Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Complex and Convoluted Borders within EU: Free-Movers and Their Experience of Negotiating Borders to Labor Market and Social Welfare in Sweden Cover

Complex and Convoluted Borders within EU: Free-Movers and Their Experience of Negotiating Borders to Labor Market and Social Welfare in Sweden

Open Access
|Jun 2022

References

  1. Anderson, B. 2010. Migration, immigration controls and the fashioning of precarious workers. Work, Employment and Society, 24(2): 300317. DOI: 10.1177/0950017010362141
  2. Andrejuk, K. 2017. Is Poland perceived as a welfare state by foreigners? Perception of Polish welfare system by immigrants from selected European countries. The WSF Workshop Welfare and Migration, Hague, The Netherlands.
  3. Balibar, E. 2002. Politics and the other scene. London, NY: Verso.
  4. Bucken-Knapp, G. 2009. Defending the Swedish model: Social democrats, trade unions, and labor migration policy reform. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  5. Carmel, E and Sojka, B. 2020. Beyond welfare chauvinism and deservingness. Rationales of belonging as a conceptual framework for the politics and governance of migrants’ rights. Journal of Social Policy, 50(3): 645667. DOI: 10.1017/S0047279420000379
  6. Charmaz, K. 2011. Grounded Theory Methods in Social Justice Research. In: K. Charmaz The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 359380. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  7. Cooper, A, Perkins, C and Rumford, C. 2014. The Vernacularization of Borders. In: A. Cooper, et al. Placing the Border in Everyday Life, 1532. Farnham: Ashgate.
  8. Emilsson, H. 2016. Recruitment to occupations with a surplus of workers: The unexpected outcomes of Swedish demand-driven labour migration policy. International Migration, 54(2): 517. DOI: 10.1111/imig.12222
  9. Favell, A and Hansen, R. 2002. Markets against politics: Migration, EU enlargement and the idea of Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 28(4): 581601. DOI: 10.1080/1369183021000032218
  10. Fröhlig, F, Runfors, A and Saar, M. 2016. Swedish and Estonian Discourses on Free EU-movement, Welfare and Belonging. Welfare State Future Working Paper Transwel Serie #3/2016. University of Södertörn, Sweden. Available at https://welfarestatefutures.org/working-papers/.
  11. Genelyte, I. 2018. Lost in Mobility? [Unpublished thesis]. Department of Social and Welfare Studies. Linköping University Electronic Press. Available at http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1258449&dswid=2273
  12. Guentner, S, Lukes, S, Stanton, R, Vollmer, BA and Wilding, J. 2016. Bordering practices in the UK welfare system. Critical Social Policy, 36(3): 391411. DOI: 10.1177/0261018315622609
  13. Ho, M and Bauder, H. 2012. ‘We are chameleons’: identity capital in a multicultural workplace. Social Identities, 18(3): 281297. DOI: 10.1080/13504630.2012.661997
  14. Kramer, D. 2017. Administering the Needy Union Citizen: The Impact of ECJ case law on National Welfare State Bureaucracy. The WSF Workshop Welfare and Migration, Hague, The Netherlands.
  15. Lafleur, J-M and Mescoli, E. 2018. Creating undocumented EU migrants through welfare: A conceptualization of undeserving and precarious citizenship. Sociology, 52(3): 480496. DOI: 10.1177/0038038518764615
  16. Lillie, N and Simola, A. 2016. The crisis of free movement in the European Union. Mondi Migranti, 3: 719. DOI: 10.3280/MM2016-003001
  17. MacKenzie, R and Forde, C. 2009. The rhetoric of the ‘good worker’ versus the realities of employers’ use and the experiences of migrant workers. Work, Employment and Society, 23(1): 142159. DOI: 10.1177/0950017008099783
  18. McCollum, D and Findlay, A. 2015. ‘Flexible’ workers for ‘flexible’ jobs? The labour market function of A8 migrant labour in the UK. Work, Employment and Society, 29(3): 427443. DOI: 10.1177/0950017014568137
  19. O’Brien, C. 2016. Civis capitalist sum: Class as the new guiding principle of EU free movement rights. Common Market Law Review, 53(4): 937977.
  20. Parker, N and Vaughan-Williams, N. 2012. Critical border studies: Broadening and deepening the ‘lines in the sand’ agenda. Geopolitics, 17(4): 727733. DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2012.706111
  21. Saar, M, Fröhlig, F and Runfors, A. 2018. Welfare negotiations Among Estonians working in Sweden. Experiences, Barriers and Narrated coping strategies. Welfare State Future Working Paper Transwel Serie #1/2018. University of Södertörn, Sweden. Available at https://welfarestatefutures.org/working-papers/.
  22. Schierup, C-U and Bak Jørgensen, M. 2016. An introduction to the special issue. Politics of precarity: Migrant conditions, struggles and experiences. Critical Sociology, 42(7–8): 947958. DOI: 10.1177/0896920516640065
  23. Sheller, M and Urry, J. 2003. Mobile transformations of ‘public’ and ‘private’ life. Theory, Culture and Society, 20(3): 107125. DOI: 10.1177/02632764030203007
  24. Spehar, A, Hinnfors, J and Bucken-Knapp, G. 2017. Passing the buck: The case of failing multilevel governance and vulnerable EU migrants in Sweden. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 7(2): 114123. DOI: 10.1515/njmr-2017-0010
  25. Tervonen, M, Pellander, S and Yuval-Davis, N. 2018. Everyday bordering in the Nordic countries. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 8(3): 139142. DOI: 10.2478/njmr-2018-0019
  26. Urry, J. 2007. Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity.
  27. van Houtum, H. 2010. Human blacklisting: The global apartheid of the EU’s external border regime. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(6): 957976. DOI: 10.1068/d1909
  28. Wagner, I. 2015. The political economy of borders in a ‘borderless’ European Labour Market. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(6): 13701385. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12256
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/njmr.356 | Journal eISSN: 1799-649X
Language: English
Page range: 174 - 189
Submitted on: Jun 11, 2020
Accepted on: Oct 8, 2021
Published on: Jun 1, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2022 Maarja Saar, Florence Fröhlig, Martin Ericson, Valeria Kopeykina, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.