References
- Aumann, Anthony. ‘The Relationship between Aesthetic Value and Cognitive Value.’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 72 (2014): 117–27. DOI: 10.1111/jaac.12073
- Brosch, Renate. ‘What We “See” When We Read: Visualization and Vividness in Reading Fictional Narratives.’ Cortex 105 (2018): 135–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.08.020
- Cui, Xu, Cameron B. Jeter, Dongni Yang, P. Read Montague, and David M. Eagleman. ‘Vividness of Mental Imagery: Individual Variability Can Be Measured Objectively.’ Vision Research 47 (2007): 474–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.11.013
- Currie, Gregory. Imagining and Knowing: The Shape of Fiction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780199656615.001.0001
- Declos, Alexandre. ‘The Aesthetic and Cognitive Value of Surprise.’ Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics 6(2014): 52–69.
- Friend, Stacie. ‘Fictive Utterance and Imagining II.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 85 (2011): 163–80. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8349.2011.00201.x
- Frijda, Nico H. ‘The Laws of Emotion.’ American Psychologist 43 (1988): 349–58. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.43.5.349
- Gaut, Berys. Art, Emotion and Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263219.001.0001
- Gerrig, Richard. ‘Individual Differences in Readers’ Narrative Experiences.’ Scientific Study of Literature 1 (2011): 88–94. DOI: 10.1075/ssol.1.1.09ger
- Gibson, John. Fiction and the Weave of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199299522.001.0001
- Green, Melanie C., Christopher Chatham, and Marc A. Sestir. ‘Emotion and Transportation into Fact and Fiction.’ Scientific Study of Literature 2 (2012): 37–59. DOI: 10.1075/ssol.2.1.03gre
- Hartung, Franziska, Peter Withers, Peter Hagoort, and Roel M. Willems. ‘When Fiction Is Just as Real as Fact: No Differences in Reading Behavior between Stories Believed to Be Based on True or Fictional Events.’ Frontiers in Psychology 8, no. 1618 (2017). DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01618
- Innocenti, Beth. ‘Towards a Theory of Vivid Description as Practices in Cicero’s Verrine Orations.’ Rhetorica 12 (1994): 355–81. DOI: 10.1525/rh.1994.12.4.355
- Jajdelska, Elspeth, Christopher Butler, Steve Kelly, Allan McNeill, and Katie Overy. ‘Crying, Moving, and Keeping It Whole: What Makes Literary Description Vivid?’ Poetics Today 31 (2010): 433–63. DOI: 10.1215/03335372-2010-002
- Kind, Amy. ‘Imaginative Vividness.’ Journal of the American Philosophical Association 3 (2017): 32–50. DOI: 10.1017/apa.2017.10
- Kivy, Peter. The Performance of Reading. Malden: Blackwell, 2006. DOI: 10.1002/9780470776650
- Lamarque, Peter. The Philosophy of Literature. Malden: Blackwell, 2009.
- Lamarque, Peter. The Opacity of Narrative. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2014.
- Lamarque, Peter, and Stein Haugom Olsen. Truth, Fiction, and Literature: A Philosophical Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
- Langkau, Julia. ‘Two Kinds of Imaginative Vividness.’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy 51 (2021): 33–47. DOI: 10.1017/can.2020.54
- Matravers, Derek. Fiction and Narrative. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199647019.001.0001
- McIver Lopes, Dominic. ‘The Myth of (Non-Aesthetic) Artistic Value.’ The Philosophical Quarterly 61 (2011): 518–36. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.700.x
- Mellor, D. Hugh. Probability. New York: Routledge, 2005. DOI: 10.4324/9780203504864
- Nisbett, Richard and Lee Ross. Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
- Nussbaum, Martha C. Love’s Knowledge. Essays on Philosophy and Literature. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
- Radford, Colin.
‘How Can We Be Moved by the Fate of Anna Karenina?’ In Arguing About Art: Contemporary Philosophical Debates, 2nd ed., edited by Alex Neill and Aaron Ridley, 239–49. London: Routledge, 2002. - Sibley, Frank. ‘Aesthetic Concepts.’ Philosophical Review 68 (1959): 421–50. DOI: 10.2307/2182490
- Stecker, Robert. Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art: An Introduction. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005.
- Stock, Kathleen. Only Imagine: Fiction, Interpretation, and Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198798347.001.0001
- Voltolini, Alberto. ‘The Nature of Fiction/al Utterances.’ Kairos 17 (2016): 28–55. DOI: 10.1515/kjps-2016-0016
- Walton, Kendall L. Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.
- Zagzebski, Linda T. Virtues of the Mind. An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139174763
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/eeja.224 | Journal eISSN: 2571-0915
Language: English
Page range: 114 - 128
Submitted on: Jan 31, 2020
Accepted on: Nov 4, 2020
Published on: Sep 16, 2021
Published by: Helsinki University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2021 Tilmann Köppe, Julia Langkau, published by Helsinki University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.