References
- Berto, Francesco. ‘The Selection Problem.’ Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4 (2012): 519–37. DOI: 10.3917/rip.262.0519
- Berto, Francesco, Filippo Casati, Naoya Fujikawa, and Graham Priest. ‘Modal Meinongianism and Object Theory: A Reply to Bueno and Zalta.’ Australasian Journal of Logic 17 (2020): 1–21. DOI: 10.26686/ajl.v17i1.4814
- Brentano, Franz. Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt. Vol. 1. Hamburg: Meiner, 1924. DOI: 10.1515/9783110332582.1
- Bueno, Otávio, and Edward N. Zalta. ‘Object Theory and Modal Meinongianism.’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (2017): 761–78. DOI: 10.1080/00048402.2016.1260609
- Castañeda, Hector-Neri. Thinking, Language, and Experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.
- Grossmann, Reinhardt. Meinong. London: Routledge, 1974.
- Ingarden, Roman. Controversy over the Existence of the World. Vol. 1. Translated by Arthur Szylewicz. Frankfurt: Lang, 2013. DOI: 10.3726/978-3-653-03767-8
- Ingarden, Roman. Controversy over the Existence of the World. Vol. 2. Translated by Arthur Szylewicz. Frankfurt: Lang, 2016.
- Ingarden, Roman. ‘Essentiale Fragen: Ein Beitrag zu dem Wesensproblem.’ Jahrbuch für Philosophie und Phänomenologische Forschung 7 (1925): 125–304.
- Ingarden, Roman. The Literary Work of Art. Translated by George G. Grabowicz. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1973.
- Jacquette, Dale. Alexius Meinong: The Shepherd of Non-Being. Cham: Springer, 2015. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-18075-5
- Jakha, Hicham. ‘The Aesthetic Value of Literary Works in Roman Ingarden’s Philosophy.’ Kultura i Wartoci, no. 32 (2022): 165–85. DOI: 10.17951/kw.2021.32.165-185
- Kroon, Fred. ‘Was Meinong Only Pretending?’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (1992): 499–527. DOI: 10.2307/2108206
- Lewis, David. ‘Truth in Fiction.’ American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (1978): 37–46.
- Mally, Ernst. Gegenstandstheoretische Grundlagen der Logik und Logistik. Leipzig: Barth, 1912.
- Meinong, Alexius.
Gesamtausgabe . Suppl. vol., Kolleghefte und Fragmente: Schriften aus dem Nachlaß. Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, 1978. - Meinong, Alexius.
Gesamtausgabe . Vol. 4, Über Annahmen. Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, 1977. - Meinong, Alexius.
Gesamtausgabe . Vol. 6, Über Möglichkeit und Wahrscheinlichkeit: Beiträge zur Gegenstandstheorie und Erkenntnistheorie. Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, 1972. - Meinong, Alexius.
‘The Theory of Objects.’ In Realism and the Background of Phenomenology, edited by Roderick M. Chisholm, translated by Isaac Levi, D. B. Terrell, and Roderick M. Chisholm, 76–117. Glencoe: Free Press, 1960. - Parsons, Terence. Nonexistent Objects. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1980.
- Płotka, Witold. ‘A Controversy over the Existence of Fictional Objects: Husserl and Ingarden on Imagination and Fiction.’ Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 51 (2019): 33–54. DOI: 10.1080/00071773.2019.1629553
- Rapaport, William J. ‘Meinongian Theories and a Russellian Paradox.’ Noûs 12 (1978): 153–80. DOI: 10.2307/2214690
- Routley, Richard. Exploring Meinong’s Jungle and Beyond: An Investigation of Noneism and the Theory of Items. Canberra: Australian National University, 1980.
- Russell, Bertrand. ‘On Denoting.’ Mind 14 (1905): 479–93. DOI: 10.1093/mind/XIV.4.479
- Sainsbury, Mark R. Fiction and Fictionalism. Oxford: Routledge, 2010. DOI: 10.4324/9780203872567
- Smith, Barry. ‘Ingarden vs. Meinong on the Logic of Fiction.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 41 (1980): 93–105. DOI: 10.2307/2107393
- Summa, Michela. ‘Phenomenology of Imagining and the Pragmatics of Fictional Language.’ Continental Philosophy Review 53 (2020): 465–86. DOI: 10.1007/s11007-020-09506-9
- Thomasson, Amie L. Fiction and Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
- Uemura, Genki.
‘Demystifying Roman Ingarden’s Purely Intentional Objects of Perception.’ In New Phenomenological Studies in Japan, edited by Nicolas de Warren and Shigeru Taguchi, 139–62. Cham: Springer, 2019. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-11893-8_11 - van Oort, Richard. ‘Three Models of Fiction: The Logical, the Phenomenological, and the Anthropological (Searle, Ingarden, Gans).’ New Literary History 29 (1998): 439–65. DOI: 10.1353/nlh.1998.0032
- Voltolini, Alberto. How Ficta Follow Fiction: A Syncretistic Account of Fictional Entities. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006. DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-5147-6
- Walton, Kendall L. Mimesis as Make-Believe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.
- Zalta, Edward N. Abstract Objects. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1983. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-6980-3
- Zalta, Edward N. ‘Referring to Fictional Characters.’ Dialectica 57 (2003): 243–54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2003.tb00269.x
- Zalta, Edward N.
‘The Road between Pretense Theory and Abstract Object Theory.’ In Empty Names, Fiction, and the Puzzles of Non-Existence, edited by Anthony Everett and Thomas Hofweber, 117–47. Stanford: CSLI, 2000.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/eeja.376 | Journal eISSN: 2571-0915
Language: English
Page range: 54 - 72
Submitted on: Sep 20, 2022
Accepted on: Jun 8, 2023
Published on: Mar 14, 2024
Published by: Helsinki University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2024 Hicham Jakha, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.