Interpersonal Austerity as a Barrier to the Social Integration of Highly Skilled Immigrants in Norway
By: Tone Liodden and Anne Balke Staver
References
- Anthias, F. 2014.
‘Beyond integration: intersectional issues of social solidarity and social hierarchy’ , in Contesting integration, engendering migration: Theory and practice. London: Springer, pp. 13–36. - Becker, C.C. 2022. ‘Migrants’ social integration and its relevance for national identification: an empirical comparison across three social spheres’, Frontiers in Sociology, 6, pp. 1–15.
- Brochmann, G. and Hagelund, A. 2011. ‘Migrants in the Scandinavian welfare state. The emergence of a social policy problem’, Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 1, pp. 13–24.
- Constant, A. and Massey, D.S. 2002. ‘Return migration by German guestworkers: neoclassical versus new economic theories’, International Migration, 40, pp. 5–38.
- Constant, A.F. 2021.
‘Return, circular, and onward migration decisions in a knowledge society’ , in Kourtit, K., Newbold, B., Nijkamp, P. and Partridge, M. (eds.). The economic geography of cross‑border migration. Charm, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 133–156. - Constant, A.F. and D’Agosto, E. 2010.
‘Where do the brainy Italians go?’ , in Caroleo, F.E. and Pastore, F. (eds.) The labour market impact of the EU enlargement: a new regional geography of Europe? Heidelberg: Physica‑Verlag, pp. 247–271. - Dahinden, J. 2016. ‘A plea for the ‘de‑migranticization’ of research on migration and integration’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39, pp. 2207–2225.
- De Haas, H., Fokkema, T. and Fihri, M.F. 2015. ‘Return migration as failure or success?’, Journal of International Migration and Integration, 16, pp. 415–429.
- De Vroome, T., Martinovic, B. and Verkuyten, M. 2014. ‘The integration paradox: level of education and immigrants’ attitudes towards natives and the host society’, Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20, pp. 166–175.
- Desjardin, L. 2022. Are Norwegians rude? What to expect from a people with no word for ‘please.’ A Frog in the Fjord. Available at:
https://afroginthefjord.com/2022/06/16/are-norwegians-rude-what-to-expect-from-a-people-with-no-word-for-please/ (Accessed: 25 May 2025). - Diehl, C. and Trittler, S. 2024. ‘Highly skilled and highly skeptical? How education and origin shape newcomers’ relationship with their new home’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 50, pp. 1777–1802.
- Esping‑Andersen, G. 2001. ‘A welfare state for the 21st century’, The global third way debate, 134, pp. 156.
- Favell, A. 2019. ‘Integration: twelve propositions after Schinkel’, Comparative Migration Studies, 7, pp. 1–10.
- Favell, A. 2021.
‘Integration: a critical view’ , in Contested concepts in migration studies. London: Routledge, pp. 131–148. - Frykman, M.P. and Mozetič, K. 2020. ‘The importance of friends: social life challenges for foreign physicians in Southern Sweden’, Community, Work and Family, 23, pp. 385–400.
- Geurts, N., Davids, T. and Spierings, N. 2021. ‘The lived experience of an integration paradox: why high‑skilled migrants from Turkey experience little national belonging in the Netherlands’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47, pp. 69–87.
- Gibson, J. and McKenzie, D. 2011. ‘The microeconomic determinants of emigration and return migration of the best and brightest: evidence from the Pacific’, Journal of Development Economics, 95, pp. 18–29.
- Giddens, A. 2013. The transformation of intimacy: sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Grzymala‑Kazlowska, A. 2016. ‘Social anchoring: immigrant identity, security and integration reconnected?’, Sociology, 50, pp. 1123–1139.
- Grzymala‑Kazlowska, A. and Ryan, L. 2022. ‘Bringing anchoring and embedding together: theorising migrants’ lives over time’, Comparative Migration Studies, 10, pp. 1–19.
- Gullestad, M. 1986. ‘Symbolic “fences” in urban Norwegian neighbourhoods’, Ethnos, 51, pp. 52–70.
- Gullestad, M. 1990. ‘Doing interpretive analysis in a modern large scale society: the meaning of peace and quiet in Norway’, Social Analysis: the International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice, pp. 38–61.
- Gullestad, M. 1991. ‘The Scandinavian version of egalitarian individualism’, Ethnologia Scandinavica, 21, pp. 3–18.
- Gullestad, M. 1992. The art of social relations: essays on culture, social action and everyday life in modern Norway. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
- Gullestad, M. 2002. ‘Invisible fences: egalitarianism, nationalism and racism’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 8, pp. 45–63.
- Gullestad, M. 2013.
‘Home decoration as popular culture: constructing homes, genders and classes in Norway’ , in Valle, T. D. (ed.) Gendered anthropology. London: Routledge, pp. 128–161. - Heckmann, F. 2005. Integration and integration policies: IMISCOE network feasibility study. Available at:
https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/19295/ssoar-2005-heckmann-integration_and_integration_policies.pdf . - InterNations. 2024. Expat insider 2024: the world through expat eyes. Available at:
https://www.internations.org/expat-insider/2024/best-and-worst-places-for-expats-40450 . - Kennedy, P. 2004. ‘Making global society: friendship networks among transnational professionals in the building design industry’, Global Networks, 4, pp. 157–179.
- Klarenbeek, L. 2024. ‘Relational integration: from integrating migrants to integrating social relations’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 50, pp. 233–256.
- Koskela, K. 2014. ‘Boundaries of belonging: highly skilled migrants and the migrant hierarchy in Finland’, Journal of Finnish Studies, 17, pp. 19–41.
- Kotavaara, N. and Prokkola, E.‑K. 2023. ‘Role of social ties in long‑term settlement of highly skilled migrants in Finland’, Migration Letters, 20, pp. 88–96.
- Leinonen, J. 2012. ‘Invisible immigrants, visible expats?’, Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 2, pp. 213–223.
- Levisen, C. 2013. Cultural semantics and social cognition: a case study on the Danish universe of meaning. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
- Longva, A.N. 2003. ‘Nordmenn, høflighet og kunsten å omgås fremmede’, Norsk Antropologisk Tidsskrift, 1, pp. 16–26.
- Pedersen, E. 2014. ‘Jakten på en foreldreskapskontrakt: betydningen av arbeidsvilkår for fruktbarhetsoverveielser’, Sosiologisk Tidsskrift, 22, pp. 178–198.
- Plöger, J. and Becker, A. 2015. ‘Social networks and local incorporation: grounding high‑skilled migrants in two German cities’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41, pp. 1517–1535.
- Ryan, L. 2018. ‘Differentiated embedding: polish migrants in London negotiating belonging over time’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44, pp. 233–251.
- Rygg, K. 2012. Direct and indirect communication styles: a study of sociopragmatics and intercultural communication based on interview discourses with Norwegian and Japanese business executives. PhD thesis (unpublished). University of Bergen.
- Rygg, K. 2017. ‘‘Typically Norwegian to be impolite.’ Impoliteness according to whom?’. FLEKS ‑ Scandinavian Journal of Intercultural Theory and Practice, 4(1), pp. 1–15.
- Schaeffer, M. and Kas, J. 2024. ‘The integration paradox: a review and meta‑analysis of the complex relationship between integration and reports of discrimination’, International Migration Review, 58, pp. 1384–1409.
- Schinkel, W. 2017. Imagined societies: a critique of immigrant integration in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Schinkel, W. 2018. ‘Against ‘immigrant integration’: for an end to neocolonial knowledge production’, Comparative Migration Studies, 6, pp. 1–17.
- Schramm‑Nielsen, J. 2002. ‘Conflict management in Scandinavia’. Available at:
https://ssrn.com/abstract=305153 . - Schulz, B. and Leszczensky, L. 2016. ‘Native friends and host country identification among adolescent immigrants in Germany: the role of ethnic boundaries’, International Migration Review, 50, pp. 163–196.
- Spencer, S. and Charsley, K. 2021. ‘Reframing ‘integration’: acknowledging and addressing five core critiques’, Comparative Migration Studies, 9, pp. 18.
- Teije, I.t., Coenders, M. and Verkuyten, M. 2013. ‘The paradox of integration: immigrants and their attitude toward the native population’, Social Psychology, 44, pp. 278–288.
- Van Doorn, M., Scheepers, P. and Dagevos, J. 2013. ‘Explaining the integration paradox among small immigrant groups in the Netherlands’, Journal of International Migration and Integration, 14, pp. 381–400.
- Verkuyten, M. 2016. ‘The integration paradox: empirical evidence from the Netherlands’, American Behavioral Scientist, 60, pp. 583–596.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/njmr.1062 | Journal eISSN: 1799-649X
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 3
Submitted on: May 20, 2025
Accepted on: Feb 16, 2026
Published on: Apr 9, 2026
Published by: Helsinki University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2026 Tone Liodden, Anne Balke Staver, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.