A Kantian Sense of Aesthetic Methodology: ‘Manner’ Instead of ‘Method’

Moran Godess-Riccitelli

doi:10.33134/eeja.588

A Kantian Sense of Aesthetic Methodology: ‘Manner’ Instead of ‘Method’

Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics

Volume 62 (2025): Issue 2

By: Moran Godess-Riccitelli

Open Access

|Sep 2025

Abstract

This paper aims to explore a potential avenue for applying ‘aesthetic methodology’ through an examination of Kant’s distinction between method (modus logicus) and aesthetic manner (modus aestheticus). In the Critique of the Power of Judgement, Kant refers to this distinction explicitly in two contexts: regarding the creation of the genius artist and the possibility of teaching this creation. I will discuss these two contexts as two dimensions of aesthetic judgement, arguing that the genius artist’s creative process provides valuable insights into the aesthetic judgement process for the viewer. I conclude by asserting a direct link between the idea of humanity and our aesthetic commitment: the way we practise our humanity is through ‘aesthetic methodology’, as manifested in concrete judgements of beauty.

References

Allison, Henry E. Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the ‘Critique of Aesthetic Judgment’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511612671
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ameriks, Karl. Interpreting Kant’s Critiques. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. DOI: 10.1093/0199247315.001.0001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Breitenbach, Angela. ‘The Beauty of Science without the Science of Beauty: Kant and the Rationalists on the Aesthetics of Cognition.’ Journal of the History of Philosophy 56 (2018): 281–304. DOI: 10.1353/hph.2018.0024
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dewey, John. ‘Kant and Philosophic Method.’ Journal of Speculative Philosophy 18 (1984): 162–74.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ferrarin, Alfredo. ‘Method in Kant and Hegel.’ British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27 (2019): 255–70. DOI: 10.1080/09608788.2018.1506314
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Friedlander, Eli. ‘On Common Sense, Communicability, and Community.’ In Palgrave Kant Handbook, edited by Matthew Altman, 407–24. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. DOI: 10.1093/aesthj/ayw048
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gammon, Martin. ‘“Exemplary Originality”: Kant on Genius and Imitation.’ Journal of the History of Philosophy 35 (1997): 563–92. DOI: 10.1353/hph.1997.0076
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gava, Gabriele. Kant’s ‘Critique of Pure Reason’ and the Method of Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023. DOI: 10.1017/9781009172127
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ginsborg, Hannah. The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s ‘Critique of Judgement’. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547975.001.0001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Godess-Riccitelli, Moran. ‘The Cipher of Nature in Kant’s Third Critique: How to Represent Natural Beauty as Meaningful?’ Con-Textos Kantianos 12 (2020): 338–57. DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.4304101
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Godess-Riccitelli, Moran. ‘The Moral Expression of Beauty: Rethinking the Relationship between Aesthetics and Morality in Kant’s Third Critique.’ Lexicon Philosophicum 12 (2024): 235–53.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gorodeisky, Keren. ‘A New Look at Kant’s View of Aesthetic Testimony.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (2010): 53–70. DOI: 10.1093/aesthj/ayp052
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Guyer, Paul. ‘Autonomy and Integrity in Kant’s Aesthetics.’ Monist 66 (1983): 167–88. DOI: 10.5840/monist198366214
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hughes, Fiona. Kant’s Aesthetic Epistemology: Form and World. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007. DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748621224.001.0001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kalar, Brent. The Demands of Taste in Kant’s Aesthetics. London: Continuum, 2006. DOI: 10.1177/1206331206289019
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Translated by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Abbreviated as CJ.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Practical Reason. Translated by Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2002.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited and translated by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511804649
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lemos, João. ‘Restrictions, Incitements, and Aesthetic Value: The Role of Historical Sciences in Art Production and the Aesthetic Appreciation of Art.’ Polish Journal of Aesthetics 59 (2020): 13–27.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Makkreel, Rudolf A. ‘Reflection, Reflective Judgment, and Aesthetic Exemplarity.’ Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy, edited by Rebecca Kukla, 223–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511498220.009
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Matherne, Samantha. ‘Kant on Aesthetic Autonomy and Common Sense.’ Philosopher’s Imprint 19, no. 24 (2019). http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3521354.0019.024.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Meerbote, Ralf. ‘Reflection on Beauty.’ In Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics, edited by Ted Cohen and Paul Guyer, 55–86. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nuzzo, Angelica. Kant and the Unity of Reason. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 2005.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reiter, Aviv. ‘Artistic Manner as Autonomy: Creative Freedom and the Constraint of Rules in Vasari, Bellori and Kant.’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 20 (2023): 1–16. DOI: 10.1093/jaac/kpad062
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rind, Miles. ‘What Is Claimed in a Kantian Judgment of Taste?’ Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (2000): 63–85. DOI: 10.1353/hph.2005.0103
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Williams, Jessica J. ‘Autonomy and Community in Kant’s Theory of Taste.’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 82 (2024): 204–14. DOI: 10.1093/jaac/kpae005
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article