Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
On Particularity in Painting Cover
By:   
Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Adorno, Theodor W. Gesammelte Schriften. Vol. 7, Ästhetische Theorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2013.
  2. Adorno, Theodor W. Gesammelte Schriften. Vol. 6, Negative Dialektik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2013.
  3. Alberti, Leon Battista. On Painting. Translated by Cecil Grayson. London: Penguin, 1991.
  4. Bach, Kent. ‘Part of What a Picture Is.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 10 (1981): 119–37. DOI: 10.1093/bjaesthetics/10.2.119
  5. Benjamin, Walter. Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1963.
  6. Costello, Diarmuid. On Photography: A Philosophical Inquiry. London: Routledge, 2018. DOI: 10.4324/9781315266688
  7. Crowther, Paul. What Drawings and Paintings Really Mean: The Phenomenology of Image and Gesture. London: Routledge, 2017. DOI: 10.4324/9781315311852
  8. Elkins, James. On Pictures and the Words that Fail Them. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
  9. Elkins, James. What Painting Is: How to Think about Oil Painting Using the Language of Alchemy. London: Routledge, 1999.
  10. Freedberg, David, and Vittorio Gallese. ‘Motion, Emotion and Empathy in Esthetic Experience.’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 (2007): 197–203. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.02.003
  11. Gombrich, Ernst. Art and Illusion. Oxford: Phaidon, 1960.
  12. Goodman, Nelson. Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1976. DOI: 10.5040/9781350928541
  13. Heidegger, Martin. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1993.
  14. Hepburn, Ronald. ‘Particularity and Some Related Concepts in Aesthetics.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 59 (1959): 189–212. DOI: 10.1093/aristotelian/59.1.189
  15. Hopkins, Robert. Picture, Image and Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
  16. Hyman, John. The Objective Eye. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.
  17. Inkpin, Andrew. Disclosing the World: On the Phenomenology of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/10454.001.0001
  18. Inkpin, Andrew. ‘Merleau-Ponty and the Significance of Style.’ European Journal of Philosophy 27 (2019): 468–83. DOI: 10.1111/ejop.12430
  19. Inkpin, Andrew. ‘Merleau-Ponty on Painting, Sedimentation, and the Cultural World.’ European Journal of Philosophy, forthcoming.
  20. Inkpin, Andrew. ‘Merleau-Ponty’s “Sensible Ideas” and Embodied-Embedded Practice.’ Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 22 (2023): 501–24. DOI: 10.1007/s11097-021-09750-1
  21. Inkpin, Andrew. ‘The Nonconceptual Content of Paintings.’ Estetika 48 (2011): 29–45. DOI: 10.33134/eeja.75
  22. Inkpin, Andrew. ‘Projection, Recognition, and Pictorial Diversity.’ Theoria 82 (2016): 32–55. DOI: 10.1111/theo.12074
  23. Kandinsky, Wassily. Über das Geistige in der Kunst. Bern: Benteli, 1952.
  24. Kant, Immanuel. Kritik der Urteilskraft. Hamburg: Meiner, 1990.
  25. Kulvicki, John V. On Images. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
  26. Lopes, Dominic. Understanding Pictures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
  27. Lopes, Dominic McIver. Four Arts of Photography. Chichester: Wiley, 2016. DOI: 10.1002/9781119053194
  28. Lopes, Dominic McIver. Sight and Sensibility: Evaluating Pictures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
  29. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. ‘Le doute de Cézanne.’ In Sens et non-sens, 13–33. Paris: Gallimard, 1996. DOI: 10.14375/NP.9782070743551
  30. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard, 1990.
  31. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. La prose du monde. Paris: Gallimard, 1969.
  32. Nietzsche, Friedrich. Ueber Wahrheit und Lüge im aussermoralischen Sinne. In Kritische Studienausgabe, vol. 1, edited by Giorgio Colli and Mazzino Montinari, 875–90. Munich: dtv, 1980.
  33. Phillips, Dawn. ‘Photography and Causation: Responding to Scruton’s Scepticism.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 49 (2009): 327–40. DOI: 10.1093/aesthj/ayp036
  34. Searle, John. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139173452
  35. Sibley, Frank. ‘Particularity, Art and Evaluation.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 48 (1974): 1–21. DOI: 10.1093/aristoteliansupp/48.1.1
  36. Walton, Kendall. Marvelous Images: On Values and the Arts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780195177947.001.0001
  37. Walton, Kendall. ‘Transparent Pictures: On the Nature of Photographic Realism.’ Critical Inquiry 11 (1984): 246–77. DOI: 10.1086/448287
  38. Wentworth, Nigel. The Phenomenology of Painting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  39. Wilson, Dawn. ‘Invisible Images and Indeterminacy: Why We Need a Multi-Stage Account of Photography.’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 79 (2021): 161–74. DOI: 10.1093/jaac/kpab005
  40. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Werkausgabe 1. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1989.
  41. Wölfflin, Heinrich. Kunstgeschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Das Problem der Stilentwicklung in der neueren Kunst. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1957.
  42. Wollheim, Richard. Painting as an Art. London: Thames and Hudson, 1987. DOI: 10.1515/9780691252308
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/eeja.777 | Journal eISSN: 2571-0915
Language: English
Page range: 173 - 191
Submitted on: Jan 31, 2026
Accepted on: Aug 2, 2026
Published on: Sep 15, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Andrew Inkpin, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.