Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Stitching People Together: The Art of Cross-Cultural Encounters in an Embroidery Workshop Cover

Stitching People Together: The Art of Cross-Cultural Encounters in an Embroidery Workshop

Open Access
|Dec 2021

References

  1. Alfreds, L and Åberg, C. 2017. Social Sculpture Through Dreams and Conversations: Creating Spaces for Participatory and Situation-specific Art-based Methods. In: Livholts, M and Bryant, L (eds.), Social Work in a Glocalised World, 156166. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315628417-10
  2. Amin, A. 2002. Ethnicity and the multicultural city: Living with diversity. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 34(6): 959980. DOI: 10.1068/a3537
  3. Amin, A. 2012. Land of strangers. Cambridge: Polity.
  4. Aronin, L. 2014. The Concept of Affordances in Applied Linguistics and Multilingualism. In: Pawlak, M and Aronin, L (eds.), Essential Topics in Applied Linguistics and Multilingualism, 157173. Berlin: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-01414-2_9
  5. Aronin, L and Laoire, . 2013. The material culture of multilingualism: Moving beyond the linguistic landscape. International Journal of Multilingualism, 10(3): 225235. DOI: 10.1080/14790718.2012.679734
  6. Askins, K and Pain, R. 2011. Contact zones: Participation, materiality, and the messiness of interaction. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29: 803821.
  7. Aure, M, Al-Mahamid, MA and Seljevold, S. 2021. Å sy sammen – sammensyinger: Fortellinger om broderiverksted og integrerende samhandling. In: Gullikstad, B, Kristensen, GK and Fånes Sætermo, T (eds.), Fortellinger om integrering i norske lokalsamfunn, 224245. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. DOI: 10.18261/9788215042961-2021-10
  8. Aure, M, Førde, A and Liabø, RB. 2020. Vulnerable spaces of coproduction: Confronting predefined categories through arts interventions. Migration Letters, 17(2): 249256. DOI: 10.33182/ml.v17i2.895
  9. Balibar, E. 1995. Ambiguous universality. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 7(1): 48+.
  10. Berg, AJ, Flemmen, AB and Gullikstad, B. 2010. Likestilte norskheter. Om kjønn og etnisitet. Trondheim: Tapir Akademisk Forlag.
  11. Bergold, J and Thomas, S. 2012. Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in motion. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(1): 30. DOI: 10.17169/fqs-13.1.1801
  12. Beuys, J and Harland, V. 2007. What is art? Conversation with Joseph Beuys. Forest Row: Clairview Books.
  13. Bishop, C. 2004. Antagonism and relational aesthetics. OCTOBER 110, Fall 2004, pp. 5179. © 2004 October Magazine, Ltd. and Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3397557.
  14. Brown, KM. 2012. Sharing public space across difference: Attunement and the contested burdens of choreographing encounter. Social & Cultural Geography, 13(7): 801820. DOI: 10.1080/14649365.2012.728614
  15. Førde, A. 2019. Enhancing Urban Encounters: The Transformative Powers of Creative Integration Initiatives. Urban Planning, 4(1): 4452. DOI: 10.17645/up.v4i1.1713
  16. Cahill, C. 2007. The personal is political: Developing new subjectivities through participatory action research. Gender, place and culture, 14(3): 267292. DOI: 10.1080/09663690701324904
  17. Gibson, JJ. [1979] 2014. The ecological approach to visual perception: Classic edition. 1st ed. New York, London: Psychology Press. Taylor and Francis Group. DOI: https://doi-org.mime.uit.no/10.4324/9781315740218.
  18. Gressgård, R and Jensen, GT. 2016. Planning for pluralism in Nordic cities. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 6(1): 18. DOI: 10.1515/njmr-2016-0005
  19. Gullestad, M. 2002. Invisible fences: Egalitarianism, nationalism and racism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 8(1): 4563. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9655.00098
  20. Hanania, A. 2020. Embroidery (Tatriz) and Syrian Refugees: Exploring Loss and Hope Through Storytelling (Broderie [tatriz] et réfugiées syriennes: exploration de la perte et de l’espoir à travers le récit). Canadian Journal of Art Therapy, 33(2): 6269.
  21. Haraway, D. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspectives. Feminist Studies, 14(3): 575599. DOI: 10.2307/3178066
  22. Hauan, H. not dated. The stitch project. tHE sTITCH pROJECT [http://www.hildehauanjohnsen.no/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/publikasjon_tsp_10.pdf last accessed 15 June 2020].
  23. Hickey-Moody, AC. 2017. Arts practice as method, urban spaces and intra-active faiths. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(11): 10831096. DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2017.1350317
  24. Jónsdóttir, Á. not dated. The role of the arts in a time of change. tHE sTITCH pROJECT [http://www.hildehauanjohnsen.no/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/publikasjon_tsp_10.pdf last accessed 15 June 2020].
  25. Kindon, S, Pain, R and Kesby, M. 2007. Introduction. In: Kindon, S, Pain, R and Kesby M (eds.), Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place. London: Routledge.
  26. Kinkaid, E. 2019. Experimenting with creative geographic methods in The Critical Futures Visual Archive. Cultural Geographies, 26(2): 245252. DOI: 10.1177/1474474018808640
  27. Koefoed, L and Simonsen, K. 2011. ‘The stranger’, the city and the nation: on the possibilities of identification and belonging. European Urban and Regional Studies, 18(4): 115. DOI: 10.1177/0969776411399343
  28. Leavy, P. 2015. Method meets art: Arts-based research practice. New York, London: Guilford Publications.
  29. Macleroy, V and Shamsad, S. 2020. A moving story from Dhaka to London: Revealing vibrant identities in young people’s intercultural encounters with mobile art, embroidery and artefacts. Language and Intercultural Communication, 20(5): 482496.
  30. Mayblin, L, Valentine, G and Andersson, J. 2016. In the contact zone: Engineering meaningful encounters across difference through an interfaith project. The Geographical Journal, 182(2): 213222. DOI: 10.1111/geoj.12128
  31. Mayblin, L, Valentine, G, Kossak, F and Schneider, T. 2015. Experimenting with spaces of encounter: Creative interventions to develop meaningful contact. Geoforum, 63: 6780. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.03.010
  32. Mayblin, L, Valentin, G and Winiarska, A. 2016. Migration and diversity in a post-socialist context: Creating integrative encounters in Poland. Environment and Planning A, 48(5): 960978. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X15623534
  33. Noble, G. 2013. Strange familiarities: A response to Ash Amin’s Land of Strangers. Identities, 20(1): 3136. DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.2012.752373
  34. Nunn, C. 2017. Translations-generations: Representing and producing migration generations through arts-based research. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 38(1): 117. DOI: 10.1080/07256868.2017.1269059
  35. Peterson, M. 2017. Living with difference in hyper-diverse areas: How important are encounters in semi-public spaces? Social & Cultural Geography, 18(8): 10671085. DOI: 10.1080/14649365.2016.1210667
  36. Sacks, S. 2016. Social sculpture research unit. The Territory [http://www.social-sculpture.org/category/territory last accessed 11 January 2016].
  37. Simmel, G. [1908] 1950. The Stranger. In: Wolff, K (ed.), The Sociology of Georg Simmel, 402408. New York: Free Press.
  38. Solomos, J. 2013. Strangers, identities and belonging. Identities, 20(1): 1823. DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.2013.763039
  39. Sonn, C and Baker, A. 2016. Creating inclusive knowledges: Exploring the transformative potential of arts and cultural practice. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(3): 215228. DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2015.1047663
  40. Taşan-Kok, T, Bolt, G, Plüss, L and Schenkel, W. 2017. A handbook for governing hyper-diverse cities. Utrecht: Utrecht University, Faculty of Geosciences.
  41. Tolstad, IM, Hagen, AL and Andersen, B. 2017. The Amplifier Effect: Oslo Youth Co-creating Urban Spaces of (Be) longing. In: Youth as Architects of Social Change, 215242. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  42. Valentine, G. 2008. Living with difference: reflections on geographies of encounter. Progress in Human Geography, 32(3): 323337. DOI: 10.1177/0309133308089372
  43. Valentine, G and Sadgrove, J. 2012. Lived difference: A narrative account of spatiotemporal processes of social differentiation. Environment and Planning A, 44(9): 20492063. DOI: 10.1068/a44491
  44. Vestby, N. 2015. I crossed the line. Nordic Journal of Art and Research, 4(2): 122. DOI: 10.7577/if.v4i2.1546
  45. Wilson, HF. 2013. Learning to think differently: Diversity training and the ‘good encounter’. Geoforum, 45: 7382. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.10.001
  46. Wilson, HF. 2016. On geography and encounter: Bodies, borders, and difference. Progress in Human Geography, 44(4): 121. DOI: 10.1177/0309132516645958
  47. Wise, A. 2013. Hope in a land of strangers. Identities, 20(1): 3745. DOI: 10.1080/1070289X.2012.752372
  48. Yuval-Davis, N. 2006. Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3): 193209. DOI: 10.1177/1350506806065752
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/njmr.373 | Journal eISSN: 1799-649X
Language: English
Page range: 400 - 415
Submitted on: Jul 22, 2020
Accepted on: Aug 10, 2021
Published on: Dec 2, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Marit Aure, Marsil Andjelov Al-Mahamid, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.