Beyond the Pleasure Principle: A Kantian Aesthetics of Autonomy
References
- Allison, Henry E. Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511612671
- Ameriks, Karl. ‘On the Many Senses of “Self-Determination”.’ Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 92 (2018): 258–83.
- Bhattacharyya, K. C.
‘The Concept of Rasa (1930).’ In Indian Philosophy in English: From Renaissance to Independence, edited by Nalini Bhushan and Jay L. Garfield, 195–206. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. - Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Translated by Richard Nice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.
- Cohen, Alix. ‘Kant on the Ethics of Belief.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 114 (2014): 317–34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9264.2014.00375.x
- Cohen, Alix. ‘Kant on Science and Normativity.’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 71 (2018): 6–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.03.002
- Crawford, Donald W. Kant’s Aesthetic Theory. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1974.
- Dobe, Jennifer Kirchmyer. ‘Kant’s Common Sense and the Strategy for a Deduction.’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (2010): 47–60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6245.2009.01391.x
- Egan, Andy.
‘Disputing about Taste.’ In Disagreement, edited by Richard Feldman and Ted A. Warfield, 247–92. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. - Ginsborg, Hannah. ‘In Defence of the One-Act View: Reply to Guyer.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 57 (2017): 421–35. DOI: 10.1093/aesthj/ayx027
- Ginsborg, Hannah.
‘Kant on Aesthetic and Biological Purposiveness.’ In Reclaiming the History of Ethics: Essays for John Rawls, edited by Andrews Reath, Barbara Herman, and Christine Korsgaard, 329–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. - Gorodeisky, Keren. ‘A New Look at Kant’s View of Aesthetic Testimony.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (2010): 53–70. DOI: 10.1093/aesthj/ayp052
- Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Taste. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
- Guyer, Paul. ‘One Act or Two? Hannah Ginsborg on Aesthetic Judgement.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 57 (2017): 407–19. DOI: 10.1093/aesthj/ayw050
- Guyer, Paul.
‘The Standard of Taste and the “Most Ardent Desire of Society”.’ In Values of Beauty: Historical Essays in Aesthetics, 37–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511840876.003 - Guyer, Paul. ‘The Value of Reason and the Value of Freedom.’ Ethics 109 (1998): 22–35. DOI: 10.1086/233871
- Herman, Barbara. The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993.
- Herrnstein Smith, Barbara. Contingencies of Value: Alternative Perspectives for Critical Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.
- Hill, Thomas E.,
Jr. ‘The Kantian Conception of Autonomy.’ In The Inner Citadel: Essays on Individual Autonomy, edited by John Christman, 91–105. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989. - Hopkins, Robert.
‘Beauty and Testimony.’ In Philosophy, the Good, the True, the Beautiful, edited by Anthony O’Hear, 209–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. - Hopkins, Robert. ‘How to Be a Pessimist about Aesthetic Testimony.’ Journal of Philosophy 108 (2011): 138–57. DOI: 10.5840/jphil201110838
- Hopkins, Robert. ‘Kant, Quasi-Realism, and the Autonomy of Aesthetic Judgement.’ European Journal of Philosophy 9 (2001): 166–89. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0378.00134
- Hume, David. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. 1777. Edited by P. H. Nidditch. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975. DOI: 10.1093/oseo/instance.00046351
- John, Eileen. ‘Beauty, Interest, and Autonomy.’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (2012): 193–202. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6245.2012.01511.x
- Johnson, Robert N.
‘Value and Autonomy in Kantian Ethics.’ In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, edited by Russ Shafer-Landau, 2 (2007): 133–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press. - Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Translated by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Abbreviated: CJ.
- Konigsberg, Amir. ‘The Acquaintance Principle, Aesthetic Autonomy, and Aesthetic Appreciation.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (2013): 153–68. DOI: 10.1093/aesthj/ays003
- Kubala, Robbie. ‘Grounding Aesthetic Obligations.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 58 (2018): 271–85. DOI: 10.1093/aesthj/ayy015
- Levinson, Jerrold. ‘Hume’s Standard of Taste: The Real Problem.’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (2002): 227–38. DOI: 10.1111/1540-6245.00070
- Lopes, Dominic McIver. Being for Beauty: Aesthetic Agency and Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198827214.001.0001
- Lopes, Dominic McIver. ‘Feeling for Freedom: K. C. Bhattacharyya on Rasa.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 59 (2019): 465–77. DOI: 10.1093/aesthj/ayz022
- Makkreel, Rudolf A.
‘Reflection, Reflective Judgment, and Aesthetic Exemplarity.’ In Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy, edited by Rebecca Kukla, 223–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. - Matherne, Samantha. ‘Kant on Aesthetic Autonomy and Common Sense.’ Philosophers’ Imprint 19 (2019): 1–22.
- Matherne, Samantha, and Nick Riggle. ‘Schiller on Freedom and Aesthetic Value: Part II.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 61 (2021): 17–40. DOI: 10.1093/aesthj/ayaa005
- McGonigal, Andrew. ‘The Autonomy of Aesthetic Judgement.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (2006): 331–48. DOI: 10.1093/aesthj/ayl019
- Merritt, Melissa. Kant on Reflection and Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. DOI: 10.1017/9781108344005
- Moran, Richard. ‘Kant, Proust, and the Appeal of Beauty.’ Critical Inquiry 38 (2012): 298–329. DOI: 10.1086/662744
- Mothersill, Mary. Beauty Restored. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.
- Mothersill, Mary.
‘Hume and the Paradox of Taste.’ In Aesthetics: A Critical Anthology, edited by George Dickie, Richard Sclafani, and Ronald Roblin, 269–86. New York: St Martin’s, 1989. - O’Neill, Onora. Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
- Riggle, Nick. ‘On the Interest in Beauty and Disinterest.’ Philosophers’ Imprint 16 (2016): 1–14.
- Sensen, Oliver.
‘The Moral Importance of Autonomy.’ In Kant on Moral Autonomy, edited by Oliver Sensen, 262–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511792489.018 - Todd, Cain. ‘Quasi-Realism, Acquaintance, and the Normative Claims of Aesthetic Judgement.’ British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (2004): 277–96. DOI: 10.1093/aesthj/44.3.277
- van der Berg, Servaas. ‘Aesthetic Hedonism and Its Critics.’ Philosophy Compass 15 (2020): 1–15. DOI: 10.1111/phc3.12645
- Velkley, Richard L. Freedom and the End of Reason: On the Moral Foundation of Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226157580.001.0001
- Watkins, Brian. ‘The Subjective Basis of Kant’s Judgment of Taste.’ Inquiry 54 (2011): 315–36. DOI: 10.1080/0020174X.2011.592327
- Wollheim, Richard. Art and Its Objects. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316286777
- Wolterstorff, Nicholas. Art Rethought: The Social Practices of Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747758.001.0001
- Wood, Allen. Kant’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
- Zuckert, Rachel. Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the ‘Critique of Judgment’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/eeja.251 | Journal eISSN: 2571-0915
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 18
Submitted on: Dec 9, 2019
Accepted on: May 8, 2020
Published on: Mar 17, 2021
Published by: Helsinki University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2021 Dominic McIver Lopes, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.