10.1080/09502389300490251
  23. Heino, H and Jauhiainen, JS. 2020. Immigration in the strategies of municipalities in Finland. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 10(3): 7389. DOI: 10.33134/njmr.345
  24. Hudson, C, Nyseth, T and Pedersen, P. 2019. Dealing with difference. Contested place identities in two Northern Scandinavian cities. City, 23(4–5): 564579. DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2019.1684076
  25. Kosic, A and Triandafyllidou, A. 2005. Active civic participation of immigrants in Italy. Country Report for the European project POLITIS. Available at: http:/www.politis.europe.uni-oldenburg.de/download/Italy.pdf.
  26. Lee, LS, Arcodia, C and Lee, TJ. 2012. Key characteristics of multicultural festivals. A critical review of the literature. Event Management, 16(1): 93101. DOI: 10.3727/152599512X13264729827758
  27. Maunaunaho, K. 2016. Political, practical and architectural notions of the concept of the tight to the city in neighborhood regeneration. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 6(1): 5964. DOI: 10.1515/njmr-2016-0008
  28. Mayblin, L, Valentine, G and Winiarska, A. 2016. Migration and diversity in a post-socialist context: Creative integrative encounters in Poland. Environment and Planning; A, 48(5): 960978. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X15623534
  29. Meissner, F and Vertovic, S. 2015. Comparing super-diversity. Ethnic and Racial Studies 38: 541555. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2015.980295
  30. Morales, L and Giugni, M. (eds.) 2011. Social Capital, Political Participation and Migration in Europe. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  31. Niessen, J and Engeberink, G. 2006. Position Paper. Integrating Cities: European Policies, Local Practices. Immigrants, Integration and Cities. Exploring the Links. Paris: OECD.
  32. Nyseth, T, Ringholm, T and Agger, A. 2019. Innovative forms of citizen participation at the fringe of the formal planning system. Urban Planning, 4(1): 718. DOI: 10.17645/up.v4i1.1680
  33. Ot.Prop Nr. 32. 2007–2008. Plan og Bygningsloven. Regjeringen.no.
  34. Penninx, R and Martinello, M. 2004. Integration policies and processes: State of the art and lessons. In: Penninx, R, Kraal, K, Martinello, M, and Vertovec, S (eds.). Citizenship in European Cites. Immigrants, Local Politics and Integration Policies. Aldershot: Ashgate. pp. 139163.
  35. Pestieau, K and Wallace, M. 2003. Challenges and opportunities for planning in the ethno-culturally diverse city. Planning Theory & Practice, 4(3): 253258. DOI: 10.1080/1464935032000118625
  36. Sandercock, L. 1998. Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities. New York, NY: Wiley and Sons.
  37. Sandercock, L. 2000. When strangers become neighbours: Managing cities of difference. Planning Theory & Practice, 1(1): 1330. DOI: 10.1080/14649350050135176
  38. Schiller, M. 2016. European Cities, Municipal Organizations and Diversity. The New Politics of Difference. Göttingen, Germany: Springer.
  39. Takle, M. 2015. Institutional design and political representation: The council of immigrant organisations in Oslo. International Journal of Migration & Integration, 16: 11951211.
  40. Takle, M. 2018. Cultural recognition and democratic participation: Immigrant organisations in Oslo. In: Fossum, JE (ed.). Diversity and Contestations Over Nationalism in Europe and Canada. London: Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology.
  41. Tromsø Municipality. 2017. Kommunestyresak. 25.01. Opprettelse av Integreringsråd.
  42. Tromsø Municipality. 2020. Minutes from the meeting in the Integration Council, 20.05.2020.
  43. Vertovic, S. 2007. “Super-diversity” and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30: 10241054. DOI: 10.1080/01419870701599465.
  44. Wilson, HF and Darling, J. 2016. The possibilities of encounter. In: Wilson, HF and Darling, J (eds.). Encountering the City. London: Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/njmr.379 | Journal eISSN: 1799-649X
Language: English
Page range: 430 - 443
Submitted on: Aug 11, 2020
Accepted on: Jul 8, 2021
Published on: Dec 2, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Torill Nyseth, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.