Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
‘ARE WE GOING TO STAY REFUGEES?’ Hyper-precarious Processes in and Beyond the Danish Integration Programme Cover

‘ARE WE GOING TO STAY REFUGEES?’ Hyper-precarious Processes in and Beyond the Danish Integration Programme

Open Access
|Jun 2021

References

  1. Agustín, OG and Jørgensen, MB. 2016. Solidarity without Borders: Gramscian Perspectives on Migration and Civil Society Alliances. In Agustín, ÓG and Jørgensen, MB (eds.), Solidarity without borders: Gramscian perspectives on migration and civil society alliances, 319. Pluto Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt19qgdww.5
  2. Andersen, LH, Dustmann, C and Landersø, R. 2019. Lowering welfare benefits: Intended and unintended consequences for individuals and their families. Rockwool Foundation, study paper nr.138. København.
  3. Bakewell, O. 2008. Research beyond the categories: The importance of policy irrelevant research into forced migration. Journal of Refugee Studies, 21(4): 432453. DOI: 10.1093/jrs/fen042
  4. Block, K, Riggs, E and Haslam, N. 2013. Values and vulnerabilities: The ethics of research with refugees and asylum seekers. Toowong: Australian Academic Press.
  5. Blomberg, H. 2011. Introduction. In: Blomberg, H and Kildal, N (eds.), Workfare and welfare state legitimacy 1, 515. Helsinki: NordWel Studies in Historical Welfare State Research.
  6. Brännström, L, et al. 2018. Lived experiences of changing integration policies. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 8(1): 2534. DOI: 10.1515/njmr-2018-0009
  7. Breidahl, K. 2017. Scandinavian exceptionalism? Civic integration and labour market activation for newly arrived immigrants. Comparative Migration Studies, 5(2): 119. DOI: 10.1186/s40878-016-0045-8
  8. Brun, C. 2015. Active waiting and changing hopes: Toward a time perspective on protracted displacement. Social Analysis, 59(1): 1937. DOI: 10.3167/sa.2015.590102
  9. Careja, R. 2018. Making good citizens: Local authorities’ integration measures navigate national policies and local realities. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(8): 13271344. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1441613
  10. Casas-Cortés, M. 2017. A Genealogy of Precarity: A Toolbox for Rearticulating Fragmented Social Realities In and Out of the Workplace. In: Schierup, C-U and Jørgensen, MB (eds.), Politics of precarity: Migrant conditions, struggles and experiences, 3051. Leiden: Brill. DOI: 10.1163/9789004329706_003
  11. Change of the Integration Act. 2016. Announcement of law on integration of foreigners in Denmark. Law no. 665 of 08/06/2016. https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2016/665.
  12. Change of the Integration Act. 2019. Announcement of law on integration of foreigners in Denmark. Law no. 174 of 27/02/2019. https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2019/174.
  13. Dean, M. 2010. What is society? Social thought and the arts of government. British Journal of Sociology, 61(4): 677695. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01336.x
  14. Doherty, B, Haugh, H and Lyon, F. 2014. Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16: 417436. DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.12028
  15. Fangen, K and Paasche, E. 2012. Young adults of ethnic minority background on the Norwegian labour market: The intersectional co-construction of exclusion by employers and customers. Ethnicities, 13(5): 607624. DOI: 10.1177/1468796812467957
  16. Fernandes, AG. 2015. (Dis)Empowering new immigrants and refugees through their participation in introduction programs in Sweden, Denmark and Norway. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 13(3): 245264. DOI: 10.1080/15562948.2015.1045054
  17. Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. 2016. Hvordan løser vi flygtningekrisen? Viborg: Informations Forlag Moderne Ideer.
  18. Gammeltoft-Hansen, T and Whyte, Z. 2011. Dansk Asylpolitik 1983–2010. In: Vitus, K and Nielsen, SS (eds.), Asylbørn i Danmark. En barndom i undtagelsestilstand, 152172. Frederiksberg: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
  19. Garrow, EE and Hasenfeld, Y. 2014. Social enterprises as an embodiment of a neoliberal welfare logic. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(11): 14751493. DOI: 10.1177/0002764214534674
  20. Gilbert, N. 2002. Transformation of the welfare state. The silent surrender of public responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  21. Gullestad, M. 1984. Kitchen-table society. A case-study of the family life and friendships of young working-class mothers in urban Norway. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
  22. Hammersley, M and Atkinson, P. 1995. Ethnography. Principles in practice. London & New York: Routledge.
  23. Højholt, C and Kousholt, D. 2014. Practice Research. In: Teo, T (ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology, 14851488. New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_615
  24. Horst, C and Grabska, K. 2015. Flight and exile—Uncertainty in the context of conflict-induced displacement. Social Analysis, 59(1): 118. DOI: 10.3167/sa.2015.590101
  25. Institut for Menneskerettigheder. 2018. Familier på Integrationsydelse: En analyse af økonomi, afsavn og social eksklusion i et menneskerettighedsperspektiv. https://menneskeret.dk/udgivelser/familier-paa-integrationsydelse.
  26. Jørgensen, MB. 2015. Precariat–What it is and isn’t–Towards an understanding of what it does. Critical Sociology, 42(7–8): 959974. DOI: 10.1177/0896920515608925
  27. Kooy, J and Bowman, D. 2019. “Surrounded with so much uncertainty”: Asylum seekers and manufactured precarity in Australia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(5): 693710. Taylor & Francis. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1427563
  28. Larsen, BR. 2011. Becoming part of welfare Scandinavia: Integration through the spatial dispersal of newly arrived refugees in Denmark. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(2): 333350. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2011.521337
  29. Larsen, BR. 2018. Parents in the migratory space between past, present and future. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 8(2): 116123. DOI: 10.1515/njmr-2018-0014
  30. Lewis, H, et al. 2015. Precarious lives. Forced labour, exploitation and Asylum. Bristol: Policy Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1t896xk
  31. Lewis, H, Dwyer, P and Hodkinson, S. 2015. Hyper-precarious lives: Migrants, work and forced labour in the Global North. Progress in Human Geography, 39(5): 580600. DOI: 10.1177/0309132514548303
  32. Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-level bureaucracy—Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. DOI: 10.2307/1288305
  33. Mackenzie, C, McDowell, C and Pittaway, E. 2007. Beyond “do no harm”: The challenge of constructing ethical relationships in refugee research. Journal of Refugee Studies, 20(2): 299319. DOI: 10.1093/jrs/fem008
  34. Maroufi, M. 2017. Precarious integration: Labour market policies for refugees or refugee policies for the German labour market? Refugee Review, 3: 1533. ISSN 2371-9001. www.espminetwork.com.
  35. McPherson, M. 2010. I integrate, therefore I am: Contesting the normalizing discourse of integrationism through conversations with refugee women. Journal of Refugee Studies, 23(4): 546570. DOI: 10.1093/jrs/feq040
  36. Mik-Meyer, N and Villadsen, K. 2012. Power and welfare: Understanding citizens’ encounter with state welfare. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203113370
  37. Ministry of Immigration and Integration. 2018. Integrationsbarometer. https://integrationsbarometer.dk/tal-og-analyser/beskaeftigelse.
  38. NordForsk. 2017. Nordic migration and integration research: Overview and future prospects. https://old.nordforsk.org/en/publications/publications_container/nordic-migration-and-integration-research-overview-and-future-prospects.
  39. Nunn, C, et al. 2017. Navigating precarious terrains: Reconceptualizing refugee-youth settlement. Refuge, 33(2): 4555. DOI: 10.7202/1043062ar
  40. Olwig, KF. 2011. ‘Integration’: Migrants and refugees between Scandinavian welfare societies and family relations. Journal of Ethnic Migration Studies, 31(2): 179196. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2010.521327
  41. Ortner, SB. 2006. Anthropology and social theory. Culture, power and the acting subject. Durham & London: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1215/9780822388456
  42. Padovan-Özdemir, M and Moldenhawer, B. 2017. Making precarious immigrant families and weaving the Danish welfare nation-state fabric 1970–2010. Race Ethnicity and Education, 20(6): 723736. Routledge. DOI: 10.1080/13613324.2016.1195358
  43. Pedersen, OK. 2011. Konkurrencestaten. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
  44. Pink, S. 2012. Situating everyday life. London: Sage Publications.
  45. Rytter, M. 2018. Writing against integration: Danish imaginaries of culture, race and belonging. Ethnos, 184(4): 678697. DOI: 10.1080/00141844.2018.1458745
  46. Schierup, C-U and Jørgensen, MB. 2017. From “Social Exclusion” to “Precarity”. The Becoming-Migrant of Labour: An Introduction. In: Schierup, C-U and Jørgensen, MB (eds.), Politics of precarity: Migrant conditions, struggles and experiences, 129. Leiden: Brill. DOI: 10.1163/9789004329706_002
  47. Shapiro, DK. 2017. Disrupted Refugee Family Life: Collective Agency and Conflictual Care. In: Sullivan, GB, Cresswell, J, Ellis, B, Morgan, M and Schraube, E. (eds.) Resistance and renewal in theoretical psychology, 149156. Canada: Captus Press.
  48. Shapiro, DK and Montgomery, E. 2020. Forced Separation, Ruptured Kinship and Transnational Family Life. In: De Haene, L and Rousseau, C (eds.), Working with refugee families: Coping with trauma and displacement in family relationships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781108602105.007
  49. Standing, G. 2011. The precariat: The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  50. Strauss, K. 2018. Labour geography 1: Towards a geography of precarity? Progress in Human Geography, 42(4): 622630. DOI: 10.1177/0309132517717786
  51. Trimikloniotis, N, Parsanoglou, D and Vassilis, T. 2017. Mobile Commons and/in Precarious Spaces: Mapping Migrant Struggles and Social Resistance. In: Schierup, C-U and Jørgensen, MB (eds.), Politics of precarity: Migrant conditions, struggles and experiences, 224244. Leiden: Brill. DOI: 10.1163/9789004329706_012
  52. Van der Haar, M. 2015. The political context in everyday social work practice. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 13(3): 265280. DOI: 10.1080/15562948.2015.1057788
  53. Vigh, H. 2009. Motion squared. A second look at the concept of social navigation. Anthropological Theory, 9(4): 419438. DOI: 10.1177/1463499609356044
  54. Waite, L. 2017. Asylum seekers and the labour market: Spaces of discomfort and hostility. Social Policy and Society, 16(4): 669679. DOI: 10.1017/S1474746417000173
  55. Waite, L, et al. 2015. Precarious lives: Refugees and asylum seekers’ resistance within unfree labouring. Acme, 14(2): 479491.
  56. Whyte, Z. 2011. Enter the myopticon. Anthropology Today, 27(3): 1821. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8322.2011.00808.x
  57. Whyte, Z. 2015. Integration på dansk-Statslige tilknytninger, sociale netværk og mobilitet blandt flygtninge på danske sprogskoler. In: Valentin, K and Olwig, KF (eds.), Mobilitet og tilknytning, 89114. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/njmr.151 | Journal eISSN: 1799-649X
Language: English
Page range: 172 - 187
Submitted on: Apr 3, 2020
Accepted on: Jan 13, 2021
Published on: Jun 4, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Ditte Shapiro, Rikke Egaa Jørgensen, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.