Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Scandinavian Social Democrats Facing The ‘Progressive Dilemma’: Immigration and Welfare States In Left-of-Centre Party Programs Cover

Scandinavian Social Democrats Facing The ‘Progressive Dilemma’: Immigration and Welfare States In Left-of-Centre Party Programs

Open Access
|Jun 2022

References

  1. Alesina, A and Glaeser, EL. 2004. Fighting poverty in the US and Europe: A world of difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/0199267669.001.0001
  2. Allern, EH, Bay, AH and Saglie, J. 2013. The new politics of the welfare state? A case study of extra-parliamentary party politics in Norway. European Journal of Social Security, 15(3): 249273. DOI: 10.1177/138826271301500302
  3. Bacchi, CL. 2009. Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Melbourne: Pearson.
  4. Bale, T, Green-Pedersen, C, Krouwel, A, Luther, KR and Sitter, N. 2010. If you can’t beat them, join them? Explaining social democratic responses to the challenge from the populist radical right in Western Europe. Political Studies, 58(3): 410426. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00783.x
  5. Barth, E, Moene, KO and Willumsen, F. 2014. The Scandinavian model—An interpretation. Journal of Public Economics, 117: 6072. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.04.001
  6. Bay, AH, Finseraas, H and Pedersen, AW. 2016. Welfare nationalism and popular support for raising the child allowance: Evidence from a Norwegian survey experiment. Scandinavian Political Studies, 39(4): 482494. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9477.12067
  7. Breidahl, KN. 2017. Scandinavian exceptionalism? Civic integration and labour market activation for newly arrived immigrants. Comparative Migration Studies, 5(1): 2. DOI: 10.1186/s40878-016-0045-8
  8. Brochmann, G and Grødem, AS. 2013. Migration and Welfare Sustainability: The Case of Norway. In: Jurado, E and Brochmann, G (eds.), Europe’s Immigration Challenge. Reconciling Work, Welfare and Mobility, 5976. London: I.B.Tauris. DOI: 10.5040/9780755619931.ch-003
  9. Brochmann, G and Grødem, AS. 2019. Absorption Capacity as Means for Assessing Sustainable Immigration. EMN Norway Occasional Paper. European Migration Network Norway. https://www.udi.no/globalassets/global/european-migration-network_i/emn-norway-papers/absorption-capacity.pdf [Last accessed 30 September 2021].
  10. Brochmann, G and Hagelund, A. 2012. Immigration policy and the Scandinavian welfare state 1945–2010. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9781137015167
  11. Burgoon, B and Rooduijn, M. 2021. ‘Immigrationization’ of welfare politics? Anti-immigration and welfare attitudes in context. West European Politics, 44(2): 177203. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2019.1702297
  12. Cappelen, C and Midtbø, T. 2016. Intra-EU labour migration and support for the Norwegian welfare state. European Sociological Review, 32(6): 691703. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcw025
  13. Entman, RM. 1993. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4): 5158. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  14. Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press. DOI: 10.1177/095892879100100108
  15. Friberg, JH. 2016. New patterns of labour migration from central and Eastern Europe and its impact on labour markets and institutions in Norway: Reviewing the evidence. Comparative Social Research, 32(1): 1943. DOI: 10.1108/S0195-631020160000032002
  16. Goodhart, D. 2004. Too diverse? Prospect Magazine, 95: 3037.
  17. Grødem, AS. 2017. Family-oriented policies in Scandinavia and the challenge of immigration. Journal of European Social Policy, 27(1): 7789. DOI: 10.1177/0958928716673315
  18. Hagelund, A. 2020. After the refugee crisis: Public discourse and policy change in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Comparative Migration Studies, 8(1): 13. DOI: 10.1186/s40878-019-0169-8
  19. Hänggli, R and Kriesi, H. 2012. Frame construction and frame promotion (strategic framing choices). American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3): 260278. DOI: 10.1177/0002764211426325
  20. Heinze, A-S. 2018. Strategies of mainstream parties towards their right-wing populist challengers: Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Finland in comparison. West European Politics, 41(2): 287309. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2017.1389440
  21. Heleniak, T. 2018. From migrants to workers: International migration trends in the Nordic countries. Nordregio Working Paper. Stockholm: Nordregio, 46. DOI: 10.30689/WP2018:1.1403-2511
  22. Hernes, V. 2018. Cross-national convergence in times of crisis? Integration policies before, during and after the refugee crisis. West European Politics, 41(6): 13051329. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2018.1429748
  23. Holmøy, E and Strøm, B. 2017. Betydningen for demografi og makroøkonomi av innvandring mot 2100. Oslo/Kongssvinger: Statistics Norway, report no. 2017/31.
  24. Horn, A, Kevins, A, Jensen, C and van Kersbergen, K. 2021. Political parties and social groups: New perspectives and data on group and policy appeals. Party Politics, 27(5): 983995. DOI: 10.1177/1354068820907998
  25. Hovden, JF and Mjelde, H. 2019. Increasingly controversial, cultural, and political: The immigration debate in Scandinavian newspapers 1970–2016. Javnost—The Public, 26(2): 138157. DOI: 10.1080/13183222.2019.1589285
  26. Kivisto, P and Wahlbeck, Ö. 2013. Debating multiculturalism in the Nordic Welfare States. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9781137318459
  27. Koopmans, R. 2010. Trade-offs between equality and difference: Immigrant integration, multiculturalism and the welfare state in cross-national perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(1): 126. DOI: 10.1080/13691830903250881
  28. Meer, Tvd and Tolsma, J. 2014. Ethnic diversity and its effects on social cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1): 459478. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043309
  29. Midtbøen, AH, Birkvad, SR and Erdal, MB. 2018. Citizenship in the Nordic countries: Past, present, future. Copenhagen: Nordisk Ministerråd. DOI: 10.6027/TN2018-522
  30. Morel, N, Palier, B and Palme, J. 2012. Beyond the Welfare State as We Know It? In: Morel, N, et al. Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges, 130. Bristol: Policy Press. DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781847429247.003.0001
  31. Nordic Council of Ministers. 2018. State of the Nordic Region 2018. Immigration and integration edition. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers, ANP 2018:742.
  32. Putnam, RD. 2007. E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century the 2006 johan skytte prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2): 137174. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x
  33. Quillian, L, Heath, A, Pager, D, Midtbøen, AH, Fleischmann, F and Hexel, O. 2019. Do some countries discriminate more than others? Evidence from 97 field experiments of racial discrimination in hiring. Sociological Science, 6: 467496. DOI: 10.15195/v6.a18
  34. Reeskens, T and van Oorschot, W. 2012. Disentangling the ‘New Liberal Dilemma’: On the relation between general welfare redistribution preferences and welfare chauvinism. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 53(2): 120139. DOI: 10.1177/0020715212451987
  35. Rothstein, B. 2017. Solidarity, Diversity and the Quality of Government. In: Banting, K and Kymlicka, W (eds.), The Strains of Commitment: The Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse Societies, 300326. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198795452.003.0011
  36. Schumacher, G and van Kersbergen, K. 2016. Do mainstream parties adapt to the welfare chauvinism of populist parties? Party Politics, 22(3): 300312. DOI: 10.1177/1354068814549345
  37. Skjeie, H. 1992. Den politiske betydningen av kjønn: en studie av norsk topp-politikk. Oslo: Institutt for samfunnsforskning, report no. 1992:11.
  38. Vogt Isaksen, J. 2020. The framing of immigration and integration in Sweden and Norway: A comparative study of official government reports. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 10(1): 106124. DOI: 10.2478/njmr-2019-0033
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/njmr.351 | Journal eISSN: 1799-649X
Language: English
Page range: 223 - 239
Submitted on: May 25, 2020
Accepted on: Nov 8, 2021
Published on: Jun 1, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2022 Anne Skevik Grødem, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.